1sara4u - Preston

[bigthickdick]

I'd never knowingly book a barebacker... but I know since then it has been discussed. Is there any actual confirmation she was/is a bb?

If you're referring to bella39 then yes. There's a screenshot of her profile advertising it on the NW BB AVOIDANCE THREAD

[NigelF]

A long way short of being an AW member since 2012 and 600+'s... no comparison at all

This one's been a member since 2010 (not that it makes a blind bit of difference) and has 400+ positive feedback: External Link/Members Only
Yet on here she has 5 negatives and only 1 positive (and the negatives are for actual meets not no-shows).

This one's been a member since 2009 and has 1100+ positive feedback: External Link/Members Only
She has 3 positives on here but has 1 negative and 1 neutral plus this comment from another punter, who's usually rather fluffy if his reviews are anything to go by (he either meant to to say he didn't review her on here or was referring to feedback he left on AW):

NigelF  ,you are right. Manyou years ago I met this girl
External Link/Members Only
With over 1140 positive feedbacks,
God ,my 2 hours there was pure hell ( I did wrote a report abouto her),
You are right about feedbacks,I believe about the girl above,the only genuine feedbacks are the negative one.

Obviously I've know about the first example for ages (as on AW she's one of the top 3 highest rated escorts in/close to Manchester City Centre) but the other was obviously just a recent example that came to my attention. I'm sure if I did some digging I'd be able to find more. I'm also sure Sinz would have a number of good examples from outside the North West.

As for me being naive and stupid... I don't think we're going to get along are we

 

Definitely a sensitive snowflake. Regardless, you definitely are naive and stupid because you can't tell the difference between AW feedback (which tells you fuck all) and a proper review on here. To be fair to you though, you don't need to be told anything more than "she's amazing" or "really good service" because you're obviously just very easily pleased.

Agreed btd... total sense

Backtracking now eh? I don't blame you, it's good that you now see that even having well over 1000 positive AW feedback is still pretty much meaningless, especially in comparison to even just one or two reviews on here, which especially if from a reliable reviewer, are easily worth more/far more reliable than 1000 AW feedback.

You're probably right Oaktree... but I never quit. Maybe some good will come of it if the one's who've been shouted down in the past get some balls and dish out what they've been given. It's equivelent to cyber bullying and it's been going on  for too long

Aww, cyber bulling 
Do you need your mummy and a blanket?

If you're referring to bella39 then yes. There's a screenshot of her profile advertising it on the NW BB AVOIDANCE THREAD

+1
There's also plenty of other evidence (e.g. on other forums).

[Saeran]

Prime example why reviews on here are so important, when AW reviews are full of shit. If one went off the AW reviews, she looks great... but as we all know from here...

External Link/Members Only

Never too many reviews for SP on here imo, as some can vary so much from punt to punt.

[marlboro20]

Gee Nigel you and John Major have so much in common... I'm not going to elaborate.

[marlboro20]

Like I've said  Saeran... long way short of 600+'s... and with 12 Negs she wouldn't even be on my radar... why the fuck OP saw her is beyond me

[Sinz]

Like I've said  Saeran... long way short of 600+'s... and with 12 Negs she wouldn't even be on my radar... why the fuck OP saw her is beyond me

Why the fuck you are a moron is beyond me. You keeping missing the point. Get off your hammock wacko and read what seasoned punters are trying to tell you. 

[frankc]

why the fuck OP saw her is beyond me

Maybe he's like you and believes all the bullshit reviews on AW.

The 12 Negs on this site are here because, unlike you, they could be arsed to spend 10 minutes out of their day to review her..... it works the other way round too.....if you value the 600+ reviews on AW then why should it not work like that on here....if you see someone bang a positive review up, it helps point punters in their direction the same way you swerved this girl because of her Negs

[NigelF]

Gee Nigel you and John Major have so much in common... I'm not going to elaborate.

Like I've said  Saeran... long way short of 600+'s... and with 12 Negs she wouldn't even be on my radar... why the fuck OP saw her is beyond me

I gave some much better examples above. I'm sorry I've proved you wrong and you feel the need to deflect.

[marlboro20]

You assume too much John
For the sake of argument...  an SP may have 1000 AW Positive reviews and 20 UKP Negs. What makes you assume that the 980 (that's 1000-20) are UKP members/posters

[Sinz]

You assume too much John
For the sake of argument...  an SP may have 1000 AW Positive reviews and 20 UKP Negs. What makes you assume that the 980 (that's 1000-20) are UKP members/posters

One thing I don't have to assume and I know for a fact is you are a twat and a pretty stupid one.

[NigelF]

You assume too much John
For the sake of argument...  an SP may have 1000 AW Positive reviews and 20 UKP Negs. What makes you assume that the 980 (that's 1000-20) are UKP members/posters

What are you on about, that has nothing to do with it.

Your original assertion was that if girls have lots of AW feedback then you know they'll be good (and don't even need UKP reviews):

"If you haven't gathered AW reviews means jack shit ! She has one review on UKP (this one)
Other than this review no one has reviewed her or added anything of value for this WG."

600 Positive Reviws means jack shit?  Don't think so... don't be so naive as to believe everything the cynics on here tell you.

Frank... I share information and reply to questions to the best of my knowledge. 600+ Positive = a good fuck even if only half are legit. I really don't see the the point in stating the obvious.

Sinz... AW is the first call... if there was no AW then there would be no UKP. AW is the first ref then UKP is complementary but after 600+ Positives why would you need complementary assurances

When given an example of someone with nearly 100 positive feedback you say that it doesn't compare, which is somewhat true but according to your previous post around half should be "legit", which doesn't stack up with her overwhelmingly negative reviews on here.

However I gave two examples above and bigthickdick gave another (his post directly quoting one of yours):

I have to disagree too. My worst punt ever had 1300+ aw rating when i met her. And she's the worst by far.

Such examples totally disprove your posts. Your subsequent posts make your excuse for not bothering to review to be patently false because you're happy to spend time spouting rubbish but not actually contributing although admittedly, your contributions are fluffy rubbish anyway so I'm happy to keep laughing at your normal dumb posts 

[marlboro20]

Your original assertion was that if girls have lots of AW feedback then you know they'll be good (and don't even need UKP reviews):
Total bollocks... that's not what I said. You do have a habit of miss-quoting to fit your opinion John... sack your researcher.
There are a miriad of diverse reasons why one punter may get a superb meet and another one gets a rubbish meet... hence AW and UKP views don't corrolate. I seem to remember a very long rant somewhere on the NW forum earlier this year where a WG gave bigthickdick chapter and verse why some WG's just want to get the punter out as fast as possible... strangely enough I think her name was sara. Think I read it on the NW bb avoidance thread... maybe you could find it for us... she highlighted points which punters should take note of.

[OakTree]

Your original assertion was that if girls have lots of AW feedback then you know they'll be good (and don't even need UKP reviews):
Total bollocks... that's not what I said. You do have a habit of miss-quoting to fit your opinion John... sack your researcher.
There are a miriad of diverse reasons why one punter may get a superb meet and another one gets a rubbish meet... hence AW and UKP views don't corrolate. I seem to remember a very long rant somewhere on the NW forum earlier this year where a WG gave bigthickdick chapter and verse why some WG's just want to get the punter out as fast as possible... strangely enough I think her name was sara. Think I read it on the NW bb avoidance thread... maybe you could find it for us... she highlighted points which punters should take note of.

That post was deleted by admin due to its offensive nature. Actually I believe a lot of what she said. I don’t doubt that the vast majority of the time We punters are absolutely abhorrent to them. But then that’s why we pay an extraordinary hourly rate for them to overcome that abhorrence. It really isn’t for us to take note of such things outside of being on time, presentable, clean and polite. It really isn’t fair (or good business) for punter A to get a favourable type of service due to his goodlooks and large cock over punter B because he’s not her type and got a tiny dick. Their money is just the same.

Much as you might argue, AW feedback doesn’t reflect that reality, this site does.

[marlboro20]

Thanks Oaktree... it stuck in my mind because it was such a damn long rant...  and how can one forget a handle like bigthickdick...brilliant ID. I don't think the size of one's dick, or whether or not you look like Brad Pitt, has much to do with SP's giving good service... but body odour, bad breath, tooth decay and a crusty foreskin might just want her to get a punter out asap. Heaven forbid that any one of us on UKP fit the bill?

[cueball]

Your original assertion was that if girls have lots of AW feedback then you know they'll be good (and don't even need UKP reviews):
Total bollocks... that's not what I said. You do have a habit of miss-quoting to fit your opinion John... sack your researcher

You say this ^^ fags, but earlier say this vv fags 

Sinz... AW is the first call... if there was no AW then there would be no UKP. AW is the first ref then UKP is complementary but after 600+ Positives why would you need complementary assurances

Frank... I share information and reply to questions to the best of my knowledge. 600+ Positive = a good fuck even if only half are legit.

You do talk some absolute bollocks fags 

Obviously, you're not getting podged today, I think i prefer the dick who can't spell, who posts during the week up to tea time 

[vw]

Your original assertion was that if girls have lots of AW feedback then you know they'll be good (and don't even need UKP reviews):
Total bollocks... that's not what I said. You do have a habit of miss-quoting to fit your opinion John... sack your researcher.
There are a miriad of diverse reasons why one punter may get a superb meet and another one gets a rubbish meet... hence AW and UKP views don't corrolate. I seem to remember a very long rant somewhere on the NW forum earlier this year where a WG gave bigthickdick chapter and verse why some WG's just want to get the punter out as fast as possible... strangely enough I think her name was sara. Think I read it on the NW bb avoidance thread... maybe you could find it for us... she highlighted points which punters should take note of.

The 1/4 wit still has not figured out how to quote after 3 years.   

Add that to your calling escorts undervalued assets you are one thick pimp.   

[marlboro20]

This shut you down on the other thread Half-Wit... might work on this one...
I'm a SCUBA diver... you know why we sit on the edge of the boat and go in backwards?

[marlboro20]

You say this ^^ fags, but earlier say this vv fags 

You do talk some absolute bollocks fags 

Obviously, you're not getting podged today, I think i prefer the dick who can't spell, who posts during the week up to tea time 

Don't think I prefer you any which way Piggy

[vw]

This shut you down on the other thread Half-Wit... might work on this one...
I'm a SCUBA diver... you know why we sit on the edge of the boat and go in backwards?

Didn't shut me down at all.

Why do you want the truth shut down, you are one dodgy poster.   

[marlboro20]

  Laughing ny nuts off at you bud

[vw]

Laughing ny nuts off at you bud

Lets play the game "Spot who doesn't think marlboro20 is dodgy."   Your go first.   

[chrishornx]

Lets play the game "Spot who doesn't think marlboro20 is dodgy."   Your go first.   

who do you want to go first?

[Sinz]

Laughing ny nuts off at you bud

Surprised you have nuts, don't sound like you have any.

[threechilliman]

Noted Frank... I'll try do better... but just repeating and re-hashing what's already been said on previous UKP write-ups a dozen times sounds a bit pointless. Do you really consider another Positive on, say, JessVixen or Alana or GlisteningJools would be useful?
See Sinz... I'm OK with Quotes... just prefer my wy... can cut the bits I don't need

Additional reviews are always important. I tend to go through reviews of girls I'm interested in to paint a picture of the likely punt,, 'What's the theme here?' Plus there'll be odd snippets of information on individual reviews which I might find useful. No such thing as too many reviews.

[goldwing1]

The problem with AW feedback is that if you leave shit feedback, you will probably get one back, so when you want to  book someone in the future, they might see it and not go ahead with the booking.

At which point do you believe AW feedback over UK punting?
Take elizayates for example  External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Over 400 positive AW
1 positive, 0 neutral, 5 negative on here. then there is also the issue of a WG having equal measures of positives and negatives on here/

[cueball]

At which point do you believe AW feedback over UK punting?
Take elizayates for example  External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
Over 400 positive AW
1 positive, 0 neutral, 5 negative on here. then there is also the issue of a WG having equal measures of positives and negatives on here/

You've answered your own question

[Knucklehead]

I saw Sara because the aw feedback wasn’t just one line or sometimes one word which never gives any confidence, however I still felt I was taking a punt because nothing here. I know it’s a stuck record but I wish lads would just review on here, even a couple of lines on a well reviewed girl is worthwhile info’.

[Sinz]

I saw Sara because the aw feedback wasn’t just one line or sometimes one word which never gives any confidence, however I still felt I was taking a punt because nothing here. I know it’s a stuck record but I wish lads would just review on here, even a couple of lines on a well reviewed girl is worthwhile info’.

Exactly what everyone has been trying to tell marlboro20, but for some reason he stupid to understand that.

Thanks for sharing your experience OP.

[frankc]

 I know it’s a stuck record but I wish lads would just review on here, even a couple of lines on a well reviewed girl is worthwhile info’.

+1

[Master1961]

She’s on preston docks easy parking dresses as you want ,size 8 but not too skinny, starts with vanilla kissing then French then as you pull her skirt up she leads you into the bedroom and a bit more French , likes to be licked and 69 and likes to watch you as she sucks you and will give you a snowball if you want to a bit cherly ladd in appearance and small boobs , she makes the effort , a girl next door who will have you satisfied ,