Author Topic: BrookeDeLuxe/Glasgow  (Read 6709 times)


28 review(s) for Brooke_Deluxe (25 positive, 3 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,162
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
External Link/Members Only
45 mins - £90
Done this as an advance booking through AW..Pretty good comms, texted on the day and was given the city centre hotel to go to..Got to the hotel  2 minutes before time booked and texted Brooke...waited and nothing back...Then phoned ,which got cut off..I then got a txt saying the previous punter Was late and could I wait till she had a shower..Fine with me.Pandered about till I got the ok 10 mins after the booking was meant to start.

Was then given the room number, and prob one of the worst hotels to get to the lifts to discreetly..

Got to the room and seen Brooke once inside..Good looking girl with a slim frame and huge tits..was offered shower which I accepted.(in and out in 2 mins)

Into the room,bit of Dfk then Brooke stripped off as did I..she got a vibrator out for me to use on her while she lay back on the bed,then I went down on her before she sucked my cock before moving onto 69..Bit of missionary next then she moved right to the edge of the bed for some doggy while she insisted on me grabbing her arse cheeks..

After this ,and prob about 30 mins in she took the condom off and started giving me oral..Told her I was a one pop guy,so wasn't gonna cum till time up..so back on with another condom..She lay back,for more mish...At this point I was thinking things were to mechanical, or on a schedule..Anyway finished off cumming over her tits, then she got cleaned up in the bathroom..

By time I came out the shower she was dressed to go for a duo in another room in the hotel..She said to me she loves duo's...

Nice girl (and I hummed and hawed between a pos and neutral)but is a neutral because ,when the booking started late I thought her mind was elsewhere during a good bit of my booking(prob on the duo)and I could sense it....If she maybe left more time between bookings in the first place then one punter being a bit late shouldn't effect my booking,and before anyone says it..My shower at the start and finish were even within the 45 mins I payed for.

Doubt I would see her again.
« Last Edit: September 20, 2016, 03:28:33 am by Clattypats »

Offline David1970

What's that noise I hear coming over the hill, its the horse hooves of the white knights led by Sir fluffy.

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,166
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
What's that noise I hear coming over the hill, its the horse hooves of the white knights led by Sir fluffy.

 :D
Great review Clattypants, it kinda confirms my gut feeling that both the Maisies and the Brookes are overrated.  :hi: :cool:

Offline pilgrim

I think this duo have peaked.  Ive said it before they get pimped and hyped up so much by their fluffy fan boys who write Mills & Boon novels.  Folk go into a punt expecting so much and if its not up to scratch the whole booking turns mediocre.

No doubt they will continue to tour Scotland and make their money but it would be nice to see them come and go without all the advertising and upcoming tour announcements their PR consultant seems to ram down our throats.  A few of their pals seem to be a bit wiser to the pestering tactics and are still getting repeat customers with glowing feedback.

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
I think this duo have peaked.  Ive said it before they get pimped and hyped up so much by their fluffy fan boys who write Mills & Boon novels.  Folk go into a punt expecting so much and if its not up to scratch the whole booking turns mediocre.

No doubt they will continue to tour Scotland and make their money but it would be nice to see them come and go without all the advertising and upcoming tour announcements their PR consultant seems to ram down our throats.  A few of their pals seem to be a bit wiser to the pestering tactics and are still getting repeat customers with glowing feedback.

Pilgrim enlighten us with any of your recents punts as your last fluffy review was over 8mths ago?
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
External Link/Members Only
45 mins - £90
Done this as an advance booking through AW..Pretty good comms, texted on the day and was given the city centre hotel to go to..Got to the hotel  2 minutes before time booked and texted Brooke...waited and nothing back...Then phoned ,which got cut off..I then got a txt saying the previous punter Was late and could I wait till she had a shower..Fine with me.Pandered about till I got the ok 10 mins after the booking was meant to start.

Was then given the room number, and prob one of the worst hotels to get to the lifts to discreetly..

Got to the room and seen Brooke once inside..Good looking girl with a slim frame and huge tits..was offered shower which I accepted.(in and out in 2 mins)

Into the room,bit of Dfk then Brooke stripped off as did I..she got a vibrator out for me to use on her while she lay back on the bed,then I went down on her before she sucked my cock before moving onto 69..Bit of missionary next then she moved right to the edge of the bed for some doggy while she insisted on me grabbing her arse cheeks..

After this ,and prob about 30 mins in she took the condom off and started giving me oral..Told her I was a one pop guy,so wasn't gonna cum till time up..so back on with another condom..She lay back,for more mish...At this point I was thinking things were to mechanical, or on a schedule..Anyway finished off cumming over her tits, then she got cleaned up in the bathroom..

By time I came out the shower she was dressed to go for a duo in another room in the hotel..She said to me she loves duo's...

Nice girl (and I hummed and hawed between a pos and neutral)but is a neutral because ,when the booking started late I thought her mind was elsewhere during a good bit of my booking(prob on the duo)and I could sense it....If she maybe left more time between bookings in the first place then one punter being a bit late shouldn't effect my booking,and before anyone says it..My shower at the start and finish were even within the 45 mins I payed for.

Doubt I would see her again.

Clatty I know the duo haven't been ideal for you ....but I've genuinley had a great time on each visit with both of them either seperatley or as a duo.

Who would you recomend or say is better that has a similar look to either Brooke or Maisie?
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,162
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
Clatty I know the duo haven't been ideal for you ....but I've genuinley had a great time on each visit with both of them either seperatley or as a duo.

Who would you recomend or say is better that has a similar look to either Brooke or Maisie?
Lucy May has a kind of similar look to Maisie(bit more glam rock  :D) and is better in my opinion,although she is hard to get a hold of..

Noone I can think of I've seen that's similar to Brooke :unknown:

I know they float your boat Taz, and that's fair enough...Would be pretty boring if we all thought the same about every girl..I just feel( probably because of how many they see in a day)they are going through the motions a bit.

I've seen some girls I've reviewed on here, that blow them out the water. :bomb:

Maybe with Brooke if the punter before me wasn't late it might have been better,thats not my problem though.




mavgoose

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
"".....I just feel (probably because of how many they see in a day) , they are going through the motions a bit. ....""

Mentioned too often by too many punters.

I've seen Maisie , once. Never been back. Although my punt was a positive.

It is all about opinions on here.
But yes , the constant advertising and threads being bumped prior to their arrival actually has the opposite effect on me.

Offline David1970

"".....I just feel (probably because of how many they see in a day) , they are going through the motions a bit. ....""

Mentioned too often by too many punters.

I've seen Maisie , once. Never been back. Although my punt was a positive.

It is all about opinions on here.
But yes , the constant advertising and threads being bumped prior to their arrival actually has the opposite effect on me.

There PR man on this site has made me not want to see them, I do not take his reviews of comments seriously.

Offline David1970

What's that noise I hear coming over the hill, its the horse hooves of the white knights led by Sir fluffy.

I see Sir Fluffy is defending the damsels reputation as expected.

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
I see Sir Fluffy is defending the damsels reputation as expected.

You are one unlucky bastard aren't you ..... 5 positives out of 14 reviews.... Maybe you need to stop your "sweetie wife and indirect bitching" and concentrate on your punts .... Or maybe it wasn't actually the girls that were that bad but it was your constant drivel and moaning that made your punt negative or neutral  :timeout: ....

Now let's stop this under hand bitching because I can be as fluffy as I like about anyone and your drivel isn't going to change that .....  :thumbsup:
« Last Edit: September 20, 2016, 11:09:06 pm by tazman1002001 »
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Offline David1970

You are one unlucky bastard aren't you ..... 5 positives out of 14 reviews.... Maybe you need to stop your "sweetie wife and indirect bitching" and concentrate on your punts .... Or maybe it wasn't actually the girls that were that bad but it was your constant drivel and moaning that made your punt negative or neutral  :timeout: ....

Now let's stop this under hand bitching because I be as fluffy as I like about anyone and your drivel isn't going to change that .....  :thumbsup:
[/qu


My reviews
5 positive
4 neutral
5 negative

I would say very balanced reviews.

Not the PR man for any of them, promoting before, during and after there tour. Attacking anyone who dares question your belief they are wonderful. I wonder what your reaction would have been if anyone had done a Negitive review on any of the ladies your promote, not a neutral like this one.
You are the PR pimp.

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
You are one unlucky bastard aren't you ..... 5 positives out of 14 reviews.... Maybe you need to stop your "sweetie wife and indirect bitching" and concentrate on your punts .... Or maybe it wasn't actually the girls that were that bad but it was your constant drivel and moaning that made your punt negative or neutral  :timeout: ....

Now let's stop this under hand bitching because I be as fluffy as I like about anyone and your drivel isn't going to change that .....  :thumbsup:
[/qu


My reviews
5 positive
4 neutral
5 negative

I would say very balanced reviews.

Not the PR man for any of them, promoting before, during and after there tour. Attacking anyone who dares question your belief they are wonderful. I wonder what your reaction would have been if anyone had done a Negitive review on any of the ladies your promote, not a neutral like this one.
You are the PR pimp.

Sorry I didn't realise you were a wannabe ADMIN .... As I said why don't you concentrate on YOUR punts and stop your bitching ...... You bitching makes you sound a lot like one of our banned members from a couple of year ago....Coincidence ......  :hi:
« Last Edit: September 20, 2016, 11:16:43 pm by tazman1002001 »
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Offline David1970

Standard PR reply, try and shift the blame.

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Standard PR reply, try and shift the blame.

Oh did I touch a nerve...... Mmmm ...... Your one to watch and this fluffy is keeping his eye on you
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Offline henry brubaker

It's you that seems to be upset about the review. Why?

Offline pilgrim

It seems we have our own fluffy sergi who is starting to get a bit repetitive with his admin comments.  A bit rattled when folk disagree with his fluffy blockbuster reviews for the girls he tends to tout.  Im glad to see a few of the girls  who have become wise to his pestering ways just patch him.  Well done.

Firebird

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
It seems we have our own fluffy sergi who is starting to get a bit repetitive with his admin comments.  A bit rattled when folk disagree with his fluffy blockbuster reviews for the girls he tends to tout.  Im glad to see a few of the girls  who have become wise to his pestering ways just patch him.  Well done.

Are girls patching Tazz? Do tell...

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
It's you that seems to be upset about the review. Why?

Henry Hoover..... Clarify where I have been upset at the review please as I don't see that's anywhere?

I've been annoyed at some of the keyboard warriors but not at the actual review?
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Are girls patching Tazz? Do tell...

Firebird you're such a gossip lover ......  :D
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
It seems we have our own fluffy sergi who is starting to get a bit repetitive with his admin comments.  A bit rattled when folk disagree with his fluffy blockbuster reviews for the girls he tends to tout.  Im glad to see a few of the girls  who have become wise to his pestering ways just patch him.  Well done.

Listen I'm glad your mum patched me she wasn't my type anyway, plus you must be her sergei if she has let you know she patched or maybe someone has been talking to the girls about the forum .....mmmm Pilgrim wonder who that could be.......naughty naughty for both you and your mum?

And again Pilgrim there is nothing but negativity from you...it seems like you've got an axe to grind and I'm not sure what your problem is with your sergei comments.

This is a review board and to share information now if that doesn't work for you and your keyboard Warriors then maybe YOU are in the wrong place?
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Offline mr small

Been disappointed by a few of Taz's superstars, haven't put much faith in his reviews for a long time now.

Only three less than 'Fantastic' punts in three years - you can claim extensive research all you like Taz,  I think you set too low a standard.

 :hi:

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Been disappointed by a few of Taz's superstars, haven't put much faith in his reviews for a long time now.

Only three less than 'Fantastic' punts in three years - you can claim extensive research all you like Taz,  I think you set too low a standard.

 :hi:

Mr small Im gutted you have no faith  :D :lol: ....... I do my reviews on my booking not what keyboard warriors want to hear ...... So I stick by my reviews but thanks for your useless feedback once again  :thumbsup:
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Offline tazman1002001

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 4,403
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Oh I'm glad but surprised that you had a positive review with Brooke .... Mmm maybe some of the girls we see are actually good but some other may not like them......strange that how people have different tastes eh?
Banned reason: White-knight abusing facility to change another punters negative review and then getting abusive after his touting and white-knighting is exposed. Previously banned for similar reasons.
Banned by:

Offline mr small

We accept that we all have different tastes and every punt will be different .........










Unless your name is TAZ n whch case they are all wonderful  :lol:


 :hi:


Offline Matrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,776
  • Likes: 10
  •  
  • Reviews: 164
I'm getting the popcorn out for this one......................................... :bomb:

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,162
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
My review didn't half open up a can of worms :D :bomb:


Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,162
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96

Hidden Image/Members Only
Hope your not implying I was 'fishing' Mr small :hi:

My review was honest and based on my experience/booking, as all reviews should be  :thumbsup:

Offline nuube



Although I'm a frequent visitor to the forum this is my first post here for almost two years.

The main reason for this is the white knighting and blatant touting that comes from some of the members here and Taz is by far the worst offender.

He has now written FORTY TWO positive reviews but if that's not bad enough he continues to troll anyone who leaves a less than glowing review of these girls.

Why do these people feel the need to do this? why can't they just stay off the thread and accept some one else had a different opinion than they did?

The fact is Taz was arrogant and stupid enough to use the same username both here and on adultwork and there is no way he will ever risk his AW account being trashed by tit for tat negative feedback so he will NEVER leave a negative or even neutral review for anyone.

Now let me ask the genuine members here a simple question.

How many positive reviews does a member have to write before his credibility is destroyed....50?... 100?... 200? because that is eventually what is going to happen!

All the reviews are linked now so that any punter can easily read multiple reviews on a girl from different punters and get a broad range of opinions on an escort before making a decision.

Yet despite this very useful feature the white knights' huge and fragile egos just can't resist crashing other people's reviews and attempting to discredit them if they're unhappy with the conclusions.

The upshot of this is that I and I suggest many other punters will not leave a review here despite genuinely wanting to help other punters make an informed decision.

Speaking for myself I have visited a dozen escorts since my last review (which was trolled and white knighted to death btw) nine of these girls have never been reviewed here and the other three only have a few reviews between them.

I will not be sharing these experiences here until and  unless all the remaining touts and white knights are gone.

I do notice the most prolific trolls are gone now and that is a big step in the right direction.

Now it's time to finish the job and purge the white knights, then and only then can the forum reach it's full potential.

Anyway I've had  my say but if nothing changes I expect it will be another two years before I bother posting again let alone writing a review.
Until then happy punting to one and all! :hi:










Offline David1970

Listen I'm glad your mum patched me she wasn't my type anyway, plus you must be her sergei if she has let you know she patched or maybe someone has been talking to the girls about the forum .....mmmm Pilgrim wonder who that could be.......naughty naughty for both you and your mum?

And again Pilgrim there is nothing but negativity from you...it seems like you've got an axe to grind and I'm not sure what your problem is with your sergei comments.

This is a review board and to share information now if that doesn't work for you and your keyboard Warriors then maybe YOU are in the wrong place?

Very mature PR man, having a go at someone's mother, I haven't heard that since primary school.

Back to the review, it was a good review and neutral. God knows what your reaction would be if it had been a negative, against one of the girls you pimp on this site.

Offline Matrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,776
  • Likes: 10
  •  
  • Reviews: 164

Offline Matrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,776
  • Likes: 10
  •  
  • Reviews: 164
I'm thinking perhaps a thread should be started, titled "Greatest quotes from Tazman". 

Can't decide whether it should be in the off topic section or the non review section.

I almost miss him already.

 :rolleyes:

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,166
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
He's gone.

....time to open the champagne. :cool: :drinks: :drinks: :drinks:

He'll be back.

:scare:   ...he'd stick out like a sore thumb anyway. :D

Can't decide whether it should be in the off topic section or the non review section.

Off-topic.

« Last Edit: September 21, 2016, 08:50:36 pm by Courtney »

Offline Keema


How many positive reviews does a member have to write before his credibility is destroyed....50?... 100?... 200? because that is eventually what is going to happen!
<snip>
The upshot of this is that I and I suggest many other punters will not leave a review here despite genuinely wanting to help other punters make an informed decision.

Trouble is human nature, you've had a positive experience and you want to shout it out from the rooftops. Getting up on the roof after a shit punt isn't so easy and that's without the trolls. 

Yet for this place to be helpful we need to be honest- but how many of us are prepared to admit we got it wrong?  This also raises another question not quite right for here, going to put it in the main section.



Offline mr small

Right Nuube , he's gone get your reviews up

 :thumbsup:

Offline henry brubaker

Well that banning was a long time coming.

Offline daneeboy

Well said guys, i refuse too take part in any topics or reviews as long as Taz is exploiting these wgs for his own gain.

I have only been doing this for around a couple of years, but i am sick of some wgs telling me of how Taz has used them {eg 2 for 1 deals with the girls for good reviews]  some of these girls have been very upset about how they have been used, but what can they do?

Hopefully the site can draw more decent guys to pass on their views and reviews.

Happy_Punter

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
For what it's worth, here's my take on the whole Taz thing.  From following ukpunting.com for a whole now,  it seems there is a bit of a hierarchy on the forum.  You have your top dogs,  Taz and his 5 punts a week,  Auldie with his encyclopedic knowledge of punting in Glasgow and MavGoose.

Us new guys to an extent kinda accepted that what these guys said to some extent is true due to the extent of Taz's punting.

Which leads me to the conclusion that either:

1. Taz is an incredibly wealthy yet very lonely and insecure person who needs to punt as much as he claims to try and improve the monotony of his mundane existence

2. Most of these punts are figments of Taz's imagination and that he is trying to "compete"  with the other major players on the forum.  Let's be honest here.  Taz puts up a glowing review,  criticizes any difference of opinion,  becomes a fluffy white Knight.  The WG in question isn't exactly going to come onto the forum and claim that Taz is full of shite,  is she?

If Taz really did punt as much as he'd have us believe,  then I think he probably has some kind of sex addiction for which he may need treated. 

I punt once,  maybe twice a month because that's all I can afford and also because punting becomes boring and monotonous if you do it all the time.

So let's stop this Billy Big Time pish,  the whole " I've shagged more WGs than you"  mentality and make the forum a level playing field for anyone happy to contribute

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,166
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
I have only been doing this for around a couple of years, but i am sick of some wgs telling me of how Taz has used them {eg 2 for 1 deals with the girls for good reviews]  some of these girls have been very upset about how they have been used, but what can they do?

:dash: .....good reviews in return for special treatment. That's why all overly fluffy/toutish reviews should be treated with caution.

What a complete and utter douchebag. :crazy: :thumbsdown: Good riddance. :drinks:

Offline bushman

Shit happens. He is gone.
Now we need more input from all the younger/ new punters that lurk in the dark corners of this forum.

Wish I could punt 5 times a week. But unfortunately I can't mentally handle all that meaning less sex.

Game on

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
If he was getting 2 for 1 how the fuck did they not say anything. they've only got there self's to blame.

I accused him of writing pish reviews for freebies months ago, one of the WG'S could have come on the forum then and said there bit.



Offline S.X. MacHine

How will history remember him? What will be his epitaph? How about 'he became a legend in his own lunchtime, only to bring it all up after the dessert...'

mavgoose

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
For what it's worth, here's my take on the whole Taz thing.  From following ukpunting.com for a whole now,  it seems there is a bit of a hierarchy on the forum.  You have your top dogs,  Taz and his 5 punts a week,  Auldie with his encyclopedic knowledge of punting in Glasgow and MavGoose.


Hi Happy P.
Unsure if I've ever been in a hierarchy of any kind in all my years on this earth. Is it a good thing ? Or a bad thing ?

Like a few months ago , when loads of people contributed to the forum(s) , after the banning of people who got carried away with bitching / scoring points -
I hope this has the same effect.

I hadn't realised or considered that Taz and his ways would keep people away. I realise now that could be possible.
Taz just got too famous in his own lunchtime and began to believe his own hype.
I met at least 2 WGs who were very nervous at their impending "first meet" with king Taz.
Let this be a chance just like a few months ago where there was a flurry of activity and new users coming on and posting reviews and discussions. For fux sake that is what we are here for after all.

However , let us also not forget that people will always use this forum for the wrong reasons. Hopefully , over the top fluffy or self promoting , false or vindictive reviews will be called out and spotted.

Mav

 :hi:
« Last Edit: September 22, 2016, 09:10:53 am by mavgoose »

Offline Harrymetsally

Something that isn't highlighted is that inconsistency of women.  Their personas and mood can change like the weather.  And with that comes a change in technique and effort.  I've had 10/10 experiences with girls only to visit regular and once in a while it's 5/10.  It's hard to find a consistent girl....like that restaurant that is excellent any day any time.  And therefore a reviewer might have an excellent time but the next person not quite so much.

Also if the wg likes you expect better performance.  I remember a girl I booked for 2hrs...first bj ok.  Then I went down on her and gave her a solid orgasm.  2nd bj was quite a bit better.

 I will say the eastern blok sex machines are very consistent though.


Offline Micky5633

More about the review and less about Taz. My first meet with her was honestly my best to date as my review will reveal. However my 2nd meet I had a similar experience to clatty, seemed more rushed and the condom came off after 2 positions but me still being slightly new to the game I never have the guts to say I'm not really yet and just let her suck me off till I blew in her mouth. That's why I prefer seeing different girls, variety is the spice and all that jazz.