Lily Delphine

[Uniformad]

Call me a lazy bugger as I ain't trawled through all the info about lily but can someone confirm if she does facials got my first meet booked so was wanting to know

[johnny34]

Call me a lazy bugger as I ain't trawled through all the info about lily but can someone confirm if she does facials got my first meet booked so was wanting to know

Yes she does indeed    you lazy bugger 

[Shyandrew2001]

Never got the rebooking that was promised to me by Lily. Won't be wasting my time again. And really should leave another review for the 3rd booking that was scheduled and she didn't even bother to contact me that that one was cancelled.

[LilyD]

Hi Andrew,
Apologies but I have not recieved any emails or texts from you requesting another booking? As i said in my original reply, I will organise the booking for an evening / time of your choice, meaning you did not have to worry about me being fully booked within advertsised hours as I was willing to work round you. You have commented that you did not appreciate me contacting you via text out of the blue, so I decided the best idea would be to wait for you to contact me regarding the booking (which you have not done, the last I heard was that you would be contacting me to rearrange). I am not a mind reader, if you do not let me know that you are looking to book then I have no idea that you are.
Thanks,
Lily

[LilyD]

Also, just want to point out that I realise a lot of guys on here do not appreciate girls posting, however in situations where clients choose to complain on here first about issues they have without contacting the girl direct, it is very difficult to know how else to respond.

[domino999]

in situations where clients choose to complain on here first about issues they have without contacting the girl direct, it is very difficult to know how else to respond.

Best advice:

Don't give them a reason to complain.

On the previous post first few lines were leave it up to me, I will work around you, then there is the part about not wanting to receive text, then jumps to waiting for him. I dont think he's a mind reader either. What about a pm here or AW messaging. I'm sure there were others ways to contact without needing to text.

[AnthG]

Also, just want to point out that I realise a lot of guys on here do not appreciate girls posting, however in situations where clients choose to complain on here first about issues they have without contacting the girl direct, it is very difficult to know how else to respond.

Now that Andrew's issue has been resolved/responded to. Can I raise my personal gripe that I didn't feel comfortable messaging you direct to ask.

It is so annoying, infuriating, and insulting in the extreme that both you and EvaBello work for an agency where you will come away with £70 per hour for those bookings (after the client pays £100). And yet for independent bookings you want £120 per hour.

Do you not agree it is more sensible to charge the same £100 per hour as independents which is the same as the guy pays when seeing you via the agency.

I know you are both regarded as two of the best in the region, but Tori Taylor, Keeva and Savannah - who are the others regarded as the best in the region, all charge the same independently as they do via the agency. So why can't you too, please?

[LilyD]

Hi Anth,
Thanks for your message.
As you know, our main method of working is via adultwork. We work the occasional shift with Amour, and rather than seeing it as raising our prices for independent bookings, it is more of a case of we are willing to take less money from agency work because 1. it is less work for us in terms of organising bookings, 2. we do not have to take care of security precautions ourselves as the agency does this for us and 3. the agency manages the advertising on our behalf for these bookings. The time spent on all the above when we are working independly means that we choose to charge £120 / hour for this service, as we believe that is what the service is worth. It is not intended as an insult, and infact I have not recieved a single complaint or been challenged on the price of my adultwork bookings by any of my new or regular clients. If people do not believe that a booking is worth the money I charge I have no problem with this, it is up to clients what they are willing to pay, and by the same token it is up to us to decide what we believe our services are worth. To me, working for an agency and working independent are two very different experiences, and so I price accordingly.
Hope this clears it up a little, please feel free to contact me via pm if you have any further questions.
Thanks
Lily

[domino999]

I would guess.

100 is a ceiling imposed by the agency, whereas the girl thinks that too small, however to get the exposure/publicity is willing to work some hours through the agency. Once those agency hours are booked up, the punter has no option than pay the higher amount.

So it's simple economics - supply and demand. If the girl was sitting twiddling her fingers then the agency hours would increase and the AW price would decrease.

You lot are to blame for keeping these girls busy so you are the reason it's 120.

I don't buy the added cost due to managing the process themselves, although i assume a greater number of time wasters will book independently and therefore any pricing model should incorporate unnecessary down time

[rthunderbird]

Yeah I am going to chime in here, I have not yet seen Lily personally although I hope to at some point in the summer assuming she is still around however I do understand the reason for the higher price. Like the poster said above me first it is just simple economics, supply and demand etc however it is also far less work to go through an agency if any of you have ever met with an Amour or Diamonds girl you may have heard them say they prefer working through the agency due to the things the agency does for them. If you are independent as Lily & Eva often are then the amount of responsibility and expenses increases. Plus as I have been told they are considered two of the highest rated so I don't think £120 is too much to ask especially since Brooke is £150 and she is booked until God knows what century.

[domino999]

Earning 70 through an agency or 120 indie is a mark up for  the girl is 71%. Whereas the 120 opposed to 100 is 20% more expensive to the punter.

If both were 100 then the girls markup from the agency amount would still be 42% i.e the £30 the agency don't get.

I personally think the extra 30 is adequate to cover Admin, just depends how hard the girls wants to squeeze the punter

[rthunderbird]

Exactly, I don't condemn them for it. Its business like anything else in this line of work. Quite fun business if I do say so myself.

[daviemac]

It's been said many times the likes of Keeva and Savanah, who are very popular, are happy to use the commission they save as an independent to cover any extra costs incurred by not using the agency.

Why does anyone need almost double the rate ?   

[rthunderbird]

£100 - An hour at amour - £30 for amour themselves leaves them with £70. £120 independent but that means they have to cover what amour does for that £30 +- lets say £5 and then they're making maybe £20-£30 more due to supply and demand so no they're not making double, definitely making more but not anywhere near double. If it seems unfair to you fair enough then book them through amour when you can. I however do not mind the added charge.

[AnthG]

I however do not mind the added charge.

My thoughts are, people have said there are a few girls in the region who are the "untouchables" in that no matter what they do, people will accept it and try and find means to defend it.

If it was any other girl it would be classed as pure greed on her behalf. But because its Lily, people try to find means to justify it.

Its worth remembering when Lily was working at Diamonds, and thus using their flats, which she and Eva did do as the reason she quit them was because the Quayside flat was messy that one time. She will have been working for £50 an hour with them. And she was offering a very good hour in that time for it.

Getting £50 per hour to now getting £120 per hour independently is a 140% markup.  On Amour she gets £70 per hour and same again gets a 70% markup from that.

You can argue she is well regarded. But the counter to that argument is Tori Taylor is also well regarded, very popular, and offers a good booking. She also like Lily has the same admin, security and all others to do also and yet she still charges £100 independently.

So its either a case of Tori is more efficient at handling the admin work than Lily and Eva are. Or its a case of they are being a bit greedy.   (I do know that sounds unpleasant. But again my case is, if someone said that in the Tiffany topic nobody would mind, but in the LilyD topic it sounds very unpleasant to say, because she is so well regarded, hence why untouchables term came about).

[LilyD]

Firstly just want to say that Diamonds charge exactly the same amount of comission as Amour do (30%) so I have never recieved less than the standard £70 from agency or idependent work. Even as a niave newbie I would not have worked for less than this. We paid a flat fee for use of the apartments.
Whilst I appreciate what you are saying, I'm afraid I still stand by my prices and do not believe that they are unfair to clients. So many girls that charge £100 an hour offer a fraction of the effort I put into my work, both in and outside bookings. I make sure I find out in detail about the services my clients are interested in, and if I am unsure on any of it I employ the same amount of rigour to perfecting it as I would in any other career. I will only see a limited number of clients a day, as I value being fresh for every booking and do not believe this can be achieved if I see more than three people. At risk of sounding arrogant, I do not think that the extra £20 I charge is excessive for the service that I offer, nor do I believe that the service I offer can be compared to girls who do not genuinely enjoy and care about the work they do. (Obviously this is not aimed at any of the girls mentioned on this thread)
I do not have a choice about how much I charge at Amour, the rate is decided by the agency and it is not my place to question this. For me, the security of having Amour as an agency, aswell as the support and publicity I recieve from them is worth the reduced amount of money I recieve when working through them. I strongly agree with the work Stacy does with SAFE and would like to show my support for the way she looks after the girls, even if it means overall I make a little less. I do not think that greed can be used as an argument when we are speaking about bussiness. I run my bussiness taking into consideration many factors, including maximum profit, as anyone running a bussiness would.
Anth, if you have any doubts about whether my time is worth the small extra fee then I would urge you to come and find out for yourself! (She says, tongue in cheek and hoping she doesn't get in trouble for percieved touting!)
I apologise if anyone feels that negative critism cannot be voiced about myself or any other girls. I never consider myself above it, to be honest I'm still getting used to the idea that we have been as succesful in this industry as we have been so far. Obviously for that I am very grateful. ANYWAY! My messages are always so wordy, must still be in dissertation mode.
Thanks,
Lily   

[alenski]

i dont think the girls are being greedy they are merely charging what they think they are worth  as they quite entitled to. we do live in a free market economy do we not.they have no need to defend their fees if you dont wish to join the party you  are free to look elsewhere as you say there are many girls happy to accept £100.

[daviemac]

£100 - An hour at amour - £30 for amour themselves leaves them with £70. £120 independent but that means they have to cover what amour does for that £30 +- lets say £5 and then they're making maybe £20-£30 more due to supply and demand so no they're not making double, definitely making more but not anywhere near double. If it seems unfair to you fair enough then book them through amour when you can. I however do not mind the added charge.

Sorry my almost 50% is in fact 42%

The point I'm trying to make is if Lilly wants to charge £120 ph and punters pay it then fair enough, I haven't got a problem with that, just stay as an independent and don't work for Amour at £70 ph.

She's in a service industry and I just can't understand why for an extra £20 she would leave herself open to so much criticism.

If she left the agency and charged £120 - no probs, if she just charged the same £100 and kept the £30 commission like other popular girls do the again - no problem.

To me (and many others) it seems greedy. 

[Uniformad]

Yes she does indeed    you lazy bugger 

Very true and thanks for the info

[Toshiba]

AG , i think its a simple case that they think they are worth the £120 as do many other escorts, the only way they will drop the price is when the work dries up, me personally i wouldnt pay it.

regardless of who it is i dont think she deserves any stick, if you dont wanna pay it dont, simple. 

[greychap]

Hi Anth,
Thanks for your message.
As you know, our main method of working is via adultwork. We work the occasional shift with Amour, and rather than seeing it as raising our prices for independent bookings, it is more of a case of we are willing to take less money from agency work because 1. it is less work for us in terms of organising bookings, 2. we do not have to take care of security precautions ourselves as the agency does this for us and 3. the agency manages the advertising on our behalf for these bookings. The time spent on all the above when we are working independly means that we choose to charge £120 / hour for this service, as we believe that is what the service is worth. It is not intended as an insult, and infact I have not recieved a single complaint or been challenged on the price of my adultwork bookings by any of my new or regular clients. If people do not believe that a booking is worth the money I charge I have no problem with this, it is up to clients what they are willing to pay, and by the same token it is up to us to decide what we believe our services are worth. To me, working for an agency and working independent are two very different experiences, and so I price accordingly.
Hope this clears it up a little, please feel free to contact me via pm if you have any further questions.
Thanks
Lily

Personally i dont feel you need to come on here and justify your £120 price tag.

Your fee of £120 I do not think it is high for what you provide in the hour, the services you provide cim, owo, rimming etc carry risks of you catching diseases so the price to me is very good value.

The problem with the North East is it is a very cheap area for sex workers and a lot of the punters want a hell of a lot for there money.

Personally I can see why you still did work with an agency every now and again to build up more regulars and more exposure. The only thing with some agencies who you were with is they say your self employed and you don't work for them but that they tell you how little you must charge and everyone must be the same price (more control then they like to admit)

You have built up a lot of regulars so I doubt many would have a problem with your price of just £120 for everything they get and I doubt very much you would want the punters that dont want to pay your amount so probably a win for you anyway.

You don't do this for fun you want the money and you provide a very good service for your fee so carry on and stick to your guns.

[greychap]

Sorry my almost 50% is in fact 42%

The point I'm trying to make is if Lilly wants to charge £120 ph and punters pay it then fair enough, I haven't got a problem with that, just stay as an independent and don't work for Amour at £70 ph.

She's in a service industry and I just can't understand why for an extra £20 she would leave herself open to so much criticism.

If she left the agency and charged £120 - no probs, if she just charged the same £100 and kept the £30 commission like other popular girls do the again - no problem.

To me (and many others) it seems greedy.

I agree with the fact she had exposure on here and with Amour so does not need to work for there £70 as it is a bit conflicting, but then saying it she barely works for them anyway.

[greychap]

My thoughts are, people have said there are a few girls in the region who are the "untouchables" in that no matter what they do, people will accept it and try and find means to defend it.

If it was any other girl it would be classed as pure greed on her behalf. But because its Lily, people try to find means to justify it.

Its worth remembering when Lily was working at Diamonds, and thus using their flats, which she and Eva did do as the reason she quit them was because the Quayside flat was messy that one time. She will have been working for £50 an hour with them. And she was offering a very good hour in that time for it.

Getting £50 per hour to now getting £120 per hour independently is a 140% markup.  On Amour she gets £70 per hour and same again gets a 70% markup from that.

You can argue she is well regarded. But the counter to that argument is Tori Taylor is also well regarded, very popular, and offers a good booking. She also like Lily has the same admin, security and all others to do also and yet she still charges £100 independently.

So its either a case of Tori is more efficient at handling the admin work than Lily and Eva are. Or its a case of they are being a bit greedy.   (I do know that sounds unpleasant. But again my case is, if someone said that in the Tiffany topic nobody would mind, but in the LilyD topic it sounds very unpleasant to say, because she is so well regarded, hence why untouchables term came about).

Anth we know you love a good deal or a freebie but I don't think every girl should be compared to another girl just because another charges £20 less, there body there choice as far as I am concerned.

I kind of see the point about getting £70 from Amour and a lot more independent but they have had the exposure from them and don't really need them anymore as why they do much more independent work.

Some people could call the girls greedy but I bed some of the girls call you a tight arse behind your back

[Toshiba]

her being on Amour gives them exposure  ..........i think Anths point is how come LillyD can come on here and get away with charging her prices when other good escorts dont feel the need to up their price? well its a case of where you pitch your price , its as simple as that, her choice and no reason to question  her for it.

[greychap]

her being on Amour gives them exposure  ..........i think Anths point is how come LillyD can come on here and get away with charging her prices when other good escorts dont feel the need to up their price? well its a case of where you pitch your price , its as simple as that, her choice and no reason to question  her for it.

It certainly gives them exposure now she has built up a good reputation they need her more then she needs them.

It does look a little pointless that she would want to work for them and get £70 rather then the £120 but I think they keep her on there site more to look good as its obvious she does independent work a lot more then bothering with them.

[sentinel]

Oh dear Lily, all those years at University and they still didn't teach you how to spell.

Just joking of course.  Don't mind me, I'm just old-fashioned.

But seriously don't listen to tight buggers like Anth, if you think £120 is a good deal then stick with it.    

[AnthG]

her being on Amour gives them exposure  ..........i think Anths point is how come LillyD can come on here and get away with charging her prices when other good escorts dont feel the need to up their price? well its a case of where you pitch your price , its as simple as that, her choice and no reason to question  her for it.

My point is I don't like it when girls charge one rate to some people but a different one to to others. And that is what those girls are doing by charging £100 if I book via the agency, but £120 plus if I book direct.

I said the same in the Tiffany topic, and the same in the Loretta topic. But to be honest I feel kind of bad saying it in the Lily topic as she comes across as very likable in her forum posts and always comes back with the right, and pleasant, things to say. But I would be feeling a personal hypocrite to myself if I didn't raise it as I personally think its very wrong to do.

Some people could call the girls greedy but I bed some of the girls call you a tight arse behind your back

To be honest when I first started out punting I tried to be friends with all the girls both that I booked and on the forums. And it still resulted in them pretty much either disliking me anyway or trying to take me for a ride.

I think every punter needs to accept the girls behind their backs pretty much dislike them immensely. Believing otherwise you risk falling into the Denyason trap.

I am not a rich person by any long stretch. And thus I want good value for money when I book someone. I do think given she looks very attractive and she comes across as very articulate that LilyD is providing good value for money at £120. But she is much better value for money booking her via the agency for £100. So I guess someone shoot me for thinking that

[greychap]

Oh dear Lily, all those years at University and they still didn't teach you how to spell.

Just joking of course.  Don't mind me, I'm just old-fashioned.

But seriously don't listen to tight buggers like Anth, if you think £120 is a good deal then stick with it.   

Anth just likes to get the cheapest deal he can get, problem is though a lot of the girls end up hating you for it and sometimes the service will suffer, I have heard many girls really slag off other punters for being too tight, it does not always pay off for the punter.

[greychap]

My point is I don't like it when girls charge one rate to some people but a different one to to others. And that is what those girls are doing by charging £100 if I book via the agency, but £120 plus if I book direct.

I said the same in the Tiffany topic, and the same in the Loretta topic. But to be honest I feel kind of bad saying it in the Lily topic as she comes across as very likable in her forum posts and always comes back with the right, and pleasant, things to say. But I would be feeling a personal hypocrite to myself if I didn't raise it as I personally think its very wrong to do.

To be honest when I first started out punting I tried to be friends with all the girls both that I booked and on the forums. And it still resulted in them pretty much either disliking me anyway or trying to take me for a ride.

I think every punter needs to accept the girls behind their backs pretty much dislike them immensely. Believing otherwise you risk falling into the Denyason trap.

I am not a rich person by any long stretch. And thus I want good value for money when I book someone. I do think given she looks very attractive and she comes across as very articulate that LilyD is providing good value for money at £120. But she is much better value for money booking her via the agency for £100. So I guess someone shoot me for thinking that

I get your point about why work for £70 when independent as £120 but she barely works at Amour so that answers the question and deep down she knows she is worth more then the cheaper prices they charge.

[greychap]

My point is I don't like it when girls charge one rate to some people but a different one to to others. And that is what those girls are doing by charging £100 if I book via the agency, but £120 plus if I book direct.

I said the same in the Tiffany topic, and the same in the Loretta topic. But to be honest I feel kind of bad saying it in the Lily topic as she comes across as very likable in her forum posts and always comes back with the right, and pleasant, things to say. But I would be feeling a personal hypocrite to myself if I didn't raise it as I personally think its very wrong to do.

To be honest when I first started out punting I tried to be friends with all the girls both that I booked and on the forums. And it still resulted in them pretty much either disliking me anyway or trying to take me for a ride.

I think every punter needs to accept the girls behind their backs pretty much dislike them immensely. Believing otherwise you risk falling into the Denyason trap.

I am not a rich person by any long stretch. And thus I want good value for money when I book someone. I do think given she looks very attractive and she comes across as very articulate that LilyD is providing good value for money at £120. But she is much better value for money booking her via the agency for £100. So I guess someone shoot me for thinking that

Also rather then thinking the girls are just greedy for charging more independent it is more odd the fact that they are seen else where far cheaper, its not a good business model for the girl to be seen cheaper and very pointless in Lilly's case where she  sees more punters independent anyway.

[Toshiba]

i book keeva always independently, never through the agency, but i must admit i'd think twice at £120 knowing i could get her for less....i guess Anth if like me money sometimes is an issue then we look at any savings as a bonus

[Toshiba]

It certainly gives them exposure now she has built up a good reputation they need her more then she needs them.

It does look a little pointless that she would want to work for them and get £70 rather then the £120 but I think they keep her on there site more to look good as its obvious she does independent work a lot more then bothering with them.

i find it hard to understand what she gets out of working for them tbh

[PlasticGeordie]

Personally I am perfectly happy to pay the AW prices. I know for a fact I am going to get excellent service from Lily who as I have said before many times is the best escort I have ever seen by far. She is only charging the same as the majority of dodgy Romanians and not much more than for possibly good possibly shite service from assorted agency girls. Punting is expensive full stop. If we are going to indulge go for the best.

I have decided to go for a Heaton double next week. One hour with Lily and then a duo 2 days later if I can book it. Eva is also outstanding as every punter who has ever seen her will testify.

[wheatbeerlover]

I am going to say the same as I said on another thread on the subject, it's a business, the girls can charge what they want, if it's too high they won't get any work, simple.

Anth just seems to want everything his own way...all costs the same, the girls face on show, enhanced or real boobs, charge less than their hourly rate to have dinner with him..the list goes on

[OldAdmin]

Anth just seems to want everything his own way...all costs the same, the girls face on show, enhanced or real boobs, charge less than their hourly rate to have dinner with him..the list goes on

Maybe because he's the customer, spending his hard earned money and this is a PUNTER forum

[OldAdmin]

You seem overly interested in AnthG, a quick glance shows that many of your 45 posts are directed at him...

[AnthG]

I am going to say the same as I said on another thread on the subject, it's a business, the girls can charge what they want, if it's too high they won't get any work, simple.

Anth just seems to want everything his own way...all costs the same, the girls face on show, enhanced or real boobs, charge less than their hourly rate to have dinner with him..the list goes on

You say in your first paragraph its all just business. And yet you then imply in your second paragraph that I am wrong for treating this as nothing more than a business transaction. 

I am a customer, this is a customer based discussion forum. These are service providers and agencies offering services. Where else but here are people going to say and discuss what they want or what they are seeking from the service providers.

*Edit* Seems I was typing the same thing as Admin at the same time.

[rthunderbird]

Anth you may recall I said that I had not seen Lily and thus any idea of her being untouchable is meaningless to me. All I said was that personally I don't mind the added charge if you do don't see her. Simple. She's not going to change her rates nor do I think she should.

[Fragilehand]

Am I the only 1 that thinks she's not "that attractive" I wished I didn't start reading this thread as once I started I had to finish!

[domino999]

Am I the only 1 that thinks she's not "that attractive"

You've just opened a new can of worms there 

no oil painting to me, but will be for some evidently.
So what what would be your score out of 10 for visuals?
we need a poll function here i think 

[Toshiba]

Am I the only 1 that thinks she's not "that attractive" I wished I didn't start reading this thread as once I started I had to finish!

Attractive can be many things to many people.

I call girls pretty and others good looking but i prefer pretty girls to good looking(hope that makes sense)

She's very pretty imho, but shes also top notch at what she gives you, something more important in my book

[flash1965]

This thread seems to going round in circles; it’s a simple choice if you want to see her sooner you pay her higher Indy price otherwise wait for availability on Armour.

If people are willing to pay her higher price she would be stupid to turn it down, which you can tell by her posts she isn’t. If you were in her position would you turn down the chance to earn extra money for providing the same service doubt it?

[foreverchanges]

If people are willing to pay her higher price she would be stupid to turn it down, which you can tell by her posts she isn’t. If you were in her position would you turn down the chance to earn extra money for providing the same service doubt it?

Exactly..I saw Lily a couple of months ago and booked her via Amour for the Friday and then had no qualms whatsoever about seeing  her again four days later with her AW rates.
In my opinion she provides a superb service.

[Mansell]

Personally I am perfectly happy to pay the AW prices. I know for a fact I am going to get excellent service from Lily who as I have said before many times is the best escort I have ever seen by far. She is only charging the same as the majority of dodgy Romanians and not much more than for possibly good possibly shite service from assorted agency girls. Punting is expensive full stop. If we are going to indulge go for the best.

I have decided to go for a Heaton double next week. One hour with Lily and then a duo 2 days later if I can book it. Eva is also outstanding as every punter who has ever seen her will testify.

Exactly what I was thinking, just don't understand the EE girls and won;t see any more of them whilst they are overpriced. If Lily's business dries up then she will have to charge less but I wouldn't want to wait till 2050 !!

[greychap]

Am I the only 1 that thinks she's not "that attractive" I wished I didn't start reading this thread as once I started I had to finish!

I have seen her just the once, I would say she is fairly attractive compared to a lot in the industry, not stunning or anything, but think for the money she charges she gives a lot, so I think a lot of the punters compare the whole deal they get with her.

[domino999]

I've must have been spoilt as most of my punts have been abroad. With a better looking girl £120 would pay for a week and I'd have do a disappearing act to rid her.

Depends what we've been used to and personal standards.

[David Larry]

Am I the only 1 that thinks she's not "that attractive" I wished I didn't start reading this thread as once I started I had to finish!

Attraction is purely subjective, as are most things in life, e.g. music. I could write down exactly what I think ticks all my boxes but I've been caught out many a time with girls I never thought would do it for me (strangely, and as much as I try to fight it, I find Eileen Grimshaw attractive, hahaha). Anyhow, I personally think Lily's stunning and can't wait to spend some time with her... £100 / £120... I totally get her strategy... so, if you don't like the prices, shop elsewhere. There will always be objections and sure she'll get 100 thumbs up for every 1 thumb down. Each to their own.

[Warwick Hunt]

Supposing Lilly never covered any work for her agency, would her rate be questioned?
It seems that she has a bond with the agency and owner, that is the reason why she continues to give up some of her time, supporting Amour. This is the way i picked up Lilly's post.
The question Anth asked was fair enough in my view, but Lilly's answers was emphatic.
It sounds to me that should you manage to get a booking through Amour then you would be getting a bargain, as opposed to paying over the odds outside, at least you have a choice.
I have never met LD, but if the service is as good as she says (and i don't doubt her) then surely that must be worth paying a little extra for. We know some girls hold their agency rates, which is great for us, but i wouldn't mind paying a little extra for Savannah for example, because we rate them highly.

[Fragilehand]

If I had a choice of reading this thread or watching Jeremy kyle ..... I would be watching jezza!
 
Out of ten personally speaking I would say 7 max. Eva would be a 11. Lil hasn't got any thing special about her she's beautiful but so are most uni students. But then again I used to fantasize about Gillian Anderson (scully of X files )so what do I know 

[David Larry]

But then again I used to fantasize about Gillian Anderson (scully of X files )so what do I know 

I've ruined many a sock fantasising over GA