She certainly seems to have changed since I last saw her... she didn't have any of these issues
You're such a blatant white knight.
Cheers for sharing MrA. 
How can you possibly know this ?? 
Do you have her under 24/7 surveillance ?? Are you her keeper MrM ?? 
It's subliminal white knighting fishmonger... She does it all time but thinks nobody will notice
+1
Sometimes he is rather subtle but in total there's absolutely loads of examples of his white knighting. If I bothered to skim all his posts I'm sure there's more but for now, here's just a few examples:
Trying to counter a negative review:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=165946.msg1778646#msg1778646Attacking/discrediting a punter and making excuses for the inexcusable from a WG, describing her very clear threat of violence as "heat of the moment stuff" (plus his other posts in this thread which are white knighting):
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=122759.msg1396805#msg1396805White knighting in this thread:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=187666His comments are tongue in cheek but they’re not funny and are clearly just an attempt deflect from his white knighting and pathetic attempt to abuse this site to get a discount (by pretending he wasn't being serious).
He even defends her elsewhere (claiming that either the punters on here - "the pack" - were abusive or that she’s good because she didn’t get abusive
:
Yeah... that was a good thread... the girl's got balls and she didn't get abusive with the pack. Like her style a lot
Even though her posts were better than the rubbish most WGs post, that's not saying much, especially since she still put out plenty of "classic" rebuttals. I have no idea why he didn't notice her passive aggression and the flawed logic in her posts.
Jumped at the opportunity to tout/go on the white knight offensive after one his prossies/"assets" (or her tout) was banned:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=197973.msg2060303#msg2060303White knighting one of his favourite prossies/"assets" because someone dared to call her "mature" (even though she is early-mid 40s):
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=213185.msg2165879#msg2165879Slagging off a punter (saying he "needs to call in at specsavers") because the punter said one of his favourite "assets" was average facially/not a stunner:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=204872.msg2111814#msg2111814(That punter is also the punter he claims to know personal info about from his MsVictoriaK review - probably because he talked to her about him and then fell out with her hence the review)
Defends a prossie for being at least 2 sizes bigger than she claims and well over 5 years older than she claims:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=227007.msg2310248#msg2310248https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=227007.msg2312404#msg2312404Minor white knighting by defending a WG lying about her age (it's also proof that he's easily pleased/doesn't care about age, as he says himself):
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=172295.msg1928895#msg1928895More white knighting (the OP gives a justified and very damning negative but of course marlboro can’t help himself):
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=212600.msg2159986#msg2159986Can’t resist white knighting another WG:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=228641.msg2329909#msg2329909https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=228641.msg2329939#msg2329939And then slagging off punters for posting helpful info and scrutinising that WG:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=228641.msg2333821#msg2333821Again, he can’t resist an opportunity to white knight
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=220881.msg2238935#msg2238935His subsequent comments in that thread are just trolling and his first post is proven to be totally wrong (and therefore misleading/unhelpful – as per the screenshot posted by mrjoydivision) although to be fair many punters seem to forget about the “feedback only” but you’d expect better from someone as experienced and “ultra careful” as marlboro.
Minor white knighting (of a girl he’s touted multiple times) and I have no idea how he’s so certain that she doesn’t do coke unless he’s with her 24/7 (as MrFF later points out) but fortunately the OP mostly agrees with him (although I have a feeling that’s mainly because he got into an argument with the poster who Marlboro was slagging off) -
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=229655.msg2339801#msg2339801There’s also plenty of evidence that marlboro is wrong according to other punters, e.g.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=230704.msg2351874#msg2351874 But of course marlboro will ignore or refute anything that doesn’t support his white knighting.
White knighting her again:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=230704.msg2350647#msg2350647Despite touting her numerous times in the past, he never bothered to do a review but still finds the time to constantly white knight her on numerous reviews.
More subtle white knighting posts in this thread, where the OP mostly agrees with him but clearly others (who’ve seen the girl in question) don’t:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=228054.msg2323437#msg2323437He takes a different approach here by making multiple posts in this thread defending a white knight who’s also too lazy to do a review:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=212476.msg2165757#msg2165757Here's one of the many examples of his fluffiness, in this case he's not interested in helping punters, he’s only concerned with making prossies feel better:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=194684.msg2020630#msg2020630He subsequently agrees with MrFF and says that's what he was thinking but he didn't say that before and clearly his priority is with the WG not the objectivity of the forum.
Here’s his most recent example of trying to white knight, as stevedave accurately points out:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=234235.msg2389873#msg2389873https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=234235.msg2389958#msg2389958It's also pretty obvious from many of his posts that he's far more interested in trolling than helping punters. It is somewhat amusing but it's also rather boring now. Anyway, here's some examples of his trolling:
Most of his posts in this thread are just trolling (and as Cueball says, he only started it in order to backtrack from previous hypocritical comments he made):
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=212842.0So he posts a BS/trolling thread in two separate sections (to deflect from previous dumb statements) and in this process seems to advocate attacking other punters:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=212742.msg2162085#msg2162085But then totally backtracks on his earlier posts (but not specifically about attacking other punters) and pretty much admits trolling:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=212842.msg2165695#msg2165695I do believe he can't find anyone better to talk to than random prostitutes and they probably do feel sorry for him but I’m sure he's still trolling to some extent here:
I sure do BP... and all my punts run well over time... anything up to another hour... fuck, drink, talk and have a couple of fags. The girls don't seem in any hurry to get me out... guess I'm just lucky I'm a nice guy. You aught to try it.
Also bear in mind that he’s saying it’s
all of his punts and elsewhere on here he's previously said that he's had well over 400 punts in total (presumably many more now).
I suppose getting extra time isn't actually that uncommon and the girls he sees probably aren't very busy but you still don't even need to bring wine or sit around talking to get it. Anyway, he contradicts himself with many of his other posts, such as these:
Viagra only works during sexual stimulation... so after round1 you're in recovery time with no hard on. 10-15 minutes later with stimulation you're hard again for round 2. Can't say after that... the hours up :o(
Don't know about you but I'm pretty chuffed when I get a 20 minutes shagging over-run
Clearly at least some of his posts are just straight up lies.
Defending a leech:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=210985.msg2171849#msg2171849Instead of encouraging punters to actually contribute (he could do it in a different way if he takes issue with the approach of others), he just shit stirs:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=186106.msg1953425#msg1953425https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=188441.msg1983125#msg1983125There's some classics in this thread, where he claims to have been punting for over 20 years, with well over 400 punts but not a single bad punt (although he's probably only trolling about his research and how "ultra careful" he is, I think the rest is explained by just being really easily pleased and having a shit memory):
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=165377.msg1780152#msg1780152https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=165377.msg1782204#msg1782204He then backtracks a little by adding:
Stood up three time and walked away once. Guess I'm just lucky... or maybe just ultra careful.
He can pretend it's because he's "ultra careful" but that's clearly not the case:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=194140.msg2013531#msg2013531He has now posted 2 negatives but one was just a no show (seems to be only his 4th ever let down in well over 400 punts) and the other review wasn't about her looks or service. It is definitely a valid and helpful review if true though. It seems he does know personal info about other punters so that suggests it is true, however that might well be because he got her to reveal info about other punters before having some sort of falling out. The negative review (his first ever despite having had so many punts) is probably just "revenge" (he'd already posted so positively about her previously so couldn't slag her off much without looking like an idiot/hypocrite). It's also very convenient that he doesn't have any of the texts/proof - probably because they'd show him encouraging her/asking for info. In the following comment from a thread I linked above, BP sums it up quite well (which marlboro has no reply to, only deflections):
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=212842.msg2169414#msg2169414Not only does he like to drink and chat with them, he likes to exchange ID info with them too, quite a few of them it seems hence he posted this (the thread was started by him as well):
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=210847.msg2146366#msg2146366 And following on from that, referring to the time when he gave £1k to a prossie, he gives the dumb and potentially dangerous advice that "random acts of kindness are always repaid":
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=210847.msg2147521#msg2147521In this thread he can’t be arsed to contribute helpfully and just ends up spending way longer defending himself than a review would’ve taken. Clearly just posting to troll:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=209957.0In it he repeatedly defends the reliability of AW feedback:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=209957.msg2168347#msg2168347And doesn't even see the need for UKP when someone has a few hundred feedback on AW:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=209957.msg2168396#msg2168396And even thinks he knows that admin would agree with him:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=209957.msg2168516#msg2168516In the following thread he provides a little bit of helpful information (not much) but then refuses to elaborate or do a review, see all his posts in this thread:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=130052His worst post being (directly after he was asked by multiple punters to do a review):
Hell no.
I have a policy on Reviews.
If I can't say something good about a girl I leave it... cos it's just my opinion... I don't want to discourage others trying her.
Most of the girls I book have already been well reviewed and I doubt I could add to the very eloquent reviews already posted.
The only review I've done was on Lucy361 External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only. Booked her a couple of days after she appeared on AW... so no reviews... fabulous booking and a gal I wanted to recommend
(Think I'm gonna get a lot of flack for this policy)
Despite the girl having no reviews on here at the time, he can't be arsed posting a review which might actually be helpful because it'd take 10 mins (and the reliable AW feedback tells you everything you need to know even though there's literally fuck all detail in them):
"Marlboro20, You still haven't responded to this, are you still saying AW ratings are a better guidance for people than reviews on here?"
Absolutely and emphatically not Frank... I'm saying that an SP who's been on AW since 2012, with 728 +'s and no UKP Negs hardly needs any further endorsements... so why do a write-up and waste 10 minutes of my life.
But he's happy to spend 10 hours trolling and slagging off the membership:
Don't mind wasting 10 hours mate. This lot think they can be abusive, ridicule and say whatever to whover... most on the receiving end just fade away. It's a damn sight easier usuing a keyboard to defend instead of a Belgian FN 7.62mm
Here's a great example of his trolling where he provides no actual information and still can't be arsed to post any reviews but has all the time in the world to post rubbish. At the time, the girls he mentions in this post had only a handful of AW feedback between them and at the time he posted the comment, 0 reviews on here:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=212710.msg2161201#msg2161201Having said all that, his reviews are usually rubbish anyway, e.g.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=184485.msg1934976#msg1934976In that thread I tried to explain to him the usefulness of having multiple, detailed positive reviews of a WG but despite proving that he's wrong about "just repeating what's already been said" he's clearly still too thick to understand. It’s also pretty obvious the only reason he posted that review anyway was to counter all the justified negatives she’s had, which he’s only to eager to do.
Dumb/trolling comments in this thread. He obviously gives up when he’s lost the argument but you can clearly see that he’s not actually interested in having a debate or trying to help other punters by sharing his methods for never having a bad punt (despite me asking him to):
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=222854.0Indeed, the only non-generic, not obvious and fairly specific piece of advice I’ve ever seen him give is just to avoid girls with regional accents
– in that thread where he claimed to have never had bad punt thread (as linked above -
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=165377)
Whinging about contributing members:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=221548.msg2249364#msg2249364One of his trolling posts which was deleted (only visible if you can see deleted posts):
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=213949.msg2172086#msg2172086 I’m not entirely sure what he’s whinging about here but I think he’s complaining that punters on here try to be helpful, accurate and save people their precious time and money:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=228101.msg2332141#msg2332141 Almost seems to be discouraging a punter from writing reviews (or at least justifying why he and therefore why they don’t need to bother):
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=227480.msg2314750#msg2314750I have no idea why he’s still too stupid to realise that it’s not just about adding new info, it’s about further confirming what’s already been said from yet another punter (we all have different perspectives) and further demonstrating a WG’s consistency.
Supports/tells a punter to withhold useful information (“you’d be very correct in not sharing”), of course he’s correct about the guy being a smug twat:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=226390.msg2346892#msg2346892He doesn’t see anything unusual about only having good punts and only posting positive reviews but when a punter only reviews their bad ones, he seems to cast suspicion/slag them off. In this example he does it because he’s trying to white knight a girl he’s reviewed positively:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=231264.msg2359126#msg2359126Of course the punter he picked on replied justifying himself very well.
While the OP of the following thread does sound like a genuine punter based on his previous posts (and I actually I confirm that myself with a subsequent review of my own), marlboro makes an unfounded comment as, at the time, the OP definitely didn’t sound legit, his review seems very fluffy and touty. Indeed the OP’s subsequent posts indicate his primary focus isn’t to inform other punters, it’s to help the WG because “the girl deserves credit” (a phrase he said twice):
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=229768.msg2341543#msg2341543That's definitely not a great example it’s just a recent one. Marlboro loves defending dodgy posters and does his utmost to counteract punters who dish out very legitimate scrutiny. I think he undermines this site and seems to want to turn it into the likes of pro$$ienet.
Many of the things I’ve linked above are quite minor but clearly together they really add up and show him up for what he is. To be honest, if he actually bothered to contribute reviews or even just detailed posts about WGs, I could see how he adds a somewhat healthy “counter view” to the majority on this forum (even though he’s wrong or at least useless because he’s so easily pleased) but given that he seems to be more interested in trolling, shit stirring, white knighting and moaning about contributing members, I don’t see how he’s in anyway an “asset” (to use one of his favourite terms) to this forum. Even his more subtle white knighting posts aren’t of any use and don’t seem to add value or encourage healthy debate (which he almost never bothers to engage in anyway).
You’d think someone who has (or at least had) around 2 punts a month (which is exactly what he claimed in one of the threads above), would have contributed more than 6 reviews (many of which aren’t particularly helpful anyway).
avinsumfun’s post in this WG's other review is a great example of why white knights like marlboro20 are detrimental to this forum:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=229655.msg2350427#msg2350427