sweet_emily X - Derby

[HailWood]

Yes those that don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it.      Hence my free history lessons to keep Sherwood safe.   

I bet you wear your pants outside your trousers. Super VW coming to the rescue of the Marions.  Has a certain ring to it 

[cueball]

keep Sherwood safe.

It's a bloody good job the sherwoodians have got us on hand with warm cuddly advice isn't it! 

We deserve a medal, a medal I say 

[Picti]

Another who appears to be playing the accumulate false positive AW feedback after a negative UKE review game.

One particular punter has left multiple feedback since her negative on here. He has even left two feedback for the same day, and then feedback on three consecutive days.

If you're on here, have you really met Emily on all these occasions? If you have, and you're genuinely enjoying her then there's no problem, but if you haven't and you're leaving false feedback then stop it!

[mrfishyfoo]

Another who appears to be playing the accumulate false positive AW feedback after a negative UKE review game.

One particular punter has left multiple feedback since her negative on here. He has even left two feedback for the same day, and then feedback on three consecutive days.

If you're on here, have you really met Emily on all these occasions? If you have, and you're genuinely enjoying her then there's no problem, but if you haven't and you're leaving false feedback then stop it!

I don't get these cunstruck twats that think the whore they've just fucked actually gives a shit.

Deluded fuckwits the lot of them.

[vw]

Another who appears to be playing the accumulate false positive AW feedback after a negative UKE review game.

These punters are shady, in order of shadiness for multiple feedback for her.

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

[Picti]

These punters are shady, in order of shadiness for multiple feedback for her.

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

I didn't know that we're allowed to post AW IDs. The first one was who I referred to, and also noticed the second.

[badsin]

These punters are shady, in order of shadiness for multiple feedback for her.

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

They might just be fluffy fuckers, that enjoy trying to ingratiate themselves to these pro's?
Different folks get off on all manor of things.

If they are lurkers on here, then should do a balls out review of the whores they adore

[mrfishyfoo]

I didn't know that we're allowed to post AW IDs. The first one was who I referred to, and also noticed the second.

Linking AWank and UKP usernames is what's frowned on as many members on here don't want this info public.

They feel it compromises their anonymity and also "hinders" their ability to do reviews.

[vw]

I didn't know that we're allowed to post AW IDs. The first one was who I referred to, and also noticed the second.

Have not linked them to anyone so broke no rules.

Maybe will make them think better of it next time just shameing them rather than naming and shaming.

[Picti]

Have not linked them to anyone so broke no rules.

Maybe will make them think better of it next time just shameing them rather than naming and shaming.

Good to know  .

I'll be sure to add that to MTBs induction pack 

[vw]

Good to know  .

I'll be sure to add that to MTBs induction pack 

Well that and the trousers.      Have you caught up on #trousergate?

Sure we had a list of togs that review new girls somewhere in the past so we know the bullshit 1st feedbacks.

[NervousJ]

Hmmmmm 3 days running my arse, well shady..

I'd still quite like to see her, but something's stopping me at present...

Does she's actually look like  her pics...I guess that's the least of my worries...

[cueball]

I'd still quite like to see her, but something's stopping me at present..

  something stopping you at present 

The last 19 pages perhaps? 

[NervousJ]

something stopping you at present 

The last 19 pages perhaps? 
[/quote



Yes....

[NervousJ]

Tbh, if there were some official reviews and sightings I might take a chance.. nothing like a spot of Russian roulette..

[mrfishyfoo]

.. nothing like a spot of Russian roulette..

Better off TOFFT with a Rommie off Viva if you're after that. 

[mrfishyfoo]

The last 19 pages perhaps? 

Just keeps on giving doesn't it. 

Shame that little todger never told his story. 

[Picti]

Well that and the trousers.      Have you caught up on #trousergate?

In his defence it might have been "Jeans for Genes Day" at work that day 

[cueball]

Shame that little todger never told his story. 

Don't be too hard on yourself 

[Picti]

I'd still quite like to see her, but something's stopping me at present...

Remember her disinhibition and indiscretion on here, and on more than one occasion? Let me construct a wee scenario for you.

Your out with your OH, family, friends, or colleagues. You look up and there she is, a bit pissed and lary. Now, she's with Pete who already knows about her whoring activities so she has nothing to loose by saying something. How confident are you that she'll keep to the Punting Code...how tight is your pulsing sphincter?

[mrfishyfoo]

Don't be too hard on yourself 

Cheeky twat 

WHEN A PUNTER POSTS THIS AND THEN GOES QUIET....

.....since she fucked me about and the 'condom incident'.

.....then I for one think the insuation requires that he gives a little more.

Did it split ??

Is she a closet barebacker and offered to fuck him without one ??

WTF is he hinting at ??

[Picti]

I have seen her several time since she started in June. Very sexy, filthy, loves giving oral, swallows. All was going well until the last couple of meets...she is fast becoming flaky. Last meet we arranged a time, I text to say I was almost there to be told she had to go into work (part-time stuff) and that we could meet an hour later.... an hour later, I text again and she eventually replied to say it would be another half hour and that she would text me to say when ready. More fool me, I called her two hours after the original appointment, she answered and said that she was very tipsy and that she wanted to see me. Against my better judgement, I went...she was duly pissed, I asked if she had seen any other punters that day..to which she admitted she had seen two. I guess that is why I was kept waiting. Anyway, carried on with meet...she really is filthy, I think she drinks to cope with meets tbh. Anyway, putting my clothes back on, I find a used condom underneath my clothes..it wasn't mine. I put it in the bin, asking her about it and she said it must have been her boyfriends.

My first meets and impression of her were favourable however, I am not sure she will be escorting for much longer and is becoming something of a conveyor belt.

Not for me.

He may have been referring to this.

[mrfishyfoo]

He may have been referring to this.

REALLY  FFS if that's what he was referring to then he needs to toughen up.

She's a whore so used condoms are par for the course IMHO.

[PepeMAGA]

REALLY  FFS if that's what he was referring to then he needs to toughen up.

She's a whore so used condoms are par for the course IMHO.

Depends if it's contents were emptied on his garments. Wouldn't really want pete's spunk on my threads

[mrfishyfoo]

Depends if it's contents were emptied on his garments. Wouldn't really want pete's spunk on my threads

Only little todger has the answer to that.

I still think there's more going off here than what he's letting onto.

[fingerdeep]

She ticks a lot of my boxes, so going to give her a try, email sent, will let you know progress or not and if it goes down will review. Thanks for the info as ready to walk if anything does not feel right.

[Paris69]

Looks stunning... Hope she is real

[mrfishyfoo]

Hope she is real

Really ?? 

You read this whole thread and MTB's review ?? Clearly not. 

[vw]

Really ?? 

You read this whole thread and MTB's review ?? Clearly not. 

Maybe he has MTT on ignore.   

[mrfishyfoo]

Maybe he has MTT on ignore.   

 

[fingerdeep]

Hiya,
When I search on her handle/name I only get your negative review MrF which I agree with, but have to admit I started skimming pages will go back and re-read and the thread by RM78 which was not really a review, results did not return a reviews by MTB unless it was berried in the 20 odd pages, but am forewarned so thanks will tread carefully and will report back if anything happens.

[vw]

Hiya,
When I search on her handle/name I only get your negative review MrF which I agree with, but have to admit I started skimming pages will go back and re-read and the thread by RM78 which was not really a review, results did not return a reviews by MTB unless it was berried in the 20 odd pages, but am forewarned so thanks will tread carefully and will report back if anything happens.

there it is

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=164657.0

[CoolTiger]

Hiya,
When I search on her handle/name I only get your negative review MrF which I agree with, but have to admit I started skimming pages will go back and re-read and the thread by RM78 which was not really a review, results did not return a reviews by MTB unless it was berried in the 20 odd pages, but am forewarned so thanks will tread carefully and will report back if anything happens.

Also on the very first page of this long thread, under the very first post, i.e. Mr FF's negative review... straight after his post, there is anote under his post which tells you how many reviews the girl in the OP has, in this case x2 reviews. Click on the "2 review(s) found for sweet_emily x", and you get taken to a new tab which lists her 2 reviews, Mr FF's and MTB's review.

Same applies to any review.... under the revew itself, there is a link telling you how many reviews the WG has, and clicking on it teakes to you these reviews.

[fingerdeep]

Thanks Guys my bad. No response yet, she's not logged in.