SummerSexy89 / Missblonde2076 - hoist on my own petard while TOFTT!

[jimbobwood]

The solution is so simple!

1. Give Q a full refund,
2. Give Q a free 2 hour punt plus one hour extra for the inconvenience (with limited talking)

She needs to try to redeem her situation because it's a great opportunity for women to become prossies. There is never enough good quality English prossies and they make such a good living. I don't get it, why fuck up like this. Quite a few of the top rated prossies are fully booked for a few weeks and punters are always looking for alternatives.

Another prossie to avoid...

[hendrix]

The solution is so simple!

1. Give Q a full refund,
2. Give Q a free 2 hour punt plus one hour extra for the inconvenience (with limited talking)

She needs to try to redeem her situation because it's a great opportunity for women to become prossies. There is never enough good quality English prossies and they make such a good living. I don't get it, why fuck up like this. Quite a few of the top rated prossies are fully booked for a few weeks and punters are always looking for alternatives.

Another prossie to avoid...

Quite right. It's so simple really.. Everybody, and I mean everybody,  fucks up sometimes. It's how you deal with it that counts.

[Sedlmayer]

The solution is so simple!

1. Give Q a full refund,
2. Give Q a free 2 hour punt plus one hour extra for the inconvenience (with limited talking)

She needs to try to redeem her situation because it's a great opportunity for women to become prossies. There is never enough good quality English prossies and they make such a good living. I don't get it, why fuck up like this. Quite a few of the top rated prossies are fully booked for a few weeks and punters are always looking for alternatives.

Another prossie to avoid...

Why fuck up like this? She's an alcoholic  by the sounds of it .......?
That answer your question? 

[squeezebox]

Quite right. It's so simple really.. Everybody, and I mean everybody,  fucks up sometimes. It's how you deal with it that counts.

This is the key to providing A1 customer service, something clearly forgotten in this example and on previous occasions, as the prostitute blacklist testifies.

Hoisted on my own petard
Takes on a new definition and now applies to the prossie     Summerpsycho89    

[Quesadilla]

The solution is so simple!

1. Give Q a full refund,
2. Give Q a free 2 hour punt plus one hour extra for the inconvenience (with limited talking)

Would have to be option 1. I now wouldn't fuck her if she paid me. Although thinking about it maybe a BDSM session with extreme humiliation might make me feel better...

[greychap]

Would have to be option 1. I now wouldn't fuck her if she paid me. Although thinking about it maybe a BDSM session with extreme humiliation might make me feel better...

I do think she should offer some money back if she wants to put this to bed and admit you got lead on thinking you would be getting a lot more then you did.

I cannot see it even entering her head to pay back the full £300 but I think she should offer at least £150 back or £200 as nothing sexual happened and not because Q treated her so bad that she had to leave and refused the sex because he abused her, this was so far from the case she decided she did not want to do anything so as far as I am concerned some of this money should be returned and this is me trying to look at the whole review as I am not a punter.

It was obvious that there was advantage taking going on from this escort and if she decides on a booking that she wont go ahead with sexual activities then the fee of £300 is way too high for just chatting and drinking all his wine and wasted petrol picking you up and dropping you off at train station.

Doing the right thing would be to return some money back to Q and learn from this situation that the way you are promoting yourself as an escort is the wrong way and if you carry on somebody could hurt you. It will happen if you carry on like this.

[squeezebox]

I do think she should offer some money back if she wants to put this to bed and admit you got lead on thinking you would be getting a lot more then you did.

I cannot see it even entering her head to pay back the full £300 but I think she should offer at least £150 back or £200 as nothing sexual happened and not because Q treated her so bad that she had to leave and refused the sex because he abused her, this was so far from the case she decided she did not want to do anything so as far as I am concerned some of this money should be returned and this is me trying to look at the whole review as I am not a punter.

It was obvious that there was advantage taking going on from this escort and if she decides on a booking that she wont go ahead with sexual activities then the fee of £300 is way too high for just chatting and drinking all his wine and wasted petrol picking you up and dropping you off at train station.

Doing the right thing would be to return some money back to Q and learn from this situation that the way you are promoting yourself as an escort is the wrong way and if you carry on somebody could hurt you. It will happen if you carry on like this.

This is the best advice/guidance for any prossie or potential prossie to take note of. 

There is no shadow of a doubt she set out to con a client, one she thought would be an easy touch. It wouldn't surprise me if she has pulled the same con on punters before, as it was so blatant and in her world, justified.   

[Cornish sub]

I do think she should offer some money back if she wants to put this to bed and admit you got lead on thinking you would be getting a lot more then you did.

I cannot see it even entering her head to pay back the full £300 but I think she should offer at least £150 back or £200 as nothing sexual happened and not because Q treated her so bad that she had to leave and refused the sex because he abused her, this was so far from the case she decided she did not want to do anything so as far as I am concerned some of this money should be returned and this is me trying to look at the whole review as I am not a punter.

It was obvious that there was advantage taking going on from this escort and if she decides on a booking that she wont go ahead with sexual activities then the fee of £300 is way too high for just chatting and drinking all his wine and wasted petrol picking you up and dropping you off at train station.

Doing the right thing would be to return some money back to Q and learn from this situation that the way you are promoting yourself as an escort is the wrong way and if you carry on somebody could hurt you. It will happen if you carry on like this.

I totally disagree with this. She should pay ALL the money back, not just some of it. Yes, she spent the best part of 2 hours with Q, but she went there with no intention whatsoever of providing any of the services that she'd agreed to provide. Her only intention was to get her grubby hands on the £300 for as little physical contact with Q as possible. She conned him pure and simple, only a full refund is justified, not a partial one.

[JamesRockford]

I've lived North London most of my life and I've seen things people can do, that mite qualify as psycho. 

Yeah North London is pretty rough.  I once (politely) asked a lady in Hampstead where I could get a shag and quick as a flash her husband whipped out a pouch of Old Virginia and asked me to help myself.  I initially thought that the old boy was about to hit me with his pipe.  Yes, North London's a bit edgy.

[yorkshire123]

I totally disagree with this. She should pay ALL the money back, not just some of it. Yes, she spent the best part of 2 hours with Q, but she went there with no intention whatsoever of providing any of the services that she'd agreed to provide. Her only intention was to get her grubby hands on the £300 for as little physical contact with Q as possible. She conned him pure and simple, only a full refund is justified, not a partial one.

I slightly disagree Cornish,
I'm trying to put myself in the boots of Q on this one, if I had been conned by this girl in the same manner quite frankly the last thing I would want is a post negative review refund & if it was offered I would more than likely tell her to shove it up her arse.

I'm guessing here but I feel in Q's case much the same as it would be for me this is more to do with been conned & possibly a slight ego dent rather than about the lost money, however I don't punt with money I can't afford to lose so maybe I'm quite fortunate in that respect (not that I would be happy with it)

This review has shown what a brazen con artist she is & I would hate for people to have the slightest bit of sympathy for her if she returned the money now, for this I'm grateful to Q for writing this review as I for one could imagine myself falling for those profile picture tits.

If a full refund was due then it should have been at the time of the meeting, and I have no doubt that Q would have bunged her a few quid for her troubles as he seems quite the gentleman 

[Ali Katt]

I agree 100% Yorkshire, the problem is even if she offered him a refund she gone on to burn her bridges by calling him a cunt. She can't be that bothered about her reputation, I can't say what goes on inside her head, but I'm sure when she meets some punters she is laughing all the way to the bank. As said if she only wants to offer social escorting she should say so and I'm sure she would do alright at it.

[Sedlmayer]

I agree 100% Yorkshire, the problem is even if she offered him a refund she gone on to burn her bridges by calling him a cunt. She can't be that bothered about her reputation, I can't say what goes on inside her head, but I'm sure when she meets some punters she is laughing all the way to the bank. As said if she only wants to offer social escorting she should say so and I'm sure she would do alright at it.

Yes - it sounds like after her second bottle of wine, she's the life and soul of the party 

[Cornish sub]

I slightly disagree Cornish,
I'm trying to put myself in the boots of Q on this one, if I had been conned by this girl in the same manner quite frankly the last thing I would want is a post negative review refund & if it was offered I would more than likely tell her to shove it up her arse.

I'm guessing here but I feel in Q's case much the same as it would be for me this is more to do with been conned & possibly a slight ego dent rather than about the lost money, however I don't punt with money I can't afford to lose so maybe I'm quite fortunate in that respect (not that I would be happy with it)

This review has shown what a brazen con artist she is & I would hate for people to have the slightest bit of sympathy for her if she returned the money now, for this I'm grateful to Q for writing this review as I for one could imagine myself falling for those profile picture tits.

If a full refund was due then it should have been at the time of the meeting, and I have no doubt that Q would have bunged her a few quid for her troubles as he seems quite the gentleman 

Oh believe you me, I'd still have no sympathy for her, even if she returned all the money. My opinion of her wouldn't change, that she's an out and out con artist who only paid the money back because of all the (deserved) negative publicity this thread has brought her. And her threats to sue Q for him using her picture as his avatar has cemented my lack of sympathy for her. No, the only person I was considering when I said only a full refund is justified was Q himself.

[Ali Katt]

Yes - it sounds like after her second bottle of wine, she's the life and soul of the party 

Given she looks pretty from her pictures, and has what look likes a big pair of tits, some men would just want to be seen with her, regardless of personality and lack thereof. No, doubt she's devious and I can imagine a crap shag. I'm still undecided if the two bottles of wine was a wind-up by her. I don't drink much, but after one bottle I'm overtly pissed.

[JamesRockford]

I'm still undecided if the two bottles of wine was a wind-up by her. I don't drink much, but after one bottle I'm overtly pissed.

She may be an alcoholic - 2 bottles and you're pissed and almost asleep while she's just pissed and laughing at you.  Dangerous.

[Quesadilla]

Oh believe you me, I'd still have no sympathy for her, even if she returned all the money. My opinion of her wouldn't change, that she's an out and out con artist who only paid the money back because of all the (deserved) negative publicity this thread has brought her. And her threats to sue Q for him using her picture as his avatar has cemented my lack of sympathy for her. No, the only person I was considering when I said only a full refund is justified was Q himself.

I actually couldn't give a toss either way at this point. Fortunately I have a decent punting budget and as Yorkshire said I don't punt with money I can't afford to lose - well, good punt or bad the money's gone so it's all the same.

Getting it back would mean another decent punt or two though so I wouldn't say no to it - my ego is not remotely bruised by this skank conning me - I am a trusting punter and not sure I could have done much differently other than manage my risk a bit better - so I'll take it on the chin, learn and move on.

If that thieving skank wants her pictures to stop appearing in every post I make (and of course those of you still using her avatar) then a refund is the only way it will happen.

I'm fairly prolific on here (no doubt some wish I wasn't!  ) but now have all the more reason to post regularly and keep her face fresh in the mind of punters who visit.

And yes it would need to be a full refund. She delivered no services and I don't pay escorts for conversation only. Ever. I can get good chat elsewhere for free.

[Cornish sub]

Q, any correspondence from her legal team yet? She must be feeling pretty stupid that her pathetic threats were treated with ridicule and derision by everyone on here, and angry as fuck that not only did those threats totally fail to get you to remove her picture, but that they had the opposite effect by making more people use more of her pictures as their avatars. How does the old saying go - there's no such thing as bad publicity? Haha, I beg to differ.

[Ali Katt]

Q, any correspondence from her legal team yet? She must be feeling pretty stupid that her pathetic threats were treated with ridicule and derision by everyone on here, and angry as fuck that not only did those threats totally fail to get you to remove her picture, but that they had the opposite effect by making more people use more of her pictures as their avatars. How does the old saying go - there's no such thing as bad publicity? Haha, I beg to differ.

To fucking right, but the sad fact is she still got paid. However, I doubt she has got a booking since, but of course she will say she has been on her back more times than Taka Michinoku and has a string of regular gents. I hope she makes that £300 last and hasn't bought those Laboutins that every whore has.

[greychap]

I actually couldn't give a toss either way at this point. Fortunately I have a decent punting budget and as Yorkshire said I don't punt with money I can't afford to lose - well, good punt or bad the money's gone so it's all the same.

Getting it back would mean another decent punt or two though so I wouldn't say no to it - my ego is not remotely bruised by this skank conning me - I am a trusting punter and not sure I could have done much differently other than manage my risk a bit better - so I'll take it on the chin, learn and move on.

If that thieving skank wants her pictures to stop appearing in every post I make (and of course those of you still using her avatar) then a refund is the only way it will happen.

I'm fairly prolific on here (no doubt some wish I wasn't!  ) but now have all the more reason to post regularly and keep her face fresh in the mind of punters who visit.

And yes it would need to be a full refund. She delivered no services and I don't pay escorts for conversation only. Ever. I can get good chat elsewhere for free.

You do have a very similar outlook to me there is always a chance of losing the money and it going wrong so its the risk we all take.

I never expected her to ever refund all that £300 but thought she would of at the very least offered half or three quarters of it back after all this, but then again she is a chancer and should not be on adultwork advertising sexual services it should state no services or if she decides not to go through with anything sexual she should have on her profile this could happen and the price would be far less then punters have a choice wether to go ahead and risk it or not.

The only good thing that might have come out of this is she might realise this has really backfired and lost her work and not worth doing again but then again she might just get a new profile up soon and take her face off and still try this scam again, if she does then she will be taking a big risk that someone wont turn very nasty on her.

I get the impression because she went to your home address and you did not pounce on her and played it her way for a while she thought you was an easy target and would not cause her any problems but your a single guy and are not married so have nobody to answer to and this is what she probably plays on that punters will take it.

[Availableinlarge]

The solution is so simple!
1. Give Q a full refund,
2. Give Q a free 2 hour punt plus one hour extra for the inconvenience (with limited talking)

In the 'normal' world with rules and regulations and openness yes she should but not in this murky world in which we delve from time to time, it's not going to happen... 

[StevenS]

Any news from her or has she crawled back into her hole?

[Quesadilla]

Any news from her or has she crawled back into her hole?

Deafening silence. I'm sure it's the calm before the full might of her legal team (or dangerous friends) descend upon me!     

[HappyandLucky]

Deafening silence. I'm sure it's the calm before the full might of her legal team (or dangerous friends) descend upon me!     

Or her lack of business means she cannot afford to top up her dusty phone thus preventing her sending more threatening txts 

Purely for my amusement and others on this forum, I hope she does make contact again so we can all get the latest update on her  chatline escorting. 

[squeezebox]

Deafening silence. I'm sure it's the calm before the full might of her legal team (or dangerous friends) descend upon me!     

That's what she is probably hoping to achieve..however...

Hidden Image/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

[Quesadilla]

Or her lack of business means she cannot afford to top up her dusty phone thus preventing her sending more threatening txts 

Purely for my amusement and others on this forum, I hope she does make contact again so we can all get the latest update on her  chatline escorting. 

Yeah I almost miss her inane ravings.  The angrier she got the funnier it got.  Could imagine her at the end of the phone literally tearing her curly hair out.

I guess she eventually realised how utterly impotent she was when I didn't cower under the awful onslaught of harsh language she hurled at me! 

[HappyandLucky]

Almost 7000 views in under a week. I appreciate some of these are her being a lurker, but  it must almost be driving her to contemplate providing  an actual service.   

All credit to you Q, hopefully this saga is drawing to a close and she will crawl back under her rock 

[Cornish sub]

Almost 7000 views in under a week. I appreciate some of these are her being a lurker, but   it must almost be driving her to contemplate providing  an actual service.    

All credit to you Q, hopefully this saga is drawing to a close and she will crawl back under her rock 

Steady on there, HappyandLucky, let's not wander into the realms of fantasy and make believe.

[Quesadilla]

So...guys, the saga continues!

Just had a message through the other site - you may recall someone suggested I put the review on there as well to spread the net wider. 

The lady in question has asked that I keep her anonymous and I'm very grateful for her doing this so will honour her wishes.

Hiya I saw your review of the girl who basically ripped you off for £300.
I just want to say I think it's absolutely awful and she should be blacklisted rightly so... BUT you posting her private gallery pictures is making things worse rather than better. I read UKP from time to time and see you have posted her private gallery pictures and other posters have done so too, I think this is what has made her threaten you.

I have messaged you here as the girl you reviewed posted on Saafe two days ago claiming you were dangerous and that you are a boundary pusher and should be avoided.

She posted up your number with two digits missing and told girls to PM her for your full address she did put the post code I can't for the life of me remember what it was but something like KT1 or KT7?
Admin on Saafe took the post down as they could see it was revenge, but I don't know how long it was up for and how many girls she gave your address to.

I wish I had screenshotted the page about what she said but I was just reading away and it only clicked that it was about you after the fact and when I tried to search for the post it had gone.

Anyway, I just wanted to tell you this as I saw the review today and think you have a right to know she tried to post malicious things about you and I don't think its right she did so, I do hope you don't get any more abuse from her what a pathetic excuse of an escort.

Have a good day and I hope any other punts you have don't end up like this!!

X

So not just threats now but actually outing me by posting my phone number and giving my home address away.   

Thank you again to the WG who let me know about this!  I of course already knew that the vast majority (IME) are good 'uns but nice to have my faith confirmed

Also thanks to admin at SAAFE for taking the message down promptly.

[d00fer]

So...guys, the saga continues!

Just had a message through the other site - you may recall someone suggested I put the review on there as well to spread the net wider. 

The lady in question has asked that I keep her anonymous and I'm very grateful for her doing this so will honour her wishes.

So not just threats now but actually outing me by posting my phone number and giving my home address away.   

Thank you again to the WG who let me know about this!  I of course already knew that the vast majority (IME) are good 'uns but nice to have my faith confirmed

Also thanks to admin at SAAFE for taking the message down promptly.

Amazing, can't wait to see the next installment will be. Oh, and sorry for 'outing' you Q.

[squeezebox]

So...guys, the saga continues!

Just had a message through the other site - you may recall someone suggested I put the review on there as well to spread the net wider. 

The lady in question has asked that I keep her anonymous and I'm very grateful for her doing this so will honour her wishes.

So not just threats now but actually outing me by posting my phone number and giving my home address away.   

Thank you again to the WG who let me know about this!  I of course already knew that the vast majority (IME) are good 'uns but nice to have my faith confirmed

Also thanks to admin at SAAFE for taking the message down promptly.

I see that move as a last desperate act from someone that knows they can't go on any further.

The fact that SAAFE also recognised her stupidity and removed the post too, shows support for you too. 

[Dani]

Saafe admin do remove fake warnings when they know it is fake. Sometimes it takes a while as they try to find the truth and sometimes they do it straight away as they are not dumb and the way it was written anyone could see it is a bitchy fake post. I didn't twig it was about Q as just skimmed it otherwise I wiuld have reported it to both saafe and Q immediately with screen shots

She must be getting desperate now as she has run out of places to turn so perhaps she will now see sense and offer Q a refund. If she doesn't she will find herself with very little work and if she carries on ripping people off she may rip off the wrong man who may not take it very well and leave her in a situation no one wants to be in.  She is playing a very dangerous game

[Cornish sub]

What an utterly despicable, vindictive cow. Good on the WG for informing you about it and good on SAAFE for seeing through it and removing it. And as Dani's just said, the con artist's getting desperate and running out of places to turn. Maybe she should turn to her kitchen cupboard, get out the Mr Sheen and cloth and give her phone a good dusting off and polish. Btw, Dani, will SAAFE now ban her for being a con artist and malicious liar?

[Ali Katt]

For the record my picture of her is in her free gallery. There's also a lesson in this never use your own home for an incall with a first timer.

[west8]

Happy to see that SAAFE are swift to respond when the attempted deceit is obvious.

I seem to recall stayer had a similar problem with his details being published by a vindictive WG, but they too were removed by the Admin.

She may sound a little harsh, but Amy @ SAAFE is clearly a pragmatist.

[OldAdmin]

I seem to recall stayer had a similar problem with his details being published by a vindictive WG, but they too were removed by the Admin.

Not correct, the false allegations against stayer are still up.

Fuck SAAFE, it's owners and moderators.

[west8]

Not correct, the false allegations against stayer are still up.

Fuck SAAFE, it's owners and moderators.

Sorry - I stand corrected. His full number was originally posted, but later edited by the Admin. But his name remains.

That is bang out of order.

[Expl1cit]

I haven't read the full thread and maybe i'm a little naive in the punting world, but for me punting is a hassle free way to have sex without the dramas of a relationship.  Seems more people on here seem to enjoy or get involved with the drama side of punting which is taking over what this board is useful for and that is reviewing the WG's and attacks are getting more personal.

I don't understand how a punter can get ripped off to the tune of £300, drive the slag back to the station and then spend a week moaning about it.  There is a difference being fluffy and stupid.  Either get the booking moving in the direction you expect & paid for or take your money back and show her the door. 

Allowing someone to rip you off is more a dent to the ego.  A week of hassle would have been saved if you politely or otherwise said 30 mins into the booking, its lovely to chat but either we start fucking or you leave without my £300 and i'll be generous and say the drink was on me.  Simple!

[Quesadilla]

I haven't read the full thread and maybe i'm a little naive in the punting world, but for me punting is a hassle free way to have sex without the dramas of a relationship.  Seems more people on here seem to enjoy or get involved with the drama side of punting which is taking over what this board is useful for and that is reviewing the WG's and attacks are getting more personal.

I don't understand how a punter can get ripped off to the tune of £300, drive the slag back to the station and then spend a week moaning about it.  There is a difference being fluffy and stupid.  Either get the booking moving in the direction you expect & paid for or take your money back and show her the door. 

Allowing someone to rip you off is more a dent to the ego.  A week of hassle would have been saved if you politely or otherwise said 30 mins into the booking, its lovely to chat but either we start fucking or you leave without my £300 and i'll be generous and say the drink was on me.  Simple!

I suggest you take your own advice:

If this is considered 'trolling' I can bite my tounge until I've had some of my own reviews to be judged against.

Fuck off trolling review threads until you demonstrate you have a clue. 

[yorkshire123]

Another example of floater doing what floater does 

Definition
Floater
Fecal matter that refuses to be flushed.

How apt 

[Expl1cit]

I suggest you take your own advice:
Fuck off trolling review threads until you demonstrate you have a clue.

I'm all for reviewing WG's in both the positive and negative sense and I sympathise with any genuine punter who is at the wrong end of a bad punt.  Fortunately I have never been in a similar situation although I have had one of two less than perfect punts which left me with a slight bitter taste. 

The most notable one that springs to mind was an expensive £180 tantric massage that was supposed to be 90 minutes with an assisted shower that I paid extra for.  With 15 mins left of the 90, she said I can take a shower but she wouldn't be joining me 'this time' as she had to prepare for another client.  I declined the solo shower and my attempts to get back a refund for the lost time and lack of additional services fell on deaf ears. Rather than cause a scene for £40, I left as it was an incall location and I heard a male voice in the shared flat.  I did revisit her a month later and knocked £40 off the RRP and got an assisted shower thrown in for free, but it still left a bitter taste.

What I disagree with in your situation is, which is simply a difference of opinion (ie: not trolling) is in my opinion you let it happen, or rather gave her the opportunity to take the piss, creating this mess.  It doesn't justify the poor service, but also doesn't justify the 12 page dribble we see here and personal ongoing attack/bullying tactics of the silly cow.

If she walked out with no money, she would be less likely to do it again, but now more fluffies are at risk of similar situations as she knows she can get away with it.

[NIK]

Right.. just had a look at this outfit.

First alarm bell is this line in her profile ''I am not desperate for money so I will not just see anyone or do anything im not comfortable with just for the cash''

- she puts this in there so she can control the situation and the punt. If you come onto her she can say 'not yet' and waste time in the punt. Before you can get your money back but now you can't because she stipulated the rules in the profile - now the entire punt is on her terms.

Straight away she is in the HAP (half-assed prossie) category. and I would have avoided...

Next alarm bell is this line in her profile ''I will leave immediately and happily give back money to anyone who thinks its acceptable to rip my clothes off straight away''   again - cementing the frame and allowing her control of the punt (ability to waste time and manipulate the punter)

If you see this type of stuff on any profile just AVOID right away.

For her this is just an enhanced-dating website with the added bonus of getting paid and scamming. She is a HAP who is not suited to this line of work and I have added to the SCAMS thread.

When she refused to do anything on her likes list the first time it should have set off major alarm bells. Definitely walk and get your money back as soon as possible if any wg pulls this stunt.

She needs to realize that UKPUNTING is bigger than her. We will still be here when her phone goes dusty and she deletes her profile.

Well done for submitting a review and letting us all know the thief that she is.

Put on my blacklist.

I have just read this entire thread for the first time and immediately thought this. Wonder why it has taken so long for someone to mention it. The profile rings so many alarm bells. 
Just to add in the dim and distant past I have met a number of prossies who behaved like this and some were outcalls to my home.  However this was largely pre internet and didn't cost me so much. Furthermore I never had a two hour booking with someone I hadn't previously met.

[HappyandLucky]

I haven't read the full thread and maybe i'm a little naive in the punting world,

Let me assist you in not being so naive and coming across like a total trolling cunt. Firstly I would expect even the lowest scum troll to at least read the full thread before spouting a pile of crap. Secondly, I have not read any of your other master pieces as life is too short, but from Q's reply you appear to be intent on being a serial cunt. 

[akauya]

I haven't read the full thread and maybe i'm a little naive in the punting world, but for me punting is a hassle free way to have sex without the dramas of a relationship.  Seems more people on here seem to enjoy or get involved with the drama side of punting which is taking over what this board is useful for and that is reviewing the WG's and attacks are getting more personal.

I don't understand how a punter can get ripped off to the tune of £300, drive the slag back to the station and then spend a week moaning about it.  There is a difference being fluffy and stupid.  Either get the booking moving in the direction you expect & paid for or take your money back and show her the door. 

Allowing someone to rip you off is more a dent to the ego.  A week of hassle would have been saved if you politely or otherwise said 30 mins into the booking, its lovely to chat but either we start fucking or you leave without my £300 and i'll be generous and say the drink was on me.  Simple!

Unbelievable! So you're blaming the punter for getting scammed by a scamming prossie thief? Also you said "Allowing someone to rip you off [...] politely or otherwise" what did you expect Q to do? Beat the prossie up and take his money back? 

It will be interesting to see how you react the day you get scammed, you know shit happens even if you don't "allow" it.

[James999]

Unbelievable! So you're blaming the punter for getting scammed by a scamming prossie thief?

Quas has to take some responsibility for this, she clearly realised he was a mug and played him. It sounds like he was treating it more like a date than a punt giving her wine and sitting chatting to her, surely he could have done the chatting on the way back from the station when he picked her up.

And after he realised he'd been ripped off he then drove her back to the station, float does have a point in that fluffy / deluded action such as quas displayed here are not good for punters as pro$$ies will realise they can get away with it.

Seriously would ANYONE drive her back to the station after she took £300 for nothing 

[PumpAction]

Just a bizarre situation. The woman sounds horrendous but it's incomprehensible to me paying £300 for sex and chatting for 1 and a half hours. Mr Floater does have a point. After 30 mins tell the girl the score or to give your money back for not providing the agreed services. Disgusting woman but Q didn't help himself and needs to just learn from it and move on.

[akauya]

Quas has to take some responsibility for this, she clearly realised he was a mug and played him. It sounds like he was treating it more like a date than a punt giving her wine and sitting chatting to her, surely he could have done the chatting on the way back from the station when he picked her up.

And after he realised he'd been ripped off he then drove her back to the station, float does have a point in that fluffy / deluded action such as quas displayed here are not good for punters as pro$$ies will realise they can get away with it.

Seriously would ANYONE drive her back to the station after she took £300 for nothing 

Yes I think we all established Q made a number of mistakes here (and driving her back to the station was stupid) but (from what I can remember of the op) short of Q getting violent she wasn't going to let go of the £300.

Anyway, I think this thread shows that there are good lessons to be learned.

[Quesadilla]

Yes I think we all established Q made a number of mistakes here (and driving her back to the station was stupid) but (from what I can remember of the op) short of Q getting violent she wasn't going to let go of the £300.

Anyway, I think this thread shows that there are good lessons to be learned.

Agreed - as I've said a number of times.  I'm quite prepared to be shot down for being a nice guy vs being a total bastard - as Akauya and others have said, not sure what else I could have done differently without getting physical with her. 

After 30 mins as I said I asked her plainly to "move things along" - she then sat on the sofa next to me but still kept talking machine-gun style. This is clearly a time-wasting tactic she's mastered and not something that just casually happened.  No doubt a more hardened punter would have confronted her - resulting in her walking with the money anyway - unless he were prepared to get physical with her.  For all I know she's done this before and when a punter does try to get physical she cries rape or threatens to do so.  She is a twat but a wily twat.  If you're so confident you wouldn't fall for that crap - book her yourself and see how you get on. Look forward to the review.

As for taking her back to the station - as I said before I could have cut my losses and just kicked her out the door and told her to find herself a taxi but I was still trying to convince her to give me my cash back and still taking the view that being nice had more chance of getting my cash back than being a bastard which would have ended that discussion there and then.  No, it did not get my cash back but what did it cost me?  Nothing.  And as a result I know I tried everything possible to get my cash back, and I 100% fulfilled my end of our agreement which was to pick her up from the station pay her for the activities we agreed in my booking, and then drop her back to the station again. 

Not necessarily a great consolation, but at the end of the day as I said elsewhere I only punt with money I can afford to lose.  Financially I'm no worse off as a result of this than I would have been had I fucked her senseless for 2 hours.  Just with slightly bluer balls and a bit wiser. 

Lesson learnt - I will be limiting my exposure to high risk meets like this for the foreseeable future although I don't 100% rule out a similar meet as I know that would exclude me from finding the occasional "outcall only" gem like Mitzi Maraschino - my TOFTT of the year. 

In future the only way I will see an unkown / unrated (on UKP) outcall only girl is by rb however - as at least then I am getting a much better rate which significantly reduces my exposure - I will also be much more wary and be looking out for some of the alarm bells Ben pointed out in Becky SummerPsycho's profile.

[Ali Katt]

but also doesn't justify the 12 page dribble we see here and personal ongoing attack/bullying tactics of the silly cow.

The irony of this comment. It's drivel, not dribble.

The chatting time away is explained on Puntingwiki for the floaters:
External Link/Members Only

[Simon S]

Quas has to take some responsibility for this, she clearly realised he was a mug and played him. It sounds like he was treating it more like a date than a punt giving her wine and sitting chatting to her, surely he could have done the chatting on the way back from the station when he picked her up.

And after he realised he'd been ripped off he then drove her back to the station, float does have a point in that fluffy / deluded action such as quas displayed here are not good for punters as pro$$ies will realise they can get away with it.

Seriously would ANYONE drive her back to the station after she took £300 for nothing 

You forget she was in his home. It isn't just as easy as taking the money back and getting her to leave.

She could cause damage to the house, problems with neighbours or even get someone to pay him a visit at a later date.

This is why I'd never do an outcall at home. Unless I knew the girl for a while.

[Simon S]

She's taken down all her photos and phone number.

Her actions have certainly damaged her business.