Lusty Busty Lucy - glasgow

[Scot712]

External Link/Members Only

£50 for 30min - usually £60 but it was a summer offer

Communication : Spot on. Texted on short notice and got reply immediately.

Location : City Centre flat
Look : tall, about 6ft, good pair of boobs

Meeting : Paper work done straight away and shower taken

Lots of DFK, exploring each other's body. She gave me one of the best OWO very enthusiastically, very deep throat, lots of eye contact. I licked her for a  while, tasted clean and fresh, lots of moaning - may be fake

With bag, cow girl, doggy, missionary - all delivered without any issues and enthusiastically

Looks : 7/10
Body: 8/10
Service: 9/10

Overall very nice and friendly lady, eager to please and delivers what she claims on her profile.

[S.X. MacHine]

Good review, thankyou. Economy of words but without omission; in other words, has all the information I need to help me choose. I assume the 'city centre' flat is in Glasgow? She mentions Motherwell as a location in her AW profile.

[Givememilf]

Hey good review.

Would you say her age is accurate?

[Scot712]

Good review, thankyou. Economy of words but without omission; in other words, has all the information I need to help me choose. I assume the 'city centre' flat is in Glasgow? She mentions Motherwell as a location in her AW profile.

Yeah, it was a glasgow city centre flat, off Argyle Street. I think she works alternatively from East Kilbride and city centre.

[Scot712]

Hey good review.

Would you say her age is accurate?

IMHO, she looks like somewhere between 38 to 42 around.

[Clattypats]

Good review, thankyou. Economy of words but without omission; in other words, has all the information I need to help me choose. I assume the 'city centre' flat is in Glasgow? She mentions Motherwell as a location in her AW profile.

Nice to see he has your seal of approval 

You seem to have your own view of how reviews should be written on here (you mention it enough)....A reviewer can review anyway he wishes, whether that be more detailed, or slightly more restrained, as you are alluding to here...Aslong as it fits the criteria for a review then that's fine..

Do you still hold the same opinion on NEGs:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=185449.msg1944700#msg1944700

Maybe you should refresh your memory, and look at site rules, as to what constitutes a review... 

[S.X. MacHine]

Nice to see he has your seal of approval 

You seem to have your own view of how reviews should be written on here (you mention it enough)....A reviewer can review anyway he wishes, whether that be more detailed, or slightly more restrained, as you are alluding to here...Aslong as it fits the criteria for a review then that's fine..

Do you still hold the same opinion on NEGs:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=185449.msg1944700#msg1944700

Well, it was a cryptic review (mine are longer), but it contained sufficient information for me to decide whether the WG is worth visiting.
Please do not think that, by implication, I am being negative about reviews which are more detailed. That said, I agree that Reviews can sometimes be so short and lacking in detail that they are of no use. At the other extreme, do you remember Taz's reviews? I rarely had the attention span to get through those.
I think there is a balance to be found in writing reviews. Where that balance is, remains a matter of opinion.

Maybe you should refresh your memory, and look at site rules, as to what constitutes a review... 

[S.X. MacHine]

Bugger! Got the technology wrong again.
My reply is contained in the lower part of the shaded text.

[Clattypats]

I agree, there are extremes tbh...Maybe gets a bit boring when you mention it on comments, after alot of reviews that fit in with the way you like them to be written...

BTW, you should know how to quote properly by now...

[Clattypats]

Bugger! Got the technology wrong again.
My reply is contained in the lower part of the shaded text.

I know...That's why I didn't quote you...It just ends up a fangled mess ...But fair dooz, I wasn't looking for an argument anyway...just stating a point...