ditto what VirtualWaster said and all newbies, do try to have a look at the the Review Writing Guide and try to pick up the ethos of the site. It's a serious project to help punters, not a club, nor a democracy (admin owns it, makes the rules, and keeps it going at his personal cost; Nik is the mod and founder). There's lots of fun too, but the underlying objective is to put the punter first and help him get vfm paid sex.
Either the reminders are repeated or it would degenerate into lovey-dovey every prossie a 10/10 piece of bullshit. If you read reviews to buy anything else, you'd look for a range of factual reviews, good and bad. Would you read an auto site where every second-hand car was "perfection on wheels, the stuff dreams are made of!!!" Of course not.
Think about your punts. Which were the best (positive), which were the worst (negative) and which were inbetween (neutral). My own yardstick for instance for 'positive' is 'I intend probably to see her again.' Everyone has their own yardstick, but it means using it, not just the rating everything in the top inch.
Don't think about "what the prossie will think" of your review. That's who AW feedbacks are written for. There's no need to use all those 'polite' terms as if you were still in the punt and she were listening and you "didn't want to offend." Reviews are aimed at other blokes. Did she have a big arse? Did she do the stuff you reasonably expected from her profile?
Newbies especially often like 'a bit of colour' but it does mean 10 reviews on a prossie take longer to read. Skimming through 20 to choose? Most people will skip.
Whereas "Excellent OWO and enjoyed CIM" can be read at a glance. (Presuming you had that.)
If it's an unusual story, probably everyone wants to hear: but it's not a competition. Get the basics:
Link. Name. City. Price paid. Length of booking.
Physical (Age, approx nationality, build, bust, differences from profile etc, nice, average, covered in tats and scars etc)
Comms. Speed of answering, intelligible directions.
Venue. Approx location. Swish/housing estate/crack den look. Parking.
Service. Did she do what was promised. Good attitude. Took direction. Didn't switch phone off. Time waster. Skilful/not.
Only examples but useful to jot that stuff down first.
Then add a personal opinion and if you thought the punt was value for money. The opinion is useful (especially if it sounds level headed and not OTT) but the fact list is likely to apply to every punter; the personal opinion mostly just to those punters with the same tastes and yardsticks.
It's a big jump from the AW ethos of prossie worship. Btw, everyone gets a 'mauling', me included. Guys are paying good money and they're entitled question your judgement if it seems to them rose-tinted. It's not personal. If the striker misses a penalty his mates and the supporters are likely to slag him off for it if they think he wasn't focussed. They're not jailers: just saying it as they see it.
Hope that helps someone. Now stop being a woos, write some reviews. And welcome to UKP.
