Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Brooke Knights frustrations - a normal experience?  (Read 6287 times)

I don't want to be seen to be making a negative post on my first post but here goes.  I'm curious and want to know what others are experiencing.

This isn't a complaint about the long waiting times for Brooke, I know some others have commented on it here but personally I don't mind it as long as the appointment happens.

I've seen Brooke in the past and those meetings went fine, but lately in 2015 there have just been a series of cancellations.

There have been three cancelled appointments in a row over the past 3-4 months and curious if anyone else here is experiencing the same thing or it's just me?

In the latest instance there was no offer of an alternative appointment - the meet was cancelled and that was it, I basically just had to re-book and wait another 2-3 months.

Brooke's schedule seems to revolve heavily around 24hr or longer bookings, and I am wondering if anyone else who is going for 1-2hr bookings is experiencing the same thing?

I'm just starting to feel like I'm the butt of some kind of elaborate running joke.

Offline themademan2

No doubt she will be cancelling for the likes of her regular Vlinders who will book long appointments (her feedback on AW confirms) and gets one as and when he pleases regardless of waiting time at other clients expense. But that's the way it is, plenty more lasses out there.
Banning reason: Undesirable and untrustworthy. Treat all posts by this member with suspicion.

Going by her AW feedback she has regular meetings with wealthy guys who spend a lot of money on her. I would suspect that you are being dropped for these guys. She looks amazing but I've never even tried booking her due to the demand.

Offline AnthG

I have honestly never once understood this thing going on with Brooke Knights. Looking at her profile she is booked out till mid October!!! She charges £150 per hour. And looking at her photos. i.e



I would put her down as an honest 7 out of 10 on the attractiveness scale and even that is at a major push. On the flipside, I can see the fuss over LilyD. As looking at her photos I would put her down as a good 8 to maybe 8.5 out of 10. And she is only booked out a couple of weeks in advance and she is £120 per hour. (and I am not saying this as a LilyD fanboy as I have never seen LilyD either)

So either Brooke has the most terrible photos in history that make her look uglier than real life. Or she is not worth all this hassle.

My advice to the OP there are way more attractive girls in the north east. Book LilyD or Tori Taylor and laugh as you've saved money and had less hassle and seen someone way fitter.

Just to also say, if people say she is way prettier in real life than her photos then she needs to literally use all her money to hire a hit man onto her photographer as those photos show a girl who is very mediocre looking.

Can I ask out of curiosity, am I the only one or does anyone else think she is not really in anyway attractive either?
« Last Edit: June 25, 2015, 12:51:57 AM by AnthG »

Offline Gothic D

Without a doubt she is attractive but then so are lots of other girls.There isn't any that I am so desperate to see I will book weeks in advance.
Over priced and most probably overrated.

Anth go see her and then tell me you still think she is a 7 it would be the best punt of your life. Thats why booked months in advance and higher prices. Agree with original poster

Offline Houdini

Without a doubt she is attractive but then so are lots of other girls.There isn't any that I am so desperate to see I will book weeks in advance.
Over priced and most probably overrated.
Seen her and agree with Anth 7/10.  I don't know what all the fuss is about. Totally over rated and the fluffy lengthy reports by Vlinders only confirm to me that I don't want to book her or even try. Facially I personally think Lilly D or Sarah-Jane are more attractive and neither of them have overinflated egos or overinflated false tits. In terms of service I would rather spend an hour with either of them or a few others including the likes of Savannah or Jasmine Kisses. There are plenty more out there too.

I have never met her but I do think she looks stunning, I just cannot see how anyone can make a booking 4-5 months in advance. I never even consider booking her.

Think this has been said before, how attractive someone is differs for all of us. Some say tori Taylor is drop dead gorgeous, so say she's average, ditto lilyd, same goes for Brooke obviously and pretty much every girl you can think of.

And more to the point Brooke does always seem to be booked a long way in advance but it could mostly be put down to regulars booking a dates multiple times months ahead so as not to have to wait months to make a booking.

I have sympathy for the op though as if as he says he has booked months in advance only to be cancelled by Brooke then Brooke should really be tying to offer him another appointment.

Offline themademan2

I have never met her but I do think she looks stunning, I just cannot see how anyone can make a booking 4-5 months in advance. I never even consider booking her.
+1, I like the idea of some dirty texts she sends before meets, maybe if I booked , she would send me some dirty texts daily to keep me going  :D
« Last Edit: June 25, 2015, 09:19:19 AM by themademan2 »
Banning reason: Undesirable and untrustworthy. Treat all posts by this member with suspicion.

I really don't get the dirty text thing, if she is that popular and busy why bother ?
I would suspect that she has a few 'pro forma' texts that she sends to everyone, texts do nowt for me.
After looking at her AW profile again I really do think she looks great but she seems to have a very few punters who she sees regularly, I cannot fathom why anyone would keep paying for overnights and long bookings with the same lass, there are loads of others equally good looking.

Online Mansell

I have never seen her but would like to one day just for the experience.

From a business point of view Vinders must be spending tens of thousands with her a year the number of long overnight away bookings he is doing, so I would guess if he says jump she just asks how high. She probably has others like this and from an earning money point of view why not, best way to maximise your limited life career in this game. Also though don;t forget she did have a very serious back injury and I bet that take it's toll on her.

Online Mansell

I really don't get the dirty text thing, if she is that popular and busy why bother ?
I would suspect that she has a few 'pro forma' texts that she sends to everyone, texts do nowt for me.
After looking at her AW profile again I really do think she looks great but she seems to have a very few punters who she sees regularly, I cannot fathom why anyone would keep paying for overnights and long bookings with the same lass, there are loads of others equally good looking.
She very cheap for the overnight bookings relative to other girls so obviously prefers them. ?

Standard text template and a few images from her aw profile
she cancelled my app. Fair play she attempted to squeeze me in but after I couldn't make it, nothing back
Think I would avoid looking back. Way too expensive

Received a message from Brooke via AW asking if the OP could contact her through AW.

Offline themademan2

Received a message from Brooke via AW asking if the OP could contact her through AW.
Wow, the power of this forum. Vlinders even shut his aw account down for her!!!!
Banning reason: Undesirable and untrustworthy. Treat all posts by this member with suspicion.

Offline dino1990

Wow, the power of this forum. Vlinders even shut his aw account down for her!!!!

This pisses me off a bit, girls only sorting out issues when their name has been dragged through the mud on here.Its a bit like BBC watchdog when the big companies sort out customers issues ONLY when after being shown on the programme.

Regarding Brooke, I've seen her once and thought it was a very good experience. She's very good looking and looks a lot more feminine then her pics suggest.  If she had more availability I would see her again, but I've not been interested in sticking my name down on the waiting list.

Offline dino1990

+ I can see why older gents like her. She seems very sophisticated and educated and would be good company for an oldie that squirts after 2 pumps.

Online Mansell

Wow, the power of this forum. Vlinders even shut his aw account down for her!!!!

Yeh, that was interesting !!

Offline Marmite

Vlinders even shut his aw account down for her!!!!

I seem to remember Vlinders briefly being a member on here... I believe he had an assisted departure.

She used to post on here but was banned so I'm assuming she's asking others to sort issues out on her behalf? Re the booking in advance, I simply cannot do it, not even a day in advance. My punts are always on the day itself so I'll probably not see Brooke again, I originally saw her a few years ago and would I go back?

I suppose to answer this I need to ask myself - why do I punt,
Just for the sexual aspect? (Sometimes)
To shag a lady that is out of my pulling class? (as most are!) mostly yes,
Or for variety?
The excitement?
Or a combination of the above?

Based on these would I see her again? No, not based on waiting 4-5 months, not even a week! Sorry  :drinks:

Offline Marmite

I really don't get the dirty text thing, if she is that popular and busy why bother ?
 

I think the main purpose of the texting is to make sure the booking is not forgotten as many are made well in advance...can also be a bit of fun and ramps up the sexual tension.  It may also give somebody who is having second thoughts the opportunity to back out earlier rather than later.

Offline Magicman11

Once again AnthG makes a fair opening post into a personal vendetta. He seems to have a thing about the more popular girls and then terrifies half the girls he meets.
I post occasionally but read the forum alot but this character really does seem a nasty piece of work.
"7 out of 10 at a push"
"So either Brooke has the most terrible photos in history that make her look uglier than real life. Or she is not worth all this hassle."
"those photos show a girl who is very mediocre looking."

He portrays the nice innocent shy boy of the forum but he clearly has major social issues and seems a nasty piece of work!

I admit I am a brooke fan but there is no need for AnthG's post.
Banning reason: Fluffy + Constant trolling of AnthG

Offline AnthG

Once again AnthG makes a fair opening post into a personal vendetta. He seems to have a thing about the more popular girls and then terrifies half the girls he meets.

I admit I am a brooke fan but there is no need for AnthG's post.

Its not a personal vendetta, its a discussion forum to discuss prostitutes. This is one who I personally don't see all this incredible fuss over as her own photos are very poor in the extreme. Terrible infact.

I was asking if anyone else agreed with my belief. A few people responded saying she is attractive. One or two said they also didn't think she was all that hot. That is what the benefits of a discussion forum are. It allows people to express their opinions either way.

If people are going to be afraid to say anything negative about a WG or make any criticisms then this makes things bad overall. As all this will turn into is like the previous forum - auto-censored. Where it was a case of no negative thoughts or comments could be said about a WG or you'd be dived upon.

People have said for the north east there are a few girls classed as the "untouchables" in that any negative comments towards them gets that person dived upon and I do not think that should be the case, but you kind of have shown it.

Offline Gothic D

A decent debate being derailed by a fanboy.I see no vendetta against her,just a frank exchange of views.




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)