Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Michelle Independent  (Read 3448 times)


115 review(s) for Michelle Independent (112 positive, 0 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline Strikar

So I had a second visit with Michelle on her recent tour, just a brief update as her reviews are plentiful.

Venue was a hotel close to West Brompton, fit for purpose and no A/C issues like the last time.

Comms were good. Confirmed before she was due to arrive in London as I wanted her to be dressed in a tight dress. When I arrived she was looking killer in a black dress, was rock hard as soon as I stepped in the door, straight to DFK as before, great start.

Shower then more DFK while peeling off the dress while standing by a mirror, mutual stroking, got her naked and a long RO sesh, she returned the favour with a very sloppy BJ, attention to my balls, slow then fast, eye contact had to request a condom as was too close.

Into CG with MIchelle varying her position a few times, she ended up riding me hard in CG up on her hands and feet only. Epic view and overall hot session sent me over the edge.

Cleaned up, then chatted for a while. Tried to start round 2 but time was up. Quick shower then out the door a happy man.

Will be back for more.

www.adultwork.com/1583488


115 review(s) found for Michelle Independent linked to in above post (112 positive, 0 neutral, 3 negative)

Will be back for more.

And will you be doing yet another positive review for that punt as well?  I only ask because you reviewed this pro$$ie just a month ago.  :rolleyes:

Offline Cunning Punt

And will you be doing yet another positive review for that punt as well?  I only ask because you reviewed this pro$$ie just a month ago.  :rolleyes:

Yes, doing a second review only a month after your previous one and so soon after the damaging negative one (plus the consequent fallout) makes you seem a fluffy who wants to give MI some good publicity after the recent (deserved) bad publicity for her. Even if you're not.

Standard practice is to update your previous review and only do a fresh one if there is something materially different from the first, which there isn't.

Offline The_Don


to update your previous review and only do a fresh one if there is something materially different from the first

+1

I update my reviews, unless some thing changed, like a duo or my rating rating. From a positive to negative. 

Offline smiths

Yes, doing a second review only a month after your previous one and so soon after the damaging negative one (plus the consequent fallout) makes you seem a fluffy who wants to give MI some good publicity after the recent (deserved) bad publicity for her. Even if you're not.

Standard practice is to update your previous review and only do a fresh one if there is something materially different from the first, which there isn't.

There isn't a standard practice, what admin once posted was a punter can do more than 1 positive review on the same WG but don't take the piss. To ME 2 positives in 2 months on the same WG where it wasn't even a MFF that included a different WG is taking the piss, but I see nothing wrong with doing another positive 6 months or more later and have done 1 of those myself.

Offline smiths

+1

I update my reviews, unless some thing changed, like a duo or my rating rating. From a positive to negative.

Indeed, but there isn't a rule that says a punter cant post another positive on the same WG as I posted above though 6 months or more later is about right in my opinion, not before, but that's for punters too decide of course. Some punters have done a number of positives on the same WG in a short space of time.

Offline SamLP

So those 86 punters that apparently may disagree with me are actually much less, since quite a few have written multiple reviews  :D

Offline Nagilum

Indeed, but there isn't a rule that says a punter cant post another positive on the same WG as I posted above though 6 months or more later is about right in my opinion, not before, but that's for punters too decide of course. Some punters have done a number of positives on the same WG in a short space of time.

Agreed.  Unless they start posting 8 reviews of the same girl, then jump to their defense.  UncleSnideHeart comes to mind.


Offline blue

+1

I update my reviews, unless some thing changed, like a duo or my rating rating. From a positive to negative.

Say you gave a positive review and then on the second visit the punt was poor, would you ask Admin to change the original review to a negative or write a completely new review...just wondered what the general convention would be?

Offline smiths

So those 86 punters that apparently may disagree with me are actually much less, since quite a few have written multiple reviews  :D

Maybe but I don't know how many punters have done more than 1 positive on here on MI without checking. Some will do MFF reviews as well as 121 reviews of the same WG which is allowed.

Having had a brief look at the 90 reviews linked into this thread no punter has really taken the piss that I saw and done loads of positive reviews on MI.
« Last Edit: June 12, 2016, 07:53:12 PM by smiths »

Offline Nagilum

Say you gave a positive review and then on the second visit the punt was poor, would you ask Admin to change the original review to a negative or write a completely new review...just wondered what the general convention would be?

No, that should be a new review, because your last visit would have been accurate.

Remember - A negative does not imply that the girl is terrible and all positives will subsequently be treated as such.

Each day is a new day and people make mistakes.

Offline smiths

Say you gave a positive review and then on the second visit the punt was poor, would you ask Admin to change the original review to a negative or write a completely new review...just wondered what the general convention would be?

No you cant do that, you just do a negative review. Admin made clear in this scenario a while back that he didn't want punters to just add a negative onto an existing positive but do them separately. I have had this scenario myself and just did a new negative and mentioned I had done a positive previously.

Offline Nagilum

No you cant do that, you just do a negative review. Admin made clear in this scenario a while back that he didn't want punters to just add a negative onto an existing positive but do them separately. I have had this scenario myself and just did a new negative and mentioned I had done a positive previously.

+1

Offline smiths

No, that should be a new review, because your last visit would have been accurate.

Remember - A negative does not imply that the girl is terrible and all positives will subsequently be treated as such.

Each day is a new day and people make mistakes.

Indeed, a positive review is about how good the WG was when you punted with her of course, you then having a bad punt with her on another occasion doesn't change that positive punt, but it does obviously inform punters of the change from good to bad.

Offline The_Don

Say you gave a positive review and then on the second visit the punt was poor, would you ask Admin to change the original review to a negative or write a completely new review...just wondered what the general convention would be?

 I'm not Admin he sets the rules here

IMO, at one time. A punt with a W/G, was positive for me and that still stands.

But on a later punt, with the same W/G, was a negative punt. I would do a new review.


See these reviews of W/G that I once reviewed as positive and then I posted negatives at a later point (details listed in the reviews)


https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=61672.0  and then https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=83921.0


https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=72626.0  and then https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=78883


https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=51315.0 and then https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=76855.0

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=42725.0 and then https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=68778.0


https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=55670.0 and then https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=58211.0


I have more listed in my reviews!


Offline blue

Thanks for the clarification  :hi:

OP, apologies for asking about this in your review thread.

Offline punk

Say you gave a positive review and then on the second visit the punt was poor, would you ask Admin to change the original review to a negative or write a completely new review...just wondered what the general convention would be?

I would write it as a new negative review.May be link with the previous one.

Offline Nagilum

Thanks for the clarification  :hi:

OP, apologies for asking about this in your review thread.

Don't be.  That's what we are here for.

Offline Cunning Punt

There isn't a standard practice, what admin once posted was a punter can do more than 1 positive review on the same WG but don't take the piss. To ME 2 positives in 2 months on the same WG where it wasn't even a MFF that included a different WG is taking the piss, but I see nothing wrong with doing another positive 6 months or more later and have done 1 of those myself.

I didn't say doing repeat reviews was not permitted by admin, but I think it is fair to say it is standard practice by punters in that updating previous reviews is what the majority of members do in practice and reality.

There are very, very few repeated reviews by members of the same escort where there isn't a material difference, ie a change in rating or different type of service etc.

Either way, I think we're all agreed, 2 similar reviews in quick succession is rather odd.

No round 2 because round 1 went on for so long meaning your time was up?

Also, money,  location and availability aside, who would YOU pick from Emily Creme Brule or Michelle if
you had to choose just one?  ...or is their a 3rd WG who is better than both in your eyes?
« Last Edit: June 12, 2016, 10:08:36 PM by Tony_Red »

Offline Strikar

And will you be doing yet another positive review for that punt as well?  I only ask because you reviewed this pro$$ie just a month ago.  :rolleyes:

Nope as I'm booked in to see her next month so doubt the anger over what happened will of died down by then.  :angry:

Happy to just update previous reviews going forward, didn't see the issue just been adding reviews as I go. :unknown:


Offline Strikar

No round 2 because round 1 went on for so long meaning your time was up?

Also, money,  location and availability aside, who would YOU pick from Emily Creme Brule or Michelle if
you had to choose just one?  ...or is their a 3rd WG who is better than both in your eyes?

Yep time was slightly over due to taking too long on fore play and DFK. I take s bit of time to recover Henderson the chatting only gone twice in an hour once.

Probably MI but Emily was one of my first and was nervous at the time. Been meaning to revisit and thinking of booking them both for my first MFF if they duo again.

Had a hot time with Appke Pie too but she had a negative or neutral review so haven't been back in a while and she is 100 for 30 mins which I won't pay again.


Offline smiths

I didn't say doing repeat reviews was not permitted by admin, but I think it is fair to say it is standard practice by punters in that updating previous reviews is what the majority of members do in practice and reality.

There are very, very few repeated reviews by members of the same escort where there isn't a material difference, ie a change in rating or different type of service etc.

Either way, I think we're all agreed, 2 similar reviews in quick succession is rather odd.

I have been surprised when reading reviews to see how many have done 2 or more positives on the same WG in a short space of time. Yes I agree 2 positives in a month is a bit odd.

Offline comaminion

I have been surprised when reading reviews to see how many have done 2 or more positives on the same WG in a short space of time. Yes I agree 2 positives in a month is a bit odd.

I dunno could be a genuine mistake I did exactly the same thing when I signed up here just because I genuinely was not aware  :unknown:

But once your told there's no excuse to make the same mistake again
Banning reason: White-knighting

Offline smiths

I dunno could be a genuine mistake I did exactly the same thing when I signed up here just because I genuinely was not aware  :unknown:

But once your told there's no excuse to make the same mistake again

As I said above its not against the rules to do more than 1 positive review on the same WG, admins advice was just don't take the piss, so a review a month I view as taking the piss myself but a review every 6 months or so I don't. So its not necessarily a case of the punter making a mistake like you did, in some cases presumably the punter is purposely doing more than 1 positive review on the same WG in a short period of time.

Different I know but there is also a punter on here that in about 18 months has done 8 positive reviews on the same party provider out of his 14 reviews AND 1 of those is on another party that was also run by the same people who ran the 8. Now that to me is what I call excessive. Sure there might be different WGs at some of these parties but I think the message is loud and clear, he rates them.
« Last Edit: June 12, 2016, 11:36:14 PM by smiths »




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)