Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Lies, damned lies and .....  (Read 3631 times)

Arley Hall

  • Guest
I was feeling very bored today, so I decided to give free rein to my inner geek by analysing this last week's UKP reviews (roughly 250). These are my findings .....

Percentage of positive reviews by nationality

British ........... 76%
Hungarian ..... 57%
Polish ............ 65%
Romanian ...... 38%
Spanish ......... 55%

The above list is relatively short because I omitted nationalities with fewer than 10 reviews in total. I didn't think these would be statistically valid.

Percentage of positive reviews by price band (per 1 hour incall)

up to £99 ..... 61%
£100-124 ..... 63%
£125-149 ..... 79%
£150-174 ..... 82%
£175 + ........ 70%

Percentage of positive reviews by age range

18-20 ..... 61%
21-25 ..... 68%
26-30 ..... 68%
30 + ....... 77%

Comments  I may repeat the exercise and analyse a larger sample if I get the the time. This would enable me to include more nationalities. It would also give me more data on the 30+ age group, allowing it to be split into smaller age ranges. The figures seem to support the notion that price has little bearing on service, though there does appear to be a small advantage in going for the £125 - £174 price band. The 30 + age group also come out well but, again, there's not a lot in it as far as age is concerned. Nationality makes by far the biggest difference, with Brits coming out best and Romanians worst. Even so, more than a third of Roms were deemed to be delivering a good service. Overall the reviews were 71% positive.
« Last Edit: April 30, 2016, 11:40:36 pm by Arley Hall »

Mysterion

  • Guest
Interesting data but I'm not sure it's scientifically valid. Don't get me wrong, I'm not having a go at you or your figures, just that there is a long boring list of things that you need to ensure that a dataset is valid and representative. I'm guessing that you already know that since anyone who's idea of a good time is statistical analysis of punting reviews is probably in a data related profession.  :D

I would be interested in why anyone thinks that the 30+ age group is so highly regarded. I suppose that girls that have been in the biz for a decade or more have to be comfortable with themselves and their profession and have also learned many of the lessons about comms and services that young girls haven't got yet or just don't care about but that are really appreciated by punters

Candyman

  • Guest
Supports the poor reputation Romanians have of being cold, uninterested and unenthusiastic. I'm sure that would be the case with a larger data set too. Shame because some of them are great looking and there are more than any other nationality

Offline fairfield

Thanks for the analysis - must have been quite some hard work.

But don't you think the £175+ positives might be somewhat self-selecting? Are you less likely to report a neg - if you have spent that kind of money?

And i can only go on my own 'anecdotal' evidence, but 100% of my knockbacks have come from English WG's. You state your requirements and get instantly blocked. Only one had the decency to explain "don't do THAT with old men."  So am convinced English WG's ARE more choosy. Tho maybe the guys that do get to see them, benefit as a result.
( ofc just bcs the EE/Asian WG's agree to the services prior to the punt, it doesn't mean they actually deliver. Usually the opposite.)   

Swansea lad

  • Guest
My guess is younger girls get more offers of work which makes them less reliable.

Girls 30+ probably have more financial commitments and probably less offers of work so less likely to disappoint.

Offline PuntingNameUK

The main problem with this type of analysis, is the inconsistency of reviewers.

Flunt

  • Guest
The main problem with this type of analysis, is the inconsistency of reviewers.

The bigger problem is sample sizes and the fact that one negative can swing the stats wildly.

My guess is that the older pro$$ies offer a particular service which is discussed and agreed pre punt, maybe more expensive and maybe English?

The other thought is that the under 30s are cheaper EEs and one in three wasn't worth the trip?

All of which means that some lucky punter banged a hot EE and enjoyed a great punt for less than £100, while another paid through the nose for a bitter old pro$$ie and had a shit punt  :unknown:

Offline The_Don

My guess is younger girls get more offers of work which makes them less reliable.

Girls 30+ probably have more financial commitments and probably less offers of work so less likely to disappoint.


YMMV, with any W/G

oring123

  • Guest
i may be wrong but when i went to school % always add up to a total of 100 %
so Percentage of positive reviews by nationality

British ........... 76% guess25%
Hungarian ..... 57%          19%
Polish ............ 65%         21%
Romanian ...... 38%         13%
Spanish ......... 55%         22%
total               291 %      100%

Offline bigmc


Mysterion

  • Guest
i may be wrong but when i went to school % always add up to a total of 100 %
so Percentage of positive reviews by nationality

British ........... 76% guess25%
Hungarian ..... 57%          19%
Polish ............ 65%         21%
Romanian ...... 38%         13%
Spanish ......... 55%         22%
total               291 %      100%

The figures quoted are the percentage of positive reviews per nationality so don't have to add up to 100%. For the British there is another 24% of neutrals and negatives to make up the total and the same for the others.
« Last Edit: May 01, 2016, 08:48:01 am by Mysterion »

Arley Hall

  • Guest
Interesting data but I'm not sure it's scientifically valid. Don't get me wrong, I'm not having a go at you or your figures, just that there is a long boring list of things that you need to ensure that a dataset is valid and representative. I'm guessing that you already know that since anyone who's idea of a good time is statistical analysis of punting reviews is probably in a data related profession.  :D

I would be interested in why anyone thinks that the 30+ age group is so highly regarded. I suppose that girls that have been in the biz for a decade or more have to be comfortable with themselves and their profession and have also learned many of the lessons about comms and services that young girls haven't got yet or just don't care about but that are really appreciated by punters

Yes - you're right about the validity of the dataset etc. I did try to make it as valid as possible, by excluding FBSMs for example. In hindsight I think it would also have been better to only include reviews of girls with an AW profile. That would have restricted the dataset, but made it more consistent. I'm not a statistician, but am in a numerate profession - let's put it that way!

Agree about the 30+ age group too - though I don't usually punt in that age range myself.

Arley Hall

  • Guest
There are loads of interesting points here that I'd like to reply to. I will do so when I get a bit more time.

mgtow15

  • Guest
"don't do THAT with old men."

What are you trying to do with them  :D?
« Last Edit: May 01, 2016, 09:10:27 am by mgtow15 »

oring123

  • Guest
What are you trying to do with them?
hard to know how old you are from e/mail/text

Offline Roth

Thanks for the analysis - must have been quite some hard work.

But don't you think the £175+ positives might be somewhat self-selecting? Are you less likely to report a neg - if you have spent that kind of money?

And i can only go on my own 'anecdotal' evidence, but 100% of my knockbacks have come from English WG's. You state your requirements and get instantly blocked. Only one had the decency to explain "don't do THAT with old men."  So am convinced English WG's ARE more choosy. Tho maybe the guys that do get to see them, benefit as a result.
( ofc just bcs the EE/Asian WG's agree to the services prior to the punt, it doesn't mean they actually deliver. Usually the opposite.)

You should name and shame them.  :angry: :angry:

Fagin Again

  • Guest
A most interesting and erudite statistical analysis!

As to why younger escorts get a lower satisfaction score, I would suggest that one reason is that most women become more sexually adventurous and uninhibited as they get older, and therefore also more at ease about having sex with strangers – and indeed about doing the diverse things that appeal to some of us!  (The Enjoys Lists of slightly older escorts tend to be longer and more enterprising...)

Another reason may be that the older girls are a bit nearer the age of most punters than the young ones are, so the age gap is less uncomfortable for them; and therefore they feel more relaxed.

Offline Blackpool Rock


As to why younger escorts get a lower satisfaction score, I would suggest that one reason is that most women become more sexually adventurous and uninhibited as they get older, and therefore also more at ease about having sex with strangers – and indeed about doing the diverse things that appeal to some of us!  (The Enjoys Lists of slightly older escorts tend to be longer and more enterprising...)

Another reason may be that the older girls are a bit nearer the age of most punters than the young ones are, so the age gap is less uncomfortable for them; and therefore they feel more relaxed.
Is it also down to expectations before the punt so if i'm going to see a stunning 21 year old with a fit tight body my expectation is to be blown away but if her attitude or service if off then she may not rate as a positive.
On the other hand if a guy is going to see an older girl who doesn't look as good and carries a few extra pounds then his expectation may not be so high however she is great to get on with and delivers the advertised services exceptionally well, this girl is more likely to get a positive rating.
In my experience it's not just about the sex but the whole package, i want to feel like the girl actually wants me there for the duration of the punt even though she may not / doesn't. 

Offline cueball


In my experience it's not just about the sex but the whole package, i want to feel like the girl actually wants me there for the duration of the punt even though she may not / doesn't.

Excellent summary  :thumbsup:

Offline Belgarion

A most interesting and erudite statistical analysis!

As to why younger escorts get a lower satisfaction score, I would suggest that one reason is that most women become more sexually adventurous and uninhibited as they get older, and therefore also more at ease about having sex with strangers – and indeed about doing the diverse things that appeal to some of us!  (The Enjoys Lists of slightly older escorts tend to be longer and more enterprising...)

Another reason may be that the older girls are a bit nearer the age of most punters than the young ones are, so the age gap is less uncomfortable for them; and therefore they feel more relaxed.


Agree with that. I cannot hand on heart say I have had a bad punt with a WG in her 30s and above.

Top 10 punts have been for the most part with ladies in the 35 to 50 age group

mgtow15

  • Guest
Top 10 punts have been for the most part with ladies in the 35 to 50 age group

Are you an OAP if you don't mind me asking?

punther

  • Guest
Great posts   :hi:

You're findings reflect what ive experienced punting

Nationality: Romanians are generally the worst service providers and british generally the best

Age: The best punts are with older women. They are more experienced and comfortable with themselves. Also their maturity has taught them its important to give a good service

Price: Beyond a certain point there is no added benefit in seeing a more expensive girl and punts at the extreme bottom of the market are generally shit

Offline fairfield

hard to know how old you are from e/mail/text
Don't wanna distract from this topic - its too interesting.  But i always now tell the WG's in initial negotiations that i am an OAP wanting DFK etc. Got fed turning up and being knocked back in person.

In the young  vs old debate - have to admit my (limited) experience is completely the opposite. Pimped 18/19 yr olds are the best at delivering the agreed services. Guess they are sort of pseudo 'subs.'
After a punt with 50+ WG ( Kirsten review if anyone's interested.) would never repeat. Boasting 30 years experience under her belt. she managed to avoid even taking me upstairs!

pking_paul

  • Guest

Agree with that. I cannot hand on heart say I have had a bad punt with a WG in her 30s and above.

Top 10 punts have been for the most part with ladies in the 35 to 50 age group

Me too.

It is all so subjective but to be fair to the OP he accepts that. I've been avoiding younger girls for the kinds of reasons discussed and trying to find older woman who are still fit, and ideally can converse too. Not an easy task from experience as they all carry those extra pounds or if they are still slim, aren't available when I want them to be.  :unknown:

Candyman

  • Guest
i may be wrong but when i went to school % always add up to a total of 100 %
so Percentage of positive reviews by nationality

British ........... 76% guess25%
Hungarian ..... 57%          19%
Polish ............ 65%         21%
Romanian ...... 38%         13%
Spanish ......... 55%         22%
total               291 %      100%

 :dash: :dash: :dash:

Offline Donnie69

Looking at the data, it suggests you have the best chance of a good punt with a British prossie aged about 30.
Most of my best prossies have fitted that profile, aged 27-31. 


I've seen a few young (18-21 year old) stunning prossies and many just weren't that keen to provide a good service. They certainly didn't cater for anything really kinky.
 

Arley Hall

  • Guest
Supports the poor reputation Romanians have of being cold, uninterested and unenthusiastic. I'm sure that would be the case with a larger data set too. Shame because some of them are great looking and there are more than any other nationality

Yes - they don't come out too well. On the other hand, the results don't support the notion that good Romanians are as rare as hen's teeth. 38% of Rom-encounters are good, after all. I personally have had some decent punts with Romanians, and some of them are very hot as you say. Those of us who are willing to give them a go think we can beat the odds by careful selection and by using our 'sixth sense'.

Arley Hall

  • Guest
Thanks for the analysis - must have been quite some hard work.

But don't you think the £175+ positives might be somewhat self-selecting? Are you less likely to report a neg - if you have spent that kind of money?

And i can only go on my own 'anecdotal' evidence, but 100% of my knockbacks have come from English WG's. You state your requirements and get instantly blocked. Only one had the decency to explain "don't do THAT with old men."  So am convinced English WG's ARE more choosy. Tho maybe the guys that do get to see them, benefit as a result.
( ofc just bcs the EE/Asian WG's agree to the services prior to the punt, it doesn't mean they actually deliver. Usually the opposite.)

I see what you mean about guys who have spent a lot of money. It may be difficult for them to admit (even to themselves) that they've wasted it. On the other hand, it could be that they'd be more demanding having spent so much? I'm not sure which effect would be stronger.

Like you, I'm not a Brit-girl fanboy - though I have met some really good English prossies. I think they sometimes rely too much on their Englishness/Britishness as a selling point, when they may be lacking in other areas. Part of the reason they do so well in the stats could be that punting with a girl who speaks fluent English may be very important for some clients. (Also shared culture, sense of humour, etc.) I'm not too bothered personally.

Arley Hall

  • Guest
A most interesting and erudite statistical analysis!

As to why younger escorts get a lower satisfaction score, I would suggest that one reason is that most women become more sexually adventurous and uninhibited as they get older, and therefore also more at ease about having sex with strangers – and indeed about doing the diverse things that appeal to some of us!  (The Enjoys Lists of slightly older escorts tend to be longer and more enterprising...)

Another reason may be that the older girls are a bit nearer the age of most punters than the young ones are, so the age gap is less uncomfortable for them; and therefore they feel more relaxed.

Many thanks! Agree with the above. Those of us who go for the younger girls are unlikely to change our habits. We think we can beat the odds and, in any case, the difference in 'satisfaction rating' is not big enough to be a real deterrent.

Arley Hall

  • Guest
Great posts   :hi:

You're findings reflect what ive experienced punting

Nationality: Romanians are generally the worst service providers and british generally the best

Age: The best punts are with older women. They are more experienced and comfortable with themselves. Also their maturity has taught them its important to give a good service

Price: Beyond a certain point there is no added benefit in seeing a more expensive girl and punts at the extreme bottom of the market are generally shit

Good to hear that it ties in with a real punter's own experience! I thought that the Poles might beat the Brits, but that probably just reflects the fact that I've not punted with enough Brits.

Arley Hall

  • Guest
Looking at the data, it suggests you have the best chance of a good punt with a British prossie aged about 30.

Yes - it could be that I need to re-think my punting habits! Just can't resist the 18-20 year olds.

Arley Hall

  • Guest
My guess is younger girls get more offers of work which makes them less reliable.

Yes - and also just the fact that they're young. I wasn't all that reliable when I was 19 (though I think I was more reliable than the average young prossie!)

Arley Hall

  • Guest
The main problem with this type of analysis, is the inconsistency of reviewers.

Yes - that's the weakest aspect of the whole thing. However UKP reviews are the best information we have, or are ever likely to have.

Offline Horizontal pleasures

Am I the only one who finds this boring?


Arley Hall

  • Guest
Am I the only one who finds this boring?

You're either turned on by stats or you're not - it's a bit like trying to understand another punter's sexual preferences :)

Offline shagbambi

In my experience women over 35 are consistently better punts (as a statistical cohort).  I suspect it has much to do with them being comfortable with what they do and with themselves (body image etc). Many are also hugely experienced.  That said I am kind of biased towards MILFs...

oring123

  • Guest
%  numbers  ratio mean nothing in punting
only
really shit  :bomb:
shit            :timeout:
ok                :rolleyes:
good                 :cool:
great                          :lol:
fucking great                          :yahoo:

Candyman

  • Guest
Yes - they don't come out too well. On the other hand, the results don't support the notion that good Romanians are as rare as hen's teeth. 38% of Rom-encounters are good, after all. I personally have had some decent punts with Romanians, and some of them are very hot as you say. Those of us who are willing to give them a go think we can beat the odds by careful selection and by using our 'sixth sense'.

I have also had some decent experiences with Romanians. It helps a lot if you have read good reviews on here before, as you say. I would be interested in how many of the 38% positives have been reviewed before and how many of the negatives are first timers

Arley Hall

  • Guest
I have also had some decent experiences with Romanians. It helps a lot if you have read good reviews on here before, as you say. I would be interested in how many of the 38% positives have been reviewed before and how many of the negatives are first timers

Yes - it would be interesting to know that. Once you start looking at the stats it opens up more and more questions. I guess, also, that the stats would be skewed if there was a particularly good girl (of any nationality) who was being reviewed over and over again. I can't think of any easy way to correct for that off the top of my head - though maybe it doesn't matter if it happens to all nationalities, ages and prices equally.
« Last Edit: May 02, 2016, 09:41:18 pm by Arley Hall »

oring123

  • Guest
numbers mean fuck all
from your details
3 punts , 2 shit, 1 good   33% good
close to your 38%
still seems good ?

Offline Belgarion

Are you an OAP if you don't mind me asking?

You are banned, so will not see this post, I'm in my 30s.

Not sure why I have to be an OAP to enjoy sex with mature women

5th Musketeer

  • Guest
There are loads of interesting points here that I'd like to reply to. I will do so when I get a bit more time.
Great piece of work AH - thank you.

Since I have only an elemental grasp of statistics, if (and when) you start reviewing these data again, does length of time in the business (obviously, can only tell from AW profiles) have any bearing on their positives/negatives? 
 :hi: :drinks:

Arley Hall

  • Guest
Great piece of work AH - thank you.

Since I have only an elemental grasp of statistics, if (and when) you start reviewing these data again, does length of time in the business (obviously, can only tell from AW profiles) have any bearing on their positives/negatives? 
 :hi: :drinks:

You're welcome! That would be an interesting thing to look at for sure. I suspect that performance might go up a bit to begin with, and then possibly decline as the girl got burnt out? I am actually thinking of analysing the whole month of May, keeping a tally day by day. That way I should get about 1000 in my sample, which is a lot better than the 250 I had in my first attempt. If I were to look at 'time in the business' I'd probably have to assume that it was the same as her AW profile 'age' - which might not be true, I guess? It might be worth doing even so - I'll look into it.

One thing I definitely am going to include in my next analysis is percentage of positives by region. It would be interesting to see which regions fare best.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2016, 07:47:54 pm by Arley Hall »

Offline Taggart

Supports the poor reputation Romanians have of being cold, uninterested and unenthusiastic. I'm sure that would be the case with a larger data set too. Shame because some of them are great looking and there are more than any other nationality

Yes, put another way less than two out of five sessions with a Romanian are upto the mark. Poor, innit.

oring123

  • Guest
glad it makes you happy  with figures
as just one certainty
romanians are 99%
a shit punt !

Arley Hall

  • Guest
I've created a new, improved and updated version of my statistical analysis of UKP reviews. The sample this time is much bigger (923) - taken entirely from May 2016 reviews. This has enabled me to include more nationalities, to have narrower price bands, and to improve the age stats. Two new features this time are: (1) an analysis by the girls' AW join-up years, and (2) an analysis by region. The nationalities and regions have also been ranked in descending order of 'positiveness'. When looking at the figures below it is useful to bear in mind that the overall percentage of positive reviews for the sample is 67%. So any nationality, age, region etc that scores above 67% is ahead of the game, and any that scores below 67% is doing worse than average. Categories that are better than average by more than 5 percentage points are highlighted in green. Those worse than average by more than 5 percentage points are highlighted in red. I've tried to ensure that the number of reviews in each category is at least 20, in order to make the percentages meaningful. Most categories contain far more than 20 reviews.


Percentage of positive reviews by nationality

#1  Spanish ............. 76%
#2  British ............... 73%

#3= Brazilian ........... 70%
#3= Polish ............... 70%
#5  Czech ................ 65%
#6  Hungarian .......... 59%
#7  Thai ................... 57%
#8  Romanian ........... 49%

There were a further 27 nationalities present in the sample - but they all had fewer than 20 reviews, so I didn't include them. Nationality and price are not independent variables - some nationalities are cheaper on average than others - so it would be interesting to compare different nationalities at the same price point (e.g. £100). Likewise some nationalities are, on average, younger or older than others - so one maybe ought to compare different nationalities at the same age. Unfortunately I haven't done either of these things in this survey. In the case of price, it would be difficult to find a price level that would enable enough data to be gathered for all nationalities. (For example, there might be too few Brits at £100.) This problem of interdependent variables applies to all these statistics in fact.


Percentage of positive reviews by price (per 1 hour incall)

< £80 ....... 50%

£80 .......... 61%
£90 .......... 57%

£100 ........ 63%
£110 ......... 66%
£120 ......... 69%
£130 ......... 73%

£140 ......... 72%
£150 ......... 71%
> £150 ...... 79%

While it is true that you can get a good punt at any price level, there does seem to be some positive correlation between price and satisfaction, with a VFM sweet spot somewhere around the £130 mark.


Percentage of positive reviews by age range

18-20 ..... 52%

21-25 ..... 66%
26-30 ..... 68%
31-35 ..... 69%
36-40 ..... 72%
> 40 ....... 82%

Bear in mind that the above ages are the ones stated on the girls' AW or agency profiles - or on their own websites. Their true ages will probably be higher, with the discrepancy increasing as the age increases! One would expect girls' skills and attitude to improve with age and, indeed, the figures bear this out. 18-20 is a relatively poor age-group to punt with. Age-related improvement doesn't really kick in fully, however, until age 40+. Perhaps this is the age-group punted by the serious and committed MILF-lovers?!


Percentage of positive reviews by AW join-up year

Pre 2012 ...... 64%
2012 ............ 82%
2013 ............ 68%
2014 ............ 75%
2015 ............ 64%
2016 ............ 61%

Girls that have been on AW for at least a couple of years definitely seem to be the best bet (though the 2013 vintage is a bit of an anomaly.) Too long on AW doesn't seem to be a good thing, however.


Percentage of positive reviews by region

#1   North East ................. 80%
#2   West Midlands ............ 74%
#3   South West ................ 71%
#4= Scotland .................... 70%
#4= North West ................ 70%
#6= London ...................... 66%
#6= Yorkshire & Humber .... 66%
#8   East Midlands ............. 62%
#9   Wales ......................... 61%
#10  East England .............. 58%
#11  South East ................. 56%

I'm sure local punters will have a far better idea than me of why their own particular region fares well or badly. However here are a few factors that may, or may not, play a role: (1) different proportions of foreign girls in different regions; (2) punting styles - e.g. parlours, saunas, use of agencies, etc - varying from region to region; (3) socio-economic differences between regions - leading to different punting behaviour, differing punter profiles, and to different types of girls becoming prossies; (4) proximity of London (the 'pussy drain'), which may account for the poor performance of my own region, the South East; (5) regional punter personality differences (affecting reviews and ratings) - though this is admittedly the least likely explanation! A high punter satisfaction percentage in this category does not necessarily mean that the region is brilliant for choice and variety, of course. It could just be that there is a restricted pool of good girls in the region.

punther

  • Guest
I've created a new, improved and updated version of my statistical analysis of UKP reviews. The sample this time is much bigger (923) - taken entirely from May 2016 reviews. This has enabled me to include more nationalities, to have narrower price bands, and to improve the age stats. Two new features this time are: (1) an analysis by the girls' AW join-up years, and (2) an analysis by region. The nationalities and regions have also been ranked in descending order of 'positiveness'. When looking at the figures below it is useful to bear in mind that the overall percentage of positive reviews for the sample is 67%. So any nationality, age, region etc that scores above 67% is ahead of the game, and any that scores below 67% is doing worse than average. Categories that are better than average by more than 5 percentage points are highlighted in green. Those worse than average by more than 5 percentage points are highlighted in red. I've tried to ensure that the number of reviews in each category is at least 20, in order to make the percentages meaningful. Most categories contain far more than 20 reviews.


Percentage of positive reviews by nationality

#1  Spanish ............. 76%
#2  British ............... 73%

#3= Brazilian ........... 70%
#3= Polish ............... 70%
#5  Czech ................ 65%
#6  Hungarian .......... 59%
#7  Thai ................... 57%
#8  Romanian ........... 49%

There were a further 27 nationalities present in the sample - but they all had fewer than 20 reviews, so I didn't include them. Nationality and price are not independent variables - some nationalities are cheaper on average than others - so it would be interesting to compare different nationalities at the same price point (e.g. £100). Likewise some nationalities are, on average, younger or older than others - so one maybe ought to compare different nationalities at the same age. Unfortunately I haven't done either of these things in this survey. In the case of price, it would be difficult to find a price level that would enable enough data to be gathered for all nationalities. (For example, there might be too few Brits at £100.) This problem of interdependent variables applies to all these statistics in fact.


Percentage of positive reviews by price (per 1 hour incall)

< £80 ....... 50%

£80 .......... 61%
£90 .......... 57%

£100 ........ 63%
£110 ......... 66%
£120 ......... 69%
£130 ......... 73%

£140 ......... 72%
£150 ......... 71%
> £150 ...... 79%

While it is true that you can get a good punt at any price level, there does seem to be some positive correlation between price and satisfaction, with a VFM sweet spot somewhere around the £130 mark.


Percentage of positive reviews by age range

18-20 ..... 52%

21-25 ..... 66%
26-30 ..... 68%
31-35 ..... 69%
36-40 ..... 72%
> 40 ....... 82%

Bear in mind that the above ages are the ones stated on the girls' AW or agency profiles - or on their own websites. Their true ages will probably be higher, with the discrepancy increasing as the age increases! One would expect girls' skills and attitude to improve with age and, indeed, the figures bear this out. 18-20 is a relatively poor age-group to punt with. Age-related improvement doesn't really kick in fully, however, until age 40+. Perhaps this is the age-group punted by the serious and committed MILF-lovers?!


Percentage of positive reviews by AW join-up year

Pre 2012 ...... 64%
2012 ............ 82%
2013 ............ 68%
2014 ............ 75%
2015 ............ 64%
2016 ............ 61%

Girls that have been on AW for at least a couple of years definitely seem to be the best bet (though the 2013 vintage is a bit of an anomaly.) Too long on AW doesn't seem to be a good thing, however.


Percentage of positive reviews by region

#1   North East ................. 80%
#2   West Midlands ............ 74%
#3   South West ................ 71%
#4= Scotland .................... 70%
#4= North West ................ 70%
#6= London ...................... 66%
#6= Yorkshire & Humber .... 66%
#8   East Midlands ............. 62%
#9   Wales ......................... 61%
#10  East England .............. 58%
#11  South East ................. 56%

I'm sure local punters will have a far better idea than me of why their own particular region fares well or badly. However here are a few factors that may, or may not, play a role: (1) different proportions of foreign girls in different regions; (2) punting styles - e.g. parlours, saunas, use of agencies, etc - varying from region to region; (3) socio-economic differences between regions - leading to different punting behaviour, differing punter profiles, and to different types of girls becoming prossies; (4) proximity of London (the 'pussy drain'), which may account for the poor performance of my own region, the South East; (5) regional punter personality differences (affecting reviews and ratings) - though this is admittedly the least likely explanation! A high punter satisfaction percentage in this category does not necessarily mean that the region is brilliant for choice and variety, of course. It could just be that there is a restricted pool of good girls in the region.

This is brilliant

What would be interesting is if based on these numbers you/someone undertook a series of 10 punts 5punts using the outcomes in green e.g. Over 40+ year old, spanish, £150 etc. etc.  and 5 punts using the outcomes in red  Romanian, 18-20 years old, <£80, etc..

This would be good as there would be no variation in the punter so we have a constant in terms of the punters appearance, personality etc.

Offline Azucar D Artagnan

Interesting and thanks for the time input to produce this . Could you have printed the sample size of each category next to the % figure ? Looks like the young Romanian's reputations are vindicated as poor SPs  :thumbsdown:

Offline Simon32123

What a great post.

I'm off to look for a Spanish 40 year old in the Northeast who's been punting since 2012 and offer £170 for the hour and I should get a good punt!   :yahoo: