Agreed. Also there is no evidence to show that Alex48 did not rubber up when he saw the bare backers.
Add to that Lilith is screened for STDs every 3 months as even with safe sex, you can't be too careful.
How many of us take the same precautions? See the review by The Owl when he saw Xenia a while back, a known barebacker. My earlier response refers.
Regarding SAAFE and Clienteye, if you register and check, you should find the same details that were tweeted. They are in the public domain.
Regarding the review, it is a negative and will stand although the reviewer, James or whoever has gone silent. I suspect he is watching this anonymously and enjoying it as it unfolds. He is yet to back up his claimed text exchange.
There are quite a few inconsistencies in his review that I will take with a pinch of salt.
Are you really suggesting that a punter who
repeatedly seeks sex workers who openly advertise bareback then wears a condom? Yes perhaps he pays their hourly rate and simply prays with them in some purifying ritual. I think the odds are against that. Let's be realistic, Lilith's screening was inefficient and she sucked some barebacker dick OWO.
Furthermore, if you are simply A N OTHER punter then you cannot possibly know her actual STI testing routine. A quarterly STI testing regime would be admirable, but even a cursory knowledge of STIs, incubation periods, etc highlights that for someone with multiple sexual partners, their test results are already expired and invalid at the point of receipt.
Does the possibility of a false and malicious review trouble me? Yes it does, as that would be against the ethos of the site. However, it is for the OP to corroborate his claims, and he either will or won't. It's then for the UKP brethren to base their conclusions on that, and I doubt many will be swayed by your intervention.
Does your obsequious, projectile rainbow glitter trouble me? Yes it does because again it's against the ethos of the site. By all means, challenge the review, ask incisive questions, etc, but do so without the nonsense evident in the quoted post.