Author Topic: Vanessa20 in N13  (Read 2818 times)


11 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5948037) (6 positive, 2 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by WARSZAWA16]
3 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5466116) (1 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Fully Sated]

Offline Bobmo1

Saw this girl earlier this week. Based not far from the Silver St roundabout towards Palmers Green. Link:
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Based on the top floor of a small block of flats. No buzzer to get in, just open the door and climb the stairs. Not very secure. I hate this kind of location as you never know who you will bump into on the stairs.

Anyway the girl is cute, young and hot. But she is rude and moody.

I paid £50 fucked her and left. She is really fucking moody but her body is fine. I would probably begrudgingly return as there is not much happening round north London so a neutral but honestly should be a negative.

Offline Wozel

Moody how? Please give more details


Offline ollielon

Pretty sure she is not new and has been reviewed before under another profile .. and was already a moody cunt ... thanks for the review !

Offline bedhedred

I've not seen her, but the face looks familiar . The OP gave scant detail,  but from what he did say, I can imagine her added to the list below. Cheapo Hungarian. Hot looking if your lucky, shit service 9 times out of 10.

I avoided Lola because I reckon she was working alongside Lucky Lucy x4. Guilty by association and high risk of a neg.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=284570.msg2963711#msg2963711

Lots of these cheapo Hungarians are utter shite.
A motley crew of neutral and negative experiences

Wanda
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=282963.0
Angelica
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=282950.0
Bbw
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=279282.0
Zara
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=278994.0
Alex love x2 - annoyed me coz I really fancied her.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=278773.0
Hidden Image/Members Only

Bbw
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=278552.0
Larina
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=278447.0



Two really decent ones, when available

Hidden secret
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=278599.0
Hidden Image/Members Only

Aimee Bell
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=267316.0
Hidden Image/Members Only

I can't resist tagging this one. Amyra Blondie. Another negative.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=230440.0
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=276833.0

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: October 15, 2020, 08:47:32 am by bedhedred »

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Pretty sure she is not new and has been reviewed before under another profile .. and was already a moody cunt ... thanks for the review !

Yes she was Chloe Baby 22 who I did a negative review on, but she did get a positive as well off a punter. She was based in a well dodgy brothel off Hedge Lane, Palmers Green, N13 which could match the OPs location.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
I've not seen her, but the face looks familiar . The OP gave scant detail,  but from what he did say, I can imagine her added to the list below. Cheapo Hungarian. Hot looking if your lucky, shit service 9 times out of 10.

Same place you saw Big Butt Michelle though they may have moved since for all I know, its certainly the same brothel set-up. If the postcode the OP went to is N13-5SY then its the same place I went to twice. Full of low lifes. :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: Chloe, Jessica and Michelle are the regular 3 or have been for a long time now with Chloe now calling herself Vanessa and the pimp may add another or other WGs to those 3 sometimes. Basically any Hungarians in N13 going for £80 an hour could well be in this brothel.

Offline Fully Sated

Yes she was Chloe Baby 22 who I did a negative review on, but she did get a positive as well off a punter. She was based in a well dodgy brothel off Hedge Lane, Palmers Green, N13 which could match the OPs location.

Good intel Smiths, I have indexed her AW Profile;

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=273518.0

Offline bedhedred

If it is the Michelle pad, then a high chance of a poor outcome.

And a long journey for me.

At least when I went to the fun house, I felt it was worth the schlep.

Having said all that, the girl looks really hot, with a nice gash as well! I can see why a chap might risk it.
« Last Edit: October 15, 2020, 10:04:20 am by bedhedred »

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
Good intel Smiths, I have indexed her AW Profile;

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=273518.0

Thanks, :thumbsup: that also links in the positive I mentioned I see. My advice to punters remains avoid this brothel.


Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
If it is the Michelle pad, then a high chance of a poor outcome.

And a long journey for me.

At least when I went to the fun house, I felt it was worth the schlep.

Having said all that, the girl looks really hot, with a nice gash as well! I can see why a chap might risk it.

Its 100% the same brothel set-up you experienced, they may of moved but if they have its not by much according to the OP, the only other possibility is Vanessa aka Chloe has now gone it alone, which I think is highly unlikely but not impossible obviously.

Yes the Fun House is ok for me dependent on who is working, vanilla but no bait and switch and I get what was agreed. The FH is still open if not in the same flat its in the same block of flats in Harrow Weald, the difference is some of the WGs are now charging £100 an hour or £60 for half hour both up £10. £50 for half hour was a very good rate, Red Amy in Wood Green charges that but no kissing on offer.

Offline Gambitman92

Pretty sure she is not new and has been reviewed before under another profile .. and was already a moody cunt ... thanks for the review !

She is new, the profile is old and used to belong to Chloe who I and Smiths reviewed but the girl currently using the profile is new.

If it is the Michelle pad, then a high chance of a poor outcome.

And a long journey for me.

At least when I went to the fun house, I felt it was worth the schlep.

Having said all that, the girl looks really hot, with a nice gash as well! I can see why a chap might risk it.

Yes, same flat, I think they're pretty good if you go in there only wanting a p&d, just oral and sex. Michelle is the least attractive out of the 4 women, but at £60/30 mins, they're not worth it for most punters, you can find just as attractive for around £60-£80/30 mins who will give you a much better service.

The pussy picture isn't hers, the same picture was also used in Jessica's profile (who I also saw before I punted with Chloe).

The face and body pictures are real but the pussy ones aren't, the pimp is weird.

Jessica is currently using this stolen picture, I don't get it.
External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: October 15, 2020, 02:55:42 pm by Gambitman92 »
Banned reason: Ignoring warning about white knighting.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
She is new, the profile is old and used to belong to Chloe who I and Smiths reviewed but the girl currently using the profile is new.

Yes, same flat, I think they're pretty good if you go in there only wanting a p&d, just oral and sex. Michelle is the least attractive out of the 4 women, but at £60/30 mins, they're not worth it for most punters, you can find just as attractive for around £60-£80/30 mins who will give you a much better service.

The pussy picture isn't hers, the same picture was also used in Jessica's profile (who I also saw before I punted with Chloe).

The face and body pictures are real but the pussy ones aren't, the pimp is weird.

Jessica is currently using this stolen picture, I don't get it.
External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

This profile number of Vanessa is different to the one that both me and you used in our reviews of Chloe which no longer exists. Vanessas face is the same WG as Chloe was when I booked her, I was bait and switched so didn't meet her but her present face pic is the same woman as Chloes pic was, or its her twin. The pics used for Vanessa now aren't exactly the same pics used when I reviewed Chloe though. Fuck knows with this brothel who punters will meet but I note the OP hasn't said the WG he met looked different to the pics on the profile.
« Last Edit: October 15, 2020, 04:59:35 pm by smiths »

Offline Gambitman92

This profile number of Vanessa is different to the one that both me and you used in our reviews of Chloe which no longer exists. Vanessas face is the same WG as Chloe was when I booked her, I was bait and switched so didn't meet her but her present face pic is the same woman as Chloes pic was, or its her twin. The pics used for Vanessa now aren't exactly the same pics used when I reviewed Chloe though. Fuck knows with this brothel who punters will meet but I note the OP hasn't said the WG he met looked different to the pics on the profile.

That's because the real Chloe went on a break and Vanessa took over the profile you and I reviewed, if you go back to our review of Chloe you'll see that the profile was deleted but the pictures are of Vanessa.

This is the first review of Vanessa, unless the OP didn't see the girl who are in the pictures.

This is Chloe who I punted with
Chloe

Hidden Image/Members Only

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

This is Vanessa
Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: October 15, 2020, 08:30:46 pm by Gambitman92 »
Banned reason: Ignoring warning about white knighting.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline bedhedred

The story has many twists and turns, but only @bobmo1 can tell us for sure if the moody bitch he saw is Vanessa, and if that is her pussy (or just a stunt cunt wheeled in for the action). I'm obsessed with pussy tightness these days and you can't really gauge that from a photo; only from entry.

Offline smiths

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 18,134
  • Likes: 26
  •  
  • Reviews: 285
That's because the real Chloe went on a break and Vanessa took over the profile you and I reviewed, if you go back to our review of Chloe you'll see that the profile was deleted but the pictures are of Vanessa.

This is the first review of Vanessa, unless the OP didn't see the girl who are in the pictures.

This is Chloe who I punted with
This is Vanessa
Hidden Image/Members Only

I imagine the pimp purposely swapped the profile rather than the WG just went on a break, this pimp is well dodgy as they have proved to my satisfaction. :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: :thumbsdown: However, that's not unusual for pimps in the same area and around about.