Bonnie Scotland , Glasgow

[mavgoose]

External Link/Members Only

£80 hh.

Missed Bonnie last week and was delighted to see her back in Glasgow this week. Managed to see her today.

Yes , I reviewed her 10 months ago.
Yes , she has 20 positive reviews.

Why another ? Simple , top top girls like Bonnie deserve to be reviewed to let others know what they're getting. I'll keep it simple ;

I've had one or two punts over the years.
Today was arguably and probably the best service I've had. A seriously hot girl who gets better every time.


The end.

[emptymybaws]

External Link/Members Only

£80 hh.

Missed Bonnie last week and was delighted to see her back in Glasgow this week. Managed to see her today.

Yes , I reviewed her 10 months ago.
Yes , she has 20 positive reviews.

Why another ? Simple , top top girls like Bonnie deserve to be reviewed to let others know what they're getting. I'll keep it simple ;

I've had one or two punts over the years.
Today was arguably and probably the best service I've had. A seriously hot girl who gets better every time.


The end.

In all fairness this isn't a review, nothing here that could help another punter, I should look at your previous review maybe ? 

[Marmalade]

Yes , she has 20 positive reviews.

Why another ? Simple , top top girls like Bonnie deserve to be reviewed to let others know what they're getting. I'll keep it simple ;

She's a decent prossie and writing a review "because she deserves it" doesn't do her or us any favours in my opinion. It clearly looks as if you wrote it for her benefit, not punters.

[Boinky]

As it's a positive it shows continuity of service, while the review doesn't have any real detail in it, it lets me know as a punter that she continues to be good at what she does and hasn't become jaded and a waste of my time and money.

[mavgoose]

Apologies to the top 2 gents who were expecting a better "read".
Thank you boinky for understanding the point that I have previously mentioned through other threads , to other punters.
My first review of nearly a year ago has been followed up with a further positive.
Letting other punters know that the service remains consistent and very , very good.

Therefore I can assure you that the review is solely for punters , who can easily read my review or others , to book with confidence.

[roller coaster]

Mav seeing this is a positive sign for someone who is in 2 minds to see her or not.

I've seen people write out 2 reviews for the same person positive and negative.
The plus side for your return visit being a positive is that she is a reliable punt.
Your splashing out a bit lately and are having good punts at the same time.
You also replied back that Kiera Glasgow is the same prossie as the Kiera Falkirk one.

External Link/Members Only Shame she's up in Aberdeen next week but will wait to see her again to see if she is if she is sex on legs as before.

[mavgoose]

 Topic: Post report by Courtney  (Read 36 times)
Offline Courtney
 
Posts: 1,133
Reviews: 4

« on: Today at 02:52:35 AM »
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1645603
Comment: Not sure if this qualifies as a review, just reads like someone touting their favourite pro$$ie.


Oh dear. Mr. Sensitive "Courtney" was moved to report my "review".
Seems he feels like I was touting. Fair enough pal. Take from it what you wish.

I have consistently across the forum asked people to review girls (even if they've seen them before).
It gives a fresh update , as long as it's a reasonable time gap. I've asked people to keep reviewing other "well reviewed" girls also. As this gives constant feedback for others to check. Basically the ethos of the review section. In my humble opinion.

How I can be touting a girl I've seen 3 times in 10 months is beyond me. (?)
I've seen her. She was bloody good. I reviewed her. Apologies if that's against any "Rules".

 

[tazman1002001]

Topic: Post report by Courtney  (Read 36 times)
Offline Courtney
 
Posts: 1,133
Reviews: 4

« on: Today at 02:52:35 AM »
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?msg=1645603
Comment: Not sure if this qualifies as a review, just reads like someone touting their favourite pro$$ie.


Oh dear. Mr. Sensitive "Courtney" was moved to report my "review".
Seems he feels like I was touting. Fair enough pal. Take from it what you wish.

I have consistently across the forum asked people to review girls (even if they've seen them before).
It gives a fresh update , as long as it's a reasonable time gap. I've asked people to keep reviewing other "well reviewed" girls also. As this gives constant feedback for others to check. Basically the ethos of the review section. In my humble opinion.

How I can be touting a girl I've seen 3 times in 10 months is beyond me. (?)
I've seen her. She was bloody good. I reviewed her. Apologies if that's against any "Rules".

 

Welcome to world of "not doing what others want" ..... I think it's a great insight and much appreciated. Tempts me to go and see her as well...not sure why I haven't.

Keep up the good work 

[Matrix]

Personally I don't think you're touting but what you've written doesn't pass as a review, in my opinion. A bit more information required.

[Happyjose]

One of those situations where everyone seems to have a valid point.

Mavgoose is a prolific reviewer, and if this is indeed his best ever punt, reviewing is probably merited on that fact alone.

It is light on detail, and of course we need to ensure that reviews are written for the benefit of other punters, and not for the prossie, not matter how good a service. Fairly sure that hasn't happened here, just seems an unfortunate turn of phrase.

[Juilius_Sneezer]

She's a decent prossie and writing a review "because she deserves it" doesn't do her or us any favours in my opinion. It clearly looks as if you wrote it for her benefit, not punters.

Honestly more reviews will benefit us or else we will go back to the endless threads of "where are all the good girls now?"

[mavgoose]

All valid points above taken on board.
Perhaps it was a bit light on content , however it was written with a nod towards the fact I'd already reviewed her last year.

Ironically , I intentionally dialled back on the content in an effort to be less fluffy and long winded. Believe me , there was a lot to write about.

[Matrix]

All valid points above taken on board.
Perhaps it was a bit light on content , however it was written with a nod towards the fact I'd already reviewed her last year.

Ironically , I intentionally dialled back on the content in an effort to be less fluffy and long winded. Believe me , there was a lot to write about.

Be as fluffy as you like, just put in all the juicy details next time.

[Jock D]

Ah...to review or not to review...that is the question? This point actually came up just recently when someone else 'bumped' a review I wrote about 9 months ago...Mav suggested that I should  do an updated review as I've seen her a further 3 times...however, my view is that I would only do a second review of someone...if I was going to change the rating...I have no problem with adding a comment/update if another punter does a review though.

[Courtney]

Oh dear. Mr. Sensitive "Courtney" was moved to report my "review".
Seems he feels like I was touting. Fair enough pal. Take from it what you wish.

...no sensitivity here. Maybe it wasn't touting Gavmoose ...but whatever it was, it was a bit naff.   Either way it has been moved because it's not a review.

[Juilius_Sneezer]

Ah...to review or not to review...that is the question? This point actually came up just recently when someone else 'bumped' a review I wrote about 9 months ago...Mav suggested that I should  do an updated review as I've seen her a further 3 times...however, my view is that I would only do a second review of someone...if I was going to change the rating...I have no problem with adding a comment/update if another punter does a review though.

I would add to those if she has taken a long time off or you have revisited her after a long period and other reviews haven't been forthcoming. Just to keep things up to date.

[mavgoose]

...no sensitivity here. Maybe it wasn't touting Gavmoose ...but whatever it was, it was a bit naff.   Either way it has been moved because it's not a review.

Make your mind up Courtney Love. You reported me for touting. Now it isn't ? There are a thousand reviews worse than my (short) one.

[Clattypats]

Seen she was in Glasgow recently....pity her availability didn't suit ...Ah well... There's always next time...Defo on the HL ...

[Courtney]

Make your mind up Courtney Love. You reported me for touting. Now it isn't ? There are a thousand reviews worse than my (short) one.

....I also said I'm not sure if it qualifies as a review, it was moved ..so obviously it doesn't.

I'm not sure what to make of your posts at times.

...like this embarrassing fan boy cringe quote: 

Bonnie , if you read this , very very very  soon - please !!

[Marmalade]

Bonnie , if you read this , very very very  soon - please !!

  

That is really fucking sad. I hadn't wanted to give the OP a very hard time just for what was in effect just bumping a review count but that comment immediately tells me ignore his reviews.

[tazman1002001]

This is the reason that people do not post or are scared to write reviews..... It's the usual "moral high ground" squad doing there best to derail someone else not for any other reason than they DONT like it .... Sad times

[Marmalade]

This is the reason that people do not post or are scared to write reviews..... It's the usual "moral high ground" squad doing there best to derail someone else not for any other reason than they DONT like it .... Sad times

No it's not. It's the reason why seasoned punters ignore your McCoy-lookalike reviews. And by the way, you're also the reason why a lot of discriminating punters don't bother posting on the Scottish board rather than suffer your tripe. No offence. 

[Matrix]

This is the reason that people do not post or are scared to write reviews..... It's the usual "moral high ground" squad doing there best to derail someone else not for any other reason than they DONT like it .... Sad times

Says you, banned for white knighting on someone else's review. 

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=112270.0

Priceless.

[TommyMoundfrigger]

It's against some people's ethos to say something positive.
Prefer to winge and report.

I'll say, 'thanks for your efforts, Mav' 

[Courtney]

It's against some people's ethos to say something positive.
Prefer to winge and report.

Nonsense, as usual you seem to go about with your eyes shut these days.

..and BTW I see you had some comments in one of your reviews a while back saying that UKP was getting more like AW everyday.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=46015.0

Not exactly postive in my book.   .....but I forgot that maybe too much of a riddle for you to solve.

[mavgoose]

....I also said I'm not sure if it qualifies as a review, it was moved ..so obviously it doesn't.

I'm not sure what to make of your posts at times.

...like this embarrassing fan boy cringe quote: 

Oh dear , this has grown arms and legs.
I've no idea what your agenda is Courtney. Highlighting one bit of a review for your infantile point scoring.
How dare I ask a girl I've enjoyed seeing to visit Glasgow again ? Shocking.

Marmalade , don't hold back on my account. If you think my inputs and reviews are to be ignored , fair enough. Crack on.

You can both carry on regardless , as it won't affect me. No need for me to get involved in any tit for tat school ground name calling.

It's a bit.... Pathetic.

[Marmalade]

Mongoose is incorrect in thinking this is about name calling. It is about upholding the ethos of the site. I'm not having a go at him in particular but the comment quoted should really be retracted. The punters here are your friends, or want to be. Not the prossies. It's like going into a pub and taking your own booze under the table and of course the people of a similar mind think it's 'wonderful' as it saves them money. Regular customers who appreciate the place naturally look down on such abuse.

[tazman1002001]

No it's not. It's the reason why seasoned punters ignore your McCoy-lookalike reviews. And by the way, you're also the reason why a lot of discriminating punters don't bother posting on the Scottish board rather than suffer your tripe. No offence. 

No offence taken .....Mr "sound like a broken record" ..... Change your tune like your chat and the fact that you feel you need to get involved in everything ...it getting boring now 

No offence 

[tazman1002001]

Oh dear , this has grown arms and legs.
I've no idea what your agenda is Courtney. Highlighting one bit of a review for your infantile point scoring.
How dare I ask a girl I've enjoyed seeing to visit Glasgow again ? Shocking.

Marmalade , don't hold back on my account. If you think my inputs and reviews are to be ignored , fair enough. Crack on.

You can both carry on regardless , as it won't affect me. No need for me to get involved in any tit for tat school ground name calling.

It's a bit.... Pathetic.

 

[tazman1002001]

Says you, banned for white knighting on someone else's review. 

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=112270.0

Priceless.

You worry me you weirdo stalker im just glad I don't have a bunny you can boil, ....not ..... Loving the appreciation pics 

[Marmalade]

I'm thinking perhaps a thread should be started, titled "Greatest quotes from Tazman". 

Can't decide whether it should be in the off topic section or the non review section.

I almost miss him already.

 

(That was when he was banned)

If you have the time and energy go ahead in off-topic mate. He has endless time and energy to defend his 'reputation'. It's just feeding a troll to criticise him directly. Plus it lets the core members see what he's like as most people don't venture into every local board. I haven't got time to go through all his fanboy 'reviews' again -- or cross match them to the Scottish McCoys shit guide to saunas. 

[TommyMoundfrigger]

Nonsense, as usual you seem to go about with your eyes shut these days.

..and BTW I see you had some comments in one of your reviews a while back saying that UKP was getting more like AW everyday.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=460
Not exactly postive in my book.   .....but I forgot that maybe too much of a riddle for you to solve.

If the cap fits, son.....

[Matrix]

You worry me you weirdo stalker im just glad I don't have a bunny you can boil, ....not ..... Loving the appreciation pics 

It reads like you'd be glad if I boiled your bunny.  Belonging to you, it's probably suicidal.

Oh you're welcome for your avatar by the way.

[Juilius_Sneezer]

.and BTW I see you had some comments in one of your reviews a while back saying that UKP was getting more like AW everyday.

And at the rate you lot are going the Scotland boards are going the way of our conterparts on UKE with this constant sniping.

Drop it everybody and lets stick to enjoying this hobby.

[tazman1002001]

It reads like you'd be glad if I boiled your bunny.  Belonging to you, it's probably suicidal.

Oh you're welcome for your avatar by the way.

Your parents will be proud 

[tazman1002001]

(That was when he was banned)

If you have the time and energy go ahead in off-topic mate. He has endless time and energy to defend his 'reputation'. It's just feeding a troll to criticise him directly. Plus it lets the core members see what he's like as most people don't venture into every local board. I haven't got time to go through all his fanboy 'reviews' again -- or cross match them to the Scottish McCoys shit guide to saunas. 

All we are hearing is someone that loves his own "important in his own head" voice....what we actually hear is drivel drivel drivel drivel ...... No offence 

[CeeJay]

There's an "ethos" to this site?

I thought it was just blokes saying which working girls worked for them and giving other blokes some idea of what to expect if they did take a fancy to those girls.

[emptymybaws]

The Scottish section has an artificial hierarchy of rampant shaggers who all want to be the king of studs, mix that in with hostility and paranoia and its as Scottish as you can get 

[Marmalade]

There's an "ethos" to this site?

I thought it was just blokes saying which working girls worked for them and giving other blokes some idea of what to expect if they did take a fancy to those girls.

- Site ownership
The site owner (single male person) is not involved in prostitution in any way except as a purchaser of sex while residing in the UK. The site owner does not gain from prostitution in anyway, monetary or otherwise, from this site or any other site, online or offline. The site owner also owns the site External Link/Members Only. The mission of that site is to give unlimited free advertising and also act as a chat platform for both sex buyers and sex workers. The two sites missions and purpose are different yet both are 100% free. UKPunting.com is ran for the benefit of punters, UKEscorting.com is ran for the benefit of both punters and service providers.

- Site ethos & mission
This site puts the interests of punters (sex buyers) first. The site serves as a platform to help punters exchange info and make more informed decisions about the purchase of sexual services. This site is totally independent (from service providers) with no vested interests. The site does not generate any income and runs at a loss, covered by the site owner. The site does not take donations.

Link at the bottom of the page.

[Matrix]

All we are hearing is someone that loves his own "important in his own head" voice....what we actually hear is drivel drivel drivel drivel ...... No offence 

That statement sums you up in a nutshell. Truly delusional. 

Take a good look in the mirror, if you and the mirror can stand it. A mirror being the only way you can see you own cock.

[mavgoose]

Guys. Start a different thread. Do what yous like. I'm not interested.

Anyone remember the point of this thread ?

Ah yes , a mini review. Moved to general board.
No biggy in its own. Till we have all the posturing and attempts to be Billy big baws. We're slipping down that road again. Yawn.

Bonnie Scotland. A great Scottish girl giving a great to brilliant service.
Seriously , piss off and do your arguments elsewhere.

[Boinky]

Yup.

I'm quite new here and it getting quite tiresome already. Virtually every thread gets derailed by the same few faces bickering over bollocks.

It must put newbies off getting involved.

[Matrix]

Guys. Start a different thread. Do what yous like. I'm not interested.

Anyone remember the point of this thread ?

Ah yes , a mini review. Moved to general board.
No biggy in its own. Till we have all the posturing and attempts to be Billy big baws. We're slipping down that road again. Yawn.

Bonnie Scotland. A great Scottish girl giving a great to brilliant service.
Seriously , piss off and do your arguments elsewhere.

Might just do that chief. Unfortunately left unchallenged, this section will revert to fluffy troll touting and digs at folks mothers. You know the root of the problem and I can quote you on that.

Not interested?  Use the ignore feature.

[mavgoose]

Still at it matrix. Can't help yourself. ??
I'll see you on Monday. If you're not banned by then.

[Gollygiant]

Take a good look in the mirror, if you and the mirror can stand it. A mirror being the only way you can see you own cock.

Hi pot meet mr kettle.

[Courtney]

sniping.

I'm quoting facts Juilius. Sorry if this is too black and white for some people.

[Matrix]

Still at it matrix. Can't help yourself. ??
I'll see you on Monday. If you're not banned by then.

See me? Aye ok then. 

[Matrix]

Hi pot meet mr kettle.

I assume that's our tag team careers over then. 

[mrhyde]

Yup.

I'm quite new here and it getting quite tiresome already. Virtually every thread gets derailed by the same few faces bickering over bollocks.

It must put newbies off getting involved.

I agree, I thought the whole point of this forum was to exchange information and help fellow punters. But it seems some punters on here just like to score points of each other.

[Courtney]

I agree, I thought the whole point of this forum was to exchange information and help fellow punters.

Yes, but it looks to me like some are going down the route of pro$$ienet style posting these days ...which is not a good idea. 

Newbies have nothing to fear if they are genuine, follows the rules, stick with the facts and don't resort to AW style reviews etc.