Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Brooke Knights frustrations - a normal experience?  (Read 8679 times)

themademan2

  • Guest
Must say my dealings with Brooke have been frustrating.

Bought into the hype a few months ago. Thought it she's constantly booked weeks, nay months, in advance, she must be amazing. Asked to be notified of any cancellations as like a lot of punters, I don't know what I'm doing in 2, 3, even 4 months' time. Heard nothing, so decided to bite the bullet and make a booking proper.

Emailed her asking for a 90-minute appointment, and to let me know what date it would be. She replies with a date and time. I respond saying that's fine, and asked for next steps, i.e. if she wants me to send a booking request via Adultwork. Next message I get from her is saying the slot's gone and to consult her profile for when she's next available. I thought this was a bit of piss-take considering I confirmed the time she offered was fine and asked for directions on making it official if needs be. Her reasoning: "A booking is scheduled and confirmed once I have it on Adultworks systems, otherwise it's just discussing."

So, took her advice, looked at her profile for her next available date and sent a booking request via Adultwork. Went unanswered for over 24 hours and haven't heard back from her, so I've just cancelled it now.

I don't know what I've done, but she's clearly not interested in seeing me. If that's not the case then she's sure as well made it feel like that. But can't say I'm really interested in pursuing a booking with her any more.
That's standard protocol, snooze u lose. It happens to me with most lasses as I can't confirm til last minute most the time. She may have been on a long booking not to get back to you in that timeframe.
« Last Edit: June 26, 2015, 07:46:54 am by themademan2 »

Offline namaste

Got to say I have had similar situation to the OP.

Had a booking for April and it has been re-arranged two or three times due to booking being cancelled (No problem with the cancellations as although these were done by Brooke, they were reasons that she can't help happening)

Since then I am just waiting for cancellations as can't really book another date for October or whenever next is free and risk booking time off work only for the booking not to happen. I think a better way to sort these problems out would be to instead of waiting for cancellations to book people who have been cancelled on into days she is working already. Although this may not be possible if lots of cancellations have happened. Still frustrating though.

Offline Eurypides

Brooke and I have chatted a fair bit and looks like we have a satisfactory resolution.

From my point of view I don't exactly regret talking about my frustrations as they were real and it can be a fairly 'lonely' passtime at times (what this forum is set up to help with I guess), but I wasn't expecting the thread to turn into a little bit of bloodbath with comments about Brooke's appearance etc.  Probably this represents naivite on my part - people can obviously post what they want so it's difficult for things not to get derailed.  Nor is it my place to tell long term members what they should or shouldn't be posting.

Thanks everyone and peace.

themademan2

  • Guest
Well I thought I would just ask on this thread to definitely confirm my doubts. Noticed Tori Taylor offering trios with Brooke Knights and LilyD. If BK fully booked up, how the fuck she gonna manage this? And even more so, BK claims that even her regs MUST use booking system and don't get no priority, how does that work if Vlinders her regular no longer has an AW account  :wackogirl:? Would be nice to hear if any punters are being fucked off for better bookings

Offline johnny34

Noticed Tori Taylor offering trios with Brooke Knights and LilyD. If BK fully booked up, how the fuck she gonna manage this?

By the looks of it Brooke appears to be offering the 'Tori/Lily' duo as an 'extra' to her existing bookings? So that will work out at £390 by my reckoning.

Offline Shyandrew2001

Did this not happen previously and then people were let down when Tori retired. Again.

Offline AnthG

Did this not happen previously and then people were let down when Tori retired. Again.

Have found the topic.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=30983.0

It seems nobody got this last time as it was a three month wait to see them both, and Tori retired before the three months.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

pierrot

  • Guest
Beauty as they say is in the eye of the beholder, Brooke Knights could fuck me till my cock fell off, I think shes stunning.
Iv had 2 bookings with her one cancelled when she fell off her horse the cancelled by me a few weeks before it was due as I had to go away at short notice.
Looking at her diary weekends seem to be out and that's the  only time I punt.
 :angry:

Offline Shyandrew2001

So for this to happen all you need is to. A. Have a booking with Brooke already booked. B. Hope that Lily/tori/Sarah Jane (also an option seemingly) are working and not already booked up. C. Hope no one takes ill etc. D. Hope that tori doesn't retire in the mean time.


Offline AnthG

So for this to happen all you need is to. A. Have a booking with Brooke already booked. B. Hope that Lily/tori/Sarah Jane (also an option seemingly) are working and not already booked up. C. Hope no one takes ill etc. D. Hope that tori doesn't retire in the mean time.

And also E. as you predicted last time. Hope this doesn't occur by then.

They will have fallen out by then, I wouldn't hold my breath

If LilyD duo's with her real life partner - EvaBello. She may possibly start getting incredibly jelous if she is duoing with Tori/Brooke. Eva does seem to be the curious omission from the options - LilyD, Tori, Sarah Jayne, Brooke. But not Eva.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Shyandrew2001


 Eva does seem to be the curious omission from the options - LilyD, Tori, Sarah Jayne, Brooke. But not Eva.

I did think it quite odd myself that Eva is omitted from this.

Offline OscarC

To me it sounds more hassle than it's worth. I've done duos before (Sav/Keeva & Lily/Eva) and tbh I think they are overrated for what you pay. They feel rushed, everything is a blur (although very enjoyable) and at the end if it all I just felt fucking tired and my head spinning from what had gone on. I would rather spend that level of money of a longer appointment with one of them and feel better for it.

Agree that is is odd how Eva is omitted from it.  Personally I would rather see her on her own, I think the others egos are getting a little over inflated.
« Last Edit: July 11, 2015, 08:45:37 pm by OscarC »

Offline AnthG

Agree that is is odd how Eva is omitted from it.  Personally I would rather see her on her own, I think the others egos are getting a little over inflated.

To be honest, this paragraph in Toris Blog is pretty curious

Quote from: Toris AW Blog
Well, after a crazy night out in my home town of Newcastle myself and a very familiar face ended up having a little after party of our own! Rolling over, in the morning, to the gorgeous sight of none other than the stunning LILY DELPHINE!! We've both came to the conclusion that we are MORE than compatible in bed and we thought we would share our chemistry with you naughty gentlemen ;)

Put it this way, if Eva was in anyway the jelous type. She'd be pretty pissed on reading the intimation on this.

If I was dating Lily ( :P) I would be wanting to flatten Tori's car tyre's after reading this. :)
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Shyandrew2001

To be honest, this paragraph in Toris Blog is pretty curious

Put it this way, if Eva was in anyway the jelous type. She'd be pretty pissed on reading the intimation on this.

If I was dating Lily ( :P) I would be wanting to flatten Tori's car tyre's after reading this. :)

I was just about to type that myself. Not sure if lily or Eva mention each other on their profiles anymore and don't see any mention of them offering duos....

Offline the bloody butterfly

Do people really believe these WG's get together off the clock for filth? Or that they are in real relationships?

Marmite

  • Guest
To be honest, this paragraph in Toris Blog is pretty curious

Put it this way, if Eva was in anyway the jelous type. She'd be pretty pissed on reading the intimation on this.

If I was dating Lily ( :P) I would be wanting to flatten Tori's car tyre's after reading this. :)

Marketing or using a public forum to pursue a private agenda?

Offline rthunderbird

I found it hard to believe that Eva and Lily were a couple and I find it even harder to believe Tori and Lily just happened to shag after a night out and then decide 'Hey we may as well fuck men for money together' its just business etc.

themademan2

  • Guest
I found it hard to believe that Eva and Lily were a couple and I find it even harder to believe Tori and Lily just happened to shag after a night out and then decide 'Hey we may as well fuck men for money together' its just business etc.
+1. They just message each other with ideas after reading forum

Offline jay-north east

I found it hard to believe that Eva and Lily were a couple and I find it even harder to believe Tori and Lily just happened to shag after a night out and then decide 'Hey we may as well fuck men for money together' its just business etc.

When I last saw Tori she was telling me that in her private life she was dating girls at the moment. Didn’t mention any names.

Offline AnthG

Do people really believe these WG's get together off the clock for filth? Or that they are in real relationships?

No, but I have genuinely believed it with Lilly and Eva. This has been the only time I have truly believed it.

And either way, if it was just some gimmick to try and attract customers, or a genuine thing, I think the whole (impression) Lily is now giving of chucking Eva off to the curb and instantly going off with Tori Taylor and instantly offering duos with her is pretty scumbagish.

I get the feeling I am going to be jumped on for feeling this above. But come on, think of it this way, your girlfriend instantly leaves you for someone else. And then starts offering threesomes with them within a week. That's all kind of ok if you believed the whole Lily/Eva thing was a marketing trick to turn on punters. But if you felt they were a genuine couple then it makes Lily and Tori appear right bitchy quite frankly.

In my opinion if the whole Lily/Eva thing was just a marketing ploy. Then my advice would be to get Eva into this new orgy loop thing to make the rest of them look not scumbagish.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Shyandrew2001

I also thought by the way other punters were saying they were a couple like Lily and Eva said that they were a genuine couple. The Lily/tori/Brooke is clearly a marketing ploy. And like anth said looks bad on Lily in my opinion.

The thing that I don't get is why they need this marketing ploy, all 3 of them. They are all generally down as being fully booked, so why the need for this marketing ploy? If your already constantly fully booked how can you possibly need such a ploy to create more work?

Another thing is they have quite clearly fucked their pricing structure up. To book Tori solo it's £100 per or or £200 for 2. To book Lily it's £120 for 1 or £220 for 2. Yer as a duo it's £240 for 1 or £480 for 2!

For Brooke it's her fee, £150 for 1, £250 for 2 then add the other girls at £120 each per hour. I can't see the other girls being happy with this for to long tbh as Brooke is getting £30 more for doing the same amount of work. To me that's going to cause problems between them.

I've only had 1 threesome with escorts and to me it was a let down, all it seemed to do was pay the money I would pay for 2 hours and only get 1 hour and have each girl only spend half their time on me. I would perhaps have another but to me girls should be charging less per girl for duos, £80 would be plenty each if you ask me, as really they are getting banged less for their buck, so to speak.

Offline AnthG

The thing that I don't get is why they need this marketing ploy, all 3 of them. They are all generally down as being fully booked, so why the need for this marketing ploy? If your already constantly fully booked how can you possibly need such a ploy to create more work?

Agree, for Lily's side of things, this marketing ploy is actually a negative one.

Plus when thinking of it. Why can't I have a LilyD / Keeva threesome. And just basically, book LilyD at her place, and book Keeva to come out to an outcall and give her Lilys place as the address to go to.

Or an Eva Bello / Tori Taylor threesome, and just book Tori Taylor for an incall at her place and book Eva for an outcall to go to Tori's place.

Or any other type of threesome where I set it up.

I highly doubt if you asked permission in advance and if they are all getting the cash they'd throw up that much of an issue with the above? I am just doing what they are themselves offering.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

LilyD

  • Guest
Right, I’m probably going to be banned for this, but truly I don’t care because this is important to say.
We are escorts, Prostitutes, whores, whatever names you want to call us. This is a job. We spend time with you, when you pay us, and that time is most commonly spent having sex. At the end of the session, you go back to your life and we go back to ours. What happens outside this time in our own lives is entirely separate to what happens during our session together. And yet, for some reason unbeknown to me, you guys seem to think that you know plenty about what happens in our private lives. You come on here, and speculate all over the place about who is good and who is bad, which girl has been doing this and even about how we feel towards each other.
Eva has been with another woman (not me) for the past month now. When we first started working we were together, now we are not.  We did not feel the need to share this with you all because it is something that has happened in our private life. It has no effect on our ability to do the job or the services that we offer. We do not expect you to email us as soon as you have relationship problems, nor do we sit around gossiping about your marriages. This is because this is a JOB, and these things simply are not relevant to the professional relationship that we enjoy with you all.
Tori and I work for the same agency and get on well both professionally and personally. Many clients have asked me if I would offer duos with her, and whilst I was with Eva I made the decision to only offer duos with her. However, after recent events things have changed. I will still be offering duos with Eva, but also with Tori. If Eva’s happiness is of genuine concern to you, I can assure you that she is the happiest I have ever seen her. For obvious reasons, this means that I too, am very happy. You are welcome to request any combination of girl that you like, however Eva does not wish to offer duos with girls that she does not know.
To call a girl a scumbag, based on a business decision and your own very mislead speculations is both damaging to her professional reputation and to her as a person. I can handle criticism about my work, as I have said before I welcome feedback and have never argued that it should not be given. My personal life, however, is not your business to make moral judgments on. Eva is my best friend, and to read these things is upsetting to both of us.
If you do not wish to book a duo with Tori and I, then that is entirely your prerogative. But please could someone explain to me how behaving in such an invasive and accusatory way towards us for offering them helps to promote a healthy professional working relationship between clients and girls? If the job of this site is to help provide some order in an unregulated industry, then I can tell you now that comments such as the ones above are not the way to do so.

Offline AnthG

And yet, for some reason unbeknown to me, you guys seem to think that you know plenty about what happens in our private lives. You come on here, and speculate all over the place about who is good and who is bad, which girl has been doing this and even about how we feel towards each other.
....
To call a girl a scumbag, based on a business decision and your own very mislead speculations is both damaging to her professional reputation and to her as a person.

Hang on a second, the person who you should be clearly annoyed with is Tori Taylor. She is the one who has posted this blog entry implying quite a lot by it.

Quote
Well, after a crazy night out in my home town of Newcastle myself and a very familiar face ended up having a little after party of our own! Rolling over, in the morning, to the gorgeous sight of none other than the stunning LILY DELPHINE!! We've both came to the conclusion that we are MORE than compatible in bed and we thought we would share our chemistry with you naughty gentlemen ;)

This blog entry was not "we have decided for professional reasons to offer threesome bookings" that blog entry was now directly implying she was now from some random drunken night now in a couple with you. Making you look like the 'bad guy' in all this

And given you have spent two years creating a picture of you and Eva are this loving couple. It naturally makes people think "hang on just one second there".

These stories are worse than the WWE at times. I am half expecting a new blog entry saying Vince McMahon has driven up to take Eva away in a limo to console her grief next.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Shyandrew2001

+1 to anth. Beat me to. If you don't want your personal life speculated on don't write about your person life. You had made it clear in the past you and Eva are a couple, I didn't see the part when you said you were no longer together?

LilyD

  • Guest
I ok'd the blog entry with Tori cause in our minds, it was just a bit of fun to get you guys going.
This entire industry is built around the idea of fantasy. This should not be confused with any of our personal lives, as they are entirely separate things. It was not in any way intended to cause drama, although the part about Eva being whisked away in a limo is obviously true. Obviously!   :wackogirl:

Offline AnthG

I ok'd the blog entry with Tori cause in our minds, it was just a bit of fun to get you guys going.
This entire industry is built around the idea of fantasy. This should not be confused with any of our personal lives, as they are entirely separate things. It was not in any way intended to cause drama, although the part about Eva being whisked away in a limo is obviously true. Obviously!   :wackogirl:

And like I said, for every single other girl I go "yeah right". But for you and Eva I believed it.

It was actually part of the draw you both had as it was so realistic a portrayal. You are basically getting in to a duo on a real couple.

No offence, but you have totally ruined that very well crafted image by this new marketing ploy. As I for the first time truly and completely hands down believed it. And I bet many others did too and that is why they were so up for a duo with you both.

There is no need to get offended at being called anything, you played the image of the bad guy. And you got called for it. Thats the downsides of playing the bad guy.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline smiths

I ok'd the blog entry with Tori cause in our minds, it was just a bit of fun to get you guys going.
This entire industry is built around the idea of fantasy. This should not be confused with any of our personal lives, as they are entirely separate things. It was not in any way intended to cause drama, although the part about Eva being whisked away in a limo is obviously true. Obviously!   :wackogirl:

So its YOU that is responsible for posting it on the net you stupid fucking idiot, don't blame punters for your own stupidity. You posted it to get punters going in the hope it would get you more punters then you moan about the consequences that you have caused for yourself. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

LilyD

  • Guest
M point is, if you can't tell the difference between fantasy (ie. the way we present things in our professional lives) and reality (ie. the bits that are not relevant so aren't shared with you) then this is obviously concerning. There are no good or bad guys, we're talking about the sex industry, most of the people involved are in some way being "bad".

Offline smiths

Do people really believe these WG's get together off the clock for filth? Or that they are in real relationships?

Put it this way I would have to see them together as a couple to believe it in a social setting which isn't going to happen. For some its just marketing bollocks to entice gullible punters of course.

Looking4fun

  • Guest
not sure how this went from being about bk to an argument about Lily & Tori but i might as well have my say
my opinion is as long as the girls provide a great service i really don't care what they get up to outside of my appointment as I'm sure once that door closes behind me, I'm the last thing on their mind & they really don't care what i do in my private life so why would i care what they do in theirs

Offline Shyandrew2001

Don't try posting fiction as fact, it's that simple really. Some people, myself included, take people by their word No matter what the 'industry' or 'profession' is. I'm a straight up honest guy in my business, in my personal life and when punting also.

Offline smiths

M point is, if you can't tell the difference between fantasy (ie. the way we present things in our professional lives) and reality (ie. the bits that are not relevant so aren't shared with you) then this is obviously concerning. There are no good or bad guys, we're talking about the sex industry, most of the people involved are in some way being "bad".

As you should know some guys aren't too smart, some are gullible where pussy is concerned and some others get turned on by the thought of 2 WGs really being together which is what your aim was of course, all to entice more punters to you. You then have the brass neck to come on here  and post crap, YOU are responsible for the consequences of what YOU choose to post on the net.

Offline johnny34

M point is, if you can't tell the difference between fantasy (ie. the way we present things in our professional lives) and reality (ie. the bits that are not relevant so aren't shared with you)

The point is, YOU have shared info about the fact that you & Eva were a real couple, which is why some now are questioning the wording of the blog that was posted.

Offline Shyandrew2001

I do think it would be worth while you trying to explain the pricing structure mind. Because I do feel you seem to have messed that up.

LilyD

  • Guest
I'm happy to explain the pricing structure! What's the confusion?
xo

Offline Shyandrew2001

As solo you charge £120 and tori £100. Yet as a duo you want £240. Seems a bit off to me. Don't get me wrong I have no interest in booking a duo. Or booking you as a solo the way you messed me around previously.

Yohan Kebab 2

  • Guest
£240 is your incall rate of 120 and Toris outcall rate of 120 on top. Dont think its that confusing either. Brooke gets extra as thats her rate and you two are happy with that. My guess

So is Evas new lady an escort too im just wondering what the next chapter will be  :D

Offline Shyandrew2001

Add to that for 2 hours you are £220 and Tori is £200 but duo is £480!

Looking4fun

  • Guest
As solo you charge £120 and tori £100. Yet as a duo you want £240. Seems a bit off to me. Don't get me wrong I have no interest in booking a duo. Or booking you as a solo the way you messed me around previously.
i paid £220 for my last duo I think those 2 together would be worth the extra £20 imo

Offline Shyandrew2001

£240 is your incall rate of 120 and Toris outcall rate of 120 on top. Dont think its that confusing either. Brooke gets extra as thats her rate and you two are happy with that. My guess

So is Evas new lady an escort too im just wondering what the next chapter will be  :D

So what's the rate if the incall takes place at tori's? Lily's profile doesn't state 1 hour out calls.

Yohan Kebab 2

  • Guest
which i take it to mean she doesnt do them so the 1 hour incall would be at her place

Offline johnny34

Book a 2hr outcall duo via Amour & it works out at £380 (£190 each, less commission).

Offline Shyandrew2001

which i take it to mean she doesnt do them so the 1 hour incall would be at her place

So tori's working for 40 quid less on your speculation. Care to tell me how you work out the 2 hour pricing? 200 for Tori plus Lily's 250 equals 450 not 480

Offline smiths

I'm happy to explain the pricing structure! What's the confusion?
xo

YOU owe punters on here an apology for the shit you have posted in my view, clearly you don't like taking responsibility for your own actions but prefer to blame others for the consequences your actions cause. YOUR a classic example of a WG who comes on here posting shit, this IS a punting forum NOT a WGs forum, I trust you understand the difference though from what I have read so far from you, you don't come across as smart, fortunately to be a WG you don't have to be smart, just offer ALL punters a good service. :rolleyes:

Yohan Kebab 2

  • Guest
Id say 440 which is 220 for lily incall and 220 tori outcall. So thats £40 over priced!  :hi:

Offline Shyandrew2001

£240 is your incall rate of 120 and Toris outcall rate of 120 on top. Dont think its that confusing either. Brooke gets extra as thats her rate and you two are happy with that. My guess

So is Evas new lady an escort too im just wondering what the next chapter will be  :D

And just to say that I understand how Brooke is working it but I think punters need to be prepared to be let down. And I'm not saying this will be by Brooke.
If you've already got a booking with Brooke, that could be next week, months or even in 4 months, you can currently add 1 or more of 3 lady's to it. But if your booking isn't for say 2 months you've got to hope that none quit, take I'll, be on a period or whatever on that day you have a booking. Risky way to be doing things if you ask me as punters could be a bit miffed if let down after waitin X amount of time.

themademan2

  • Guest
And just to say that I understand how Brooke is working it but I think punters need to be prepared to be let down. And I'm not saying this will be by Brooke.
If you've already got a booking with Brooke, that could be next week, months or even in 4 months, you can currently add 1 or more of 3 lady's to it. But if your booking isn't for say 2 months you've got to hope that none quit, take I'll, be on a period or whatever on that day you have a booking. Risky way to be doing things if you ask me as punters could be a bit miffed if let down after waitin X amount of time.
Again, would be nice for punters on here that have got sessions booked with Brooke Knights to see if she is fucking them off for better appointments.  The theory that she makes them all use booking system is bollocks as her fave one vlinders ain't got account to book her on and no doubt has seen her since he closed his own AW account at her request

Offline Shyandrew2001

Again, would be nice for punters on here that have got sessions booked with Brooke Knights to see if she is fucking them off for better appointments.  The theory that she makes them all use booking system is bollocks as her fave one vlinders ain't got account to book her on and no doubt has seen her since he closed his own AW account at her request

I did recently have a booking with Brooke scheduled but I had to cancel, not Brooke. But I will say that personally I don't believe Brooke cancels bookings for different appointments. I just don't think she's that type of person. That's just my opinion though.

Offline Shyandrew2001

And in response to the pm I received, no I'm not agitated, I simply asked Lily a question and she seemed happy to respond, hopefully she will. But she did say she doesn't understand people's speculation. Then somebody tries to answer my question by speculating seemingly on her behalf.