Author Topic: 1sara4u - Preston (Read 8382 times)

Knucklehead · « **on:** July 08, 2018, 11:35:06 pm »

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Seems peculiar that Sara has so much AW feedback but none here, anyway before the punt communication by text phone and AW was perfect, dead simple. her flat is clean modern and next to free parking near a river ( I think, not local). Sara herself is just like her pictures and in my opinion very pretty, she has a cracking figure but I should mention has had an operation on her boobs which have quite a bit of scarring. It wasn't the least issue for me because I thought she looked great and gave me a really great gfe which is all I want, she kissed with passion, OWO was varied and really good, she definitely wanted me to have a good time, RO was enjoyed, by me at least. Covered (obviously) sex, nice chit chat, didn't feel rushed. Sorry if this seems at all fluffy but for me Sara is top tier.

raveydavey11 · « **Reply #1 on:** July 25, 2018, 12:29:07 am »

I've been to see Sara a few times and can't fault her!
A really pretty lady with a a great personality, intelligent, friendly, superb fit body and a gorgeous arse!
I'd definitely recommend her!

BP · « **Reply #2 on:** July 25, 2018, 12:52:52 am »

What town is she in Knucklehead?
It pisses me off when they list 4 towns....60 miles apart

chrishornx · « **Reply #3 on:** July 25, 2018, 07:33:53 am »

Quote from: BP on July 25, 2018, 12:52:52 am

What town is she in Knucklehead?
It pisses me off when they list 4 towns....60 miles apart

been on the 'to do' list for some time and I think it is Preston, as per many of the reports

marlboro20 · « **Reply #4 on:** July 25, 2018, 08:16:44 am »

Preston dock area Chris... nice ground floor apartment... loads of free parking. I've met her a few times, she always looks good, (she's a hairdresser in civvy life) but she's only got very small tits.

chrishornx · « **Reply #5 on:** July 25, 2018, 08:20:10 am »

Quote from: marlboro20 on July 25, 2018, 08:16:44 am

Preston dock area Chris... nice ground floor apartment... loads of free parking. I've met her a few times, she always looks good, (she's a hairdresser in civvy life) but she's only got very small tits.

cheers can get a haircut as well!!

marlboro20 · « **Reply #6 on:** July 25, 2018, 08:24:28 am »

She'd be up for that Chris... she's no clock watcher (we had lunch after the fun on one occasion)
Might cost you another £20 for the trim tho

Sinz · « **Reply #7 on:** July 25, 2018, 08:50:18 am »

Quote from: marlboro20 on July 25, 2018, 08:16:44 am

Preston dock area Chris... nice ground floor apartment... loads of free parking. I've met her a few times, she always looks good, (she's a hairdresser in civvy life) but she's only got very small tits.

Don't see your review for her

Any reason why ?

frankc · « **Reply #8 on:** July 25, 2018, 09:07:35 am »

Quote from: raveydavey11 on July 25, 2018, 12:29:07 am

I've been to see Sara a few times and can't fault her!
A really pretty lady with a a great personality, intelligent, friendly, superb fit body and a gorgeous arse!
I'd definitely recommend her!

Any chance of a review ?

marlboro20 · « **Reply #9 on:** July 25, 2018, 09:16:14 am »

North of 600 AW Positive Ratings when I was seeing her... why the fuck would I do a write-up... I only review if I can add something. Not my style to clock up punt #'s

Sinz · « **Reply #10 on:** July 25, 2018, 09:41:09 am »

Quote from: marlboro20 on July 25, 2018, 09:16:14 am

North of 600 AW Positive Ratings when I was seeing her... why the fuck would I do a write-up... I only review if I can add something. Not my style to clock up punt #'s

If you haven't gathered AW reviews means jack shit ! She has one review on UKP (this one)

Other than this review no one has reviewed her or added anything of value for this WG.

chrishornx · « **Reply #11 on:** July 25, 2018, 09:47:25 am »

Quote from: frankc on July 25, 2018, 09:07:35 am

Any chance of a review ?

like getting blood out of a stone

marlboro20 · « **Reply #12 on:** July 25, 2018, 09:57:19 am »

"If you haven't gathered AW reviews means jack shit ! She has one review on UKP (this one)
Other than this review no one has reviewed her or added anything of value for this WG."

600 Positive Reviws means jack shit? Don't think so... don't be so naive as to believe everything the cynics on here tell you.

frankc · « **Reply #13 on:** July 25, 2018, 09:58:41 am »

Quote from: marlboro20 on July 25, 2018, 09:16:14 am

North of 600 AW Positive Ratings when I was seeing her... why the fuck would I do a write-up... I only review if I can add something. Not my style to clock up punt #'s

Then what the fuck are you doing on this site?...It's a review site for swapping information with like minded punters. This girl has had no reviews on here up until this one yet, you say, you've seen her before, why the fuck wouldn't you review and share? Its not about clocking up punt#'s, its about sharing information

Sinz · « **Reply #14 on:** July 25, 2018, 10:00:41 am »

Quote from: marlboro20 on July 25, 2018, 09:57:19 am

600 Positive Reviws means jack shit? Don't think so... don't be so naive as to believe everything the cynics on here tell you.

What exactly are the cynics on here telling you ?

If you find AW helpful, then why bother write reviews on here or even use UKP ?

marlboro20 · « **Reply #15 on:** July 25, 2018, 10:33:41 am »

Frank... I share information and reply to questions to the best of my knowledge. 600+ Positive = a good fuck even if only half are legit. I really don't see the the point in stating the obvious.

Sinz... AW is the first call... if there was no AW then there would be no UKP. AW is the first ref then UKP is complementary but after 600+ Positives why would you need complementary assurances

Sinz · « **Reply #16 on:** July 25, 2018, 11:28:42 am »

Quote from: marlboro20 on July 25, 2018, 10:33:41 am

Frank... I share information and reply to questions to the best of my knowledge. 600+ Positive = a good fuck even if only half are legit. I really don't see the the point in stating the obvious.

Sinz... AW is the first call... if there was no AW then there would be no UKP. AW is the first ref then UKP is complementary but after 600+ Positives why would you need complementary assurances

I do not trust a single review on AW, more than happy to give you examples of WGs with 1000+ reviews on AW but they are absolute shite. All their reviews on UKP have been Negative or at the best Neutral. So don't give a lame ass excuse of number of reviews on AW determines the credibility of a WG, because it doesn't.

Moreover the reviews on AW gives no details of the service so what's the point? If AW reviewing actually worked there would be no need for UKP. With the number of punters UKP and reviews, its is more than evident that UKP is more credible than AW any day.

frankc · « **Reply #17 on:** July 25, 2018, 11:42:42 am »

Quote from: marlboro20 on July 25, 2018, 09:57:19 am

600 Positive Reviws means jack shit? Don't think so... don't be so naive as to believe everything the cynics on here tell you.

And with that quote, your credibility on here has just hit the floor, for your sake I hope the boss doesn't see that

marlboro20 · « **Reply #18 on:** July 25, 2018, 11:46:13 am »

Check AW Ratings first
Check UKP write-ups second
Good AW Ratings + good UKP write-ups = a sure bet
Good AW ratings, no UKP write-ups = you take yer chances like everyone else
No AW Ratings and no UKP write-ups = no fucking way now... I've only done it once... = Neg write-up

frankc · « **Reply #19 on:** July 25, 2018, 11:56:24 am »

Quote from: marlboro20 on July 25, 2018, 11:46:13 am

Good AW ratings, no UKP write-ups = you take yer chances like everyone else

If you and " crazydavey" had reviewed this girl when you'd seen her, then she would have had some decent feedback on here and nobody would have to " take your chances like everybody else", that's the whole point of being a member on here, something your obviously oblivious to.

marlboro20 · « **Reply #20 on:** July 25, 2018, 12:11:00 pm »

Frank... I think there's a good chance The Boss might agree there's no need to waste space writing up an SP who had 600+ AW Positives... 700+ now

marlboro20 · « **Reply #21 on:** July 25, 2018, 12:16:23 pm »

ps
On the other hand... if she'd had 600 +'s and I found her to be a rubbish SP then I would have done a write-up

frankc · « **Reply #22 on:** July 25, 2018, 12:18:42 pm »

Quote from: marlboro20 on July 25, 2018, 12:11:00 pm

Frank... I think there's a good chance The Boss might agree there's no need to waste space writing up an SP who had 600+ AW Positives... 700+ now

Then why has the boss set up a forum for like minded punter's to share info on WG's ?

Here's the perfect example of why your theory doesn't stack up

Sweet Dianne External Link/Members Only AW 98+

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=213392.0 UKP 13 Negs

marlboro20 · « **Reply #23 on:** July 25, 2018, 12:27:35 pm »

A long way short of being an AW member since 2012 and 600+'s... no comparison at all

marlboro20 · « **Reply #24 on:** July 25, 2018, 12:49:41 pm »

ps.
I've never booked an EE SP specifically because of language barriers and cultural differences
My best advise would be to stick with Brit girls

Sinz · « **Reply #25 on:** July 25, 2018, 12:59:56 pm »

Quote from: marlboro20 on July 25, 2018, 12:27:35 pm

A long way short of being an AW member since 2012 and 600+'s... no comparison at all

Quote from: marlboro20 on July 25, 2018, 12:49:41 pm

ps.
I've never booked an EE SP specifically because of language barriers and cultural differences
My best advise would be to stick with Brit girls

There is no full proof way of guaranteeing a Positive punt with a WG not even if the WG has 700+ reviews, and that is exactly the reason why every bit of information helps. If you think your theories and practices work, you should never have had a negative experience, but clearly that is not the case.

Hence, if you think not reviewing a WG just because she has AW reviews is reasonable, you are more naive and stupid than you already sound.

marlboro20 · « **Reply #26 on:** July 25, 2018, 01:30:48 pm »

There's no way of guaranteeing a Positive punt ... full stop
My first UKP Neg already had a Positive... the second had no info... What's your point?

Go ask the other 728 AW Raters why they haven't done any write-ups... some of em must be on here.
As for me being naive and stupid... I don't think we're going to get along are we

frankc · « **Reply #27 on:** July 25, 2018, 01:32:48 pm »

Quote from: frankc on July 25, 2018, 11:56:24 am

If you and " crazydavey" had reviewed this girl when you'd seen her, then she would have had some decent feedback on here and nobody would have to " take your chances like everybody else", that's the whole point of being a member on here, something your obviously oblivious to.

Marlboro20, You still haven't responded to this, are you still saying AW ratings are a better guidance for people than reviews on here?

Sinz · « **Reply #28 on:** July 25, 2018, 01:35:38 pm »

Quote from: marlboro20 on July 25, 2018, 01:30:48 pm

There's no way of guaranteeing a Positive punt ... full stop
My first UKP Neg already had a Positive... the second had no info... What's your point?

Go ask the other 728 AW Raters why they haven't done any write-ups... some of em must be on here.
As for me being naive and stupid... I don't think we're going to get along are we

So how many Negative reviews have you done on AW ?

marlboro20 · « **Reply #29 on:** July 25, 2018, 01:42:45 pm »

"Marlboro20, You still haven't responded to this, are you still saying AW ratings are a better guidance for people than reviews on here?"
Absolutely and emphatically not Frank... I'm saying that an SP who's been on AW since 2012, with 728 +'s and no UKP Negs hardly needs any further endorsements... so why do a write-up and waste 10 minutes of my life.

marlboro20 · « **Reply #30 on:** July 25, 2018, 01:44:09 pm »

Click on my reviews... but why bother?

chrishornx · « **Reply #31 on:** July 25, 2018, 01:45:21 pm »

Quote from: marlboro20 on July 25, 2018, 12:11:00 pm

Frank... I think there's a good chance The Boss might agree there's no need to waste space writing up an SP who had 600+ AW Positives... 700+ now

I am not so sure as we really are here to share info

marlboro20 · « **Reply #32 on:** July 25, 2018, 01:46:57 pm »

Sorry... I misunderstood. None because I'm very very picky... and I do tend towards seeing a lot of regulars anyhow

Sinz · « **Reply #33 on:** July 25, 2018, 01:50:16 pm »

Quote from: marlboro20 on July 25, 2018, 01:46:57 pm

Sorry... I misunderstood. None because I'm very very picky... and I do tend towards seeing a lot of regulars anyhow

So you haven't reviewed any Negatives on AW is that correct ?

marlboro20 · « **Reply #34 on:** July 25, 2018, 01:58:52 pm »

And I do share Chris ... when and where I think it's revevant. A prime example was my Negative write-up on MissVictoriaK. I liked her a lot and she was an outstanding fuck but the guys on this forum needed to know she's dangerously indiscreet... I now know the details of two punters. (Love to know if it's someone on here who tried giving her £120 of Saisburys gift vouchers to fuck her bareback)

frankc · « **Reply #35 on:** July 25, 2018, 02:00:10 pm »

Quote from: marlboro20 on July 25, 2018, 01:42:45 pm

"Marlboro20, You still haven't responded to this, are you still saying AW ratings are a better guidance for people than reviews on here?"
Absolutely and emphatically not Frank... I'm saying that an SP who's been on AW since 2012, with 728 +'s and no UKP Negs hardly needs any further endorsements... so why do a write-up and waste 10 minutes of my life.

.......Your missing the point, she also doesn't have any Positive reviews on here....that's where you come in as a member of this site, how many decent punts have you had from peoples reviews who could actually be arsed to spare 10 minutes out of their day to post a review to help other punters.

marlboro20 · « **Reply #36 on:** July 25, 2018, 02:00:39 pm »

"So you haven't reviewed any Negatives on AW is that correct ?"
Which bit of my response didn't you understand?

Sinz · « **Reply #37 on:** July 25, 2018, 02:14:16 pm »

Quote from: marlboro20 on July 25, 2018, 02:00:39 pm

"So you haven't reviewed any Negatives on AW is that correct ?"
Which bit of my response didn't you understand?

The bit where you are confused like an idiot and don't know how to quote a response before replying.

Sinz · « **Reply #38 on:** July 25, 2018, 02:15:58 pm »

Quote from: marlboro20 on July 25, 2018, 01:58:52 pm

And I do share Chris ... when and where I think it's revevant. A prime example was my Negative write-up on MissVictoriaK. I liked her a lot and she was an outstanding fuck but the guys on this forum needed to know she's dangerously indiscreet... I now know the details of two punters. (Love to know if it's someone on here who tried giving her £120 of Saisburys gift vouchers to fuck her bareback)

You never bothered to review her Negative on your favorite AW site? What happened there?

marlboro20 · « **Reply #39 on:** July 25, 2018, 02:44:22 pm »

The bizzare turn of events followd shortley after the second meet... which was not thru the AW system

Sinz · « **Reply #40 on:** July 25, 2018, 02:46:36 pm »

Quote from: marlboro20 on July 25, 2018, 02:44:22 pm

The bizzare turn of events followd shortley after the second meet... which was not thru the AW system

and the bullshit keeps on coming......

marlboro20 · « **Reply #41 on:** July 25, 2018, 02:55:26 pm »

Quote from: frankc on July 25, 2018, 02:00:10 pm

.......Your missing the point, she also doesn't have any Positive reviews on here....that's where you come in as a member of this site, how many decent punts have you had from peoples reviews who could actually be arsed to spare 10 minutes out of their day to post a review to help other punters.

Noted Frank... I'll try do better... but just repeating and re-hashing what's already been said on previous UKP write-ups a dozen times sounds a bit pointless. Do you really consider another Positive on, say, JessVixen or Alana or GlisteningJools would be useful?
See Sinz... I'm OK with Quotes... just prefer my wy... can cut the bits I don't need

Sinz · « **Reply #42 on:** July 25, 2018, 03:06:11 pm »

Quote from: marlboro20 on July 25, 2018, 02:55:26 pm

Noted Frank... I'll try do better... but just repeating and re-hashing what's already been said on previous UKP write-ups a dozen times sounds a bit pointless. Do you really consider another Positive on, say, JessVixen or Alana or GlisteningJools would be useful?
See Sinz... I'm OK with Quotes... just prefer my wy... can cut the bits I don't need

Every review is different and every punters observation and experience is different.

Can't believe you are so thick.

marlboro20 · « **Reply #43 on:** July 25, 2018, 03:12:52 pm »

Ahh yes... That must be it I guess

Sinz · « **Reply #44 on:** July 25, 2018, 03:21:58 pm »

Quote from: marlboro20 on July 25, 2018, 03:12:52 pm

Ahh yes... That must be it I guess

Unfortunate for you, there is no cure for being dumb.

cueball · « **Reply #45 on:** July 25, 2018, 03:35:16 pm »

Quote from: marlboro20 on July 25, 2018, 02:55:26 pm

but just repeating and re-hashing what's already been said on previous UKP write-ups a dozen times sounds a bit pointless.

She's only got one though fags, hardly "re-hashing what's already been said on previous UKP write-ups"

Your words fags

frankc · « **Reply #46 on:** July 25, 2018, 03:43:03 pm »

Quote from: marlboro20 on July 25, 2018, 02:55:26 pm

Do you really consider another Positive on, say, JessVixen or Alana or GlisteningJools would be useful?

This is the problem with some peoples, lazy arsed attitudes on here, let everybody else waste 10 minutes of their day ( a lot longer for most of us ) doing a review for the benefit of everybody else, whilst they can't be bothered, it does my fucking head in...they totally fail to understand the ethos of this site and why posting reviews is so important.

The positive reviews accrued by the likes of Alana, glistening jools etc....show's that their level of service are constantly high and doesn't drop, every new positive they get just adds to the confidence of members looking to book and knowing what they'll be getting is a top notch service.... if no fucker bothered to review because it would just be a "waste 10 minutes of their life" then what the fuck are you doing leeching of others who can be bothered.

But your argument that she has 700+'s on AW doesn't stack up here because your posting on UKP where this girl had no reviews.... so your input into the forum is zero and, unfortunately for you, so is your credibilty

Sinz · « **Reply #47 on:** July 25, 2018, 03:45:46 pm »

Quote from: frankc on July 25, 2018, 03:43:03 pm

This is the problem with some peoples, lazy arsed attitudes on here, let everybody else waste 10 minutes of their day ( a lot longer for most of us ) doing a review for the benefit of everybody else, whilst they can't be bothered, it does my fucking head in...they totally fail to understand the ethos of this site and why posting reviews is so important.

The positive reviews accrued by the likes of Alana, glistening jools etc....show's that their level of service are constantly high and doesn't drop, every new positive they get just adds to the confidence of members looking to book and knowing what they'll be getting is a top notch service.... if no fucker bothered to review because it would just be a "waste 10 minutes of their life" then what the fuck are you doing leeching of others who can be bothered.

But your argument that she has 700+'s on AW stack up here because your posting on UKP where this girl had no reviews.... so your input into the forum is zero and and unfortunately for you, so is your credibilty

+100 Well said

I couldn't be bothered to break it down for him, he seems pretty dumb.

I bet he will come back with another lame ass excuse

cueball · « **Reply #48 on:** July 25, 2018, 03:50:46 pm »

Franko makes some very good points above.

Reviews are the backbone of ukp. The discussions and craic are great but ukp is built on the reviewing input of its members.

Statements like "no point" or "not needed" is just a veiled leeching line, a cop out.

marlboro20 · « **Reply #49 on:** July 25, 2018, 03:54:41 pm »

She's only got one though fags, hardly "re-hashing what's already been said on previous UKP write-ups"
Are you refering to Jess? If you are check out Jess@Lush

Author Topic: 1sara4u - Preston (Read 8382 times)

marlboro20

marlboro20

marlboro20

marlboro20

marlboro20

marlboro20

marlboro20

marlboro20

marlboro20

marlboro20

marlboro20

marlboro20

marlboro20

marlboro20

marlboro20

marlboro20

marlboro20

marlboro20

marlboro20

marlboro20

Member Benefits