Please name the prostitutes to which you refer, first of all, otherwise your comment is meaningless.
Secondly, I am still waiting for an example of my hypocrisy.
Thirdly, I love the way that now it's me who is ruining people's reputations!
Let's think - a falling out with Cindy re booking, a negative regarding a 3some in Aldgate re time of booking, complete character assassination of a prostitute with allegations of drug addiction, alcoholism and barebacking, and now the review of Michelle after your confessed triple barebacking. You accusing me of ruining reputations - now there's hypocrisy for you!
Name the WG? Hint: title of this thread.
The way that a few members like yourself and puntico have seized on the bizarre and ill-informed notion that Michelle - or any subsequent WG I meet - is potentially a risk to her future clients is utter tripe and beneath contempt - as other members have rightly pointed out.
Moreover, I have no outstanding issues / disagreements with ANY WG - including those you refer to above. That was all settled many, many weeks ago and is ancient history in punterland.
Cindy, Dee, Michelle, Lucy etc - all great girls with whom I have no issues - and they have no issues with me.
No member of this forum can state categorically that indulging in services such as CIM, DFK, OWO, Facials, Rimming etc is safer than PROTECTED penetrative sex with a WG - ANY WG.
Because it jolly well is not ...