I have honestly never once understood this thing going on with Brooke Knights. Looking at her profile she is booked out till mid October!!! She charges £150 per hour. And looking at her photos. i.e
I would put her down as an honest 7 out of 10 on the attractiveness scale and even that is at a major push. On the flipside, I can see the fuss over LilyD. As looking at her photos I would put her down as a good 8 to maybe 8.5 out of 10. And she is only booked out a couple of weeks in advance and she is £120 per hour. (and I am not saying this as a LilyD fanboy as I have never seen LilyD either)
So either Brooke has the most terrible photos in history that make her look uglier than real life. Or she is not worth all this hassle.
My advice to the OP there are way more attractive girls in the north east. Book LilyD or Tori Taylor and laugh as you've saved money and had less hassle and seen someone way fitter.
Just to also say, if people say she is way prettier in real life than her photos then she needs to literally use all her money to hire a hit man onto her photographer as those photos show a girl who is very mediocre looking.
Can I ask out of curiosity, am I the only one or does anyone else think she is not really in anyway attractive either?