5,345 new reviews in 2017.
UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.
Legally, aren't escorts (as service providers) falling foul of discrimination legislation, as well as websites for not policing it?
I had just been flicking through some profiles and noted the not uncommon "Won't see XYZ - my personal preference" regarding both ages (typically older) and ethnicities (typically Black or South Asian).Legally, aren't escorts (as service providers) falling foul of discrimination legislation, as well as websites for not policing it?Anyway I tend to avoid those that place those types of restrictions, not that it would make any difference though.
It's not like a shop can put "No blacks" on their shopfront, as escorts essentially do on their profile...
A shop would be a legitimate business ----- try pursuing a prostitute through the courts.
Let's cut a long story short, what happened to you recently?
Also prostitution is legal in the UK, so by extension a "legitimate business".
Honestly nothing has happened to me, it simply crossed my mind this evening.Also prostitution is legal in the UK, so by extension a "legitimate business".
This is a sensitive subject, and allegations of it being racism usually riles prossies up.For that reason, I was hoping someone would make a list on www.PuntingWiki.com of all prossies who ban punters based upon their race.In the hope of riling them up more EDIT: And maybe other lists of prossies who ban punters based upon their age, and another for weight.
If a prostitute stated that she doesn't see old bastards why on earth would I want to visit her, the same applies if she doesn't want to see blacks or Asians ---- her pussy, her choice who she rents it out to.
JRC, I suspect that same argument was used in the UK back in the 60s, about shops/hotels/etc. I doubt anyone would want to see someone who doesn't want to see you, but it's also about shifting cultural and social attitudes too.
I couldn't see why it couldn't be challenged in the courts. The likelihood is obviously slim though, unless there was a punter comfortable enough with his lifestyle to go through with it. More likely would be websites being challenged on it, though it would depend on host country I think?I am fine about anyone refusing service based on "modifiable" attributes (particularly anything that puts individuals in any sort of harm), but not on age/race/sex.(I sense I might be in the minority here!)