Lovely Amyra - Marble Arch - Refused service because I'm a UK Punting reviewer

[stuart.]

Since when has Adultwork feedback had any validity or relevance? Or truth?

When it comes to reading escorts review yes, if I was what you say I am someone would have wrote something bad in that time period simple as

[stuart.]

See, you love making other people's points for them.  Thanks by the way.   

What point?

[bedhedred]

AW feedback has to be earned if you are a punter and it can open doors to certain escorts. I can think of 3 who gave me phone numbers based on mine. I think lots of guys struggle because they didn't bother to collect any feedback.

It is important.

[scutty brown]

So all these girls are lying?

It wouldn't surprise me if the girls comments were influenced by reciprocal fake feedback. You've been on this forum long enough to know it is a repeated perennial problem

[SamOmar]

I didn't treat her bad and in my opinion she was a nutcase with a fiery temper

Whatever you do never book Freya from Diva as she will fuck your brains out and pound up and down on your cock intensity as you will see it as being violated, abused and treating bad lol

Give it a rest, I have seen Amrya 3 times and she has always been accommodating to my requests, (me cancelling the first time, requesting mutual shower, Asking for 3 rounds, Changing a 1 hour booking to 30 minutes and her refunding me) As I said before it's her prerogative to see who she wants when she wants you cannot attempt to control / force her and then leave a negative review with accusations that she is a "nutcase".

You seem to be in denial as to what kind of punter you are...

[stuart.]

Give it a rest, I have seen Amrya 3 times and she has always been accommodating to my requests, (me cancelling the first time, requesting mutual shower, Asking for 3 rounds, Changing a 1 hour booking to 30 minutes and her refunding me) As I said before it's her prerogative to see who she wants when she wants you cannot attempt to control / force her and then leave a negative review with accusations that she is a "nutcase".

You seem to be in denial as to what kind of punter you are...

If you read it properly you would have seen that I said Prettysury was a nutcase

[stuart.]

It wouldn't surprise me if the girls comments were influenced by reciprocal fake feedback. You've been on this forum long enough to know it is a repeated perennial problem

But if I was the dangerous man that you all claim I am surely one girl would have left a negative review as a warning to others? 

[SamOmar]

If you read it properly you would have seen that I said Prettysury was a nutcase

I take back thinking Amyra is a nutcase however I standby the rest of the post especially that you are in denial as to what sort of punter you are

[SamOmar]

But if I was the dangerous man that you all claim I am surely one girl would have left a negative review as a warning to others?

Many of the AW profiles that supposedly left you positive feedback were not written by the WG herself but by her boyfriend / agency  friend who did not know the ins and outs of who you are or what might have gone down in the booking but to simply increase feedback

[LLPunting]

AW feedback has to be earned if you are a punter and it can open doors to certain escorts. I can think of 3 who gave me phone numbers based on mine. I think lots of guys struggle because they didn't bother to collect any feedback.

It is important.

AW feedback isn't important.  It may be useful in getting access to some SPs who believe it has use and turn out to turn a good trick but for the most part, given all the abuse of it in the past, it's only general utility is identifying ropey profile histories.  Particularly for punters it's a double edged sword that has been wielded by SPs (and saboteurs) to the detriment of punters who hadn't actually done anything wrong.  Punters can punt successfully with plenty of "good" SPs without being held to ransom of their "reputation".  It is only "important" to those who are fixated on particular SPs.

[LLPunting]

What point?

Maybe if you did less pounding... oh sorry CTE is blows to the cranium, my bad.

[SamOmar]

Maybe if you did less pounding... oh sorry CTE is blows to the cranium, my bad.

 

[stuart.]

Maybe if you did less pounding... oh sorry CTE is blows to the cranium, my bad.

I didn't realise the word pounding, it would get me so much heat

[stuart.]

Feel like my time on this forum is coming to an end

[scutty brown]

I didn't realise the word pounding, it would get me so much heat

That's only a symptom.....the problem is your whole attitude, which appears to be fuck'em, hurt'em, blame'em.

[stuart.]

That's only a symptom.....the problem is your whole attitude, which appears to be fuck'em, hurt'em, blame'em.

Honestly that's not my attitude towards women at all I cannot prove that though

[SamOmar]

Feel like my time on this forum is coming to an end

You should have manned up and had a long think about why a SP would refuse to see you again, your communication with her after your first review should have been a dead giveaway. Then you received a barrage of criticism on here and you kept defending yourself whilst still coming across like someone who has little respect for the SP you are seeing however you are in denial and making yourself out to be a victim.

[scutty brown]

Honestly that's not my attitude towards women at all I cannot prove that though

We can only perceive you based on the image you project through your posts and reviews.
If that perception is wrong then it's due to you misrepresenting yourself. Only you can change that.

[stuart.]

Damn, I feel like I'm witnessing OP going from hero to villain. I remember there being postive feed back on OPs previous reviews of hotties from members and now man is a villian 

It seems you was right and I wouldn't dare write another review

[stuart.]

You should have manned up and had a long think about why a SP would refuse to see you again, your communication with her after your first review should have been a dead giveaway. Then you received a barrage of criticism on here and you kept defending yourself whilst still coming across like someone who has little respect for the SP you are seeing however you are in denial and making yourself out to be a victim.

She did agree to see me again and she even said not to get cum in her eye again I think it was a week after I met her the first time I can't remember the exact time but pretty sure it's in the comments in my original review of her

[sunnyj]

IMO this is a valuable review, like many other reviews from OP. I have seen WGs based on his review and enjoyed my time. 

[popmopcop]

IMO this is a valuable review, like many other reviews from OP. I have seen WGs based on his review and enjoyed my time. 

As in first impressions count...

[LLPunting]

IMO this is a valuable review, like many other reviews from OP. I have seen WGs based on his review and enjoyed my time. 

IYO how is it valuable to you?  I don't think anyone is really saying it isn't nor hasn't been useful.

What are you really trying to say with the words you've chosen?

[cotton]

I'm trying not to be rude here but no one is going to start a text message like that 🤔

I think most punters , if theyve seen a girl before , identify themselves when rebooking , its simply natural and you hope the girl remembers you positively and wants to see you again , if she dosnt want to see you again then she can refuse and thats fair play.
Ignoring all the side issues the essential issue here is that a punter (stuart) rebooks a girl who he has seen before without identifying himself , the girl however (unbeknown to stuart) based on their first meeting dosnt want to see stuart again, so rather than having the option of refusing the booking at the outset refuses the booking when they meet and she immediately recognises him..
While in stuarts defence he dosnt seem to have acted deliberately , he did cause the issue by not identifying himself , thereby not allowing the girl to refuse the booking at the first point of contact.
The core question is if any punter who has been blocked by a girl (for whatever reason , thats up to her) obtains a booking on the sly and then gets rejected at the venue , is that a legitimate booking and is that a legitimate review 

[Payyourwaymate]

It seems you was right and I wouldn't dare write another review

Don't worry it will blow over. I am sure there are many members that appreciate your reviews. It was you going rounds with scutty brown that blew this whole review up lol. I would probably say it would be best to call it a day on this one.

[jamiekinkxxx]

Don't worry it will blow over. I am sure there are many members that appreciate your reviews. It was you going rounds with scutty brown that blew this whole review up lol. I would probably say it would be best to call it a day on this one.

100% agree it should probably be called a day!

[SoapyTW]

Crikey - what a thread.

So much white knighting of a historically flaky hooker,  with a sprinkling of misrepresentation and character assignation of Stuart on top. Seems to me that there is a lot of inaccurate reading between the lines of these historical reviews. Not sure where this has come from all of a sudden. If people had these thoughts at the time they could / would have mentioned it. Seems to be mob mentality and bandwagoning now. I've never spotted anything remotely sinister in Stuart's reviews in the past nor on a repeat reading now.

Needless to say, I'm on #TeamStuart here.

[bedhedred]

Crikey - what a thread.

So much white knighting of a historically flaky hooker,  with a sprinkling of misrepresentation and character assignation of Stuart on top. Seems to me that there is a lot of inaccurate reading between the lines of these historical reviews. Not sure where this has come from all of a sudden. If people had these thoughts at the time they could / would have mentioned it. Seems to be mob mentality and bandwagoning now. I've never spotted anything remotely sinister in Stuart's reviews in the past nor on a repeat reading now.

Needless to say, I'm on #TeamStuart here.

I think Stuart is definitely being given a kicking and it does not seem warranted. Some members of this forum enjoy the popcorn and the witch hunt. It's a lot of noise with a lot of unpleasant posturing.

[lillythesavage]

I think Stuart is definitely being given a kicking and it does not seem warranted. Some members of this forum enjoy the popcorn and the witch hunt. It's a lot of noise with a lot of unpleasant posturing.

+1.

[LLPunting]

Crikey - what a thread.

So much white knighting of a historically flaky hooker,  with a sprinkling of misrepresentation and character assignation of Stuart on top. Seems to me that there is a lot of inaccurate reading between the lines of these historical reviews. Not sure where this has come from all of a sudden. If people had these thoughts at the time they could / would have mentioned it. Seems to be mob mentality and bandwagoning now. I've never spotted anything remotely sinister in Stuart's reviews in the past nor on a repeat reading now.

Needless to say, I'm on #TeamStuart here.

I think Stuart is definitely being given a kicking and it does not seem warranted. Some members of this forum enjoy the popcorn and the witch hunt. It's a lot of noise with a lot of unpleasant posturing.

+1.

Gents, you have clearly not followed (or are blanking) what was being called out by a number of experienced UKPers with various temperaments but a shared value of respecting consent.  It is not posturing.

Any punter can deviate from past behaviours for whatever reason as has been evidenced many times here over the years, it does not necessarily invalidate any of their contribution but it re-shapes perception  Any punter can be consistent in the experience he seeks (as opposed to what he dramatises in his reviews) yet choose SPs who don't appreciate what it turns out he's after, that's why you need to read the reviews for more than the punter's angle, especially with negatives, and that's why some are questioned more than others if pertinent detail or perspective is lacking.

[centry]

Gents, you have clearly not followed (or are blanking) what was being called out by a number of experienced UKPers with various temperaments but a shared value of respecting consent.  It is not posturing.

Any punter can deviate from past behaviours for whatever reason as has been evidenced many times here over the years, it does not necessarily invalidate any of their contribution but it re-shapes perception  Any punter can be consistent in the experience he seeks (as opposed to what he dramatises in his reviews) yet choose SPs who don't appreciate what it turns out he's after, that's why you need to read the reviews for more than the punter's angle, especially with negatives, and that's why some are questioned more than others if pertinent detail or perspective is lacking.

Speaking as someone who doesn't plan to visit this SP (Lovely Amyra) and who doesn't care about the feelings about the OP (Stuart), so as someone who's as neutral as Switzerland I'm going to ask you a few questions:

Are you sure these experienced UKP'ers that you speak so highly about are truly a bunch of Sherlock-Holmes-esque detectives? The same ones that claim they can spot a TS from a photoshopped picture when even Plastic Surgeons have trouble differentiating? The same ones that claim they definitely know if a woman has orgasmed for sure even when lesbian couples/partners cannot tell for certain?

All that was set was an SP who doesn't really have the best reputation for services, and a UKP member who shared his side of the story. Are you sure you're not a sheep of this mob mentality? Are you sure he's clearly in the wrong? Are you implying that the SP in question doesn't have a few screws loose herself? I know we all think we're smart, but sometimes we just aren't.

[LLPunting]

Speaking as someone who doesn't plan to visit this SP (Lovely Amyra) and who doesn't care about the feelings about the OP (Stuart), so as someone who's as neutral as Switzerland I'm going to ask you a few questions:

Are you sure these experienced UKP'ers that you speak so highly about are truly a bunch of Sherlock-Holmes-esque detectives? The same ones that claim they can spot a TS from a photoshopped picture when even Plastic Surgeons have trouble differentiating? The same ones that claim they definitely know if a woman has orgasmed for sure even when lesbian couples/partners cannot tell for certain?

All that was set was an SP who doesn't really have the best reputation for services, and a UKP member who shared his side of the story. Are you sure you're not a sheep of this mob mentality? Are you sure he's clearly in the wrong? Are you implying that the SP in question doesn't have a few screws loose herself? I know we all think we're smart, but sometimes we just aren't.

Absolutely sure of my respect (despite differences) with the likes of SB and TM and similarly for the less vocal others.

YMMV with any SP, the range of reviews for any "inconsistent" SP proves that.  One might not agree with an SPs MO but other UKPers may lap it up.
You speak of everyone judging from their own pov and beliefs about whatever topic that rings our bells, we debate it vigorously, some of us move out povs some refuse to.  The pub table gum flapping is mostly irrelevant to the point of this site; punters genuinely reporting their encounters with facts not (mis)perceptions which lead others to have similar experiences with the SP to report either because of or despite the review posted.

[centry]

Absolutely sure of my respect (despite differences) with the likes of SB and TM and similarly for the less vocal others.

YMMV with any SP, the range of reviews for any "inconsistent" SP proves that.  One might not agree with an SPs MO but other UKPers may lap it up.
You speak of everyone judging from their own pov and beliefs about whatever topic that rings our bells, we debate it vigorously, some of us move out povs some refuse to.  The pub table gum flapping is mostly irrelevant to the point of this site; punters genuinely reporting their encounters with facts not (mis)perceptions which lead others to have similar experiences with the SP to report either because of or despite the review posted.

I think this is the first time I've ever witnessed such a political answer in this forum to be honest.
You've managed to not address any of my questions (all of them to be exact), but rather dance around it using circular philosophies.

I'll leave you with this image of a paragraph similar to what you've just uttered. 

Attachment :
Hidden Image/Members Only

[bedhedred]

I'll leave you with this image of a paragraph similar to what you've just uttered. 

Attachment :
Hidden Image/Members Only

PMSL😂🤣

[centry]

PMSL😂🤣

Everyone thinks they're smarter than they actually are, when in reality we're just a bunch of donuts ourselves. 

[bedhedred]

Everyone thinks they're smarter than they actually are, when in reality we're just a bunch of donuts ourselves. 

I walked out a disastrous punt at the weekend which was practically a mugging and far from feeling like a veteran of 200 plus reviews, I felt like a total donut. 🥯
So I guess you're right.

[LLPunting]

I think this is the first time I've ever witnessed such a political answer in this forum to be honest.
You've managed to not address any of my questions (all of them to be exact), but rather dance around it using circular philosophies.

I'll leave you with this image of a paragraph similar to what you've just uttered. 

Attachment :
Hidden Image/Members Only

Thanks for the droll quote.

Nothing political at all about my statement, a pretty clear observation/opinion without resorting to swearing and name-calling is all.

Apols, re: being sure, I'm happy to be proved wrong but have read nothing to convince me thus far about how OP engaged with this particular SP.  I've apologised before so have no qualms if it comes to that.

[Liverpool]

I'm surprised that more people don't have a quick chat with the WG face to face about what they are comfortable with and what they are not comfortable with. I find that it helps no end to have a mutually beneficial punt. Yes, shit punts still happen but at least I know I'm not boundary crossing.

Like everyone else, except Stuart and the WG, I wasnt privy to what happened and only have Stuart's report to go by. I've not seen the girl but I think she reserves the right not to see you based on previous experiences with you. Right or wrong it's her perogative to not see you. Time to move on, chalk it up to experience etc.

Lastly, Stuart, while your argument with Scutty was entertaining, your "he started it" standpoint, was juvenile in the extreme.

[ollielon]

Make of it as you will but it reads to me that's all about her not liking what's writing on UKP and as for people reporting to her I don't believe her I really doubt that people speak about me when they're going to fuck her

this review caught my eyes ! no pun intended   her text sounds quite childish but hey she is fit as fuck !

[Malvolio]

I think most punters , if theyve seen a girl before , identify themselves when rebooking , its simply natural and you hope the girl remembers you positively and wants to see you again , if she dosnt want to see you again then she can refuse and thats fair play.

I never do that - I assume the WG is using a smartphone that will show her my previous message was from six months ago asking for her address.  It's up to the WG if she keeps records of the punters she sees, but again I assume the smart ones do.

[Link7]

Good thread. Shows that people aren't scared to speak their mind or call each other out. Sign of a healthy forum imo. No need to threaten to resign Stuart  we're all men here. People see things differently, and that's to be expected.

It is a harsh neg because there was no intent to waste OP's time and she didn't take anything from him. Let's be frank - she just didn't want anything to do him. Which understandably upset the OP - but if we don't have a good experience with a prossie, we don't have to see them again, if we don't want to. Difficult to argue it shouldn't work both ways.

It is quite obvious from the text exchange (and I am not sure OP quite grasped this) that her problem was not so much that he reviewed, as that she perceives he took pleasure from her discomfiture. That is why she had a problem, even though OP rated it Positive. To her mind, he enjoyed and went and boasted about something that she did not enjoy (and perhaps even considered deliberate, or unkind).

In fairness, being excitable when reviewing is not proof of ill intent. We all know there are guys who probably fuck like Mr Bean but describe it as if they're Casanova. In this case, this isn't the first time OP's been questioned on treatment of prossies. He is likely "rough". I think there's been a few girls who never did another facial again after he booked  and there is evidence to suggest he takes his "pounding" to extremes.

But I do think OP's surprise at all this is genuine, which just goes to show self-awareness is important. Considering oneself a good guy does not nessarily mean escorts feel the same about you. Food for thought.

[adindas]

Lovely Amyra (Adultwork)

 


Links         
External Link/Members Only £200 an hour on Adultwork
External Link/Members Only £300 an hour on Diva

It is unbelievable how much divaescort.com making Money charging £200 for half hour by doing almost nothing. Apart from a phone call. The girl is probably just receiving half of it.

The same girl Amyra (Germanika) She is available in on adultwork in London Farringdon with just £70 for half hour.

[king tarzan]

It is unbelievable how much divaescort.com making Money charging £200 for half hour by doing almost nothing. Apart from a phone call. The girl is probably just receiving half of it.

The same girl Amyra (Germanika) She is available in on adultwork in London Farringdon with just £70 for half hour.

It's more security layer away from getting nasty sinister clients..

They already get to know from agency that client coming is a nice gentleman (example myself 🤜🤛🤜🤛🤜🤛✋✋👋👋)

[MrBeano]

i think there should be some kind of rule here not to tell them you gave reviews or will give reviews on here, i always questions peoples intention and motives when they tell the sp about UK punting, i dont think there is a need to tell them your from this site

[Liverpool]

i think there should be some kind of rule here not to tell them you gave reviews or will give reviews on here, i always questions peoples intention and motives when they tell the sp about UK punting, i dont think there is a need to tell them your from this site

It should be fairly obvious not to disclose you will review them anywhere.

Those that post reviews intimating that they told the SP that they will review them positively or negatively get called out for trying to curry favour.

[MrBeano]

It should be fairly obvious not to disclose you will review them anywhere.

Those that post reviews intimating that they told the SP that they will review them positively or negatively get called out for trying to curry favour.

yes i agree, if you tell them about this place thats probably your intention to curry favours from them, also if you tell them about this place we will never know how good or bad their real service is because they will want a positive review and give a different service than normally

[sunnyj]

It's more security layer away from getting nasty sinister clients..

They already get to know from agency that client coming is a nice gentleman

How do agencies know the client is a nice gentleman? 

[LLPunting]

How do agencies know the client is a nice gentleman? 

They might use an "independent" punter tracking service like Client Eye or Ugly Mugs.
They might keep records of who you've seen with them and what the girls said or didn't say.

In KT's case "nice gentleman" is code for "mostly harmless nutter who will pay you just to kiss him".

[Waterhouse]

It's more security layer away from getting nasty sinister clients..

They already get to know from agency that client coming is a nice gentleman (example myself 🤜🤛🤜🤛🤜🤛✋✋👋👋)

They know when you’re coming as they can smell the Kouros 3 blocks away. 

[sunnyj]

They might use an "independent" punter tracking service like Client Eye or Ugly Mugs.
They might keep records of who you've seen with them and what the girls said or didn't say.

In KT's case "nice gentleman" is code for "mostly harmless nutter who will pay you just to kiss him".

Thanks for these details.
Like Ashley Madison, someday the client details that these tracking services are collecting are going to get leaked.