Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: "Won't see" ages/ethnicities  (Read 6492 times)

I had just been flicking through some profiles and noted the not uncommon "Won't see XYZ - my personal preference" regarding both ages (typically older) and ethnicities (typically Black or South Asian).

Legally, aren't escorts (as service providers) falling foul of discrimination legislation, as well as websites for not policing it?

Anyway I tend to avoid those that place those types of restrictions, not that it would make any difference though.

Offline Nagilum


Legally, aren't escorts (as service providers) falling foul of discrimination legislation, as well as websites for not policing it?

Believe it or not, a business isn't forced to serve you and can turn you away, it's a common misconception people have. You confuse a public servant in this matter.

It's not like a shop can put "No blacks"  on their shopfront, as escorts essentially do on their profile...

Offline onion

I had just been flicking through some profiles and noted the not uncommon "Won't see XYZ - my personal preference" regarding both ages (typically older) and ethnicities (typically Black or South Asian).

Legally, aren't escorts (as service providers) falling foul of discrimination legislation, as well as websites for not policing it?

Anyway I tend to avoid those that place those types of restrictions, not that it would make any difference though.

Well their business is their body so ultimately they can decide who they'd like to see.

As you say, the best thing is just stay away from such providers. That's what I do

Offline Jimmyredcab

I drive past young black males late at night, let them sue me. 

A prostitute has a perfect right to refuse service to anyone, they might not want to see ageing, cockney cab drivers, I don't see that as a problem.

Offline Jimmyredcab

It's not like a shop can put "No blacks"  on their shopfront, as escorts essentially do on their profile...

A shop would be a legitimate business ----- try pursuing a prostitute through the courts.  :rolleyes:

Offline Nagilum

It's not like a shop can put "No blacks"  on their shopfront, as escorts essentially do on their profile...

Let's cut a long story short, what happened to you recently?

Offline Nagilum

A shop would be a legitimate business ----- try pursuing a prostitute through the courts.  :rolleyes:

What Jimmy said ^^

Honestly nothing has happened to me, it simply crossed my mind this evening.

Also prostitution is legal in the UK, so by extension a "legitimate business".

Online cueball

Let's cut a long story short, what happened to you recently?

My thoughts too

A prossies cunt is her castle !

If she doesn't want to see you call her the latest most applicable ism and fuck someone else !

Offline Jimmyredcab



Also prostitution is legal in the UK, so by extension a "legitimate business".

Then consult you lawyer and start legal proceedings, I wish you luck.     :rolleyes:


Legally, aren't escorts (as service providers) falling foul of discrimination legislation, as well as websites for not policing it?


"you could try Watchdog, but I think they've got bigger fish to fry"

I couldn't see why it couldn't be challenged in the courts. The likelihood is obviously slim though, unless there was a punter comfortable enough with his lifestyle to go through with it. More likely would be websites being challenged on it, though it would depend on host country I think?

I am fine about anyone refusing service based on "modifiable" attributes (particularly anything that puts individuals in any sort of harm), but not on age/race/sex.

(I sense I might be in the minority here!)

Offline Nagilum

Honestly nothing has happened to me, it simply crossed my mind this evening.

Also prostitution is legal in the UK, so by extension a "legitimate business".

There is something in law that determines if a case being brought forward is "in the public interest" not being able to pound a prossie for an hour is not one of them. Would be entertaining though  :sarcastic:

Offline Admin

  • Site Owner
This is a sensitive subject, and allegations of it being racism usually riles prossies up.

For that reason, I was hoping someone would make a list on www.PuntingWiki.com of all prossies who ban punters based upon their race.

In the hope of riling them up more  :cool:

EDIT: And maybe other lists of prossies who ban punters based upon their age, and another for weight.

Offline Sonny Crockett

I had just been flicking through some profiles and noted the not uncommon "Won't see XYZ - my personal preference" regarding both ages (typically older) and ethnicities (typically Black or South Asian).

Legally, aren't escorts (as service providers) falling foul of discrimination legislation, as well as websites for not policing it?

Anyway I tend to avoid those that place those types of restrictions, not that it would make any difference though.

I agree that it is racist. I deffo avoid ladies that discriminate against ethnicity.
« Last Edit: March 05, 2016, 11:06:12 PM by Sonny Crockett »
Banning reason: Troll

Offline Nagilum

This is a sensitive subject, and allegations of it being racism usually riles prossies up.

For that reason, I was hoping someone would make a list on www.PuntingWiki.com of all prossies who ban punters based upon their race.

In the hope of riling them up more  :cool:

EDIT: And maybe other lists of prossies who ban punters based upon their age, and another for weight.

That would be pretty good! I would also like a list of the ones that offer the dreaded cum once policy in an hour.

Offline Jimmyredcab

If a prostitute stated that she doesn't see old bastards why on earth would I want to visit her, the same applies if she doesn't want to see blacks or Asians ---- her pussy, her choice who she rents it out to.  :hi:

Offline Nagilum

If a prostitute stated that she doesn't see old bastards why on earth would I want to visit her, the same applies if she doesn't want to see blacks or Asians ---- her pussy, her choice who she rents it out to.  :hi:

Indeed, it's called freedom of choice.

JRC, I suspect that same argument was used in the UK back in the 60s, about shops/hotels/etc. I doubt anyone would want to see someone who doesn't want to see you, but it's also about shifting cultural and social attitudes too.

Online smiths

I had just been flicking through some profiles and noted the not uncommon "Won't see XYZ - my personal preference" regarding both ages (typically older) and ethnicities (typically Black or South Asian).

Legally, aren't escorts (as service providers) falling foul of discrimination legislation, as well as websites for not policing it?

Anyway I tend to avoid those that place those types of restrictions, not that it would make any difference though.

Its entirely up to a WG who she wishes to punt with or not, its not like buying goods that are inanimate. The alternative would be forcing a WG to punt with someone she doesn't wish to which can never happen I hope.

Whether some WGs are racist or ageist or not is another point but it doesn't change the fact its their choice.

Offline Nagilum

JRC, I suspect that same argument was used in the UK back in the 60s, about shops/hotels/etc. I doubt anyone would want to see someone who doesn't want to see you, but it's also about shifting cultural and social attitudes too.

You are bordering on forcing them. You cannot compel somebody to see you if they do not want to and yes a hotel owner, even now can refuse to grant you a room. Is it immoral, yes, is it illegal, no. We live in a democratic society and you can discriminate against  whom ever you want, provided it's not breaking any laws or hate speech. That's another kettle of fish.

Offline berksboy

For sure its racist in the same way some of us will not go with black / asian / white / pink with yellow spots  ! and who cares ? Just move on to the next one . And just think how bad a fuck she would be ! Sex for cash is not for the PC brigade.

I couldn't see why it couldn't be challenged in the courts. The likelihood is obviously slim though, unless there was a punter comfortable enough with his lifestyle to go through with it. More likely would be websites being challenged on it, though it would depend on host country I think?

I am fine about anyone refusing service based on "modifiable" attributes (particularly anything that puts individuals in any sort of harm), but not on age/race/sex.

(I sense I might be in the minority here!)

why leave it to someone else you are capable and over 18 and use lines like "modifiable" attributes you will be able to represent and get your compaint upheld.



Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)