Emily's Creme Brulee - London

[MrMatrix]

I was about to say a banning seemed on the horizon and then, yep banned.

Well I did warn them in this thread.

[ramrodronnie]

Problem with all these professional photos is you will feel cheated.

Happily book someone that age myself, but sounds like sex is good enough !

Thanks for review anyway 

+1 VW. But the hygiene stuff has definitely put me off. So off my HL

[GolfNut]

Well I did warn them in this thread.

Your warning had no bearing on the outcome Matrix. But thanks for your feedback 

[ramrodronnie]

A mixture is fine, I always tend to avoid professional photo only girls.

+1

[Nagilum]

Didn't need to because like most the other ever growing  reviews they are all glowing so nothing new to add !! If all of a sudden she had aged into her thirties didn't do owo and no kissing and was smelly then I'd probably of written one but my encounter I had my face snogged to pieces great owo with a fine gorgeous smelling woman ( in her twenties )  and  all round great sex !! I even ran over by ten minutes and nearly missed my train home. When I see her again I might just add one due to the recent negative report.

I disagree, there is always something to be added or gleamed.  Its a confirmation of a great service that continues to be provided.  No matter how popular the girl, if your review helps one punter discover her or get him off the fence, then its worth it. 

I would love to read the review, especially in light of today's happenings.  But of course its your call entirely.

[ramrodronnie]

So much so you didn't bother writing your own review  !   

But think its acceptable to come with plastic swords to white knight other peoples !   

Defo +1 there VW

[ramrodronnie]

But no sympathy for a fellow punter or empathy to his disappointment.

Shows you put prostitutes before punters !

A sorry you ha d a bad one, was different when I went would have been fine but hey straight on the prossie defence.

Bro's before Ho's and that.

  +1 again VW

[ramrodronnie]

The hygiene thing is unforgivable for me. She's not on my list as probably too vanilla anyway, but this review certainly confirms she'd be off my gfe list too if I wanted that type of punt. Thanks for posting OP

+1 on the hygiene point hendrix

[ramrodronnie]

Strange, this. Saw her a few weeks ago - She's late 20's, did great FK and was as fresh as a daisy (i.e. clean) when I met her.

Sorry to hear it didn't work out for you.

Mmm, seems like there are differing views on her hygiene. Maybe she was having a bad/lazy day with OP?

[ramrodronnie]

This now means she is off my hot list.

That comment about DFK is enough for me, never mind the hygiene.

There is no excuse for this at all, if she is going through punters and operating a revolving door policy, then she needs to scale back and fix her service.

Good review OP and thank you.

+1 Nagilum

[ramrodronnie]

Your call, but go in with your eyes open.  I would ask her to freshen up and confirm all services first. 

I have asked girls to be fresh in the past, because I put the effort in myself.

 Defo +1 there Nagilum

[MrMatrix]

+2 Disrespectful to do any thing less IMO

[ramrodronnie]

I had Emily on my HL. But after this Review, I am now having serious reservations. I am in the same frame of mind as Nagilum, no FK/DFK. And "If" there's a question mark on her hygiene? That would for sure put me right off.

[Nagilum]

 Defo +1 there Nagilum

It's just courtesy.  My ritual as I have said before is:

1. Shower
2. Shave
3. Groom
4. Aftershave
5. Lotion
6. Mint - No booze

Always ensures the punt goes smoothly and those discretionary items are suddenly on the menu    I suddenly realised how metrosexual I sound 

[MrMatrix]

No FK, no punt.

[treetops]

Just read the 4 new pages in this thread and I'm sitting here dumbstruck.  Emo? Old? No FK? LOL

Did anyone stop to consider that the blurred photo might simply be a shit quality picture? I saw it a few days after I met her and wondered several times what people would think when seeing it.

[ramrodronnie]

I disagree, there is always something to be added or gleamed.  Its a confirmation of a great service that continues to be provided.  No matter how popular the girl, if your review helps one punter discover her or get him off the fence, then its worth it. 

I would love to read the review, especially in light of today's happenings.  But of course its your call entirely.

You echo my views entirely Nagilum. +1

[ramrodronnie]

It's just courtesy.  My ritual as I have said before is:

1. Shower
2. Shave
3. Groom
4. Aftershave
5. Lotion
6. Mint - No booze

Always ensures the punt goes smoothly and those discretionary items are suddenly on the menu    I suddenly realised how metrosexual I sound 

  +1 again Nagilum

[treetops]

It's just courtesy.  My ritual as I have said before is:

1. Shower
2. Shave
3. Groom
4. Aftershave
5. Lotion
6. Mint - No booze

Always ensures the punt goes smoothly and those discretionary items are suddenly on the menu    I suddenly realised how metrosexual I sound 

Completely true in my short experience so far, especially for the stuff I put in bold.

I however do not believe that WG's are generally happy with after shave and perfumed lotions etc. Smelling fresh is not the same as reeking of cologne   

[GolfNut]

Just read the 4 new pages in this thread and I'm sitting here dumbstruck.  Emo? Old? No FK? LOL

Did anyone stop to consider that the blurred photo might simply be a shit quality picture? I saw it a few days after I met her and wondered several times what people would think when seeing it.

It's inevitable that a girl with 26 positive and no neutral or negatives is going to get a negative or neutral at some point. There are few exceptions. It was just a matter of time.

The issue for me is not that she's had a negative, it's that this review coincided with another negative from what turned out to be a malicious stalker, and the meeting apparently happened "a few months back". The timing does indeed seem a little suspicious.

Also the OP can't seem to get his facts straight. One minute he's saying she's 35-39, then in the next breath he's moved to 32, or 35-35. Is he an age expert I ask??

He also states that the girl he saw was considerably older than the girl in the blurred angel photo, which I know to be Emily, as it was taken only a couple of weeks ago during her duo day with Michelle.

So I can only conclude that either he hasn't actually seen Emily, or like the banned Stalker perhaps he has something to hide.

Given that Emily tends to take her first timer bookings via AW, might be pertinent to ask the OP to supply proof of the meeting for Admin to validate.

[vw]

Might be pertinent to ask the OP to supply proof of the meeting for Admin to validate.

WTF, this will go the way of reviews by Avra and Flunt !  Look how they ended, comments and some members in the bin.

You never ask for proof of positives ?

Up to the individual not assumed as nonsense because she is a forum darling !

[GolfNut]

WTF, this will go the way of reviews by Avra and Flunt !  Look how they ended, comments and some members in the bin.

You never ask for proof of positives ?

Up to the individual not assumed as nonsense because she is a forum darling !

Fair comment vw. Just seem to be a few inconsistencies that don't stack up. Happy to leave it at that.

[shagbambi]

Golfnut I suggest you stop charging.

The OP made an observation based on their experience in terms of ECB's age.  That's his right.  There are other threads where her age/experience are discussed and disputed, its not new.  (I will leave it to you to hunt them down).

[Placebo88]

Never seen her , never will , so a neutral opinion.The problem is the huge difference in style between the woman in ECB's profile photos , especially the main one , and how she looked in the dark angel photo.If I went expecting to get what was shown on AW and got the other for £160 an hour there is no way I'd stick around ; it's a huge and deliberate misrepresentation.Her body still looks good and she doesn't look that old , but it's not what it says on the tin.The interview does say visible tattoos , but I still think a whole new set of photos is in order.

[ramrodronnie]

The mere suggestion of asking for proof of positives is laughable.

But that aside, speaking personally taking into account all of the views that all of the other punters have given. I did have Emily on my HL. But I always had reservations with regard to her rates. Ok she has had lots of Positive Reviews before LuvellyJubbly's Negative. But then so do other top escort girls who have plenty of Positive Reviews, and many of them are charging less than Emily.
If her hygiene is questionable? Then that along with her not FK/DFK, and higher rates than a lot of the other top girls is enough for me to take her off my HL.

[Tim20]

The mere suggestion of asking for proof of positives is laughable.

But that aside, speaking personally taking into account all of the views that all of the other punters have given. I did have Emily on my HL. But I always had reservations with regard to her rates. Ok she has had lots of Positive Reviews before LuvellyJubbly's Negative. But then so do other top escort girls who have plenty of Positive Reviews, and many of them are charging less than Emily.
If her hygiene is questionable? Then that along with her not FK/DFK, and higher rates than a lot of the other top girls is enough for me to take her off my HL.

She does DFK though ! Hygiene was spot on and one of the best punts I encountered and I've seen and most my punts are only with quality well reviewed girls !

[Nagilum]

The mere suggestion of asking for proof of positives is laughable.

But that aside, speaking personally taking into account all of the views that all of the other punters have given. I did have Emily on my HL. But I always had reservations with regard to her rates. Ok she has had lots of Positive Reviews before LuvellyJubbly's Negative. But then so do other top escort girls who have plenty of Positive Reviews, and many of them are charging less than Emily.
If her hygiene is questionable? Then that along with her not FK/DFK, and higher rates than a lot of the other top girls is enough for me to take her off my HL.

I'm on the fence too.  Let's see what comes next and then book.  We have one negative and a valid one at that, so let's see if she indeed had a bad day or these are sign of things to come.  I hope its the aforementioned.

[monstar]

I'm on the fence too.  Let's see what comes next and then book.  We have one negative and a valid one at that, so let's see if she indeed had a bad day or these are sign of things to come.  I hope its the aforementioned.

Just to note - I saw Emily on the duo day with Michelle, which was post this reviewers visit "a few months back". She was perfectly clean and there was plenty of passionate DFK, same as my previous visits.

And I'll say no more in this thread unless directly asked. 

[collector]

Just to note - I saw Emily on the duo day with Michelle, which was post this reviewers visit "a few months back". She was perfectly clean and there was plenty of passionate DFK, same as my previous visits.

And I'll say no more in this thread unless directly asked. 

What about the famous angels picture? Did she put some weight on and it's how she looks now or was just a crap pic?

[GolfNut]

What about the famous angels picture? Did she put some weight on and it's how she looks now or was just a crap pic?

I saw her just after Christmas and here is an excerpt from my review which addresses this point:

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Her figure was even better for me as her gallery pics make her look quite slender which she is, but she has a fab full pear shaped arse and great legs, with thighs that give her an athletic appearance: Horseriding and skiiing would be the main reasons.

Dunno if that helps 

[collector]

I saw her just after Christmas and here is an excerpt from my review which addresses this point:

Dunno if that helps 

That's clear, I was curious indeed, thanks. Your descriction matches my remembrance of her body, curvy but no fat at all.

[ramrodronnie]

I saw her just after Christmas and here is an excerpt from my review which addresses this point:

Dunno if that helps 

Thanks GolfNut. Well sounds good mate. But if she dropped her rates it would be a starting point to helping as far as I'm concerned anyway.

[GolfNut]

Thanks GolfNut. Well sounds good mate. But if she dropped her rates it would be a starting point to helping as far as I'm concerned anyway.

Yep agree entirely Ronnie, she's a luxury punt for sure, with some very good girls at the price points below; Adele, Ameera, Ellie Monique, to name a couple, all good girls without doubt. Obviously that's her call not ours.

[JuliusSeizure]

I regular with Emily all the time and what gets me about this thread is Emily has 26 positive reviews all saying she is very good looking, pretty, etc, but one person comes along and says she looks late 30's and you're all suddenly like "oh she off my hotlist now".

I've seen her around 10 or 11 times now and every time I've seen her she's been very clean. I've asked her why she doesn't do CIM and she won't budge as it's not very clean and feels bad for the next guy not matter how much mouthwash she chugs so it's a straight no due to hygiene reasons. I've gone over time a few times but she always kicks me out at least 20mins before the appointment so she can wash and prep before seeing the next guy so I'm quite surprised about seeing the hygiene issue come up. 

For the record on her age, I know it exactly and I won't say for her privacy but she isn't in her 30's and not for a few more years yet. Her Tattoo she had a little added on which goes down towards her lower body and had it coloured in.   

I will do the same as monstar and only answer if asked directly if you wanna know anything but thought I chime in on this. If this one review puts you off then good luck finding a girl with this many reviews and no negatives as I think that's only reserved for Cindy at the moment. Many UKP favourites have a negative on there record including Michelle, they have off days or just don't click with the punter sometimes, it happens but if you wanna skip Emily for this then you're missing out.

Julius

[vw]

Fair comment vw. Just seem to be a few inconsistencies that don't stack up. Happy to leave it at that.

Another white knight bites the dust, my post was a warning as I quire liked you !

[lewishamguy]

Another white knight bites the dust, my post was a warning as I quire liked you !

Will they ever learn? At the end they all face banning. It's well documented here.

 

[vw]

Will they ever learn? At the end they all face banning. It's well documented here.

 

Absolutely ridiculous asking a punter to prove he went to a booking because you don;t believe a forum darling can have a bad day.

[OldAdmin]

You tell them be careful how they react to a negative review about one of their prossies and be respectful of a fellow punter's bad experience.
They seem to understand.
But then a negative appears.
Then all of it is forgotten and they become a whole different person.

[claretandblue]

I regular with Emily all the time and what gets me about this thread is Emily has 26 positive reviews all saying she is very good looking, pretty, etc, but one person comes along and says she looks late 30's and you're all suddenly like "oh she off my hotlist now".

I've seen her around 10 or 11 times now and every time I've seen her she's been very clean. I've asked her why she doesn't do CIM and she won't budge as it's not very clean and feels bad for the next guy not matter how much mouthwash she chugs so it's a straight no due to hygiene reasons. I've gone over time a few times but she always kicks me out at least 20mins before the appointment so she can wash and prep before seeing the next guy so I'm quite surprised about seeing the hygiene issue come up. 

For the record on her age, I know it exactly and I won't say for her privacy but she isn't in her 30's and not for a few more years yet. Her Tattoo she had a little added on which goes down towards her lower body and had it coloured in.   

I will do the same as monstar and only answer if asked directly if you wanna know anything but thought I chime in on this. If this one review puts you off then good luck finding a girl with this many reviews and no negatives as I think that's only reserved for Cindy at the moment. Many UKP favourites have a negative on there record including Michelle, they have off days or just don't click with the punter sometimes, it happens but if you wanna skip Emily for this then you're missing out.

Julius

As you seem to know her so well could you suggest she puts up some photos that are recent and accurate in relation to her current appearance?
I like the emo look but not expect to be punting a emo girl if it was not made clear on her profile

[Hobbit]

It's inevitable that a girl with 26 positive and no neutral or negatives is going to get a negative or neutral at some point. There are few exceptions. It was just a matter of time.

The issue for me is not that she's had a negative, it's that this review coincided with another negative from what turned out to be a malicious stalker, and the meeting apparently happened "a few months back". The timing does indeed seem a little suspicious.

Also the OP can't seem to get his facts straight. One minute he's saying she's 35-39, then in the next breath he's moved to 32, or 35-35. Is he an age expert I ask??

He also states that the girl he saw was considerably older than the girl in the blurred angel photo, which I know to be Emily, as it was taken only a couple of weeks ago during her duo day with Michelle.

So I can only conclude that either he hasn't actually seen Emily, or like the banned Stalker perhaps he has something to hide.

Given that Emily tends to take her first timer bookings via AW, might be pertinent to ask the OP to supply proof of the meeting for Admin to validate.

Mr Golfnut, I find this very disappointing and an outrageous comment asking for proof of meeting. And shows that you truly do not know how to read previous posts. If you read my previous posts, several weeks back I had mentioned that I had seen Emily and that to me she seemed much older than what I had expected. As mentioned before, in my opinion on that day she looked to be anything between 35 and 39, however, as I am not a mind reader I cannot know for sure her exact age but guaranteed she is definitely not in my opinion in her 20s that is for sure.

[JuliusSeizure]

As you seem to know her so well could you suggest she puts up some photos that are recent and accurate in relation to her current appearance?
I like the emo look but not expect to be punting a emo girl if it was not made clear on her profile

I've already suggested that she posts normal pics before but she prefers the professional ones so it's up to her. She did have normal ones in her private gallery with some including her face but whether they are still there I have no idea. I paid for it to check I wasn't booking a dog and ended up finding out she was the opposite.

[vw]

She does DFK though ! Hygiene was spot on and one of the best punts I encountered and I've seen and most my punts are only with quality well reviewed girls !

Not by you !

You just prefer to attack other's negative experiences !

Your a classic white knight with comments like this

When I see her again I might just add one due to the recent negative report.

Bet that will read like a love letter !

[rockharders]

Sad that these white knighting cunts get more upset about a negative review than the prossies themselves.

These bannings are well deserved imho.

[rockharders]

When I see her again I might just add one due to the recent negative report.

Fluffy WK cunt alert 

[MrMatrix]

I warned the pair of them 2 pages ago. Couldn't end any other way.  Can't believe GN wouldn't leave it alone. Personally I think this thread has reached the end with 2 casualties. such a shame really.

[Yeboahsleftfoot]

I'm meeting Emily with Michelle later this month, will report back with my honest opinion as per usual.

[JuliusSeizure]

I warned the pair of them 2 pages ago. Couldn't end any other way.  Can't believe GN wouldn't leave it alone. Personally I think this thread has reached the end with 2 casualties. such a shame really.

Negative reviews of a popular working girl always do, if not more casualties. I just sit here like this the whole time External Link/Members Only

[scarebear]

I'm meeting Emily with Michelle later this month, will report back with my honest opinion as per usual.

Me too, have been looking forward to this for ages, so again , ill report back.

[Tim20]

Fluffy WK cunt alert 

No need to get insulting ! You don't know me ! Firstly I'm not fluffy and just made a remark !! No wonder some people start coming off here because of insulting fools like yourself !

[vw]

Negative reviews of a popular working girl always do, if not more casualties. I just sit here like this the whole time External Link/Members Only

Did you read the Christmas massacre of the Little Katie fan club including to of London's worst punters Atticus/Sivester and USH.   

That was popcorn fodder !