There’s different levels. It varies from “well if he’s willing to pay it...” to “it’s not illegal, not my responsibility’ to cases of knowing emotional abuse of the punter.
But what’s the alternative? If there were greater acceptance of prostitution then probably more common sense would prevail and extreme cases stand out like a sore thumb. Do we need prοssies to be like pharmacists who won’t provide certain things because the patient is deemed unstable?
But it’s worse ...
The bigger picture IMO is that the internet — and also the demise of street walking — has given rise to an informal monopoly on prices. Members here are fortunate. They can afford AW prices, at least occasionally.
Yet getting your balls emptied by a woman (or a man if you’re that way inclined) is a normal, healthy thing and actually important I’d suggest to good mental and physical health. It shouldn’t be only for those lucky enough, attractive enough or with £60 or more that they can afford to lose. There are still countries where a quick shag is available for a tenner, a bit more or a bit less, and women who would do it here as well if the prevailing hassles didn’t prevent it.
I don’t think £60 is maybe too unreasonable for a very nice, well-delivered half-hour with an attractive woman who is skilled at what she does. But it should be a luxury option. Sure, sex can be an ultimate, stunningly amazing and life-enhancing experience, but an encounter with a prostitute is the kebab that meets a need, not a Michelin star fandango. We don’t live in an age where prostitutes are the most sought-after women in the world.
Give them their due, but the romanticisation that is part-and-parcel of the grossly inflated pricing system is something this site tries constantly to make punters more aware of. We can’t change the system or the prices, but we can be alert and stay in touch with what’s happening, and not get screwed (no pun intended) more than we can help.
A shag is a shag is a shag. Let’s put this EAS nonsense into history.
