Author Topic: English~Jessica of Bracknell (and tours) (Read 3554 times)

Steely Dan · « **on:** January 22, 2016, 11:07:02 pm »

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Communication: Easy to book via AW mail. Texts to confirm prompt. On time. £140, 60 min in-call.

Venue: Clean modern great facilities.

The girl: English. Pretty face. Hair a bit blonde now, looks nice. Easy to talk to - I liked her. So far so good as I walked into the room. Dressed in nice looking lingerie. But when it came off... Tits are no longer C cup - perhaps one day they were. These are perhaps now described as spaniels ears.

You know, big balloons with the air removed. Both nipples pierced drawing attention to them. I have in the past come out strongly against fake boobs. But in her case I stand corrected. Next, she had this extra bit of lingerie around her belly. (I'm thinking that no man on the planet knows what these are called). I wish it had stayed on. Her belly, though slim, had all sorts of unsightly folds of skin. Not attractive. Pussy very nice. Whew. She says on her profile she would be a good companion for a social event. Umm no. She might really be 29, but anyway she can pass for 35. Give me a girl who is really 35+ who can pass for 29 instead any time.

Ok some very hot photos in her PG. Maybe the sex will blow me away. Short answer. no. The kissing was reluctant. The OWO was mostly tickling and hands. Particularly while in 69, while I was not watching, she would just tickle with her hands. I'm not a girl that needs teasing ... suck it. To be balanced, her pussy was nice and fingers were allowed. Sex in doggy was fine. In mish she was a bit twisted to control me, and I had to look at her belly and tits - doggy was better. But overall the sex was more reluctant and passive. If she ever has 'an ever growing voracious sexual appetite' she did not display it for me.

So I had an Ok hour. Very nice English girl - I would be happy to hang out with her in the pub. Got my rocks off. Twice. Pretty girl with her clothes on. Quite nice sex in doggy. But looks takes her down a few points, service (very poor kissing, passive sex) takes her down a few more, so this is a negative.

Cunning Punt · « **Reply #1 on:** January 23, 2016, 09:54:33 am »

Thanks for TOFTT and sorry you had a shit punt, particularly at that price.
I would have felt overcharged at £80hh.

It's a sad indication of the industry that a WG with awful body and crap service can maintain a rate of £140ph just because she is English and pretty, but offers little else.

Off the HL.

Cheers.

MrMatrix · « **Reply #2 on:** January 23, 2016, 01:32:41 pm »

Unlucky SD. But there's nothing on AW to show or indicate the issues that you had. She's got decent positive FB, pictures look ok. Its a shame none of the 48 who've left AW positive FB, didn't think of doing one for UKP- then we would have all been better informed

isn't that what this sites all about?

berksboy · « **Reply #3 on:** January 23, 2016, 05:24:00 pm »

But her pics are the sort that hide more then they show .

Cunning Punt · « **Reply #4 on:** January 23, 2016, 08:06:58 pm »

Quote from: MrMatrix on January 23, 2016, 01:32:41 pm

Unlucky SD. But there's nothing on AW to show or indicate the issues that you had. She's got decent positive FB, pictures look ok. Its a shame none of the 48 who've left AW positive FB, didn't think of doing one for UKP- then we would have all been better informed isn't that what this sites all about?

That's why you can't trust AW feedback. A positive FB doesn't necessarily mean a positive rating in most people's eyes, or even their own - because many of the punters who contribute either have low standards and/or they didn't have a great punt but left positive feedback to protect/enhance their own FB.

MrMatrix · « **Reply #5 on:** January 24, 2016, 10:05:29 pm »

Sorry but out of those 48 FB's some of them would be using this site. They could have made a contribution to UKP and informed us. Thats what UKP is here for. This way standards are driven up...

Cunning Punt · « **Reply #6 on:** January 24, 2016, 10:52:17 pm »

Quote from: MrMatrix on January 24, 2016, 10:05:29 pm

Sorry but out of those 48 FB's some of them would be using this site. They could have made a contribution to UKP and informed us. Thats what UKP is here for. This way standards are driven up...

That may well be true and, yes, there are too many lurkers who contribute nothing.

I was making a general point that just because a girl has lots of AW feedback, it doesn't necessarily mean that she is a reliable SP, as I've found out myself with a couple of escorts.

MrMatrix · « **Reply #7 on:** January 24, 2016, 11:04:55 pm »

You are so right CP. Guess we've all been caught out. Lately I have on a couple of occasions, I also walked recently as well.

anonyorks · « **Reply #8 on:** January 12, 2017, 01:33:21 pm »

Just wanted to say thanks for posting this review and saving me. I was about to book her and thought ''better check UKP first''

in the bin she goes

contentguy · « **Reply #9 on:** January 12, 2017, 02:02:06 pm »

Thanks ever so much. I've tried to book her a few times and now you've saved me from another crap punt.

Guy

Author Topic: English~Jessica of Bracknell (and tours) (Read 3554 times)

Member Benefits