Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Michelle Independent - June West Brompton tour (meeting never happen)  (Read 16524 times)


115 review(s) for Michelle Independent (112 positive, 0 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline smiths

you know that he is a member on here....

Yes assuming its the same person, I see they have made a great contribution to UKP since they joined 3 months or so ago, not one post so far.

Offline Turtle Z

you know that he is a member on here....

I didn't but he's still a prick.

Offline James999

What a twat, he says he doesn't know what the previous feedback was about, why doesn't he just read the fucking words  :dash: obviously one of her lap dogs who does as she / her pimp tells him :unknown:


To STN456, I'd like to take this opportunity to say you're a prick.


Offline Jason


Here are some highlights from the two (1, 2) AW reviews stn456 has written about Michelle so far:
Quote from: stn456 review on Michelle Independent
Wow! Just wow! The photos on her profile just don't do Michelle justice; in person she has got to be one of the most beautiful women I have ever seen.
Quote from: stn456 review on Michelle Independent
A genuine privilege to have met her. Intelligent, truly stunning and very friendly. Treat her well gents.
Quote from: stn456 review on Michelle Independent
Venus de Milo (with arms, and real). Helen of Troy (but alive). Cleopatra (without the crazy). All this and more with Michelle. Treat her well gents.
Quote from: review on Michelle Independent
In terms of the 'mechanical' details of our meeting, that shall remain between myself and Michelle.
Quote from: stn456 review on Michelle Independent
Please can someone find a way for her to complete an April London tour? Not sure I can go a whole month without meeting her. Valar dohaeris Michelle.

Here are some highlights from the two (1, 2) AW reviews stn456 has written about Michelle so far:

This cunt is so far up her ass he can probably taste what she had for breakfast.

Offline Ming

Can't believe this debate is still going on.

She made a mistake, she hasn't apologised and just compounded her error.

Time for everyone to move on???

Ming  :hi:

Quote
Treat her well gents

Classic  :lol: :lol:

Offline Nagilum

No surprise, somebody will always defend heir favorite. 

To think, all this could have been avoided with one simple apology.

Offline Nagilum

I'm oddly in the mood for a TOFTT.

Offline smiths

Can't believe this debate is still going on.

She made a mistake, she hasn't apologised and just compounded her error.

Time for everyone to move on???

Ming  :hi:

Fuck me, what is it with you people, posters or admin will decide when its time to move on. :rolleyes:

Can't believe this debate is still going on.

She made a mistake, she hasn't apologised and just compounded her error.

Time for everyone to move on
???

Ming  :hi:

Not really the recent developments might get more interesting

As I cant prove it just yet but I believe that this STN456 character might have more than one profile on UK Punting one of which may have been banned for being a fluffy cunt, I am just doing some cross referencing before I do my J'Accuse bit.


Offline Turtle Z

Here are some highlights from the two (1, 2) AW reviews stn456 has written about Michelle so far:

It does beg the question, what's the difference between a stalker and a fluffy cunt like this?

Offline hendrix

Not really the recent developments might get more interesting

As I cant prove it just yet but I believe that this STN456 character might have more than one profile on UK Punting one of which may have been banned for being a fluffy cunt, I am just doing some cross referencing before I do my J'Accuse bit.

I'll get everyone gathered in the library :thumbsup:

Offline Turtle Z

I am just doing some cross referencing before I do my J'Accuse bit.

Excellent, I'm getting the snacks while I wait for the main event.

Offline SamLP

Fuck me, what is it with you people, posters or admin will decide when its time to move on. :rolleyes:

Exactly, too many prossie fanboys trying to censor peoples comments or using subtle comments to get this to die down, when in reality it would have been put to rest a long time ago if the prossie in question had the decency to offer a genuine apology to the OP rather than bring a shit attitude to this thread. No it wasn't a genuine mistake as her apologists keep saying, because had it been she would have mentioned it, but she was adamant she hadn't had a booking from the OP despite the evidence. I for one am glad she showed her true colours, and there's no doubt she'll probably remain a popular prossie but at least punters can know what a nasty character she can be. In the meantime, it's only natural to keep posting on this thread.

Offline Ming

Exactly, too many prossie fanboys trying to censor peoples comments or using subtle comments to get this to die down,

I am no one's fanboy.

Before making comments like that perhaps you should check peoples background, reviews etc?

Carry on the debate for all I care, as the old saying goes "there's no such thing as bad publicity"

I won't be commenting further on this thread.

Ming  :hi:

Offline The_Don

I am no one's fanboy.

Before making comments like that perhaps you should check peoples background, reviews etc?

Carry on the debate for all I care, as the old saying goes "there's no such thing as bad publicity"

I won't be commenting further on this thread.

Ming  :hi:





Unlike other punting forums, that suppress comments and views. Members may question and reply if they wish. As long as its with in the rules set by Admin



Offline SamLP

I am no one's fanboy.

Before making comments like that perhaps you should check peoples background, reviews etc?

Carry on the debate for all I care, as the old saying goes "there's no such thing as bad publicity"

I won't be commenting further on this thread.

Ming  :hi:

I checked your review of MI and was drawn to how you mentioned you were gently making love. Not that checking your reviews serves any purpose except that you're a West Midlands punters and decided to come to the London board and dictate what we should be doing as regards to this review.

I checked your review of MI and was drawn to how you mentioned you were gently making love. Not that checking your reviews serves any purpose except that you're a West Midlands punters and decided to come to the London board and dictate what we should be doing as regards to this review.

Loool gently making love I've heard it all now what's  next saying thank after you cum :lol:
« Last Edit: June 10, 2016, 08:38:24 PM by Brazilian Martian »

Offline Turtle Z

I checked your review of MI and was drawn to how you mentioned you were gently making love.

To be fair, this is the sort of thing a fluffy fanboy would say.

Offline comaminion

Here are some highlights from the two (1, 2) AW reviews stn456 has written about Michelle so far:

Man just seems a cunt in general looking at his field reports

Everyone's entitled to be as fluffy as they want on aw feedback to try shit on another person's negative is low

At least I know how to view his reviews if he ever posts them here

Treat him well gents
Banning reason: White-knighting

Offline Marmalade

Can't believe this debate is still going on.

She made a mistake, she hasn't apologised and just compounded her error.

Time for everyone to move on???

Ming  :hi:

Fuck off. We don't get a hagiographical debate that often.   :cool:



Here are some highlights from the two (1, 2) AW reviews stn456 has written about Michelle so far:

Sad thing is, crap like that does a woman more harm than good. It suggests the poster hasn't been let out from the cupboard under the stairs often enough to actually see many women, even in quality magazines. Even if a prossie is relatively good looking, she doesn't look like Venus de Milo (unless you are imagining that while shaging her with one and a half arms behind her back)


Offline Placebo88

Rating an escort as a good service provider is not the same thing as being a Fanboy , White Knight etc . The purpose of the forum is to point punters in the direction of quality SPs and help them to avoid the dross .

All the fanboy stuff and sickening sycophancy quoted by Jason a few posts up is no good to anyone . The escorts must hate it more than normal punters do ; creepy and deluded , only a small step to stalker . You're paying her for sex like everyone else , just another customer ,no need for that nonsense , show some pride .

I got a WK comment by someone on this thread for giving an objective opinion . Michelle has got it wrong on this occasion , both the contents of the review and her pointless contributions to the thread . That does not suddenly make her a rubbish SP or mean that the best advice to give punters is to avoid her . Rationally no-one can argue that is the case in the face of all the positive punter provided evidence on UKP .

UKP is vital to provide some sort of quality control and hold escorts accountable when they fail to meet expected standards. With escort like Michelle who read it , reviews like this remind them that they have to maintain their game and with any luck make it less likely that poor service will be repeated . Whether it was an oversight , administrative error or something more sinister , the chances of a recurrence will be reduced thanks to this thread happening . The reviewer was spot on .




Offline Turtle Z

Rating an escort as a good service provider is not the same thing as being a Fanboy , White Knight etc . The purpose of the forum is to point punters in the direction of quality SPs and help them to avoid the dross .

All the fanboy stuff and sickening sycophancy quoted by Jason a few posts up is no good to anyone . The escorts must hate it more than normal punters do ; creepy and deluded , only a small step to stalker . You're paying her for sex like everyone else , just another customer ,no need for that nonsense , show some pride .

I got a WK comment by someone on this thread for giving an objective opinion . Michelle has got it wrong on this occasion , both the contents of the review and her pointless contributions to the thread . That does not suddenly make her a rubbish SP or mean that the best advice to give punters is to avoid her . Rationally no-one can argue that is the case in the face of all the positive punter provided evidence on UKP .

UKP is vital to provide some sort of quality control and hold escorts accountable when they fail to meet expected standards. With escort like Michelle who read it , reviews like this remind them that they have to maintain their game and with any luck make it less likely that poor service will be repeated . Whether it was an oversight , administrative error or something more sinister , the chances of a recurrence will be reduced thanks to this thread happening . The reviewer was spot on .

Good post!  :hi:

Offline punk

Good in what way? She made some good posts but I never fancy UKP WGs. They are either 'one of the lads' or (more usually) silly cunts. Bit milfy for me anyway.

She seemed to keep a lot of punters happy.

As for Michelle each to his own,never punted her.I stay away from pornstars and prossies that post on here.
« Last Edit: June 10, 2016, 09:38:17 PM by punk »




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)