Okay, I didn't want to do this, but West8's OP is so disgusting and clearly a nasty and vindictive slander on a WG dressed up as a 'review' (which it clearly is not), so here goes:
I am actually a practising barrister, West8 (although this is by no means to be taken as legal advice), and I can assure you that if the WG in question decided to 'out' you by revealing your identity to the public (just as you have her by mentioning, for example, her home town etc. in your OP) then you would have very little, if any, basis whatsoever upon which to take legal action against her.
She owes you no duty of care to protect your identity. And if she wishes to make your identity public she is completely at liberty to do so.
Personally, after what you have perpetrated here, if I were her I would be very tempted to do it. I would encourage her not to, because you are not worth a second thought.
Good luck with your threat to 'sue'! 
I agree 100% with this and your earlier post puntico. This is not a review, it is a personal slandering of a girl west got attached to. The (excessive) details help very few punters and the ones that do are unconvincing;
Bareback doesn't appear to be on offer, they just got "carried away",
Alcohol issues were all 'out of hours',
There was no evidence given of any drug use,
Personality / personal issues - who doesn't have them.. from her other reviews she puts on her best side during the punt, show me a WG who doesn't.
This "review" reeks of bitterness and attention seeking and in my opinion should be deleted or severely cut down to the 'facts'.
On a lighter note, puntico is surely a barrister, confirmed by the immediate disclaimer and quoting me in an earlier thread but leaving out the rest of my sentence that nulled the point he was making! No hard feelings though
