External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
£90 no CIM or facial, should be £60
I was very tempted to see this one when she was in Didsbury, mainly because her verification pic looked good, even though it looks airbrushed or at least filtered (1st red flag):
LucyXJ
External Link/Members Only
British 🇬🇧
Devon / Plymouth
£160/h (incall)
£180/h (outcall)
OWO C̶I̶M̶ F̶a̶c̶i̶a̶l̶s̶ S̶w̶a̶l̶l̶o̶w̶ A̶n̶a̶l̶
External Link/Members Only
Hidden Image/Members Only
I called her a couple of times but she didn't pick up, however when I sent a text straight after the last call she replied straight away (2nd red flag). However in addition to not offering the services you mentioned, she also doesn't do DFK but at least she was honest when I asked her. She's had an AW profile since December 2017 but still has no escort feedback (only cam and chat) and has no reviews on here (all red flags). Another red flag is the fact that she always seem to move around a lot and only stays in one place very briefly.
She did ask me to put in a booking request on AW which in some ways was reassuring but I think that makes it even more strange that she doesn't have any escort feedback.
Despite all that, the main/final nail in the coffin that stopped me seeing her was in fact her price, which is clearly too high for what she offers, especially an unproven "newbie".
I disagree. I think it's aw itself that is making the girls re-evaluate their prices. They see similar girls to themselves advertise higher prices and then they adjust accordingly. How else does a girl know how much their services are worth?
Surely you're both right. What you say is what most girls do to set their price in the first place and it makes sense that they'd keep an eye on the price of the competition every now and then and adjust accordingly. However it's also true that many girls (not all) let the dumb feedback on AW, compliments (in person and online) and tips etc go to their head. Despite it probably only being from a minority, the fluffies are likely to be strong and convincing enough with their words (and possibly actions) to make the WG think they are actually amazing and clearly worth more.
Now in hull at much more palatable prices. Maybe she's watching this thread
FFS i'd book her at that price but can't be arsed driving all the way to Hull
Those are just her normal rates and have been for a long time. She didn't even used to offer OWO but if you look on her "Bookings in Hull" tab you'll see that the price for half an hour with OWO is £90 and for an hour it's £140!
Since she doesn't even stay anywhere particularly nice (accommodation wise) when on tour, she clearly just likes to rinse punters for as much as possible.
Also note that she has a really shit attitude, is a coke head and represents a privacy/outing risk. See these recent threads:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=200981.0https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=203171.0https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=203178 (a deleted thread where she pretended to be a punter)
Yep, some are sneaky and they should also get a negative on here for that. They can charge what they like, but at least need to provide what they advertise.
+1
Although unfortunately goldwing1 never actually bothers to mention such stuff in his reviews and basically never posts a negative (except when stood up but even then he usually has to be asked to post it).
Anyway, back on topic, punters like marlboro20 (who's posted in this thread) don't seem to realise they're part of the problem, e.g. when he bangs on about "under valued assets" in his positive reviews or makes dumb (and fluffy) comments like this:
I met up with this girl for an hour at a smart apartment in LS11 shortly after she came onto AW... she definately qualifys in my New Issues and Under Valued Assets. I'll do a write up next week... it will be a Smokin Hot Positive... with a capital P.
She is new to AW, genuine recent photos, delivered everything on her Enjoys List... IMHO ridiculously under valuing herself at £100/hr