Author Topic: MaddieS - Glasgow  (Read 1689 times)


23 review(s) for MaddieS (22 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by scouting]

Offline Nauticus

External Link/Members Only

Booking took place in an Airbnb in the city centre. £90 for 30 mins

Comms were pretty good on the morning of the punt, but left waiting for a reply to my text confirming I was at the flat. On reflection, probably not a great sign. Certainly didn't have a reply by the agreed start time of the booking, but it wasn't excessively long.

Maddie herself is very attractive and has a great personality. Photos on the profile are accurate. Greeted with GFE before even undressing, which I always appreciate, and led to the bedroom once we were both undressed. Oral (uncovered) was slow and deliberate - not really my thing, but others would appreciate the eye contact and apparent attention to detail. Moved onto reverse oral at her prompt, and I was already thinking that was a bit quick. Again, she moved it on by reaching for a condom. Sex in missionary - again, no complaints except that I just had a bit of a feeling I was being rushed along. Once done, we chatted a little as I dressed and she jumped in the shower. She showed me out when she was done and off I went down the stairs. At the front door, I literally bumped into a fairly flustered guy standing on the doorstep clearly trying to make a discrete call. Thinking it through, I was certainly late in, probably late out, and the actual sex wouldn't have been close to 30 minutes. There were just too many signs of a conveyor belt. I don't object to knowing someone has had a punt before me and another after, far from it, but I have a feeling the margin of error she was allowing that day was just too slim. It's a pity because for looks, personality and sex appeal, she'd have been one I'd have returned to, but the feeling of being rushed unfortunately downgrades this one to a neutral. Other reports don't point to this, so maybe it was just a day that wasn't going to plan for her.

Offline DDB

  • Age Check : 18+

  • Ban Countdown
    Loading...
  • Posts: 67
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 5
This could honestly describe my experience this week word for word. Particularly the bit about waiting for a reply to my text despite it clearly showing as delivered on my phone. It cut my time short and left me feeling rushed, and on one occasion I was reminded to “watch my time”. Previous meetings have been wonderful and she really ticks all the boxes. But this week just felt noticeably different.

Offline Abdhal

This could honestly describe my experience this week word for word. Particularly the bit about waiting for a reply to my text despite it clearly showing as delivered on my phone. It cut my time short and left me feeling rushed, and on one occasion I was reminded to “watch my time”. Previous meetings have been wonderful and she really ticks all the boxes. But this week just felt noticeably different.
Would this be a netural for you too.  :unknown:

Offline DDB

  • Age Check : 18+

  • Ban Countdown
    Loading...
  • Posts: 67
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 5
If I still bothered with reviews, this’d be a solid neutral. Aye, that’ll do.

Offline Abdhal

If I still bothered with reviews, this’d be a solid neutral. Aye, that’ll do.
I thought that what this site was about.  :unknown:

Seems a shame she's hurring up punters.  :thumbsdown:

Offline DDB

  • Age Check : 18+

  • Ban Countdown
    Loading...
  • Posts: 67
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 5
I still think the leaving reviews could come back to bite us on the arse one day. And aye, the clock-watching was absolutely blatant. Mid pump as well.

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,250
  • Likes: 800
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
If I still bothered with reviews, this’d be a solid neutral. Aye, that’ll do.
If everyone had your attitude we wouldn't have a site, plus posting reviews is a requirement of membership.

Rules

27 Non-Contributing Accounts
We welcome questions and participation, but members who aren't posting reviews or making a meaningful contribution may be flagged as non-contributing. Once flagged, a 30 day timer begins. Posting a review during this period will maintain your membership. Sharing reviews helps keep the community balanced and valuable for everyone..

Offline DDB

  • Age Check : 18+

  • Ban Countdown
    Loading...
  • Posts: 67
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 5
Excellent, for what it’s worth you might as well ban me now.

Offline Neptuneus959

I still think the leaving reviews could come back to bite us on the arse one day. And aye, the clock-watching was absolutely blatant. Mid pump as well.

In what way do you think leaving reviews will come back to haunt us bud. Think this site has been up and running for that to have happened already to someone on here.

Offline DDB

  • Age Check : 18+

  • Ban Countdown
    Loading...
  • Posts: 67
  • Likes: 4
  •  
  • Reviews: 5


Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,250
  • Likes: 800
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Excellent, for what it’s worth you might as well ban me now.
The ban will be automatic if you don't post a review so you will in effect ban yourself so the choice is your's, stay or go.

Offline Nauticus

I guess the problem is that if we only ever posted the positive reviews, they wouldn't be much more useful than the feedback on AW. It's not as if I've slated her either. There were a lot of positives so I think what's up there is balanced, but it would have made me think twice about booking if I'd seen a review like this prior to my booking.