Thanks!
It's always challenging to see someone else's perspective and try to fully grasp it.
Briefly
1. I understand what you were
trying to do with the Thicker edition thread but
it has turned out to be a fair proportion of fat/obese WGs, who also lack waist to hip ratio and no VWs IMHO
2. Personally, I think with regard to size per se. I think Anais (the WG in blue) is
much larger than Shirley (my last post here) by a
considerable way. Furthermore, I introduced the caveat of the FS scale for Shirley at the end of my post as I usually do when a candidate could be considered in doubt. Especially as entrants in this thread
stop just before BBW status.
3. If we try to remain true to Punther's fundamentalism as he outlined in this thread
, which I believe is clear, there should be not too many problems. Of course, there will be 'grey areas'
butt for me many in this thread have just been 'fat'...and I mean
really fat WGs. I have tried hard to stick to his definition and not to deviate away from WGs
just below BBW status. Obviously we will all have our different definition on what BBW means and I even question Punther's judgement here, but nonetheless, I still have tried to work within the parameters of his definitions.
Any more thoughts my friend.
