Michelle Independent

[Strikar]

So I had a second visit with Michelle on her recent tour, just a brief update as her reviews are plentiful.

Venue was a hotel close to West Brompton, fit for purpose and no A/C issues like the last time.

Comms were good. Confirmed before she was due to arrive in London as I wanted her to be dressed in a tight dress. When I arrived she was looking killer in a black dress, was rock hard as soon as I stepped in the door, straight to DFK as before, great start.

Shower then more DFK while peeling off the dress while standing by a mirror, mutual stroking, got her naked and a long RO sesh, she returned the favour with a very sloppy BJ, attention to my balls, slow then fast, eye contact had to request a condom as was too close.

Into CG with MIchelle varying her position a few times, she ended up riding me hard in CG up on her hands and feet only. Epic view and overall hot session sent me over the edge.

Cleaned up, then chatted for a while. Tried to start round 2 but time was up. Quick shower then out the door a happy man.

Will be back for more.

External Link/Members Only

[Bangers and Gash]

Will be back for more.

And will you be doing yet another positive review for that punt as well?  I only ask because you reviewed this pro$$ie just a month ago. 

[Cunning Punt]

And will you be doing yet another positive review for that punt as well?  I only ask because you reviewed this pro$$ie just a month ago. 

Yes, doing a second review only a month after your previous one and so soon after the damaging negative one (plus the consequent fallout) makes you seem a fluffy who wants to give MI some good publicity after the recent (deserved) bad publicity for her. Even if you're not.

Standard practice is to update your previous review and only do a fresh one if there is something materially different from the first, which there isn't.

[The_Don]

to update your previous review and only do a fresh one if there is something materially different from the first

+1

I update my reviews, unless some thing changed, like a duo or my rating rating. From a positive to negative. 

[smiths]

Yes, doing a second review only a month after your previous one and so soon after the damaging negative one (plus the consequent fallout) makes you seem a fluffy who wants to give MI some good publicity after the recent (deserved) bad publicity for her. Even if you're not.

Standard practice is to update your previous review and only do a fresh one if there is something materially different from the first, which there isn't.

There isn't a standard practice, what admin once posted was a punter can do more than 1 positive review on the same WG but don't take the piss. To ME 2 positives in 2 months on the same WG where it wasn't even a MFF that included a different WG is taking the piss, but I see nothing wrong with doing another positive 6 months or more later and have done 1 of those myself.

[smiths]

+1

I update my reviews, unless some thing changed, like a duo or my rating rating. From a positive to negative.

Indeed, but there isn't a rule that says a punter cant post another positive on the same WG as I posted above though 6 months or more later is about right in my opinion, not before, but that's for punters too decide of course. Some punters have done a number of positives on the same WG in a short space of time.

[SamLP]

So those 86 punters that apparently may disagree with me are actually much less, since quite a few have written multiple reviews 

[Nagilum]

Indeed, but there isn't a rule that says a punter cant post another positive on the same WG as I posted above though 6 months or more later is about right in my opinion, not before, but that's for punters too decide of course. Some punters have done a number of positives on the same WG in a short space of time.

Agreed.  Unless they start posting 8 reviews of the same girl, then jump to their defense.  UncleSnideHeart comes to mind.

[blue]

+1

I update my reviews, unless some thing changed, like a duo or my rating rating. From a positive to negative.

Say you gave a positive review and then on the second visit the punt was poor, would you ask Admin to change the original review to a negative or write a completely new review...just wondered what the general convention would be?

[smiths]

So those 86 punters that apparently may disagree with me are actually much less, since quite a few have written multiple reviews 

Maybe but I don't know how many punters have done more than 1 positive on here on MI without checking. Some will do MFF reviews as well as 121 reviews of the same WG which is allowed.

Having had a brief look at the 90 reviews linked into this thread no punter has really taken the piss that I saw and done loads of positive reviews on MI.

[Nagilum]

Say you gave a positive review and then on the second visit the punt was poor, would you ask Admin to change the original review to a negative or write a completely new review...just wondered what the general convention would be?

No, that should be a new review, because your last visit would have been accurate.

Remember - A negative does not imply that the girl is terrible and all positives will subsequently be treated as such.

Each day is a new day and people make mistakes.

[smiths]

Say you gave a positive review and then on the second visit the punt was poor, would you ask Admin to change the original review to a negative or write a completely new review...just wondered what the general convention would be?

No you cant do that, you just do a negative review. Admin made clear in this scenario a while back that he didn't want punters to just add a negative onto an existing positive but do them separately. I have had this scenario myself and just did a new negative and mentioned I had done a positive previously.

[Nagilum]

No you cant do that, you just do a negative review. Admin made clear in this scenario a while back that he didn't want punters to just add a negative onto an existing positive but do them separately. I have had this scenario myself and just did a new negative and mentioned I had done a positive previously.

+1

[smiths]

No, that should be a new review, because your last visit would have been accurate.

Remember - A negative does not imply that the girl is terrible and all positives will subsequently be treated as such.

Each day is a new day and people make mistakes.

Indeed, a positive review is about how good the WG was when you punted with her of course, you then having a bad punt with her on another occasion doesn't change that positive punt, but it does obviously inform punters of the change from good to bad.

[The_Don]

Say you gave a positive review and then on the second visit the punt was poor, would you ask Admin to change the original review to a negative or write a completely new review...just wondered what the general convention would be?

 I'm not Admin he sets the rules here

IMO, at one time. A punt with a W/G, was positive for me and that still stands.

But on a later punt, with the same W/G, was a negative punt. I would do a new review.


See these reviews of W/G that I once reviewed as positive and then I posted negatives at a later point (details listed in the reviews)


https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=61672.0  and then https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=83921.0


https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=72626.0  and then https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=78883


https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=51315.0 and then https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=76855.0

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=42725.0 and then https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=68778.0


https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=55670.0 and then https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=58211.0


I have more listed in my reviews!

[blue]

Thanks for the clarification 

OP, apologies for asking about this in your review thread.

[punk]

Say you gave a positive review and then on the second visit the punt was poor, would you ask Admin to change the original review to a negative or write a completely new review...just wondered what the general convention would be?

I would write it as a new negative review.May be link with the previous one.

[Nagilum]

Thanks for the clarification 

OP, apologies for asking about this in your review thread.

Don't be.  That's what we are here for.

[Cunning Punt]

There isn't a standard practice, what admin once posted was a punter can do more than 1 positive review on the same WG but don't take the piss. To ME 2 positives in 2 months on the same WG where it wasn't even a MFF that included a different WG is taking the piss, but I see nothing wrong with doing another positive 6 months or more later and have done 1 of those myself.

I didn't say doing repeat reviews was not permitted by admin, but I think it is fair to say it is standard practice by punters in that updating previous reviews is what the majority of members do in practice and reality.

There are very, very few repeated reviews by members of the same escort where there isn't a material difference, ie a change in rating or different type of service etc.

Either way, I think we're all agreed, 2 similar reviews in quick succession is rather odd.

[Tony_Red]

No round 2 because round 1 went on for so long meaning your time was up?

Also, money,  location and availability aside, who would YOU pick from Emily Creme Brule or Michelle if
you had to choose just one?  ...or is their a 3rd WG who is better than both in your eyes?

[Strikar]

And will you be doing yet another positive review for that punt as well?  I only ask because you reviewed this pro$$ie just a month ago. 

Nope as I'm booked in to see her next month so doubt the anger over what happened will of died down by then. 

Happy to just update previous reviews going forward, didn't see the issue just been adding reviews as I go.

[Strikar]

No round 2 because round 1 went on for so long meaning your time was up?

Also, money,  location and availability aside, who would YOU pick from Emily Creme Brule or Michelle if
you had to choose just one?  ...or is their a 3rd WG who is better than both in your eyes?

Yep time was slightly over due to taking too long on fore play and DFK. I take s bit of time to recover Henderson the chatting only gone twice in an hour once.

Probably MI but Emily was one of my first and was nervous at the time. Been meaning to revisit and thinking of booking them both for my first MFF if they duo again.

Had a hot time with Appke Pie too but she had a negative or neutral review so haven't been back in a while and she is 100 for 30 mins which I won't pay again.

[smiths]

I didn't say doing repeat reviews was not permitted by admin, but I think it is fair to say it is standard practice by punters in that updating previous reviews is what the majority of members do in practice and reality.

There are very, very few repeated reviews by members of the same escort where there isn't a material difference, ie a change in rating or different type of service etc.

Either way, I think we're all agreed, 2 similar reviews in quick succession is rather odd.

I have been surprised when reading reviews to see how many have done 2 or more positives on the same WG in a short space of time. Yes I agree 2 positives in a month is a bit odd.

[Cuntminion]

I have been surprised when reading reviews to see how many have done 2 or more positives on the same WG in a short space of time. Yes I agree 2 positives in a month is a bit odd.

I dunno could be a genuine mistake I did exactly the same thing when I signed up here just because I genuinely was not aware 

But once your told there's no excuse to make the same mistake again

[smiths]

I dunno could be a genuine mistake I did exactly the same thing when I signed up here just because I genuinely was not aware 

But once your told there's no excuse to make the same mistake again

As I said above its not against the rules to do more than 1 positive review on the same WG, admins advice was just don't take the piss, so a review a month I view as taking the piss myself but a review every 6 months or so I don't. So its not necessarily a case of the punter making a mistake like you did, in some cases presumably the punter is purposely doing more than 1 positive review on the same WG in a short period of time.

Different I know but there is also a punter on here that in about 18 months has done 8 positive reviews on the same party provider out of his 14 reviews AND 1 of those is on another party that was also run by the same people who ran the 8. Now that to me is what I call excessive. Sure there might be different WGs at some of these parties but I think the message is loud and clear, he rates them.

[Tony_Red]

Probably MI but Emily was one of my first and was nervous at the time. Been meaning to revisit and thinking of booking them both for my first MFF if they duo again.

Had a hot time with Appke Pie too but she had a negative or neutral review so haven't been back in a while and she is 100 for 30 mins which I won't pay again.

Thanks for your reply. Really appreciate it. Most punters tell me ECB over MI but everyone has different tastes.
And you rate Apple pie just as good except her 30m rate is too much - Got it.

Cheers, you may have just saved me a lot of £.

[Strikar]

Ya she was quality when I saw her. I prefer real to fake breasts so while Apple's look and feel great it means I sometimes pick other girls when deciding on my punt.

[lewishamguy]

Will be back for more.

Superb, life saving review. I look forward to your next review. 

[InstaPunt]

Cleaned up, then chatted for a while. Tried to start round 2 but time was up.

External Link/Members Only

Didn't once occur to you that she was chatting to you for that exact reason ?

[punk]

Cleaned up, then chatted for a while. Tried to start round 2 but time was up. Quick shower then out the door a happy man.

Will be back for more.

External Link/Members Only

Classic Prossie tactic of time wasting,if you had enough time for round 2.

[theGOAT]

And will you be doing yet another positive review for that punt as well?  I only ask because you reviewed this pro$$ie just a month ago. 

I don't see any problem with writing another review soon after the previous one, providing there is something new to tell.  If its essentially just a repeat of the last one it serves no useful purpose.  Only useful purpose of this one seems to be to distract attention from her recent Negative review?

Cheers! 

[Nagilum]

I don't see any problem with writing another review soon after the previous one, providing there is something new to tell.  If its essentially just a repeat of the last one it serves no useful purpose.  Only useful purpose of this one seems to be to distract attention from her recent Negative review?

Cheers! 

Admin is clear on the matter.  You should add to the existing positive review unless the service level has dropped to a neutral or negative.

[Strikar]

Classic Prossie tactic of time wasting,if you had enough time for round 2.

Yep it did, I'm not that naive. I don't normally try and go for 2 rounds even with my OH I've been a one pop guy for years. One pop in an hour is normally fine and I find 30 mins too short for the GFE I like.

I am considering a few 30 min £60 min punts in a toftt / pump and dump scenario to push my experience along but vanilla is currently my taste.