Author Topic: SexyPorsha, Chelsea, London, SW3 – Delusion, Drug use, Bareback … and Bullshit.  (Read 51522 times)

Offline JamesRockford

OK I'm back and I bought snacks for everyone.  Did I miss anything?

Offline johnny34

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,036
  • Likes: 12
  •  
  • Reviews: 41
OK I'm back and I bought snacks for everyone.  Did I miss anything?

Hope you got lots of popcorn?

Offline laidbackasiandude

West8, thanks for your detailed review and having the courage to openly state you BB'd this service provider.
I can up to a point empathise that in the heat of the moment both parties can get carried away but you
ought to have known better given the fact that you are an experienced punter along with having a
young family. I sincerely hope you're not infected, and likewise for this Porsha/Portia.




Megazord

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Jeez I  a good time with Sexyporsha a few months back and managed to make her cum through penetration (I felt the contractions and her face became flushed). But now this talk about bareback sex really is soiling the memory  :(

Offline Bigus Dickus

Let's hope that this episode has not produced a West8 junior bastard!

Any resultant child will no doubt entitled to a sack full of his wealth and inherit some his father's land and titles!

She might tie YOU up in court for years Westie and walk away with a nice slice of your punting budget!

 :sarcastic:


west8

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
West8, thanks for your detailed review and having the courage to openly state you BB'd this service provider.
I can up to a point empathise that in the heat of the moment both parties can get carried away but you
ought to have known better given the fact that you are an experienced punter along with having a
young family. I sincerely hope you're not infected, and likewise for this Porsha/Portia.

Thank you.

I hope this review has proved informative. It is both factual and I have not even remotely embellished the details. There is far more to this, but I'll old my ace card just in case a white knight or the lady in question decides to refute my claims. Then I'll publish and be damned.

In my humble opinion, I do not think that the expectation of an apology for her behaviour was an unreasonable one. Particularly as two hotel suites had been booked prior to the evening in Tunbridge Wells - and cancelled by Porsha. Never mind, only £380 and £290 down the drain on those two occasions for the hotels.

Most interesting of all is the fact that Porsha took the time to join this forum today to request that the review be modified.

She has not taken the trouble to refute any part of my review. Perhaps that is a positive sign that she will seek help for her issues.

More likely however is that she simply doesn't give a fuck .. unless said fuck is BB with someone she 'cares about'.

Offline MancSean

Hypocrisy, narcissism and nob head need prozac come to mind having read this.
Why would anyone with one oz of sense would want to tell the whole world about this I will ever know.
As for a solicitor wanting to sue her on your behalf - no decent lawyer in the country would touch this with a barge pole.
Sooner you are banned the better for all in here.

jason26

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I saw her once last summer and I don't want to blow my own trumpet but she looked overcome with lust as we passionately kissed each other. She definitely is more a PSE kind of escort and we ended with CIM which was amazing. She came across as very classy and well spoken so to hear she offered BB to a punter is shocking.

Offline iPad3

I've read this thread from end to end, I've said it before and I'll say it again,

Out and out attention seeking......too much money.....too much time.....nothing better to do!!!!

Offline socks

What comes out of all this for me is to wonder what it would be like if Info and West chose to take issue with each other. I reckon it'd be like perpetual motion, a self propelling virtual whirlwind of antagonism, post quoting, cross referenced hyperlinks, screen shots and banal, wholly predictable, twists. It'd be shit, total utter turgid shit. And like a case of the runs after dining out for a week on rotting vindaloo, seemingly never ending.

Not that far to go really then.

Stealthshagger

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Then they'd make up and west would want to bareback again. Infoseeker's fault though.

Offline Bigus Dickus

Hey West8, can you clarify if the incidents you mentioned in your review in Kent were related to you paying her for sex or was this one of your freebie/affair type of situations?

If you didn't pay her for sex then technically this wasn't a punt but a private non-punting arrangement?

If that's the case do you think it was deserving of a review?

Offline Jimmyredcab

I saw her once last summer and I don't want to blow my own trumpet but she looked overcome with lust as we passionately kissed each other. She definitely is more a PSE kind of escort and we ended with CIM which was amazing. She came across as very classy and well spoken so to hear she offered BB to a punter is shocking.

I have never seen CIM and very classy used in the same paragraph.    :crazy:

cupid stunt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I was hoping this odyssey had some steamy details to get my testosterone going before the gym...I feel cheated.

If I had that kind of money to splash around on sex, I think I'd get bored pretty quickly and have to sleep with my brothers wife to keep things interesting.





jason26

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I have never seen CIM and very classy used in the same paragraph.    :crazy:

lol I guess you are right but I meant in terms of her demeanor and the manner in which she spoke.  :D

charming_red

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Would someone be kind enough to summarise what the fuck is going on?

 :hi:

Stealthshagger

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Would someone be kind enough to summarise what the fuck is going on?

 :hi:

He barebacked someone he thinks is a drug user and alcoholic and has had sex with thousands of guys, and it her fault, and it was/wasn't an affair. He wrote the "review" of the "affair"/ "not affair" as his time limit for her apology expired. He is super careful though, only barebacking select drug users/ alcoholics who have had sex with thousands by his reckoning.

cupid stunt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
To summarize:

Too much money

Bored

Needs more risks to get same buzz

6 months time will be caught noshing off a guy in a bush on meow meow like Jonathan Ross's brother

Throws money at run of the mill hooker to live a fantasy of being Richard here in pretty woman

Chances of getting STDs off a girl like that, actually pretty low, serious ones virtually nil.

More chance of picking up something from an office girl on a night out who wipes back to front.

jimbobwood

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Would someone be kind enough to summarise what the fuck is going on?

 :hi:

West8 with too much time on his hands again!

My mind is boggled, why write all this on UKP?!

"Yes, the evenings out were fun and the bareback penetrative sex in the jacuzzi was enjoyable (she informed me by SMS that her tests were negative – how thoughtful). But the weird, occasionally aggressive behaviour was bizarre – as were her temper tantrums when I informed her on one occasion that I needed to be home by 6:30am as I like to spend time with my children before they go to school. Her response: “You’re going home to your wife. I want you to put me first!”. Oh dear … "

So you fuck a drugged up prossie bareback and then you go back home to play daddy before the kids go to school. Where's your wife, do you have a nanny or something? The whole situation is very weird. It seems like a fantasy almost.


Dave2014

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Any grounds he wishes to invent. It's not difficult, as any Solicitor will tell you.

Okay, I didn't want to do this, but West8's OP is so disgusting and clearly a nasty and vindictive slander on a WG dressed up as a 'review' (which it clearly is not), so here goes:

I am actually a practising barrister, West8 (although this is by no means to be taken as legal advice), and I can assure you that if the WG in question decided to 'out' you by revealing your identity to the public (just as you have her by mentioning, for example, her home town etc. in your OP) then you would have very little, if any, basis whatsoever upon which to take legal action against her.

She owes you no duty of care to protect your identity. And if she wishes to make your identity public she is completely at liberty to do so.

Personally, after what you have perpetrated here, if I were her I would be very tempted to do it. I would encourage her not to, because you are not worth a second thought.

Good luck with your threat to 'sue'!  :dash:
« Last Edit: January 12, 2015, 07:50:22 pm by Dave2014 »

Offline licky

I think I'd get bored pretty quickly and have to sleep with my brothers wife to keep things interesting.

What's your real name cupid stunt - Ryan Giggs ?


jason26

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
wow it seems West8 came one here expecting moral support from the punting community and a pat on the back for his troubles but it seems to have backfired spectacularly. You see folks this is what happens when you start to air your dirty laundry in public

Stealthshagger

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
wow it seems West8 came one here expecting moral support from the punting community and a pat on the back for his troubles but it seems to have backfired spectacularly. You see folks this is what happens when you start to air your dirty laundry in public


He came here to punish her

Quesadilla

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Okay, I didn't want to do this, but West8's OP is so disgusting and clearly a nasty and vindictive slander on a WG dressed up as a 'review' (which it clearly is not), so here goes:

I am actually a practising barrister, West8 (although this is by no means to be taken as legal advice), and I can assure you that if the WG in question decided to 'out' you by revealing your identity to the public (just as you have her by mentioning, for example, her home town etc. in your OP) then you would have very little, if any, basis whatsoever upon which to take legal action against her.

She owes you no duty of care to protect your identity. And if she wishes to make your identity public she is completely at liberty to do so.

Personally, after what you have perpetrated here, if I were her I would be very tempted to do it. I would encourage her not to, because you are not worth a second thought.

Good luck with your threat to 'sue'!  :dash:
Well said Puntico.   :hi:  :drinks:

Offline nervyfooker

If i was a prossie i would think twice before accepting a booking
from West8.
who needs this sort of drama ?

cupid stunt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I'm going to book her now, I wasn't interested before.

I'll probably go down her, give her a massage, make her a cup of tea and then get to hear her side, should be more entertaining than the Oscar Piatorius trial.

Dave2014

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Well said Puntico.   :hi:  :drinks:

 :drinks:

Normally, I wouldn't play that card, but what he has tried to do can be seen as an extremely nasty form of bullying, controlling behaviour and abuse. I see this kind of thing in the family courts a lot. I do not like it at all. It is completely unacceptable. WGs are not commodities, they are people.

And seemingly like a lot of his posts, his understanding of the legal system is completely deluded.

Just because a WG has personal problems, it does not mean that she should be slandered in this way because someone has a personal issue with her.

Stealthshagger

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
:drinks:

Normally, I wouldn't play that card, but what he has tried to do can be seen as an extremely nasty form of bullying, controlling behaviour and abuse. I see this kind of thing in the family courts a lot. I do not like it at all. It is completely unacceptable. WGs are not commodities, they are people.

And seemingly like a lot of his posts, his understanding of the legal system is completely deluded.

Just because a WG has personal problems, it does not mean that she should be slandered in this way because someone has a personal issue with her.


His nature here has been pretty consistent. It is clear he came here to punish her, and I imagine he has been holding the review threat over her for a while.

Dave2014

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
. . . he came here to punish her, and I imagine he has been holding the review threat over her for a while.

Stealthy - that was the EXACT thought I had when I first read the despicable trash he posted.  :thumbsup:

cupid stunt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
"WGs are not commodities, they are people."

Exactly, not trying to be a white knight - but what do people expect, its like employing balotelli and expecting him to score goals and draw the line.

I'm not practicing, but did train as a Barista at Costa and Starbucks, so know my way around the law enough to know how things work.

He just needs to grow up and act his age, I'm assuming he's not young enough to get a buzz through a solo yachting expedition or trek through the Sahara so has to satisfy his ego showing off on here and slating a WG.

Very big.

charming_red

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Its pretty clear this nasty character west8 has narcisstic personality disorder.

Fuckin weirdo.

cupid stunt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
He thought he'd bought the woman, probably just like his wife who was after the money.

Probably buys his kids affection as well.

Why can't some sad old men just realize you buy THE TIME not the PERSON, I've had a good laugh hearing about some of the people on this forum from WG's, looking about 25 so closer to their age - thye y often open up!about the old guys who try and buy them or spend the whole session moaning about their wives, offering marriage etc...they just strong them along for the £.

The penny dropped with west8 and the toys have been thrown out the pram.

Dave2014

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Why can't some sad old men just realize you buy THE TIME not the PERSON

Bravo that man! I couldn't have put it better myself. Absolutely right. Contrast your statement with the sentiment expressed in West8's trash.

Stealthshagger

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Some things that weren't necessary to share include, for example, that she lost her virginity at that age, etc.  it has nothing to do with anything but punishment.

I have no idea what happened, and I realise we are punter first, but this guy is something else.

Stealthshagger

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I see Cupid just got banned....who was he before?

Dave2014

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I see Cupid just got banned....who was he before?

No idea my friend, just noticed it myself.

Dave2014

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Some things that weren't necessary to share . . . it has nothing to do with anything but punishment.

I thought that many times as I was reading what he posted. Truly despicable.

Quesadilla

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
If i was a prossie i would think twice before accepting a booking
from West8.
who needs this sort of drama ?
Fcuk the drama - what about the risk of HIV infection?? He's still punting just a few weeks after bb with a known drug addict so definitely at greater risk than the average punter.  Punters like this are dangerous to themselves and all of us.  Hope someone has already put a note on his AW profile linking to this thread so WG's can see for themselves. 

Offline monstar

Okay, I didn't want to do this, but West8's OP is so disgusting and clearly a nasty and vindictive slander on a WG dressed up as a 'review' (which it clearly is not), so here goes:

I am actually a practising barrister, West8 (although this is by no means to be taken as legal advice), and I can assure you that if the WG in question decided to 'out' you by revealing your identity to the public (just as you have her by mentioning, for example, her home town etc. in your OP) then you would have very little, if any, basis whatsoever upon which to take legal action against her.

She owes you no duty of care to protect your identity. And if she wishes to make your identity public she is completely at liberty to do so.

Personally, after what you have perpetrated here, if I were her I would be very tempted to do it. I would encourage her not to, because you are not worth a second thought.

Good luck with your threat to 'sue'!  :dash:

I agree 100% with this and your earlier post puntico. This is not a review, it is a personal slandering of a girl west got attached to. The (excessive) details help very few punters and the ones that do are unconvincing;
Bareback doesn't appear to be on offer, they just got "carried away",
Alcohol issues were all 'out of hours',
There was no evidence given of any drug use,
Personality / personal issues - who doesn't have them.. from her other reviews she puts on her best side during the punt, show me a WG who doesn't.

This "review" reeks of bitterness and attention seeking and in my opinion should be deleted or severely cut down to the 'facts'.

On a lighter note, puntico is surely a barrister, confirmed by the immediate disclaimer and quoting me in an earlier thread but leaving out the rest of my sentence that nulled the point he was making! No hard feelings though :P  :drinks:

Dave2014

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
On a lighter note, puntico is surely a barrister, confirmed by the immediate disclaimer and quoting me in an earlier thread but leaving out the rest of my sentence that nulled the point he was making! No hard feelings though :P  :drinks:

 You know more about law than West8, my friend :drinks:

Tjkooker

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Skimmed over that utter diatribe posted by Snake8. Really couldn't take in any detail as I just sit repeating to myself "WANKER" every time I see his name on a post.

Really living upto his name again. Whatever the rights and wrongs of this drama the guy is of zero benefit to this forum other than unifying people opinions that he is indeed a WANKER. Please rid us of his fucked up ego.

charming_red

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
You know more about law than West8, my friend :drinks:

west8 will now come back claiming to be a High Court Judge!  :P

Quesadilla

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
west8 will now come back claiming to be a High Court Judge!  :P
Thereby proving beyond a doubt that he knows nothing about the law!  :P

Dave2014

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Thereby proving beyond a doubt that he knows nothing about the law!  :P

 :lol: :lol: :lol:

charming_red

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Thereby proving beyond a doubt that he knows nothing about the law!  :P

 :drinks:

jcdmj12

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
So the final impression I get from this is that the OP is a faggot.

Have I missed anything?

Tjkooker

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
So the final impression I get from this is that the OP is a faggot.

Have I missed anything?

Replace "faggot" with "wanker" and your spot on.

figleaf

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
This thread has actually depressed me today.  Its one of the worst things I've ever read after years of following punting forums! 

Punting is supposed to be fun but this is like watching a painful car crash and its someones life at the centre of it & she can't defend herself against this fantasist!

Punters and prossies are supposed to have an unwritten code of discretion.  That should get even stronger when you start to blur the lines into personal territory. 

I am NOT a white knight, have never seen her, but this is well out of line!!

Offline backofthenet


it had been agreed by SMS on Wednesday 17th December that I would spend the next evening in Kent, where SexyPorsha was apparently on tour......At 9pm the following evening, I duly arrived at the nondescript hotel in a freezing Tunbridge Wells, having booked a table for dinner at local Thai hotspot Sucheera.

Anyone live near Tunbridge Wells and want to pop into Sucheera and have a cheeky look at the reservations book for the name(s) of those who booked at 9pm on Thursday 18th?  :D

OldAdmin

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
After 6 pages time to put this one to bed.