Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Michelle Independent - June West Brompton tour (meeting never happen)  (Read 23422 times)


136 review(s) for Michelle Independent (134 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by ]

OldAdmin

  • Guest
I once had a banned fluffy send me email asking for another chance, he said the prossie wouldn't see him again, the prossie he white-knighted and got banned for.

That was funny given he expected some kind of special treatment from her.

There will be some on here expecting the same for their valiant efforts :rolleyes:

Offline Placebo88

Nervyfooker brought it up not me and I agree with him, why do you keep on bringing it up when you already mentioned it in a previous thread?

Anyway she could have dealt with things better in this thread and I'm not going to defend her but I at least pride myself in being a fair person, she could easily have said sorry it was an admin error, my bad and moved on. Op provided proof and she can't really argue with him on his occasion, but with you their is a case to argue which she did. Telling someone you aren't available when you are isn't the end of the world, if you found out then so be it she lied to you because she didn't want to/couldn't see you for what ever reason.

She kind of did in reply 31 with the words "Absolute fucking bollocks". My point is she can't really disagree with OP, verdict is pretty much guilty on that one. With you she seems to actually have some ground in disagreeing with you but by the looks of it that will just be a case of he said she said which isn't what we need here, it's just unnecessary drama (unless we all want drama then by all means go ahead I will shove a bag of popcorn in the microwave), we like solid evidence of a girl fucking up like op provided, no grey area just solid black and white for us to decide on and say "yeah you fucked it love".

To be honest I've been in the same boat as you and I can sympathies a bit, I've been lied to before but instead of whining about it I just moved on, if they don't want my money then fine by me, spend it else where, lying isn't the worst thing a WG can do.

I agree with all of this .

Giving a false reason of not working instead of admitting to already being fully booked is no skin off the enquiring punters nose;same outcome , no time wasted , not been messed around .It's not a great idea for escorts to give out too many details of bookings they have lined up, discretion and all that , and some precious punter's don't wanted to hear " sorry , I'm already shagging x number of blokes on Saturday " .

The important part of this thread is the review and it is clear cut . Michelle has made a mistake , no-one is infallible . As she is a member her explanation of events would have been appreciated to tie things up , but that is her call to make .This negative is warranted , so are the close to 100 positives . It all goes together to provide an overall picture .

Offline SamLP

I agree with all of this .

Giving a false reason of not working instead of admitting to already being fully booked is no skin off the enquiring punters nose;same outcome , no time wasted , not been messed around .It's not a great idea for escorts to give out too many details of bookings they have lined up, discretion and all that , and some precious punter's don't wanted to hear " sorry , I'm already shagging x number of blokes on Saturday " .

The important part of this thread is the review and it is clear cut . Michelle has made a mistake , no-one is infallible . As she is a member her explanation of events would have been appreciated to tie things up , but that is her call to make .This negative is warranted , so are the close to 100 positives . It all goes together to provide an overall picture .

Nice of you to white knight her but she had no issue telling me she was fully booked not just for the day but for her full tour when I enquired during her London tours. The fact is she has been caught out lying a few times, but some wk's are insistent on excusing her and putting the blame on the punter.

Offline Marmalade

Ever known a woman admit she was wrong??? Doesn't happen.   :wacko:

Even a woman apologising is a way of playing for time.

Haven't read all the thread but sorry if you got bumped mate.  :hi:

ClarkeOfTheCourse

  • Guest
Now she's got herself 2 AW negatives in the space of 24 hours for poor organisation skills. That attitude is really working out well for her.

Offline rockharders

Oh dear someones upset a forum darling and the white knights are already crawling out the woodwork.

Get out the popcorn and see how many survive this round :yahoo:

Offline Marmalade

Now she's got herself 2 AW negatives in the space of 24 hours for poor organisation skills.

If a second hand car salesman sold you a bummer, would you lament his 'poor organisation skills' I wonder?

Offline Brazilian Martian

Funny how guys get so defensive over their favourite prossie

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline Cunning Punt

Or do you actually mean that you expected from him to propose by himself a booking re-arrangement at a discounted rate while you didn't even offer him an apology but replied with an aggressive attitude telling him that might have blocked him?

Yes, that line from her was ridiculous.

As if he is going to send another message asking for an alternative booking at a discounted rate, when she's been adamant he got it wrong and hadn't made a booking, was rude to him and said she would block him - if he took that as her word his message wouldn't get through anyway!

That's the point.

JuliusSeizure

  • Guest
I called her out as a liar and will continue to do so because in my experience she lied and the only reason I brought it up on this thread was to back the OP that she's lied before....

....I moved on a long time ago but that doesn't stop me from making my point which you're so insistent on censoring. You've reviewed her twice and your actions IMO are just white knighting her and moving the focus away from the real point which is the actual review.

That's my point, you're both calling each other liars, so what do you do when it's a game of he said she said? Yes it's a punters forum but that doesn't mean we believe everything anyone says here, we shouldn't be immune from being unchecked and unquestioned just because we're members (Best example look up West8). Don't even tell me there is not one person who you see on this forum you see and just think to yourself "Bullshit, everything you just wrote is bullshit......" For a few that's probably me, I accept that because I can even see myself being a pain in the arse here.

But since you bring up my previous reviews of her (Only reason I did a second was because it was a threesome which adds something worth reviewing) did you check out the one with her and Emily? I was questioned quite heavily about Emily's age and instead of dodging I answered the question and when I wrote that post I was expecting to be questioned about it. Plain and simple, if you write something about a girl then don't expect to not be questioned about what you wrote, people ask questions.

I'm not calling a you a liar and never did, I'm just questioning what you said as Michelle disputed it, am I just supposed to completely ignore that she said that? Am I not allowed to do that now without being branded a "white knight"? I would rather have a bit of integrity at the expense of being called a white knight than believe anything anyone says here. But just an FYI, I agree with OP's decision and he made a booking which was confirmed which didn't happen, that in my eyes is a negative and she got a negative which is deserved, end of story. Any girl which has stood me up before with no reason I have given a negative before and I think the same applies to any girl, no exceptions. But if you want to brand me a white knight then go ahead, it doesn't effect me in the slightest.




Offline smiths

I once had a banned fluffy send me email asking for another chance, he said the prossie wouldn't see him again, the prossie he white-knighted and got banned for.

That was funny given he expected some kind of special treatment from her.

There will be some on here expecting the same for their valiant efforts :rolleyes:

Indeed which is why you chopping some of these white knight fanboys down HAS been so good in my view. :thumbsup: They are a cancer on punting, they seek to undermine UKP and will defend their "loved ones" to the hilt be that out of sheer love, or because they do get something in return like a free punt. After all to some WGs opening their legs for a freebie in return for being defended on here could be a very good deal for them given the proven effect positive reviews on here can have with WGs getting more punters. This is clear to see with forum darlings who are booked up, some also put their rates up and start dictating to punters that they need A/W feedback. :thumbsdown:

Offline smiths

That's my point, you're both calling each other liars, so what do you do when it's a game of he said she said? Yes it's a punters forum but that doesn't mean we believe everything anyone says here, we shouldn't be immune from being unchecked and unquestioned just because we're members (Best example look up West8). Don't even tell me there is not one person who you see on this forum you see and just think to yourself "Bullshit, everything you just wrote is bullshit......" For a few that's probably me, I accept that because I can even see myself being a pain in the arse here.

But since you bring up my previous reviews of her (Only reason I did a second was because it was a threesome which adds something worth reviewing) did you check out the one with her and Emily? I was questioned quite heavily about Emily's age and instead of dodging I answered the question and when I wrote that post I was expecting to be questioned about it. Plain and simple, if you write something about a girl then don't expect to not be questioned about what you wrote, people ask questions.

I'm not calling a you a liar and never did, I'm just questioning what you said as Michelle disputed it, am I just supposed to completely ignore that she said that? Am I not allowed to do that now without being branded a "white knight"? I would rather have a bit of integrity at the expense of being called a white knight than believe anything anyone says here. But just an FYI, I agree with OP's decision and he made a booking which was confirmed which didn't happen, that in my eyes is a negative and she got a negative which is deserved, end of story. Any girl which has stood me up before with no reason I have given a negative before and I think the same applies to any girl, no exceptions. But if you want to brand me a white knight then go ahead, it doesn't effect me in the slightest.

It comes down to your views on the credibility of the poster obviously. Now to ME SamLP is one of the most credible punters on here in London and I take his word above any WGs. As to West8 I called him out long before he was banned and it was me that named him the Snake which is what he was. He was a look at me, me, me poster like that megalomaniac Infoseeker, extreme attention seekers, and personally I am very glad both were banned.

FlyingBreadMan

  • Guest
Indeed which is why you chopping some of these white knight fanboys down HAS been so good in my view. :thumbsup: They are a cancer on punting, they seek to undermine UKP and will defend their "loved ones" to the hilt be that out of sheer love, or because they do get something in return like a free punt. After all to some WGs opening their legs for a freebie in return for being defended on here could be a very good deal for them given the proven effect positive reviews on here can have with WGs getting more punters. This is clear to see with forum darlings who are booked up, some also put their rates up and start dictating to punters that they need A/W feedback. :thumbsdown:

Just curious, maybe I don't pick up the subtle side of White Knights, but I didn't see any obvious "defence" of her. Who is white knighting?

See that everyone here sympathises with op.
i "never" use booking systems as I am a spontaneous punter so do know how it feels to be let down for an advanced booking.

Offline smiths

Just curious, maybe I don't pick up the subtle side of White Knights, but I didn't see any obvious "defence" of her. Who is white knighting?

See that everyone here sympathises with op.
i "never" use booking systems as I am a spontaneous punter so do know how it feels to be let down for an advanced booking.

The post you quoted was my general view from experience and observation of being a member on here for years.

FlyingBreadMan

  • Guest
The post you quoted was my general view from experience and observation of being a member on here for years.

Right, OK.

I thought shit - I must be missing something.

Anyway, gonna go do some f*cking in Germany later in the week! Fkk club reports coming your way! Wish me luck!

James999

  • Guest
Just curious, maybe I don't pick up the subtle side of White Knights, but I didn't see any obvious "defence" of her. Who is white knighting?

Here's an example, another pro$$ie trying to rubbish the review for no other reason than her desire to defend another pro$$ie  :thumbsdown:

Brought it on herself ?? Hmmm sounds like a mess up on maybe both behalfs and  u sound like a guy with a chip on his shoulder 9 months zero post dodgy some might say .... Call me a a cynic if u wish
« Last Edit: June 07, 2016, 10:09:11 pm by James999 »

Offline smiths

Right, OK.

I thought shit - I must be missing something.

Anyway, gonna go do some f*cking in Germany later in the week! Fkk club reports coming your way! Wish me luck!

Good luck. :thumbsup:

FlyingBreadMan

  • Guest
Good luck. :thumbsup:

At least there you don't fuck about with booking systems - just tap a girl on the shoulder, "shall we go?" And bliss follows!

Offline SamLP

That's my point, you're both calling each other liars, so what do you do when it's a game of he said she said? Yes it's a punters forum but that doesn't mean we believe everything anyone says here, we shouldn't be immune from being unchecked and unquestioned just because we're members (Best example look up West8). Don't even tell me there is not one person who you see on this forum you see and just think to yourself "Bullshit, everything you just wrote is bullshit......" For a few that's probably me, I accept that because I can even see myself being a pain in the arse here.

But since you bring up my previous reviews of her (Only reason I did a second was because it was a threesome which adds something worth reviewing) did you check out the one with her and Emily? I was questioned quite heavily about Emily's age and instead of dodging I answered the question and when I wrote that post I was expecting to be questioned about it. Plain and simple, if you write something about a girl then don't expect to not be questioned about what you wrote, people ask questions.

I'm not calling a you a liar and never did, I'm just questioning what you said as Michelle disputed it, am I just supposed to completely ignore that she said that? Am I not allowed to do that now without being branded a "white knight"? I would rather have a bit of integrity at the expense of being called a white knight than believe anything anyone says here. But just an FYI, I agree with OP's decision and he made a booking which was confirmed which didn't happen, that in my eyes is a negative and she got a negative which is deserved, end of story. Any girl which has stood me up before with no reason I have given a negative before and I think the same applies to any girl, no exceptions. But if you want to brand me a white knight then go ahead, it doesn't effect me in the slightest.

Maybe you're acting stupid or maybe you haven't read the replies well enough. MI never called me a liar. She's disputing the notion that she is one because in her opinion whether she told me she was busy or not working that day it's all the same to her. I happen to disagree. It's even mentioned in the other review I linked earlier. Now comparing me to West8 is quite extreme and quite a sloppy comparison. You have a funny way of saying I'm not lying when all you've done is question me, which is why I stand by my comments that you're white knighting.

Offline punk

cant be bothered to write "IMO" after every statement, so all which follows is...my opinion....

maybe not compared to others...but evidently have a lot more common sense, a bit of which from all parties instead of saying op is talking bs would have been a better approach.

so how about this...we ask for proof of a good/bad punt regardless of how many reviews the punter had??? sound reasonable???

my issue is not with MI or what the op had to say, issue is people in the first instance questioned it without any valid reason. yes, there are many fake reviews positive and negative, and if you people think its fake, then its fine to say so, and move on, but no one should have to prove anything. if you dont believe them, thats really your prerogative. end of the day, this is a punting forum, nothing here is so important that members need to provide proof.

also no issues with proof being provided, but not because members demand it. this forum isnt to resolve disputes, its for an exchange of information and nothing else.

 i think i have spent enough time on this thread, so i shall say my adieu....

"Mountains and mole hills..."

As i stated in the other post to yours,the reason the op was asked by other punters for a screen shot was because the punter has zero credibility,his very first post was  a negative review after registering  on here last september.

In the past this site has had malicious reviews from pimps,other prossies,the Prossie herself or even established punters with hidden agendas (there has been many examples).




Offline punk

At least there you don't fuck about with booking systems - just tap a girl on the shoulder, "shall we go?" And bliss follows!

Isn't that what usually happens when its a thursday,friday or saturday night in this country?  :unknown:

vt

  • Guest
Isn't that what usually happens when its a thursday,friday or saturday night in this country?  :unknown:

Not when you're overweight, balding and the wrong side of 40!!  :D

Offline punk

Not when you're overweight, balding and the wrong side of 40!!  :D

 :cry:

JuliusSeizure

  • Guest
Maybe you're acting stupid or maybe you haven't read the replies well enough. MI never called me a liar. She's disputing the notion that she is one because in her opinion whether she told me she was busy or not working that day it's all the same to her. I happen to disagree. It's even mentioned in the other review I linked earlier. Now comparing me to West8 is quite extreme and quite a sloppy comparison. You have a funny way of saying I'm not lying when all you've done is question me, which is why I stand by my comments that you're white knighting.

I was taking the original dispute as she is calling you a liar for calling her a liar about the being available on the Saturday when she wasn't. That is the wavelength were supposed to be on right?

It's fine for you to disagree Sam, if no one disagreed or questioned anything on this site then it would be a shit show of everyone circlejerking each other. But because we question and disagree with each other we can snuff out the bullshitters and liars that's why we no longer have people like West8 that was the point I was trying to make (Sorry if it came across as I was comparing him to you I wasn't, nobody here deserves that) otherwise why would we have a comment section in the review section? Us being able to comment is for us to ask questions. Don't take offense if you feel like i'm vetting you it's just how it is, I've been through the process and so has loads of other people here, you think you smell an ounce of bullshit then you call it, even if your wrong it's better to be sure you're wrong then do nothing.

If you think I'm a white knight then again, so be it. I'm not here to make people like me and be there friends, I'm here to discuss girls who I potential want to see, have seen and report back and keep myself safe by looking at others reviews to avoid the bad ones.

 

Offline SamLP

I was taking the original dispute as she is calling you a liar for calling her a liar about the being available on the Saturday when she wasn't. That is the wavelength were supposed to be on right?

It's fine for you to disagree Sam, if no one disagreed or questioned anything on this site then it would be a shit show of everyone circlejerking each other. But because we question and disagree with each other we can snuff out the bullshitters and liars that's why we no longer have people like West8 that was the point I was trying to make (Sorry if it came across as I was comparing him to you I wasn't, nobody here deserves that) otherwise why would we have a comment section in the review section? Us being able to comment is for us to ask questions. Don't take offense if you feel like i'm vetting you it's just how it is, I've been through the process and so has loads of other people here, you think you smell an ounce of bullshit then you call it, even if your wrong it's better to be sure you're wrong then do nothing.

If you think I'm a white knight then again, so be it. I'm not here to make people like me and be there friends, I'm here to discuss girls who I potential want to see, have seen and report back and keep myself safe by looking at others reviews to avoid the bad ones.

So let me get this straight. I'm being questioned by you because somehow I don't fit into your integrity list for some reason yet MI can easily just say bullshit and you're fine with that. You haven't questioned her at all. Yes that's why you're being called out as a WK. if you read her reply she added that it's not relevant whether she told me she wasn't working that day or fully booked. She also mentions in the other review that she "probably" wasn't working that day. Your argument is sloppy tbh and your assertions about integrity and questioning is an excuse to white knight. I do in fact have her texts and if she can prove her story I will happily prove mine, but as shown in this thread she is a liar and has weaseled out of offering any explanation or apology to the OP, has replied aggressively towards me and shown a general bad attitude which other punters have commented on, of course except you as you still insist on putting the burden if truth on punters. I honestly don't need to pass your integrity test and any response from you I will regard as pure and simple white knighting.

JuliusSeizure

  • Guest

So let me get this straight. I'm being questioned by you because somehow I don't fit into your integrity list for some reason yet MI can easily just say bullshit and you're fine with that. You haven't questioned her at all. Yes that's why you're being called out as a WK. if you read her reply she added that it's not relevant whether she told me she wasn't working that day or fully booked.

She also mentions in the other review that she "probably" wasn't working that day. Your argument is sloppy tbh and your assertions about integrity and questioning is an excuse to white knight. I do in fact have her texts and if she can prove her story I will happily prove mine, but as shown in this thread she is a liar and has weaseled out of offering any explanation or apology to the OP, has replied aggressively towards me and shown a general bad attitude which other punters have commented on, of course except you as you still insist on putting the burden if truth on punters. I honestly don't need to pass your integrity test and any response from you I will regard as pure and simple white knighting.

I never said I don't question her, when did I say I didn't? I question both of you and why I've disregarded the entire argument for the time being, you can't just make a passing comment of "Oh guys, she lied to be once! Would you believe it, someone told a lie!" and expect us to 100% believe you after she comes and says different. I'm telling people to look at it and maybe think twice.

It's hardly a burden when I'm asking a simple question of why I should believe you when the person you called a liar turns up and says otherwise. I don't get how that is hard for you to understand, why should I believe you? But instead all you did was cry white knight hoping for people to latch on to it like a trigger word when I questioned you and reported me to Admin (https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=99480.0), maybe you try going thicker skin for when someone doesn't agree with you instead of crying about it.........
 


Offline SamLP

You've changed your tune because from your earlier replies you "agreed" to the comment that I was being precious and then you said you disagreed with samlp. That seems to me that you already made your own mind up and started to dig at me, yet didn't once question MI. In my eyes that's white knighting and sly. You've talked about integrity but your stance lacks it completely. The sly slur about growing a thicker skin is your defence at white knighting. I will report what I see fit and all you've done is deflect away from MI's behaviour and divert the thread away from its point because you had this sudden urge to show your "integrity".

JuliusSeizure

  • Guest

The sly slur about growing a thicker skin is your defence at white knighting. I will report what I see fit and all you've done is deflect away from MI's behaviour and divert the thread away from its point because you had this sudden urge to show your "integrity".


And you calling me a white knight is literally the only defense you have in this entire argument and it's a shit one. I bothered to question you about it and all you've done is call me a white knight, well done, great argument there mate.

I don't know why you keep on mentioning me diverting it away from Michelle's behaviour, I've said I also disagree with the way she handled things in this thread......Multiple times. But if you really think I've had an effect on that happening then here's the beauty of it, if you would have just left it at the other thread and not commented here, Michelle would not have called Bollocks and none of this would have happened. But no......You had to chime in with a pointless comment, congratulations.

But for the record that was never my objective, I just want people to read an argument and maybe not believe whatever people write here, you never really know who is a West8.........Oh and just as another perspective on this, if I wanted to be a white knight for Michelle I would want this thread to have as little exposure as possible but by me and you arguing it's stayed at the top of the London review section for the past 24 hours, is that something a white knight would do? Anyway I'm going to bed and this argument is going no where. If you want to waste your time replying feel free to do so but I'm done here.......

InstaPunt

  • Guest
Fucking hell this is tragic. The op who had a booking confirmed by the escort has every right to be angry by her reaction to him on the day when she either didn't remember/deleted the message, couldn't be fucked, or found something/someone better to do. Its very telling that i don't think the escort replied to the op either to contest him , acknowledge , or apologise; well at least not initially.

The second guy who then came on making a big deal about her lying to him about not working Saturdays has absolutely no reason to be bitching. If an escort says she can't see you she doesn't have to give you a reason, if you insist she can lie, if she doesn't want to work Saturdays for you but is willing to work Saturday for another guy then that's her business. The  commitment and duty from both sides only starts when the booking is agreed to then each party owes an honest explanation if for whatever reason they have to cancel.

Also people should remember we view these girls as whores, to balance it out and make themselves feel better many view us as guys having to pay for sex and deep down don't respect us or give two fucks about us. Yes their stereotype of punters is often wrong but unless if your obviously rich and look like someone who can pull civi girls that's what most will believe. As such when they don't think that they have to be polite the mask will drop. As the op found out on the day of her booking he wasn't a regular and she realises he probably won't become one so her mask dropped.

Offline SamLP

It's going nowhere because you insist on making me the focus, yet you haven't placed the same questions or indeed any question to MI. you've taken her petty words and have decided I am untruthful and need to prove something to you. That's why you're a white knight. It's a valid observation as opposed to you ignoring my claims and repeating the same mantra over and over again. You decided to make it personal directly after I said I would provide a copy of the texts if she can back her claims. Conveniently ignored by you of course.

Some white knights are stupid or believe they are too clever, so your argument is invalid.

Offline SamLP

Fucking hell this is tragic. The op who had a booking confirmed by the escort has every right to be angry by her reaction to him on the day when she either didn't remember/deleted the message, couldn't be fucked, or found something/someone better to do. Its very telling that i don't think the escort replied to the op either to contest him , acknowledge , or apologise; well at least not initially.

The second guy who then came on making a big deal about her lying to him about not working Saturdays has absolutely no reason to be bitching. If an escort says she can't see you she doesn't have to give you a reason, if you insist she can lie, if she doesn't want to work Saturdays for you but is willing to work Saturday for another guy then that's her business. The  commitment and duty from both sides only starts when the booking is agreed to then each party owes an honest explanation if for whatever reason they have to cancel.

Also people should remember we view these girls as whores, to balance it out and make themselves feel better many view us as guys having to pay for sex and deep down don't respect us or give two fucks about us. Yes their stereotype of punters is often wrong but unless if your obviously rich and look like someone who can pull civi girls that's what most will believe. As such when they don't think that they have to be polite the mask will drop. As the op found out on the day of her booking he wasn't a regular and she realises he probably won't become one so her mask dropped.

Fuck off, it isn't bitching. Where do you dumb fuckers come from. I made a comment based on my experience, and then it spiralled because MI decided to respond with a churlish remark and her white knights jumped in. Nobody asked her to work on the Saturday. It was an enquiry and her response turned out to be a lie. I never asked for an explanation but my mind was made that she's a liar. As for your psycho bullshit, keep that to yourself.

InstaPunt

  • Guest
I made a comment based on my experience, and then it spiralled because MI decided to respond with a churlish remark and her white knights jumped in.
As I said its telling that she ignored the OP's legitimate and obvious to all that read it grievance but  she didn't hesitate to respond to your comment and make that the focus. Girls be quite cunning like that.

Offline Hertsgent

I think to summarise some points SamLP

1. Everybody agrees on here that the OP deserves a proper explanation
2. Several posters think whether you were lied to or not is inconsequential - the WG made it clear she couldn't accommodate a booking with you when you want
3. Any of those posters in (2) are treated with short sharp shrift by you - either by using deliberately inflammatory phrases (white knighting etc.....despite point 1), or just general verbal abuse.
4. You went to the post reports section to try to get a post that disagreed with you removed

Obviously this won't be the last word on the subject, because it is clear that you will need to have it. Awful that some people have different views I know, although it would be nice to get back to the original subject.

Offline SamLP

I think to summarise some points SamLP

1. Everybody agrees on here that the OP deserves a proper explanation
2. Several posters think whether you were lied to or not is inconsequential - the WG made it clear she couldn't accommodate a booking with you when you want
3. Any of those posters in (2) are treated with short sharp shrift by you - either by using deliberately inflammatory phrases (white knighting etc.....despite point 1), or just general verbal abuse.
4. You went to the post reports section to try to get a post that disagreed with you removed

Obviously this won't be the last word on the subject, because it is clear that you will need to have it. Awful that some people have different views I know, although it would be nice to get back to the original subject.

Your point 3 doesn't portray the fair image though. I was treated with suspicion and made to be a liar, hence the reaction. I can accept a fair disagreement but not when my honesty is being questioned.
As for point 2, I have repeated time and again that I don't have a problem with not getting a booking. My issue was the lie, and as support to the OP I made the point that in my experience it happened. What took place next is some punters trying to discredit me and twisting the meaning of my words.
As for point 4, I reported what I saw fit to report. I am fully aware the reports section is visible to others and it was reported to bring admins attention to the matter, and not to have the post removed as you've mentioned. There is nothing wrong at all with that and if you're suggesting that we shouldn't report posts and keep things under wrap by the continued WK of a prossie, then you're mistaken.

As for your final point, it was smart but irrelevant. It is indeed awful that some punters have decided to take it in their hands to limit the damage MI caused by moving the attention to my point. She hasn't been questioned at all of course for calling it absolute bollocks, and her attitude in this review hasn't also been called into question by those trying to defend her. On the other hand, those with their eyes open have stated that her reaction and comments (or lack of it) were not suitable.

James999

  • Guest
Another Negative feedback for her yesterday  :thumbsdown:

Negative   tantric talents (25)   07/06/2016 08:40   Seeking Services
    Meeting was cancelled by provider at short notice. Poor reason given and no alternative offered

Offline lewishamguy

She seems very happy as this review hit 4000+ views -----

Quote from: UKE
Wow... I am on over 4000 hotlists now! Thank you gents! ;) growing every day! ❤️

 :sarcastic:

Offline kim88

Just to come back one last time to clarify something.

As Jason says, I too am not sure she messaged Kim about a future booking with a discount. Her post seems to be saying she expected him to propose a future booking and ask for a discount! Lol. Kim can confirm if she really did offer him a discount or not. 

This saga reminds me of my rebel teen years when I would NOT accept my mistake, come what may. Suffered quite a bit too because of it -  almost always ended up digging myself into a hole and burning bridges. As I have matured, I have discovered that a quick and genuine apology creates more goodwill. Sadly this girl does not realise that. Her attitude is a bit despicable and as someone said 'far too up her ass'. Had hoped to see her but is now off my HL as well.  Can see better candidates for my punting money.

As far as I'm concerned, I did not receive a text back from her, offering an alternative, discounted booking. The last time she texted me that day, was that she apparently checked her diary, still insisted she did not receive any bookings from me, that she may have put me on the block list and that's why my booking didn't go through...

At that point, I thought enough was enough. After her first reply, I should have just stopped, but I pressed on a few more times, only to end up being let down by her responses. I wasn't going to set myself up for another disappointment by texting her back again.

And like I said before, I wouldn't have been so annoyed about it, had she not replied back to me with that dismissive tone, acting as though we never corresponded before, and the booking was never made. I'm pretty sure if someone told me we're suppose to have a meeting today, I wouldn't be so quick to simply dismiss it. I'd given him/her the benefit of doubt, asked to clarify when we setup the meeting and look into my diary thoroughly. And if after searching everything and I still can't find a reminder of that meeting, I'd apologise and offer a solution.

Agree with this as verification - just bung it on and then the overall review is valid.

Might be in a minority, but I'd cut out the "brought it on yourself" comments - at best it makes you look like a total wanker, at worst it makes it look like you think you control a WG .

Having went back to review this part, yes. Perhaps that comment wasn't very necessary of me. And I apologse for any wrong impressions that I may have made with this comment. It was a heat of the moment.

As i stated in the other post to yours,the reason the op was asked by other punters for a screen shot was because the punter has zero credibility,his very first post was  a negative review after registering  on here last september.

In the past this site has had malicious reviews from pimps,other prossies,the Prossie herself or even established punters with hidden agendas (there has been many examples).

And I recognize that I'm a punter with zero credibility to start off with, who has lurked around the site for 9 months without making a post until now. And this is one of the most well-reviewed and popular WG on AW, who is also a member on this site, that I'm making quite an allegation against.

I don't expect folks to just take my words at face value. If they're feeling doubtful about my case and wish to ask questions, I don't have any problems whatsoever answering them. And if they want proof, I'll be more than happy to supply it to remove any doubts on their minds. 

Anyways, whether or not I'll ever get the truth from Michelle, I'll probably never know. Maybe she really did forget about our booking and it was just an administration error, maybe someone else had used her account and confirm the booking without her knowledge, maybe another punter came by at the last minute with a better offer and I was pushed aside. I don't know. This is all just speculation.

And after all this, would I give her another chance? I don't know. Maybe.

Offline sushi

She seems very happy as this review hit 4000+ views -----

 :sarcastic:
Yeah sure because she never lies.

Offline LastManCumings

She was off my HL a few months ago for being "too busy to be bothered". Having gone through this thread I'd say I took the right decision and saved my punting ££ for someone better.

Offline Marmalade

Another Negative feedback for her yesterday  :thumbsdown:

Negative   tantric talents (25)   07/06/2016 08:40   Seeking Services
    Meeting was cancelled by provider at short notice. Poor reason given and no alternative offered

Not looking good for her.
But no interaction from her here.
Won't even qualify as a 'michelle-gate' if it doesn't go past at least 11 pages.
Just another prossie-gone-fucked up.

Offline The_Don



She seems very happy as this review hit 4000+ views -----

 :sarcastic:

Won't even qualify as a 'michelle-gate' if it doesn't go past at least 11 pages.


Or over External Link/Members Only

« Last Edit: June 08, 2016, 03:10:09 pm by The_Don »

Persie

  • Guest
She was off my HL a few months ago for being "too busy to be bothered". Having gone through this thread I'd say I took the right decision and saved my punting ££ for someone better.
Is that what she said? I got that vibe and thought fuck 'er....as a result she has lost out on quite a bit of cash from me

Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 3,924
  • Likes: 0
Is that what she said? I got that vibe and thought fuck 'er....as a result she has lost out on quite a bit of cash from me

i dont think he ment thats what she said just that was his vibe?
Banned reason: Ex sex worker with zero useful contribution to make
Banned by: Head1

cockneybstrd

  • Guest
Not looking good for her.
But no interaction from her here.
Won't even qualify as a 'michelle-gate' if it doesn't go past at least 11 pages.
Just another prossie-gone-fucked up.

Very true it does have all the quality of the usual ukpunting gates though

Negative Review for a prossie that a number of members have seen                              Check
Accusations doubting the OP                                                                                     Check
Other members add personal negative experience                                                        check
Some of the more cunt struck among the members attack the OP and the other members check
Members enjoying the car crash                                                                                 check
Members trying to get the thread locked                                                                      check
Members getting banned for being White Knights for refusing to believe that the number 1 socket could behave in any way poorly... well that is probably going to come at some point
« Last Edit: June 08, 2016, 03:53:20 pm by cockneybstrd »

Offline dubs


Won't even qualify as a 'michelle-gate' if it doesn't go past at least 11 pages.


Yeah this is amateur stuff.  A Little Katie thread would have 15 pages, 3 banned white knights and 2 positive reviews in response by now.

cockneybstrd

  • Guest
Yeah this is amateur stuff.  A Little Katie thread would have 15 pages, 3 banned white knights and 2 positive reviews in response by now.

i expect Ceaser is rallying the troops for a final all out assault on SamLP

James999

  • Guest
A Little Katie thread would have 15 pages,

Yeah but she was as fit as fuck with a killer arse  :thumbsup:

Offline Bangers and Gash

Is that what she said? I got that vibe and thought fuck 'er....as a result she has lost out on quite a bit of cash from me

Don't worry, you aint missing much. Vain, wooden and unbelievably dull... are possibly her best traits. :dancegirl:

charming_red

  • Guest
She seems very happy as this review hit 4000+ views -----

 :sarcastic:

Shes either goading or gloating and if the latter shes extremely thick to think she'd be added to punters' hotlists based on no. of views.

Besides, and more importantly, I've run out of popcorn!  :music:

InstaPunt

  • Guest
Just to come back one last time to clarify something.

As far as I'm concerned, I did not receive a text back from her, offering an alternative, discounted booking. The last time she texted me that day, was that she apparently checked her diary, still insisted she did not receive any bookings from me, that she may have put me on the block list and that's why my booking didn't go through...

At that point, I thought enough was enough. After her first reply, I should have just stopped, but I pressed on a few more times, only to end up being let down by her responses. I wasn't going to set myself up for another disappointment by texting her back again.

And like I said before, I wouldn't have been so annoyed about it, had she not replied back to me with that dismissive tone, acting as though we never corresponded before, and the booking was never made. I'm pretty sure if someone told me we're suppose to have a meeting today, I wouldn't be so quick to simply dismiss it. I'd given him/her the benefit of doubt, asked to clarify when we setup the meeting and look into my diary thoroughly. And if after searching everything and I still can't find a reminder of that meeting, I'd apologise and offer a solution.

Having went back to review this part, yes. Perhaps that comment wasn't very necessary of me. And I apologse for any wrong impressions that I may have made with this comment. It was a heat of the moment.

And I recognize that I'm a punter with zero credibility to start off with, who has lurked around the site for 9 months without making a post until now. And this is one of the most well-reviewed and popular WG on AW, who is also a member on this site, that I'm making quite an allegation against.

I don't expect folks to just take my words at face value. If they're feeling doubtful about my case and wish to ask questions, I don't have any problems whatsoever answering them. And if they want proof, I'll be more than happy to supply it to remove any doubts on their minds. 

Anyways, whether or not I'll ever get the truth from Michelle, I'll probably never know. Maybe she really did forget about our booking and it was just an administration error, maybe someone else had used her account and confirm the booking without her knowledge, maybe another punter came by at the last minute with a better offer and I was pushed aside. I don't know. This is all just speculation.

And after all this, would I give her another chance? I don't know. Maybe.

Its your business if you see her again but for the life of me i don't understand why you still even consider it as a maybe.

She was dismissive and rude when you texted her on the day of a booking that was planned a month in advance. Both during the text and through her replies on here she has shown absolutely no acknowledgment for the fact that she fucked up your day. A guy who who books a month in advance probably does so due to some specific reason maybe work,  travel, money, wife going away etc yet she doesn't  even pretend to give a shit about having wasted your time and plans. If anything she made a comment that covertly implied you was a 'stalker' simply because you texted her a few times on the day of the appointment. Something that everyone would do when something they are expecting doesn't go to plan.