Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: CutestLucy - Angel  (Read 3393 times)


46 review(s) for CutestLucy (39 positive, 3 neutral, 4 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


https://www.adultwork.com/3329708 or https://www.adultwork.com/CutestLucy
[Link added by admin]

I'm probably going to get so stick for marking this neutral rather than negative but a review is a reflection of the writers view of things, if you believe that the following tale deserves to be counted as negative then feel free to do so IN YOUR OWN HEAD.

My punting opportunities are limited due to me not wanting to punt where I live. Thus I only punt when I get sent down to London on company business. I only restarted punting last month and my very first punt was Lucy. So impressed was I with her service that I attempted to book her as soon as I knew when my next visit to the smoke was going to be.

Buy this time Lucy had already achieved forum darling status, so communication was very difficult. Repeated attempts to call and text got no response, so I put in a booking on AW for the same date and time as I had already texted and as the booking had my punting name and number on it she agreed. I sent her a text thanking her and she responded saying she was looking forward to seeing me again.

Fast forward to yesterday lunchtime and I tried calling to ask her to confirm that the punt was still on. No reply. I sent a text. No reply. Knowing how busy she is I don't panic immediately but I do start to feel a little concerned. Later that night I check her AW profile again and realise that at some point since the start of the month she changed her phone number. So another text sent to the new number. No immediate response, again not panicked but definitely more concern.

When I switched on my punting phone this morning I got a message say that she couldn't see me as she thought my booking was for tomorrow. After several attempts I got to speak to her, she was very apologetic, but said that there was no way to rearrange her bookings to fit me in.

This is where I expect I am about to part company with a lot of you guys. I suspect that a lot of you would be really pissed off at this point. But that's just not my way. Shit happens and there is no point in losing your rag about it. I had already taken steps to secure a plan b (review to follow). The call was followed by a text in which she apologised again and promised to make it up to me (will be interesting to see how that pans out).

So yes, this review of Lucy's ability to keep track of bookings is undoubtedly a negative, but I simply cannot bring myself to give her a negative review. Ask any of the guys who have seen her, she is a top class punt. It's not like I lost any money and the fact that plan b didn't work out is nothing to do with her.

So there you have it. Feel free to revise this review down IN YOUR OWN HEAD but don't expect me to revise it.


46 review(s) found for CutestLucy linked to in above post (39 positive, 3 neutral, 4 negative)

Good on you for a honest review she seemed to be developing a lil fan club on here there will be a few posts saying she's great and it's just a one off
« Last Edit: April 30, 2016, 12:08:23 AM by Brazilian Martian »

You obviously didn't read my post very well. I am well and truly part of the fan club. Go read my review of our first booking if you don't believe me

Online smiths

https://www.adultwork.com/3329708 or https://www.adultwork.com/CutestLucy
[Link added by admin]

I'm probably going to get so stick for marking this neutral rather than negative but a review is a reflection of the writers view of things, if you believe that the following tale deserves to be counted as negative then feel free to do so IN YOUR OWN HEAD.

My punting opportunities are limited due to me not wanting to punt where I live. Thus I only punt when I get sent down to London on company business. I only restarted punting last month and my very first punt was Lucy. So impressed was I with her service that I attempted to book her as soon as I knew when my next visit to the smoke was going to be.

Buy this time Lucy had already achieved forum darling status, so communication was very difficult. Repeated attempts to call and text got no response, so I put in a booking on AW for the same date and time as I had already texted and as the booking had my punting name and number on it she agreed. I sent her a text thanking her and she responded saying she was looking forward to seeing me again.

Fast forward to yesterday lunchtime and I tried calling to ask her to confirm that the punt was still on. No reply. I sent a text. No reply. Knowing how busy she is I don't panic immediately but I do start to feel a little concerned. Later that night I check her AW profile again and realise that at some point since the start of the month she changed her phone number. So another text sent to the new number. No immediate response, again not panicked but definitely more concern.

When I switched on my punting phone this morning I got a message say that she couldn't see me as she thought my booking was for tomorrow. After several attempts I got to speak to her, she was very apologetic, but said that there was no way to rearrange her bookings to fit me in.

This is where I expect I am about to part company with a lot of you guys. I suspect that a lot of you would be really pissed off at this point. But that's just not my way. Shit happens and there is no point in losing your rag about it. I had already taken steps to secure a plan b (review to follow). The call was followed by a text in which she apologised again and promised to make it up to me (will be interesting to see how that pans out).

So yes, this review of Lucy's ability to keep track of bookings is undoubtedly a negative, but I simply cannot bring myself to give her a negative review. Ask any of the guys who have seen her, she is a top class punt. It's not like I lost any money and the fact that plan b didn't work out is nothing to do with her.

So there you have it. Feel free to revise this review down IN YOUR OWN HEAD but don't expect me to revise it.

Thanks for doing A review as that's better in my book than not doing one. I have a zero tolerance policy nowadays so it would be a negative off me and I have also punted with her but that wouldn't make any odds as to me giving her a negative.

 Its clear her comms are on occasion at least a problem, I imagine going on other forum darlings that that is because she is so busy she hardly has time to put her knickers on let alone dealing with loads of punters wanting a booking. A downside of a WG becoming a forum darling in my opinion.


46 review(s) found for CutestLucy linked to in above post (39 positive, 3 neutral, 4 negative)

Obviously Its a downside of her popularity but what are you going to do? If you fail to review her or do so in a way that is inaccurate you are damaging the whole purpose of this site, in which case you can fuck off. So good WGs will always end up getting multiple positives which of course drives more people her way. Eventually the girl will burn out, fuck up in a way that damages her image or just retire to live on her pile of gold.

I have read certain punters here so they only review a girl when they tire of her and are ready to move on. Personally I think this is selfish but can definitely see the attraction in doing so

Offline mgtow15

It's a fucking negative; fluffy guys like you make it harder for the likes of me.  Big headed WGs don't have to be arsed to be organised because they know guys like you will chase them.  I'll probably never get a chance to see CutestLucy because her attitude stinks.
Banning reason: Abusive troll + Multiple accounts (jazz5316, mgtow15)

I have read certain punters here so they only review a girl when they tire of her and are ready to move on. Personally I think this is selfish but can definitely see the attraction in doing so

Just as selfish as not giving her a negative IMHO, only reason is you want to go back so a selfish decision !

Anyway punting is all about being selfish !

mgtow15 is spot on .. U are giving her too much weight. She got you all by her little finger. I am wondering whose the bitch ere - she should be working for you and not the other way round !!! There are plenty of her WGs out there on par and even better. Move on gentleman - it big old world out there.

Offline Mendra

Like some said she will eventually burn out! Then set up a hair dressing salon back in Brazil.

I asked if I could see her, her text reply was "NO" how rude. Good attitude costs nothing. She can learn a trick from Moistjsde.

As for me, every brass will have their day and so will I. Good things come for those who wait. She is not located in an area that favours me so not a big deal if one doesn't get to see her.

WG's are like cars... Eventually the either breakdown, need cleaning, sell out or get changed.

Offline The_Don


I asked if I could see her, her text reply was "NO" how rude. Good attitude costs nothing. She can learn a trick from Moistjsde.


Attitude and service, means a lot, IMO, part of that is manners. The minute, I get some bad attitude, I will look else where and even walk mid punt, if required!


Like some said she will eventually burn out!

WG's are like cars... Eventually the either breakdown, need cleaning, sell out or get changed.

Just like most jobs people need time out, from the mundane (much like a service). So they come back refreshed and ready for the grind. Or they can get jaded and not perform (what there being paid for) over time. They may get left a side, as others pass them by.

« Last Edit: April 30, 2016, 06:17:33 AM by The_Don »

It's a fucking negative; fluffy guys like you make it harder for the likes of me.  Big headed WGs don't have to be arsed to be organised because they know guys like you will chase them.  I'll probably never get a chance to see CutestLucy because her attitude stinks.
:sarcastic: :sarcastic: :sarcastic:


Come on man! This review can basically be summarised as "a wg fucked me about having had plenty of notice but I can't give her a negative review because I love her". How bad would things have to get before you would dare to besmirch her reputation with a negative? Who are you keeping it as a neutral for? Her? The other fluffys? I normally try and steer clear of being negative about reviews unless they're obviously lies but this is just a bit ridiculous.

Come on man! This review can basically be summarised as "a wg fucked me about having had plenty of notice but I can't give her a negative review because I love her". How bad would things have to get before you would dare to besmirch her reputation with a negative? Who are you keeping it as a neutral for? Her? The other fluffys? I normally try and steer clear of being negative about reviews unless they're obviously lies but this is just a bit ridiculous.

Well said you know what I'm just gonna put this op and others like him on ignore shit like this actually makes me sick nothing worse then a white knight / fluffy  :angry: :angry:

Online Ozy84

Agree with outforjustice entirely.

Mysterion we will read this as we will and that's inevitable but for the purposes of your fellow punters and this website its a 100% negative for comms and attitude. Nobody is saying you should have scored it negative based on service as you didnt sample that on this occasion. we know she provides an outstanding service WHEN you get to see her or when she chooses you basically.

No wg is beyond being called a time wasting cunt. And thats what you should have probably called her. I remember a few months ago a romanian got slaughtered on here, Renata, because of her comms and attitude albeit she was worse. Renata when you got to see provided an outstanding service however her comms and attitude got her a reputation and probably finished off her punting career....apart from the fluffies of course.... :D

Lucy, if you are reading this, sort your comms out sharpish otherwise doing what you did to mysterion to a few more punters, intentional or not, will see demand for tou decline quick. Dont forget it was the punters  on ukp that made you as early reviews will remind you.

Online smiths

Obviously Its a downside of her popularity but what are you going to do? If you fail to review her or do so in a way that is inaccurate you are damaging the whole purpose of this site, in which case you can fuck off. So good WGs will always end up getting multiple positives which of course drives more people her way. Eventually the girl will burn out, fuck up in a way that damages her image or just retire to live on her pile of gold.

I have read certain punters here so they only review a girl when they tire of her and are ready to move on. Personally I think this is selfish but can definitely see the attraction in doing so

I have done the same many times, had my fill of the WG first and then done a review, in fact some punters have recommended WGs to me on the agreement that I don't post about her yet on the open forum, getting my end away comes first in my book, then sharing with other punters.

I agree regarding what are you going to do which is why I reviewed this WG and others without much of a delay. Punters have to decide whether to be totally selfish, delay doing a review, or reviewing quite quickly, UKP obviously relies on reviews from genuine punters so I always have that in mind.

Offline Bassman

Well said you know what I'm just gonna put this op and others like him on ignore shit like this actually makes me sick nothing worse then a white knight / fluffy  :angry: :angry:.

I just hope we don't see hypocritical posts from these guys when another WG that isn't Lucy does the same to them/someone else.

I'm a lot like Mysterion in that I can only punt every so often. However unlike him I can't be sure when that day will be. So booking more than a day or so in advance is a no go. That counts out Lucy. Id be mega annoyed if this happened to me knowing I booked so long ago.

To me this isn't because she thought he was the next day. The booking was through AW, she would have had all the correct details.

Online smiths

Just as selfish as not giving her a negative IMHO, only reason is you want to go back so a selfish decision !

Anyway punting is all about being selfish !

Not all about being selfish for me because if it were I wouldn't of done any reviews on here, just lurked and got recs off punters I know and not shared fuck all. That would of been very easy to do.

OP's way of defending his neutral review reminds me that prick Sylvester. Ohhh boy he was always ready to defend his darlings. But finally got a ban months ago (with quesadilla and unclesweetheart all together  :D).

Well I can say I didn't expect this reaction. I'm not going to tell you you are wrong but i will just remind you that every review on here is a reflection of the viewpoint of the reviewer. I've given you the facts and you've made up your mind that this deserves a negative, but you aren't me (lucky you) and I'm not you (lucky me) so while you are free to adjust the review according to your own criteria I don't see the need for the abuse. As for me being a whiteknight/fluffy, if that means I am capable of seeing beyond the end of my penis, then I guess I'm guilty as charged and on the allegation that I didn't go negative because I want to see Lucy again well that ships already sailed.

This forum is all about opinions mysterion and posters are not afraid to express them, strongly at times, that's what makes it great, one man's dream is another's nightmare, one man's viewpoint is anathema to another, ti's not personal. Crack on, I'm desperate to read about your encounter with AliceInWonderland or MaliceInBlunderland.

This forum is all about opinions mysterion and posters are not afraid to express them, strongly at times, that's what makes it great, one man's dream is another's nightmare, one man's viewpoint is anathema to another, ti's not personal. Crack on, I'm desperate to read about your encounter with AliceInWonderland or MaliceInBlunderland.

Thanks, reading all the above did kind of knock the wind out of my sails, but not enough to forget my promise to review every punt. I'll get right on it.

Online smiths

OP's way of defending his neutral review reminds me that prick Sylvester. Ohhh boy he was always ready to defend his darlings. But finally got a ban months ago (with quesadilla and unclesweetheart all together  :D).

What a trio of absolute cunts, and Sylvester who then became Atticus Finch had two goes at being an absolute cunt, Ques had two chances and got banned both times, that's the level of those pricks. :thumbsdown:

Online smiths

This forum is all about opinions mysterion and posters are not afraid to express them, strongly at times, that's what makes it great, one man's dream is another's nightmare, one man's viewpoint is anathema to another, ti's not personal. Crack on, I'm desperate to read about your encounter with AliceInWonderland or MaliceInBlunderland.

Good post, :thumbsup: and I like the word anathema.

Well I can say I didn't expect this reaction. I'm not going to tell you you are wrong but i will just remind you that every review on here is a reflection of the viewpoint of the reviewer. I've given you the facts and you've made up your mind that this deserves a negative, but you aren't me (lucky you) and I'm not you (lucky me) so while you are free to adjust the review according to your own criteria I don't see the need for the abuse. As for me being a whiteknight/fluffy, if that means I am capable of seeing beyond the end of my penis, then I guess I'm guilty as charged and on the allegation that I didn't go negative because I want to see Lucy again well that ships already sailed.

You would have to be a bit of dullard not to expect this reaction. As throughout your review you make references to others may wish to downgrade the Neutral.

i dont think the neutral was based on seeing them again more your previous experience with her upgraded what is a negative to  a neutral in your mind.

Reviews are subjective and a snap shot of that moment in time. But if you hadnt met this prossie previously and she fucked you around would you have left a netural or a negative ?

You would have to be a bit of dullard not to expect this reaction. As throughout your review you make references to others may wish to downgrade the Neutral.

i dont think the neutral was based on seeing them again more your previous experience with her upgraded what is a negative to  a neutral in your mind.

Reviews are subjective and a snap shot of that moment in time. But if you hadnt met this prossie previously and she fucked you around would you have left a netural or a negative ?

Look at it this way. Imagine you found a restaurant that sold really amazing food. Now this restaurant is understandably incredibly popular and maybe is taking on more than they can handle and the staff don't have the experience to deal with such demand. So one night on attending the restaurant you discover that the person who took your booking made an error and they have no table for you. They are genuinely apologetic and offer you another booking which you unfortunately can't attend due to a prior commitment. Since you had been reading about people having booking problems on a review site you think it is only fair that people are warned about this and that maybe the restaurant will see it as fair criticism and improve their service.

This was the spirit of my review. If some of you think it isn't harsh enough, thats your issue. I remain happy with my decision.




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)