Emily's Creme Brulee - London

[Hobbit]

External Link/Members Only

I saw Emily a few months back for a one-hour session.

Communication

Communication was all done by email and was responded within a day. I had no complaints with the communication side of things as it was prompt and very courteous.

The session

Having read many reviews before deciding to meet Emily, I was expecting a superhot model, with an amazing body aged in her 20s. Once the door opened I was slightly disappointed as to me she looked much older, probably anything between 35 and 39. Don't get me wrong, she was very attractive with pout lips and very beautiful eyes. Clearly when she was younger she probably could have easily been a model. Physically, she had a tight, firm body and was slim and toned. She had tattoos running down one side of her body, which some may like but I wasn't a huge fan of.

We started off with some light kissing which never really manifested into DFK. There was some tounge probing but lacked passion and intensity. I then asked her to go down on me and the OWO was very good and deep and sloppy with attention paid to the right areas. I easily could have cum right there but held back and decided to give her pussy a good-licking. Unfortunately I did not do this for long because there was a slight odour which put me off. It wasn't awful in any way and perhaps I had caught her on a bad day. Nevertheless, I expect hygiene to be immaculate when I see someone, especially when I'm paying a lot of money.

I then decided to fuck her in doggy position, which was very deep and felt great. She responded with all the right noises and I came there and then.

During recovery time we talked general chitchat about our lives etc. Second-round commenced with more OWO and a very wet sloppy HJ.

We said our goodbyes with a goodbye kiss.

Overall, this was a hard choice between a neutral and negative review, because the OWO was very good and the sex wasn't half bad either. I was disappointed by the age aspect because I'm hoping to see someone slightly younger and of course the lack of DFK and lack of 100% hygiene meant that I would not be returning.

[vw]

Problem with all these professional photos is you will feel cheated.

Happily book someone that age myself, but sounds like sex is good enough !

Thanks for review anyway 

[Yeboahsleftfoot]

Thanks for the review LJ, you've got me seriously considering weather to go through with my duo booking with Emily & Michelle Independent, I punt to meet great girls in their 20s who deliver al listed services and have perfect hygiene, had a shocker yesterday, don't want another if I can help it.

[Hobbit]

Problem with all these professional photos is you will feel cheated.

Happily book someone that age myself, but sounds like sex is good enough !

Thanks for review anyway 

I agree about the professional photos. I myself prefer real photos like selfie's which portray a more real and natural look and makes it much easier to choose.

[Hobbit]

Thanks for the review LJ, you've got me seriously considering weather to go through with my duo booking with Emily & Michelle Independent, I punt to meet great girls in their 20s who deliver al listed services and have perfect hygiene, had a shocker yesterday, don't want another if I can help it.

I personally would never book a three some with someone I've never met before. For me, threesomes only happen when I have met both girls individually and feel comfortable and happy with the service. Why not see them individually first?

[vw]

I agree about the professional photos. I myself prefer real photos like selfie's which portray a more real and natural look and makes it much easier to choose.

A mixture is fine, I always tend to avoid professional photo only girls.

[Yeboahsleftfoot]

I personally would never book a three some with someone I've never met before. For me, threesomes only happen when I have met both girls individually and feel comfortable and happy with the service. Why not see them individually first?

Because I'm a greedy fucker and usually book threesomes, I'm very concerned about your age and hygiene comments.

[Hobbit]

Because I'm a greedy fucker and usually book threesomes, I'm very concerned about your age and hygiene comments.

It's your choice my friend. Reviews are here to help all of us to decide before seeing someone. In the past I have had some bad punts and I know the feeling.

[cumtwice]

Thanks for the review LJ, you've got me seriously considering weather to go through with my duo booking with Emily & Michelle Independent, I punt to meet great girls in their 20s who deliver al listed services and have perfect hygiene, had a shocker yesterday, don't want another if I can help it.

I personally couldn't recommend Emily enough. I would say she is never older that 28 in my opinion. Best girl on here I've seen by a mile.

[vw]

I personally couldn't recommend Emily enough. I would say she is never older that 28 in my opinion. Best girl on here I've seen by a mile.

So much so you didn't bother writing your own review  !   

But think its acceptable to come with plastic swords to white knight other peoples !   

[cumtwice]

I think she's been reviewed enough

[vw]

I think she's been reviewed enough

Explain why you reviewed Michelle Indie Then ?  She has 3 times as many ?   

Makes no sense what you said !   

[cumtwice]

The fact I returned to c the same girl within 2 weeks was quite unusual for me and i hadn't left a positive review previously.

Have u seen Emily out of interest?

[cockneybstrd]

VW what Cuntstrucktwice means

He doesnt want too see any negative comments or reviews on his fav socket.

Because it will make him upset. Always happens dont it demanding threads to be locked trying to change the subject

At the end of the day every review is subjective and snap shot of that moment in time. So why posters get bent out of shape I do not know

[vw]

The fact I returned to c the same girl within 2 weeks was quite unusual for me and i hadn't left a positive review previously.

Have u seen Emily out of interest?

Good for you, why hijack the review of someone that didn't enjoy his experience.

If you want to tell us how fantastic she is this is not the place, its like walking down Oxford street with your dick out !

[cumtwice]

Almost right, just had a different opinion... So I thought I'd voice mine.

Thanks for now.

Enjoy your sat night 

[vw]

Almost right, just had a different opinion... So I thought I'd voice mine.

But no sympathy for a fellow punter or empathy to his disappointment.

Shows you put prostitutes before punters !

A sorry you ha d a bad one, was different when I went would have been fine but hey straight on the prossie defence.

Bro's before Ho's and that.

[claretandblue]

There is a hell of a spread emerging in terms of her possible age,are we sure there are not two ecb's?!?

Personally I have never seen her as I don't think her rates are vfm in comparison to the other well known London "darlings"

[hendrix]

The hygiene thing is unforgivable for me. She's not on my list as probably too vanilla anyway, but this review certainly confirms she'd be off my gfe list too if I wanted that type of punt. Thanks for posting OP

[bokkaboy]

The hygiene thing is unforgivable for me. She's not on my list as probably too vanilla anyway, but this review certainly confirms she'd be off my gfe list too if I wanted that type of punt. Thanks for posting OP

Poor personal hygiene not excusable.
Not my experience with her, but some SPs do let themselves go with popularity.

[Sir Lancealot]

I'll just add that when I saw her (yes I have reviewed her) there were no issues with her hygiene at all and there was plenty of FK, although not totally sure whether it would be described as deep, but it did carry on throughout the punt and it was good enough for me compared to others. From an age point of view I would say late 20's rather than 35 to 39. That said I do get the impression that she is getting through one hell of a lot of punters these days so I suppose there could be issues with her service levels. Even the best SP's are likely to get a bit jaded or tired. Only seen her the once.

[molloyalloy]

But no sympathy for a fellow punter or empathy to his disappointment.

Shows you put prostitutes before punters !

A sorry you ha d a bad one, was different when I went would have been fine but hey straight on the prossie defence.

Bro's before Ho's and that.

What utter bollocks you do spout.

[PLeisure]

What utter bollocks you do spout.

A good idea would be to qualify that statement - unless this is your default behaviour on forums 

[treetops]

Strange, this. Saw her a few weeks ago - She's late 20's, did great FK and was as fresh as a daisy (i.e. clean) when I met her.

Sorry to hear it didn't work out for you.

[Rstone]

I'll just add that when I saw her (yes I have reviewed her) there were no issues with her hygiene at all and there was plenty of FK, although not totally sure whether it would be described as deep, but it did carry on throughout the punt and it was good enough for me compared to others. From an age point of view I would say late 20's rather than 35 to 39. That said I do get the impression that she is getting through one hell of a lot of punters these days so I suppose there could be issues with her service levels. Even the best SP's are likely to get a bit jaded or tired. Only seen her the once.

I had the same experience... She looked hot, delivered what i asked and didn't clock watch..

I think the is another "Creme Brulee" on AW ... Need to check again though

[Nagilum]

This now means she is off my hot list.

That comment about DFK is enough for me, never mind the hygiene.

There is no excuse for this at all, if she is going through punters and operating a revolving door policy, then she needs to scale back and fix her service.

Good review OP and thank you.

[Nagilum]

Thanks for the review LJ, you've got me seriously considering weather to go through with my duo booking with Emily & Michelle Independent, I punt to meet great girls in their 20s who deliver al listed services and have perfect hygiene, had a shocker yesterday, don't want another if I can help it.

Your call, but go in with your eyes open.  I would ask her to freshen up and confirm all services first. 

I have asked girls to be fresh in the past, because I put the effort in myself.

[lewishamguy]

.....

Having read many reviews before deciding to meet Emily, I was expecting a superhot model, with an amazing body aged in her 20s. Once the door opened I was slightly disappointed as to me she looked much older, probably anything between 35 and 39.....
....

I haven't seen Emily in the last 5yrs. But when I saw her in 2010-2011 she was around 22-23yrs. from that point of view she was supposed to be 27-28yrs. old by now unless she got some serious impact on her aging. She was vfm in sub £100 range. Since she increased her rate she's out of my hot list. Btw thanks for your review and you're obviously entitled to your own opinion .

[GolfNut]

This now means she is off my hot list.

That comment about DFK is enough for me, never mind the hygiene.

There is no excuse for this at all, if she is going through punters and operating a revolving door policy, then she needs to scale back and fix her service.

Good review OP and thank you.

Big mistake Nagilum.

You've seen Michelle.  I've now seen them both and and Emily is in the same league for sure, so if you enjoyed Michelle you WILL enjoy Emily. 

[boardyhell]

i have seen emily once,she wears false eye lashes which is quite unusual
i think this makes her look older,when i met her she had recently had some more tattoos done which were not to my taste
nothing to do with the tattoos but its not my thing
i found emily reasonably attractive on my first impression due to the fact i was expecting an amazing sex doll
emily is very clever and i mean that in the best way possible because she maximises the best possible visible experience and physical experience thats possible within a vanilla experience
the memory of an experience and enjoyment will make you return or give good review
emily gives a superb bj ,no cim but a superb gfe cuddles and intelligent conversation with no rush to kick you out
i would say she is middle to late 20
this no way condones a no show,i will return however its a 2 hour drive
just my personal opinion

[Nagilum]

Big mistake Nagilum.

You've seen Michelle.  I've now seen them both and and Emily is in the same league for sure, so if you enjoyed Michelle you WILL enjoy Emily. 

I'm on the fence GN. No DFK is a deal breaker for me.

Did she offer you DFK out of curiosity?

[GolfNut]

I'm on the fence GN. No DFK is a deal breaker for me.

Did she offer you DFK out of curiosity?

It was non stop dfk Nagilum from start to finish.

[MrMatrix]

As the OP says she looks 35-39 I'm wondering if he's subject to B&S as all others say shes in late 20's. I'm not sure he's seen the same girl. She's on my HL, The hygiene is a bit of an issue. I would hope this is a 1 off. Its a shame that there are several punters have seen her and not bothered giving UKP a review...............that's t he whole point of this platform.

[VanceStone]

I found a recent (non-airbrushed) picture of Emily from Michelle Independent's gallery-of whom Emily is pre-occupied with doing £500 threesomes. Along with picking up and dropping AW bookings on a whim.

External Link/Members Only

Emily is the shorter girl with the brown hair. Michelle is 5 feet 8, flat footed and Emily is wearing vertical heels. What a drop in physical standards. Can't believe its the same girl.

Damn her new look is awful compared to when I saw her over a year ago.
When I saw her she had minimal tattoos, wore genuine Agent Provocateur (although that was most likely a gift from a client) and had light coloured sandy blonde, wavy hair. She also had a gym toned body, flat tummy and admitted her lifestyle was a mixture of genetics and diet.

Now she's looking Emo, tattooed, her boring brown hair looks unwashed and her body has a heavily tattooed "gunt". This is what I call her desexualising her look. Its a form of rebellion and a protest her sexuality has been used to fuck men she doesn't like.
Especially white knight flufflies like Gollf Nut who thinks he got specialised treatment as a pokemon punter.
Weird that golf nut made no attempt to mention the drastic change of Emily's look in his review- despite her dressing as in the above image a month prior to their meeting.

[Hobbit]

As the OP says she looks 35-39 I'm wondering if he's subject to B&S as all others say shes in late 20's. I'm not sure he's seen the same girl. She's on my HL, The hygiene is a bit of an issue. I would hope this is a 1 off. Its a shame that there are several punters have seen her and not bothered giving UKP a review...............that's t he whole point of this platform.

I really hope it wasn't a B&S, as that would be really disappointing.  I personally don't think it was as I had communicated with her weeks before trying to arrange an appointment but she seemed to be away on holiday at the time. Also, lots of people have mentioned about the tattoo's, so I'm pretty sure it was her that I saw.

[GolfNut]

External Link/Members Only

Emily is the shorter girl with the brown hair. Michelle is 5 feet 8, flat footed and Emily is wearing vertical heels. What a drop in physical standards. Can't believe its the same girl.

Your link don't work, so I can't see this drop in standards you refer to. She looked pretty damned fine when I saw her only a few weeks ago.

I found a recent (non-airbrushed) picture of Emily from Michelle Independent's gallery-of whom Emily is pre-occupied with doing £500 threesomes. Along with picking up and dropping AW bookings on a whim.

You refer to £500 threesomes but that would be for 2 hours. The one hour rate is £300, and I believe they're fully booked.

As far as preferential treatment goes, you know full well that's absolute bollocks. I got what I paid for and it looks like pretty much everybody else who have reviewed did too, so for whatever reason you didn't who knows why.

I'm no WK and don't have a problem with you posting a  negative, that's your prerogative. But badmouthing other punters who didn't have the same bad experience as you is just plain bitter and twisted, and makes you look like a saddo.

[VanceStone]

Your link don't work, so I can't see this drop in standards you refer to. She looked pretty damned fine when I saw her only a few weeks ago.

External Link/Members Only

There's tattooed Emo Emily.

I'm no WK and don't have a problem with you posting a  negative, that's your prerogative. But badmouthing other punters who didn't have the same bad experience as you is just plain bitter and twisted, and makes you look like a saddo.

She confirmed a booking and had no reason to cancel other than she got someone willing to pay more than £160.
She lied she was going to her "other job" which doesn't take a genius to know she meant a personalised client wanted to book her to tell her his problems for 4 hours and then cum once in 15 minutes.

Highly unprofessional behaviour and unjustified. Reviewing girls has as much to do with the booking process and professional commitment to service those bookings- as the meeting itself.
To cancel a booking and then take multiple new bookings in the same day from higher bidders is a negative strike against Emily's feedback.

I saw her a year ago, she lied she never does OWO or allowed fingers. Yet she has given CIM to various reviewers her on ukpunting, deep throat unprotected and guys bragged they fingered her internally.

Considering everyone is paying £160 they should get the same.

[Nagilum]

External Link/Members Only

There's tattooed Emo Emily.

She confirmed a booking and had no reason to cancel other than she got someone willing to pay more than £160.
She lied she was going to her "other job" which doesn't take a genius to know she meant a personalised client wanted to book her to tell her his problems for 4 hours and then cum once in 15 minutes.

Highly unprofessional behaviour and unjustified. Reviewing girls has as much to do with the booking process and professional commitment to service those bookings- as the meeting itself.



To cancel a booking and then take multiple new bookings in the same day from higher bidders is a negative strike against Emily's feedback.

I saw her a year ago, she lied she never does OWO or allowed fingers. Yet she has given CIM to various reviewers her on ukpunting, deep throat unprotected and guys bragged they fingered her internally.

Considering everyone is paying £160 they should get the same.

Link isn't working.

[GolfNut]

Link isn't working.

There is no picture obviously.

[collector]

Being accurate, in the pic you posted Vancestone, Michelle is not bare feet, she wearing heels too. Emily looks like she has bigger thighs comparing when I saw her couple of months ago.

I did DFK, fingering, OWO, pussy was fresh and she looked mid 20s to me. Based to my experience I can only recommend her.
 
However yours and OP's review are very welcome to be posted and the reasons of your negatives are absolutely fair.

[VanceStone]

Link isn't working.

Try here.

[Removed by admin at request]

Or failing that. Go to Michelle Independent's Gallery.
EDIT- oh look someone must be reading this thread. The pic has disappeared from Michelle Independents gallery within the past 20 minutes!!!!

Nevermind here's a backup. Save the image before "Emo Amy" decides to have it taken down again.

[Removed by admin at request]

[random]

External Link/Members Only

There's tattooed Emo Emily.

She confirmed a booking and had no reason to cancel other than she got someone willing to pay more than £160.
She lied she was going to her "other job" which doesn't take a genius to know she meant a personalised client wanted to book her to tell her his problems for 4 hours and then cum once in 15 minutes.

Highly unprofessional behaviour and unjustified. Reviewing girls has as much to do with the booking process and professional commitment to service those bookings- as the meeting itself.
To cancel a booking and then take multiple new bookings in the same day from higher bidders is a negative strike against Emily's feedback.

I saw her a year ago, she lied she never does OWO or allowed fingers. Yet she has given CIM to various reviewers her on ukpunting, deep throat unprotected and guys bragged they fingered her internally.

Considering everyone is paying £160 they should get the same.

Neither of your links of real pics of her work.

[hendrix]

Weird. The link works for me.. Maybe a cookies thing as I've seen that picture before on UKE.

[vw]

Weird. The link works for me.. Maybe a cookies thing as I've seen that picture before on UKE.

This one

[Removed by admin at request]

[hendrix]

This one

Yep!

[Nagilum]

There is way too much doubt surrounding this girl.  I'm out on this one and I side with the punter here as there is nothing to be gained.  Two negatives, coupled with an inconsistent service and hygiene is enough for me.  Would rather spend the cash on a girl who I know will deliver at that price especially. 

Maybe it will change in time, but for now I view this as a deterioration of service from a popular forum girl. Shame!

[GolfNut]

Try here.

[Removed by admin at request]

Or failing that. Go to Michelle Independent's Gallery.
EDIT- oh look someone must be reading this thread. The pic has disappeared from Michelle Independents gallery within the past 20 minutes!!!!

Nevermind here's a backup. Save the image before "Emo Amy" decides to have it taken down again.

[Removed by admin at request]

I saw this image on uke when it was posted.

So they're both in heels and yes Michelle is 5'8 and Emily is about 5'4"

The image is blurred so how the fuck can you pass any judgement on how she looks. I did actually see the image before it was modified and both girls look absolutely stunning.

Dunno what you are seeing but:

Hidden Image/Members Only

[VanceStone]

Weird. The link works for me.. Maybe a cookies thing as I've seen that picture before on UKE.

 

Must be a browser thing.

Anyways I've done all I can.

As for Emily having her "Emo Amy" pic taken down from Michelle Independent's gallery in the past 20 minutes is amusing.
It's also proof she should've kept her agent provocatuer look, as falsely still being advertised on her AW profile.

ukpunters don't like the emo look, ukpunters dislike tattoos, girls (like Amy) are too self concious to show them and airbrush them out. So why bother with the tramp stamp look in the first place? 

[GolfNut]

Who the fuck is Amy?

[vw]

ukpunters don't like the emo look, ukpunters dislike tattoos, girls (like Amy) are too self concious to show them. So why bother with the tramp stamp look? 

You don't speak for all ukpunters after your 37  posts, and please from refraining speaking for me !

Most hide in photos to protect their own privacy.