Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Michelle Independent - June West Brompton tour (meeting never happen)  (Read 23405 times)


136 review(s) for Michelle Independent (134 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline smiths

you know that he is a member on here....

Yes assuming its the same person, I see they have made a great contribution to UKP since they joined 3 months or so ago, not one post so far.

Offline Turtle Z

you know that he is a member on here....

I didn't but he's still a prick.

James999

  • Guest
What a twat, he says he doesn't know what the previous feedback was about, why doesn't he just read the fucking words  :dash: obviously one of her lap dogs who does as she / her pimp tells him :unknown:


To STN456, I'd like to take this opportunity to say you're a prick.
Hidden Image/Members Only

Jason

  • Guest

Here are some highlights from the two (External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only) AW reviews External Link/Members Only has written about Michelle so far:
Quote from: stn456 review on Michelle Independent
Wow! Just wow! The photos on her profile just don't do Michelle justice; in person she has got to be one of the most beautiful women I have ever seen.
Quote from: stn456 review on Michelle Independent
A genuine privilege to have met her. Intelligent, truly stunning and very friendly. Treat her well gents.
Quote from: stn456 review on Michelle Independent
Venus de Milo (with arms, and real). Helen of Troy (but alive). Cleopatra (without the crazy). All this and more with Michelle. Treat her well gents.
Quote from: review on Michelle Independent
In terms of the 'mechanical' details of our meeting, that shall remain between myself and Michelle.
Quote from: stn456 review on Michelle Independent
Please can someone find a way for her to complete an April London tour? Not sure I can go a whole month without meeting her. Valar dohaeris Michelle.

Offline Brazilian Martian

Here are some highlights from the two (External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only) AW reviews External Link/Members Only has written about Michelle so far:

This cunt is so far up her ass he can probably taste what she had for breakfast.

Ming

  • Guest
Can't believe this debate is still going on.

She made a mistake, she hasn't apologised and just compounded her error.

Time for everyone to move on???

Ming  :hi:

ClarkeOfTheCourse

  • Guest
Quote
Treat her well gents

Classic  :lol: :lol:

Offline Nagilum

No surprise, somebody will always defend heir favorite. 

To think, all this could have been avoided with one simple apology.

Offline Nagilum

I'm oddly in the mood for a TOFTT.

Offline smiths

Can't believe this debate is still going on.

She made a mistake, she hasn't apologised and just compounded her error.

Time for everyone to move on???

Ming  :hi:

Fuck me, what is it with you people, posters or admin will decide when its time to move on. :rolleyes:

cockneybstrd

  • Guest
Can't believe this debate is still going on.

She made a mistake, she hasn't apologised and just compounded her error.

Time for everyone to move on
???

Ming  :hi:

Not really the recent developments might get more interesting

As I cant prove it just yet but I believe that this STN456 character might have more than one profile on UK Punting one of which may have been banned for being a fluffy cunt, I am just doing some cross referencing before I do my J'Accuse bit.


Offline Turtle Z

Here are some highlights from the two (External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only) AW reviews External Link/Members Only has written about Michelle so far:

It does beg the question, what's the difference between a stalker and a fluffy cunt like this?

Online hendrix

Not really the recent developments might get more interesting

As I cant prove it just yet but I believe that this STN456 character might have more than one profile on UK Punting one of which may have been banned for being a fluffy cunt, I am just doing some cross referencing before I do my J'Accuse bit.

I'll get everyone gathered in the library :thumbsup:

Offline Turtle Z

I am just doing some cross referencing before I do my J'Accuse bit.

Excellent, I'm getting the snacks while I wait for the main event.

Offline SamLP

Fuck me, what is it with you people, posters or admin will decide when its time to move on. :rolleyes:

Exactly, too many prossie fanboys trying to censor peoples comments or using subtle comments to get this to die down, when in reality it would have been put to rest a long time ago if the prossie in question had the decency to offer a genuine apology to the OP rather than bring a shit attitude to this thread. No it wasn't a genuine mistake as her apologists keep saying, because had it been she would have mentioned it, but she was adamant she hadn't had a booking from the OP despite the evidence. I for one am glad she showed her true colours, and there's no doubt she'll probably remain a popular prossie but at least punters can know what a nasty character she can be. In the meantime, it's only natural to keep posting on this thread.

Ming

  • Guest
Exactly, too many prossie fanboys trying to censor peoples comments or using subtle comments to get this to die down,

I am no one's fanboy.

Before making comments like that perhaps you should check peoples background, reviews etc?

Carry on the debate for all I care, as the old saying goes "there's no such thing as bad publicity"

I won't be commenting further on this thread.

Ming  :hi:

Offline The_Don

I am no one's fanboy.

Before making comments like that perhaps you should check peoples background, reviews etc?

Carry on the debate for all I care, as the old saying goes "there's no such thing as bad publicity"

I won't be commenting further on this thread.

Ming  :hi:





Unlike other punting forums, that suppress comments and views. Members may question and reply if they wish. As long as its with in the rules set by Admin



Offline SamLP

I am no one's fanboy.

Before making comments like that perhaps you should check peoples background, reviews etc?

Carry on the debate for all I care, as the old saying goes "there's no such thing as bad publicity"

I won't be commenting further on this thread.

Ming  :hi:

I checked your review of MI and was drawn to how you mentioned you were gently making love. Not that checking your reviews serves any purpose except that you're a West Midlands punters and decided to come to the London board and dictate what we should be doing as regards to this review.

Offline Brazilian Martian

I checked your review of MI and was drawn to how you mentioned you were gently making love. Not that checking your reviews serves any purpose except that you're a West Midlands punters and decided to come to the London board and dictate what we should be doing as regards to this review.

Loool gently making love I've heard it all now what's  next saying thank after you cum :lol:
« Last Edit: June 10, 2016, 08:38:24 pm by Brazilian Martian »

Offline Turtle Z

I checked your review of MI and was drawn to how you mentioned you were gently making love.

To be fair, this is the sort of thing a fluffy fanboy would say.

Offline Cuntminion

Here are some highlights from the two (External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only) AW reviews External Link/Members Only has written about Michelle so far:

Man just seems a cunt in general looking at his field reports

Everyone's entitled to be as fluffy as they want on aw feedback to try shit on another person's negative is low

At least I know how to view his reviews if he ever posts them here

Treat him well gents

Offline Marmalade

Can't believe this debate is still going on.

She made a mistake, she hasn't apologised and just compounded her error.

Time for everyone to move on???

Ming  :hi:

Fuck off. We don't get a hagiographical debate that often.   :cool:



Here are some highlights from the two (External Link/Members Only, External Link/Members Only) AW reviews External Link/Members Only has written about Michelle so far:

Sad thing is, crap like that does a woman more harm than good. It suggests the poster hasn't been let out from the cupboard under the stairs often enough to actually see many women, even in quality magazines. Even if a prossie is relatively good looking, she doesn't look like Venus de Milo (unless you are imagining that while shaging her with one and a half arms behind her back)

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Placebo88

Rating an escort as a good service provider is not the same thing as being a Fanboy , White Knight etc . The purpose of the forum is to point punters in the direction of quality SPs and help them to avoid the dross .

All the fanboy stuff and sickening sycophancy quoted by Jason a few posts up is no good to anyone . The escorts must hate it more than normal punters do ; creepy and deluded , only a small step to stalker . You're paying her for sex like everyone else , just another customer ,no need for that nonsense , show some pride .

I got a WK comment by someone on this thread for giving an objective opinion . Michelle has got it wrong on this occasion , both the contents of the review and her pointless contributions to the thread . That does not suddenly make her a rubbish SP or mean that the best advice to give punters is to avoid her . Rationally no-one can argue that is the case in the face of all the positive punter provided evidence on UKP .

UKP is vital to provide some sort of quality control and hold escorts accountable when they fail to meet expected standards. With escort like Michelle who read it , reviews like this remind them that they have to maintain their game and with any luck make it less likely that poor service will be repeated . Whether it was an oversight , administrative error or something more sinister , the chances of a recurrence will be reduced thanks to this thread happening . The reviewer was spot on .




Offline Turtle Z

Rating an escort as a good service provider is not the same thing as being a Fanboy , White Knight etc . The purpose of the forum is to point punters in the direction of quality SPs and help them to avoid the dross .

All the fanboy stuff and sickening sycophancy quoted by Jason a few posts up is no good to anyone . The escorts must hate it more than normal punters do ; creepy and deluded , only a small step to stalker . You're paying her for sex like everyone else , just another customer ,no need for that nonsense , show some pride .

I got a WK comment by someone on this thread for giving an objective opinion . Michelle has got it wrong on this occasion , both the contents of the review and her pointless contributions to the thread . That does not suddenly make her a rubbish SP or mean that the best advice to give punters is to avoid her . Rationally no-one can argue that is the case in the face of all the positive punter provided evidence on UKP .

UKP is vital to provide some sort of quality control and hold escorts accountable when they fail to meet expected standards. With escort like Michelle who read it , reviews like this remind them that they have to maintain their game and with any luck make it less likely that poor service will be repeated . Whether it was an oversight , administrative error or something more sinister , the chances of a recurrence will be reduced thanks to this thread happening . The reviewer was spot on .

Good post!  :hi:

Offline punk

Good in what way? She made some good posts but I never fancy UKP WGs. They are either 'one of the lads' or (more usually) silly cunts. Bit milfy for me anyway.

She seemed to keep a lot of punters happy.

As for Michelle each to his own,never punted her.I stay away from pornstars and prossies that post on here.
« Last Edit: June 10, 2016, 09:38:17 pm by punk »

Offline distortedbase

I agree. You can't discredit a poster immediately just because they reviewed a highly popular WG. This exact same thing happened with that other WG platinumcindy(sp?), someone had the balls to post a negative reviews and all of a sudden we get other people who are scared of being attacked by the white knights, who lurk on this forum constantly, to post their negative reviews.

It shows the true personality of a WG, when it comes to owning up for their mistake. In this case we found out she is a terrible person who cannot own up to their mistake.

Offline smiths

I am no one's fanboy.

Before making comments like that perhaps you should check peoples background, reviews etc?

Carry on the debate for all I care, as the old saying goes "there's no such thing as bad publicity"

I won't be commenting further on this thread.

Ming  :hi:

See you later then, not trying to close other threads down though I hope. :rolleyes:

Offline smiths

Rating an escort as a good service provider is not the same thing as being a Fanboy , White Knight etc . The purpose of the forum is to point punters in the direction of quality SPs and help them to avoid the dross .

All the fanboy stuff and sickening sycophancy quoted by Jason a few posts up is no good to anyone . The escorts must hate it more than normal punters do ; creepy and deluded , only a small step to stalker . You're paying her for sex like everyone else , just another customer ,no need for that nonsense , show some pride .

I got a WK comment by someone on this thread for giving an objective opinion . Michelle has got it wrong on this occasion , both the contents of the review and her pointless contributions to the thread . That does not suddenly make her a rubbish SP or mean that the best advice to give punters is to avoid her . Rationally no-one can argue that is the case in the face of all the positive punter provided evidence on UKP .

UKP is vital to provide some sort of quality control and hold escorts accountable when they fail to meet expected standards. With escort like Michelle who read it , reviews like this remind them that they have to maintain their game and with any luck make it less likely that poor service will be repeated . Whether it was an oversight , administrative error or something more sinister , the chances of a recurrence will be reduced thanks to this thread happening . The reviewer was spot on .

Yes good post. :thumbsup: IF the effect is she now ensures she offers ALL her genuine punters a good service then this thread has served a very good purpose in my opinion.

ClarkeOfTheCourse

  • Guest
Yes good post. :thumbsup: IF the effect is she now ensures she offers ALL her genuine punters a good service then this thread has served a very good purpose in my opinion.

I doubt it very much, with her attitude in this thread. Not straight away anyway, if she starts to get less busy she'll realise what a PR gaffe her comments were.

James999

  • Guest
She doesn't give a fuck, remember she's the pro$$ie that used to time clients with an egg timer to make sure they didn't get an extra minute  :music:

ClarkeOfTheCourse

  • Guest
If she tried that with me I'd shove the thing up her arse

Estoril

  • Guest
If she tried that with me I'd shove the thing up her arse

I can't find this on her likes list

Offline Dicky

If she tried that with me I'd shove the thing up her arse

Relax mate...am sure you wouldnt dream of doing that in real life at the risk of being the queen's guest (I can almost read the headline in The Sun), so why the bravado here  :timeout:

Never heard the egg timer story though...this girl has a nasty streak!

Offline Turtle Z

If she tried that with me I'd shove the thing up her arse

She charges extra for that!

ClarkeOfTheCourse

  • Guest
She charges extra for that!

Of course. Standard EE prossie rules!

Offline Marmalade

Michelle has got it wrong on this occasion , both the contents of the review and her pointless contributions to the thread . That does not suddenly make her a rubbish SP

No, but it makes her rubbish on that or those occasions. Whether she repeats it and becomes a rubbish SP is yet to be seen. Punters have a right to know SP fuck ups snd make up their own mind on whether risking their money is worth it.

Quote
or mean that the best advice to give punters is to avoid her . Rationally no-one can argue that is the case in the face of all the positive punter provided evidence on UKP .

Well rationally then can and it is up them. The fact that a prossie was great in the past is no guarantee she continues to be great.
« Last Edit: June 11, 2016, 08:16:12 am by Marmalade »

brolin_76

  • Guest
Summary
Bookings have been made and not honoured by Michelle, when asked about this she claims to know nothing about them, despite conclusive proof from AW they were made and agreed, this is furhter evidenced by the fact feedback was left on her profile, with her not knowing about these matters can only mean that someone else is managing her profile / e mails / bookings, be it a "boyfriend" / Pimp / "Manager"  :unknown:

And the Polish arrogance shows through in her inability to even apologise to the clients.

thanks James for summing up. so it looks like someone is handling her profile and managing her bookings. and she is silent now to give any reasonable explanation for the case of OP.  :cool:

Offline dubs


Never heard the egg timer story though...this girl has a nasty streak!

Looks like its from some AW feedback about 4 years ago, but if you search for "egg timer" its clear that James & JRC like to remind the forum of it as often as they can - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=8355.0  :rolleyes:

Interesting posts from JRC in that thread, its like a UKP rom-com where initially the two stars hate each other but you know they are going to wind up in bed together by the end.   Michelle -> :kissgirl: <- JRC

Offline nervyfooker


... a UKP rom-com...

'Man meets girl
Man hands over £140
Man fucks girl
Girl fakes enjoyment
Man leaves, girl now happier
Girl checks phone,next punter on the way
Girl sighs,stands behind door, ready to open...'

I'll get on to Richard Curtis.



Offline Marmalade

Looks like its from some AW feedback about 4 years ago, but if you search for "egg timer" its clear that James & JRC like to remind the forum of it as often as they can - https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=8355.0  :rolleyes:

Interesting posts from JRC in that thread, its like a UKP rom-com where initially the two stars hate each other but you know they are going to wind up in bed together by the end.   Michelle -> :kissgirl: <- JRC

More details needed. James could've been quoting something metaphorical. Egg timers literally would be 3 minute bookings or 5 minutes for hard-boiled prossies.

Offline Marmalade

Where's JRC buggered off to? Poking whores in Pattaya again then telling us they're all ugly but going back as soon as his cab tips return to shagging levels?

Offline Marmalade

Are M's tits 'natural' as claimed on her profile? (Or has M-handler not updated that bit since she started?) Looking through the pics in her public gallery and they're all assorted sizes!

And for any the fact-checkers standing outside in the rain, here's her advertised times. Be sure to check your confirmed booking 5 minutes beforehand and bring your umbrella and plan B.

2nd June- 3pm till 6pm
3rd June- 11am till 6pm
4th June- FULLY BOOKED

13th June- 11am till 6pm
14th June- 11am till 6pm
15th June- 11am till 6pm
16th June- 4pm till 6pm
17th June- 11am till 5pm
18th June 11am till 6pm

20th June- 11am till 6pm
21st June- 11am till 6pm
22nd June -11am till 6pm
23rd June- 11am till 6pm
24th June- 11am till 6pm

27th June- 11am till 6pm
28th June- 11am till 6pm

I seem to recall that JRC gave her a fluffy review once, maybe she should put that on her profile together with other historical 'information.'  :hi:

Offline The_Don

« Last Edit: June 11, 2016, 07:43:05 pm by The_Don »

Offline Marmalade

Some kitchen timers look like egg timers...

Hidden Image/Members Only

She used to use a large egg timer, not something she has denied, I am pleased to hear she has abandoned that ridiculous idea. :thumbsup:

But if the egg timer was set for an hour and wasn't started till the action began I wouldn't have a problem with that. Clock-watcher maybe, but time for money paid (as opposed to girls who time it from opening the door and then waste as much time as they can).

I think on re-reading SamLP and Kim's posts they are perfectly correct to vent their frustration, all good info. But I would say re Kim that sending a prossie proof that she messed you about is not a way to get her to correct it. She just takes that as argumentative and won't see you even if you're right. When I read profiles I assume a prossie-cultural level of lying. It depends how far they push it. To me 'fully booked' can mean 'I'm going shopping but prefer to look busy' but it still means not available. Whereas if she emails a confirmation of the booking and denies it, that to me is unacceptable lying. If she confirms a booking by means of the AW booking system and then denies it it either means her pimp has confirmed it but she's going shopping or her pimp hasn't told her; or she's bumped you for a more lucrative booking (either are totally unacceptable).


Offline Marmalade

She seems very happy as this review hit 4000+ views -----
Whereas to me this is offputting. You are about to stick your cock in and the thought comes "4000 cocks have been here first".

I know prossies that deliberately try to keep their reviews to a more demure number . . .

Don, yeah she's got more than eleven pages and it couldn't be a fuckedupprossiegate with less; but having lots of pages won't qualify it either IMO, it has to be interesting I would think. More meat needed.

Offline Marmalade

Yes

So why are they tiny on one photo, big on another, and droopy on yet another?

Offline The_Don

Yes

+1


She used to use a large egg timer


I've not seen that.


But I have seen a pig timer. On another punt, with a different W/G  :thumbsdown:

Boarder line Neutral / Negative

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


The girl:   She was dressed in a towel and wound up a pig timer (like an egg timer but a pig)



Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: June 11, 2016, 07:57:16 pm by The_Don »

Offline Marmalade

So why are they tiny on one photo, big on another, and droopy on yet another?

I repeat my question.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

I know lying down accounts for some difference but it just looks a lot. How do you know they are natural? The best fake tits these days do feel natural. But unless one photo was taken when she was a teenager, a woman's tits in her twenties don't naturally change that much without the help of babies or implants.

Offline LondonPunter69

I repeat my question.

I know lying down accounts for some difference but it just looks a lot. How do you know they are natural? The best fake tits these days do feel natural. But unless one photo was taken when she was a teenager, a woman's tits in her twenties don't naturally change that much without the help of babies or implants.

Her arms bunch them up a little, making them seem bigger than they are?