Isla_Brooks - Solihull

[_Rust_]

The only person I would like to know is jeffallen 

 

I'm Jeff Allen.



Not really, just wanted to take the 100th comment on this fascinating thread 

[_Rust_]

Ive run out of popcorn.

Safe to say this review has done nothing if not unite people 

[PepeMAGA]

I'm Jeff Allen.



Not really, just wanted to take the 100th comment on this fascinating thread 

We're all Jeff Allen, he's like a Spartacus/ Negan character.

[smiley9]

I'm Jeff Allen.



Not really, just wanted to take the 100th comment on this fascinating thread 

I'm Jeff Allen and so's my wife 

[azrael]

Never had so much fun

Can i be jeff allen?

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Oralbgood]

I think it is this thread that took UKPunting down

[Digger1965]

What's all the fuss about?. Who knows what is punters get upto in our private lives, how many pick up girls and have unprotected sex with and then go punting?. I don't think it's fair to single Isla out as some sort of diseased creature. We all know the risks involved, if you have doubts I would suggest that it is not for you.

[bearcat69]

I never met Isla so can't say what she is like, but IMHO just think linking AW names and UKP names is wrong.

We can all play detective and mention names but that doesn't help any punter. But each to there own 

The only person I would like to know is jeffallen 

 

Cheers legendinho, took the words out of my mouth. 

I mean, seriously guys, is really the way you all want to play it. Where is the mutual respect for other punters discretion? Where does such nonsense end? Anytime somebody posts a negative you don't agree with are we all going to be expected to reveal AW usernames and explain or activities on there? Hey why don't we just all post our full personal details and have real photos of ourselves as our avatars? 

I fully expected people to disagree with me and try to pick my review apart, and for the most part I'm fine with that. I know she has a lot of big fans on here, and I am sorry if I've offended anybody by criticising her. But this is stupid. We all know AW feedback is meaningless, WTF guys, do I seriously have to explain that to other punters? 

I really must've misunderstood this forum. I thought it was a place for punters to share their honest opinions, I thought those who set up this forum went to great lengths to make it that way instead of some useless forum for pimps and fluffies to pat each other on the back. This bullshit, it, well.. Dare I say it.. It really makes me not want to post a negative review again. 

[vw]

I really must've misunderstood this forum. I thought it was a place for punters to share their honest opinions, I thought those who set up this forum went to great lengths to make it that way instead of some useless forum for pimps and fluffies to pat each other on the back. This bullshit, it, well.. Dare I say it.. It really makes me not want to post a negative review again. 

No the forum is polluted with white knight bottom feeders that think they can attack any review of their favourites.

No idea why they think that they are so important that they can tell people how to rate their reviews,  They should just fuck off and be an arselicker elsewhere.

Others now think this mental behaviour is normal and more and more negatives for forum darlings will be attacked.

Keep posting honest reviews and hopefully admin will keep these fluffies from the site.

[Flunt]

I really must've misunderstood this forum. I thought it was a place for punters to share their honest opinions, I thought those who set up this forum went to great lengths to make it that way instead of some useless forum for pimps and fluffies to pat each other on the back. This bullshit, it, well.. Dare I say it.. It really makes me not want to post a negative review again. 

I sympathise with your feelings and if you feel you had a bad experience then the negative is justified and welcome by the silent majority. The problem I have with your review is that overall if I had a punt as you described I would be reasonably happy.

I get the limited reverse oral, disappointing oral, the fake moaning and a couple of other annoyances but is it really a negative review? (In your welcome opinion, YES!).

I reserve negative reviews to the time wasters that don't answer the phone when you're stood outside.

A pro$$ie gets a negative if she has misled punters with her age, appearance and/or service.

From reading your review: she was on time, fresh and ready for you; she looks about the same as her photos; she provides the services on her likes list; and finally has a fluffy chat while eating cream eggs and over running on time. If that gets a negative what's a pro$$ie to do?

[threechilliman]

Dare I say it.. It really makes me not want to post a negative review again. 

Never be afraid to post a negative review if it's honest.

tcm

[bearcat69]

From reading your review: she was on time, fresh and ready for you; she looks about the same as her photos; she provides the services on her likes list; and finally has a fluffy chat while eating cream eggs and over running on time. If that gets a negative what's a pro$$ie to do?

Well, we all have our own ways of rating things.

I'm going to make a list of positives, neutrals and negatives of the booking to try to make it as clear as I can.

Positives
-great ass
-nice legs
-tried her best to please me
-very good kisser
-nice venue
-cream eggs
-a sexy voice
-good greeting and goodbye
-running over time
-trying her best to dress to my request

Neutrals
-messaging me afterwards telling me to get myself checked (whilst I respect the honesty, I don't need to be told this, and it's hardly pleasant post-punt conversation)
-mostly does look like her photos, but they are slightly flattering IMO
-on time (this is a good thing, but should be expected really as far as I'm concerned)
-did provide the majority of the things on her likes list (the quality of the provision is the issue)
-her offering to try to make the next meet more to my preferences

Negatives
-limited RO
-fake noises
-complaining about my dick
-labeling me as shy (this has to be one of the weirdest things a prossie has said to me)
-making other personal comments towards me (about my appearance)
-being overly personal in general
-very poor and unconvincing attempt to roleplay a pornstar
-immediately at the start of the OWO asking me to tell her when I'm going to cum, and then asking it over and over again
-time consuming and awkward communications
-the mid punt shower
-not full DT and also it was quite toothy
-asking me to specify over and over again where I'm going to cum
-used too much lube (forgot to mention this)
-loose pussy
-off putting stuff around her mouth
-not really fucking me all that enthusiastically (I had to take things into my own hands and push her up and down on me to cum)
-skinnier looking than her photos
-than stupid shit she said about wanting to take back the word hooker
-stop/start flow to the sex
-just generally too much talking and fussing
-some indiscretion on communication (she actually texted me 3 hours after I texted her in the morning to confirm the booking was still on)

So, as you can see. There are some very positive things about the booking, but there are also a lot of negative things. A lot of the negative things aren't that big a deal, but when you put them all together, well you have a clear negative as far as I am concerned. If I'm guilty of anything, it's not making myself clear enough in my review. It's something I shall take into consideration if I need to post a negative review in the future.

[Jawbreak]

Cheers legendinho, took the words out of my mouth. 

I mean, seriously guys, is really the way you all want to play it. Where is the mutual respect for other punters discretion? Where does such nonsense end? Anytime somebody posts a negative you don't agree with are we all going to be expected to reveal AW usernames and explain or activities on there? Hey why don't we just all post our full personal details and have real photos of ourselves as our avatars? 

I fully expected people to disagree with me and try to pick my review apart, and for the most part I'm fine with that. I know she has a lot of big fans on here, and I am sorry if I've offended anybody by criticising her. But this is stupid. We all know AW feedback is meaningless, WTF guys, do I seriously have to explain that to other punters? 


I really must've misunderstood this forum. I thought it was a place for punters to share their honest opinions, I thought those who set up this forum went to great lengths to make it that way instead of some useless forum for pimps and fluffies to pat each other on the back. This bullshit, it, well.. Dare I say it.. It really makes me not want to post a negative review again. 

Merely pointing out that what is obvious. 
Im no detective but why the positive on AW and the negative on UKP - is all im asking 
You are not helping yourself. It was never my intention on revealing your username on AW just a highlight on your contradiction in feedback.
Its utterly misleading. wouldn't you agree Bearcat ? 
Apologies once again for revealing your usernames. was not done in malice sorry.

[vw]

Merely pointing out that what is obvious. 
Im no detective but why the positive on AW and the negative on UKP - is all im asking 
You are not helping yourself. It was never my intention on revealing your username on AW just a highlight on your contradiction in feedback.
Its utterly misleading. wouldn't you agree Bearcat ? 
Apologies once again for revealing your usernames. was not done in malice sorry.

I notice Little barbie didn't get a negative or feedback only on adultwork (Which you can do later ) from anyone saying stuff similar to your review !

you do yourself no favours, just pure white knighting a favourite prossie and probably forum buddies.

[threechilliman]

-off putting stuff around her mouth

Do you want to be more specific?

tcm

[bearcat69]

Do you want to be more specific?

tcm

Quite a few spots and piercing holes.

[vw]

Negatives
-limited RO
-fake noises
-complaining about my dick
-labeling me as shy (this has to be one of the weirdest things a prossie has said to me)
-making other personal comments towards me (about my appearance)
-being overly personal in general
-very poor and unconvincing attempt to roleplay a pornstar
-immediately at the start of the OWO asking me to tell her when I'm going to cum, and then asking it over and over again
-time consuming and awkward communications
-the mid punt shower
-not full DT and also it was quite toothy
-asking me to specify over and over again where I'm going to cum
-used too much lube (forgot to mention this)
-loose pussy
-off putting stuff around her mouth
-not really fucking me all that enthusiastically (I had to take things into my own hands and push her up and down on me to cum)
-skinnier looking than her photos
-than stupid shit she said about wanting to take back the word hooker
-stop/start flow to the sex
-just generally too much talking and fussing
-some indiscretion on communication (she actually texted me 3 hours after I texted her in the morning to confirm the booking was still on)

Thanks for simplifying this for the white knights that think they know best.

[Jawbreak]

I notice Little barbie didn't get a negative or feedback only on adultwork (Which you can do later ) from anyone saying stuff similar to your review !

you do yourself no favours, just pure white knighting a favourite prossie and probably forum buddies.

If you read my report on barbie you will know why no feedback is left.
why leave anything negative knowing full well it would impact on my aw profile, but in the same vain why leave misleading positive feedback
Please do not try to tar me with the same brush.
in my review of barbie I made it clear what she is doing.
Wouldnt you agree that no feedback it better than positive feedback, especially when the SP is asking after the meet for positive feedback entirely to bait more punters.
Your rant at me is unjustified.
Thanks
 

[azrael]

I really must've misunderstood this forum. I thought it was a place for punters to share their honest opinions, I thought those who set up this forum went to great lengths to make it that way instead of some useless forum for pimps and fluffies to pat each other on the back. This bullshit, it, well.. Dare I say it.. It really makes me not want to post a negative review again. 

I sympathise with your feelings and if you feel you had a bad experience then the negative is justified and welcome by the silent majority. The problem I have with your review is that overall if I had a punt as you described I would be reasonably happy.

I get the limited reverse oral, disappointing oral, the fake moaning and a couple of other annoyances but is it really a negative review? (In your welcome opinion, YES!).

I reserve negative reviews to the time wasters that don't answer the phone when you're stood outside.

A pro$$ie gets a negative if she has misled punters with her age, appearance and/or service.

From reading your review: she was on time, fresh and ready for you; she looks about the same as her photos; she provides the services on her likes list; and finally has a fluffy chat while eating cream eggs and over running on time. If that gets a negative what's a pro$$ie to do?

+1, this is one of the reasons why a lot of fellow punters question your " -ive" review

Never be afraid to post a negative review if it's honest.

tcm

+1,  they are the life blood of this forum especially the negatives.  Again your version of events is  questionable as you posted a -ive but you wrote everything favouring a +ive.
As most said it is the writers prerogative in what he writes, as its the right to have it criticised by fellow punters 

[naughty boy 13]

Well that escalated quickly!

[vw]

If you read my report on barbie you will know why no feedback is left.
why leave anything negative knowing full well it would impact on my aw profile, but in the same vain why leave misleading feedback
Please do not try to tar me with the same brush.
in my review of barbie I made it clear what she is doing.
Wouldnt you agree that no feedback it better than positive feedback, especially when the SP is asking after the meet for positive feedback entirely to bait more punters.
Your rant at me is unjustified.
Thanks
 

Bullcrap, you are white knighting and a hypocrite, why should bear tarnish his AW record when you are not willing to.

[Jawbreak]

Bullcrap, you are white knighting and a hypocrite, why should bear tarnish his AW record when you are not willing to.

Why leave anything at all is my point.
So leaving a fake positive is better than leaving nothing for barbie really?
yep im a hypocrite if i have left nothing knowing it will impact on my AW profile.
As for white knighting - if asking for clarification on AW positive feedback and negative UKP review is white knighting then im guilty.
Hope you understand leaving NOTHING is better than leaving a fake positive.

 

[vw]

Why leave anything at all is my point.
So leaving a fake positive is better than leaving nothing for barbie really?
yep im a hypocrite if i have left nothing knowing it will impact on my AW profile.
As for white knighting - if asking for clarification on AW positive feedback and negative UKP review is white knighting then im guilty.
Hope you understand leaving NOTHING is better than leaving a fake positive.

Well with her excessive comms, i imagine he was living in fear of being bugged for AW feedback.

Yes white knights are well known for muddying water and ignoring the facts.

Negatives
-limited RO
-fake noises
-complaining about my dick
-labeling me as shy (this has to be one of the weirdest things a prossie has said to me)
-making other personal comments towards me (about my appearance)
-being overly personal in general
-very poor and unconvincing attempt to roleplay a pornstar
-immediately at the start of the OWO asking me to tell her when I'm going to cum, and then asking it over and over again
-time consuming and awkward communications
-the mid punt shower
-not full DT and also it was quite toothy
-asking me to specify over and over again where I'm going to cum
-used too much lube (forgot to mention this)
-loose pussy
-off putting stuff around her mouth
-not really fucking me all that enthusiastically (I had to take things into my own hands and push her up and down on me to cum)
-skinnier looking than her photos
-than stupid shit she said about wanting to take back the word hooker
-stop/start flow to the sex
-just generally too much talking and fussing
-some indiscretion on communication (she actually texted me 3 hours after I texted her in the morning to confirm the booking was still on)

[Placebo88]

It is the afterthoughts part of the review that most contradicts the negative rating.

The lists make the issues easier to weigh up, and the red list is the longest.

AW profile says PSE, CIM and DT. All the asking about cumming makes no sense and reminds of rush job efforts.

All the questioning can be a headache, not what I punt for, and anything too personal is a no-no.

For all her claims her reviews are all very samey as if she only has one way of doing things. Does she take direction well and respond professionally if told to change what she is doing or does it go downhill?

The reaction to the BB punter has been excessive, but in conjunction with it the damage around her mouth is a concern.

This is the most informative review we have had of her to date and outright says a few questionable traits that were at most implied previously.

[Jawbreak]

Muddying the water,  the facts as you put it were put out there after my post I am merely saying ...
Oh well you're still missing my point so ill just STFU
This is going nowhere, Im a hypocrite for mentioning conflict of feedback.
Good day sir.
 
 

Well with her excessive comms, i imagine he was living in fear of being bugged for AW feedback.

Yes white knights are well known for muddying water and ignoring the facts.

[threechilliman]

Quite a few spots and piercing holes.

Cheers.

tcm

[Madone1]

Bearcats original review was good if not a little confusing as to why it was a negative but that's up to him the pro and con list later made the whole booking sound like a negative.

but it seems like Isla is one of the few girls around who would learn from a negative and bearcat left it open to give her a second chance.


But she is the forum darling so any negative review was always going to be meet with disbelief and a whole cavalry charge of white knights.

[Flunt]

So, as you can see. There are some very positive things about the booking, but there are also a lot of negative things. A lot of the negative things aren't that big a deal, but when you put them all together, well you have a clear negative as far as I am concerned. If I'm guilty of anything, it's not making myself clear enough in my review. It's something I shall take into consideration if I need to post a negative review in the future.

Thanks for the effort in your review and your reply. I hope you can understand the confusion of a positive leaning review with a negative headline. A couple of disappointments in a review can lead to a neutral but when there are overwhelming negatives then the review is justified.

I wish you better luck next time 

[vw]

Bearcats original review was good if not a little confusing as to why it was a negative but that's up to him the pro and con list later made the whole booking sound like a negative.

but it seems like Isla is one of the few girls around who would learn from a negative and bearcat left it open to give her a second chance.


But she is the forum darling so any negative review was always going to be meet with disbelief and a whole cavalry charge of white knights.

Morale of the story is keep it simple and maybe use a list of negative points as these white knights like golfnut are a bit thick and need it spelling out to them.

[GolfNut]

Morale of the story is keep it simple and maybe use a list of negative points as these white knights like golfnut are a bit thick and need it spelling out to them.

Yeah must be really thick to read any of this fluffy garbage as a negative 

Afterthoughts
Overall it was a good meet.

But that didn’t stop me from enjoying it

Would I go back?
I would like to try her again, once I’m as sure as can be that we are both clean and healthy, that’s if she’ll have me.

She’s a hot girl how is skilled in the bedroom, I’m happy to come and visit her and pay for the pleasure of having sex with her. It’s not rocket science.

[vw]

Yeah must be really thick to read any of this fluffy garbage as a negative 

Yes you are real special needs.   

You skip through everything else just to defend any prossie you have seen before.

Maybe admin will give you the job of deciding all review ratings of girls you have met.  Like this lot when you were asking for age specialists and evidence.   

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=84730.msg1043714#msg1043714

Or maybe we could stick to the rule his review his rating.   

[GolfNut]

Yes you are real special needs.   

You skip through everything else just to defend any prossie you have seen before.

Maybe admin will give you the job of deciding all review ratings of girls you have met.  Like this lot when you were asking for age specialists and evidence.   

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=84730.msg1043714#msg1043714

Is your spell checker working now. You're almost actually speaking English. Pity you're stuck in a bit of a time warp though 

[vw]

Is your spell checker working now. You're almost actually speaking English. Pity you're stuck in a bit of a time warp though 

Spelling the last line of defence of white knights, bet your gutted you cannot use that one today.

Those that don't learn from history are destined to repeat it.  Think most people know your destiny.   

[GolfNut]

Spelling the last line of defence of white knights, bet your gutted you cannot use that one today.

Those that don't learn from history are destined to repeat it.  Think most people know your destiny.   

You're doing very well today VW. Got a new phone?

Perhaps you should read people's posts before making yourself look like a prize dick

I personally think a Neutral is certainly fair in the circumstances given the bits you weren't happy with. Some may even have rated it a positive.

Your decision at the end of the day though.

[vw]

Perhaps you should read people's posts before making yourself look like a prize dick

Yes lots of posts

I'm struggling to see this as a negative experience as others have stated.

Anyway

Once a White Knight, always a White Knight ...

could quote pages and pages of this stuff !

Usually when you try and railroad threads away from the original negative.

[cueball]

Well, this is rolling along nicely. I'm having a right good chuckle 

End of the day, bearcat has done a negative reviewand even summed it up further back, that's enough for me. His review..... his rating. His summary post does make it a lot clearer imo.

Fwiw... I don't give a toss what his AW nic is or what he's written on AW. It's what's written here that matters to me.

[Sh5278]

Wow, I guess I missed a lot this past week. Just when I decided to take a break from UKP  Hope all is well for everyone regarding the Webber situation

[The Owl]

I had a similar experience with a escort. For some reason when we met there was something missing and the sexual side was a disaster for me despite her best efforts. In the end we had a fun conversation about shared interests. She was more like a mate (but not because of good boundaries). I decided not to review her but that was my choice.

As for STI's. We're all responsible for doing our own vetting (not just the escort). We also can only see AW active clients so anything uncovered is a risk. Want to be 100% safe? Don't have sex with anyone.

[mikexxlong]

No the forum is polluted with white knight bottom feeders that think they can attack any review of their favourites.

No idea why they think that they are so important that they can tell people how to rate their reviews,  They should just fuck off and be an arselicker elsewhere.

Others now think this mental behaviour is normal and more and more negatives for forum darlings will be attacked.

Keep posting honest reviews and hopefully admin will keep these fluffies from the site.

I couldn’t agree more
Plenty of these cunts undermining the ethos of the forum

And some pretend to be normal sensible punters but are two faced
 sneaky conniving underhanded creeps and will plead innocence when challenged,
 fucking snakes in the grass

[Taylor2441]

I agree Mike.

This thread has completely diversified from the original topic and has either helped or hindered Miss Brooke's.

Having never met the lady of whom this thread is subject to, would it be best to keep the negative thoughts seperate from the reviews.  If I met a lady, had a great hour with and enjoyed every second, but she did it kiss me for 28 seconds I wouldn't post about a negative experience. 

[Fishface]

Reads like a Negative review of a Porsche rather than a Positive review of a Mini Metro.

Still worth a go unless there is content that isn't your thing and pointers for the hooker she wants to be.

All in all a very positive negative review props to OP the devil is in the detail and what counts is how you feel as you walk away being the paying customer, not what you 'should' feel.

[Dodo]

Well, this is rolling along nicely. I'm having a right good chuckle 

End of the day, bearcat has done a negative reviewand even summed it up further back, that's enough for me. His review..... his rating. His summary post does make it a lot clearer imo.

Fwiw... I don't give a toss what his AW nic is or what he's written on AW. It's what's written here that matters to me.

Seems a fair summary to me 

Can we have a definition of a White Knight please VW........you do seem to get very excited about them for reasons I struggle to understand.

[vw]

I struggle to understand.

sorry to hear that you struggle to understand, I'm not  a great teacher but know it is well documented on this site what a white knight is.

[GolfNut]

Seems a fair summary to me 

Can we have a definition of a White Knight please VW........you do seem to get very excited about them for reasons I struggle to understand.

In VW's case I'd say anyone who can read, interpret the English language, spot inconsistencies in an argument and sees beyond the single word NEGATIVE to see what's going on under the surface of what is in this case possibly the fluffiest negative ever written. 

[GolfNut]

Seems a fair summary to me 

Can we have a definition of a White Knight please VW........you do seem to get very excited about them for reasons I struggle to understand.

He's even taken to bumping a negative review in London for a girl I gave a positive to in a pathetic attempt to rile yours truly. Clearly starting to lose the plot it appears.

[vw]

He's even taken to bumping a negative review in London for a girl I gave a positive to in a pathetic attempt to rile yours truly. Clearly starting to lose the plot it appears.

Seems yourthe one losing the plot, was thinking the blog post she posted reads very much like your normal postings when you are trying to control other peoples review rankings.

You seem flustered golfie.     

[GolfNut]

Seems yourthe one losing the plot, was thinking the blog post she posted reads very much like your normal postings when you are trying to control other peoples review rankings.

You seem flustered golfie.     

Your logic defies belief VW. I'm not the one making wild accusations or assumptions here. It's pretty obvious to all and sundry you appear to be going off the rails. Maybe seek some professional help.

[vw]

Your logic defies belief VW. I'm not the one making wild accusations or assumptions here. It's pretty obvious to all and sundry you appear to be going off the rails. Maybe seek some professional help.

I'm fine thanks, no wild accusations here.  Your obsession with certain girls rankings from other punters and desire to manipulate those is clear for all to see.  You were banned twice for it already.   

[GolfNut]

I'm fine thanks, no wild accusations here.  Your obsession with certain girls rankings from other punters and desire to manipulate those is clear for all to see.  You were banned twice for it already.   

I seriously think all your head bashing has taken its toll. Maybe loosened a few screws.  Get some help mate. Your obsession is starting to make you appear seriously deranged.

[vw]

I seriously think all your head bashing has taken its toll. Maybe loosened a few screws.  Get some help mate. Your obsession is starting to make you appear seriously deranged.

Seems you are the deranged one, time will tell, was under the impression you were the obsessed one.  Anyway best of luck.