Author Topic: saraharoundtheworld1 - Chelmsford  (Read 8207 times)


23 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 6923374) (17 positive, 0 neutral, 6 negative) [Indexed by PilotMan]
21 review(s) for Bianca Souza (15 positive, 0 neutral, 6 negative) [Indexed by JayEZ2K]

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,202
  • Likes: 334
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
Link:

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

When:

April 2025

Booking & Comms:

Long story short

Three appointment times were set, on one I got bumped for another punter, the other she said she had to get her nails done, the final one she left me hanging for hours, eventually binning me off.

Detailed story

We agreed the first booking and she said she wanted to do a video call as confirmation., I found that unusual, a first for me. In my experience prossies tell me that they don’t do video calls because when they do the punter just answers showing his cock and wanking.

Anyhow, she gave me 3 minutes notice in which to make the call. As I’m sure most members on here will appreciate, it may not be immediately convenient to have a video call with a prostitute. In my case, I was in the office working and had to find a suitable location to make the call. I messaged her 11 minutes later to say I was ready. I got a message back from her nearly two hours later telling me to video call her. I video called 9 minutes later, no answer. A few minutes later she tells me she can’t do the original time agreed and offers me a booking two hours later than the original time. I suggest an even earlier time, “sorry already booked”.

I ask her for an appointment the following day. We agree 3PM the next day. I tell her I will call her to confirm the following day also.

I message her at 10 in the morning to see if she is available for a call, I also send a message to confirm I am coming, followed by another message stating that I am definitely coming for our appointment which is at 3PM. A few minutes later she says she wants to do a video call, I reply back and say I’m ready. No response.

Some time passes and I ask her again, when will you be ready to take the call. No response for almost a half hour, then she messages to says she’s not home. Followed immediately by a voice note message saying she now can’t do 3PM because she has to get her nails done blah, blah, blah. But she says she can do 5PM. I agree the 5PM by text AND send her a Voice Note stating that I will move my day around and do 5, but let’s stick to 5 and not change again.

An hour passes and she text to say Okay 5 it is, thanks. She says I can video call her anytime.

At 2.15 I ask her can I video call now? – no response
At 3.10 I ask again, no response.
At 4.05 I make the video call anyway. No answer, and no response again.

At 4.08 I tell her that I’m now on my way (I had to leave then as I was about 45 minutes drive away). A few minutes later and I’m in the car on my way, finally she replies - she says I told you about the video call. I told her that I have tried all day to do this video call, but you are never available. She says it was inconvenient because she was shopping and having her nails done. I remind her that she is not the only one who is busy (I told her earlier in the day that I had meetings and would be unavailable at certain times), but there’s no respect for my time.

At this point I just get the feeling that she never had any intention of keeping the booking and would have bumped me no matter what. I have a sneaky suspicion that she will backtrack, so before I remind her of her voice and text messages suggesting and agreeing the appointment, I take a screenshot and record the voice message with my other phone.

I remain polite and try my best to retrieve the situation, but she starts getting aggressive, saying that I’m rude, that I’m not her employer and she doesn’t like my tone. She says that no matter what she isn’t going to meet me. Followed by a dismissive “bye, thanks”.

I tell her “OK, Negative review incoming”. (At no point did I mention or discuss UKP). Then she says “you can’t do a negative review if I didn’t agree a booking.” When I point out it was her requesting the change to a 5PM appointment in her voice note, and that she subsequently confirmed and agreed the 5PM appointment in a text. She says “With message?” I remind her of her voice note and text, then she deletes it.

The text discussion goes on for some time, I remain polite and courteous. She calls me rude, I suggest to her that I have been polite all the time and ask her to point out where she believes I am being rude.  No response to that, but she finishes with an apology. I believe this is a cynical and desperate attempt to avoid a negative review.

Verdict

I see that she already has form on here for time wasting and no shows, but she also had some great reviews on here. Had it not been for the great reviews I would have stopped bothering way before I did. This was by far and away the most difficult punt that I have ever tried to arrange, and it still didn’t materialise.

If a prossie agrees a booking, then that’s it as far as I’m concerned. She agreed the booking, but having to jump through further hoops in my experience is a round about way of her being able to control the situation and bin you off if she needs to.

I tried my hardest to jump through her additional hoops, I’m not visiting King Charles, she’s a £130 per hour prossie. She has little regard for other people’s time and seems to think punters will just be there waiting at the end of their phones for when she isn’t having her nails done or shopping.

I can see that she is trying to run some kind of appointment "qualification" system, but she isn’t professional with her time management, and isn’t respectful of other people’s time and commitments. I believe that all of her delays in replying are her hedging her bets to see what other bookings she might get. Subsequently, she will quite simply bump you for another punter. Or maybe she decides that she wants to go shopping, or get her nails done, all without a second thought for your precious time.

She will know exactly who I am and most likely put my number on some prossie blacklist. But I’ve already got a new SIM and new number, so I’m not worried.

Maybe I’ll try to book her again with my new number, she’ll never know  :lol:

I await her White Knights to come riding in.

Offline dkpunter

I remember the video call request being stated in her aw FAQ for a short time and in a very old Vs ad.
The very last time I met her in Norwich she was mentioning having a lot of time wasters so maybe she mixed up people?
I'm just trying to understand how that could have happened given I found her always reliable and not someone who tries to overbook or a conveyor belt.
Anyways sad for your bad experience
Banned reason: We don’t condone any illegal action here, especially harassment of a SP
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,202
  • Likes: 334
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
I remember the video call request being stated in her aw FAQ for a short time and in a very old Vs ad.
The very last time I met her in Norwich she was mentioning having a lot of time wasters so maybe she mixed up people?
I'm just trying to understand how that could have happened given I found her always reliable and not someone who tries to overbook or a conveyor belt.
Anyways sad for your bad experience

Thanks mate.

I appreciate that Prossies no doubt get a lot of no shows and time wasters. The same as us Punters, we arrive at a punt and get radio silence, or are deceived with a B&S and so on.

But clearly by my persistence she would know I'm not a time waster.

So the video call is for something else in my opinion. Maybe it's racial profiling; But I doubt that in my case, as I had already told her my age and ethnicity.

Maybe she wants to know if you look like the Elephant Man  :lol:

It's abundantly clear I'm not a time waster, it's more about her leaving her options open to pick and choose her customers.

Offline Dufdave

Hi at least I'm not the only one who has been having trouble with sarah text message more than six times even video called finally got a message back to book then told two hours later can't do it now complete silence 😡😡

Online Watts.E.Dunn

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,607
  • Likes: 65
  •  
  • Reviews: 47
Maybe shs morphing into;

 Saraharoundthebend!

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,202
  • Likes: 334
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
Maybe shs morphing into;

 Saraharoundthebend!

Saraharoundthehouses more like.

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,202
  • Likes: 334
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
Hi at least I'm not the only one who has been having trouble with sarah text message more than six times even video called finally got a message back to book then told two hours later can't do it now complete silence 😡😡

She's an out and out time waster and piss taker.

I'm of the belief that if she agreed a time with you, then that's a booking and a review can be done, irrespective of any further qualification tests.

What can we expect next, will we have to serenade her from outside her door and only get confirmation if our dulcet tones meet her expectations?

This video call thing is a ruse as far as I'm concerned.

« Last Edit: May 03, 2025, 06:13:15 pm by PilotMan »

Offline dkpunter

This thread is a bit concerning given my past positive experience and willingness to meet her again.
I'll update the forum regarding any outcome I'll have.
Dunno, marking her as an absolute timewaster looks a bit harsh but I appreciate op had his time wasted
Banned reason: We don’t condone any illegal action here, especially harassment of a SP
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline PeteSmyth

In all my years of punting, I have never heard of a WG requesting a video call with a punter prior to a meeting. A telephone call yes - but never a video call. Very odd indeed. What happened to discretion and anonymity? For all we know, she could be recording these video calls. Back in the day (about 15 years ago), I recall I turned up at the Hotel Inn in Norwich to see a WG. Upon entering her hotel room, I could quite certainly see that she had set up a webcam from a laptop which was recording me. When I questioned this, she told me that it was for her own security. I told her to Foxtrot Oscar and walked out.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2025, 08:36:13 pm by PeteSmyth »

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,202
  • Likes: 334
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
In all my years of punting, I have never heard of a WG requesting a video call with a punter prior to a meeting. A telephone call yes - but never a video call. Very odd indeed. What happened to discretion and anonymity?

For all we know, she could be recording these video calls.


That's a good point, she could be recording the call and you never know what can happen to that video, how it could be used, and by who.

I feel lucky now, like I've swerved some potential trouble.

« Last Edit: May 03, 2025, 09:15:53 pm by PilotMan »

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,202
  • Likes: 334
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
Dunno, marking her as an absolute timewaster looks a bit harsh but I appreciate op had his time wasted

We agreed three appointment times, she cancelled all three.

How is me calling her a time waster a bit harsh?

You actually acknowledge and appreciate that I had my time wasted too, so we agree on that.


Offline dkpunter

I'm arguing on the "out to out" time waster.
But yes, given your review, she wasted your time and I'm not arguing on your experience.

She has more green than red hence me saying that "absolute time waster" is harsh also based on my personal experience.
Banned reason: We don’t condone any illegal action here, especially harassment of a SP
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline dkpunter

That's a good point, she could be recording the call and you never know what can happen to that video, how it could be used, and by who.

I feel lucky now, like I've swerved some potential trouble.
I'll be marked as a white knight but knowing Sarah since she landed in UK I can say she is genuine and would never record a video call.
I appreciate someone can be suspicious of such request, but having a video call is also a way to prove the girl on the other end is the one in the profile? The video call could show something not visible in the photo thus leading the punter to drop the appointment hence saving him a bad experience?
Personally it looks like a double edged sword that can hurt both ways so potentially damaging for the girl requesting it.

There are recent reviews with no one complaining about the screening so maybe is not such a fuss?
Last review (before this) especially is mentioning the video call so anyone not comfortable with this should be aware and avoid booking.

However everyone has his own limits and obviously for some this video call can be too much.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2025, 10:45:39 pm by dkpunter »
Banned reason: We don’t condone any illegal action here, especially harassment of a SP
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Condominium

I'm arguing on the "out to out" time waster.
But yes, given your review, she wasted your time and I'm not arguing on your experience.

She has more green than red hence me saying that "absolute time waster" is harsh also based on my personal experience.

The OP’s experience as described was unacceptable and personally I’d have cut and run long before he did. I’d also never agree to either a video call or sending a pic. A simple phone call to establish some rapport is perfectly adequate .
That said, a woman who has such a high proportion of positive reports compared to negative ones can’t be described as an absolute time waster. Everyone’s experience varies and sometimes things click and sometimes they don’t.

One piece of advice for the OP which is well meant. Terms like ‘prossie’ are disparaging and imply someone of little worth. Therein may lie the communication breakdown.

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,202
  • Likes: 334
  •  
  • Reviews: 205

One piece of advice for the OP which is well meant. Terms like ‘prossie’ are disparaging and imply someone of little worth. Therein may lie the communication breakdown.

Totally agree.

I have deliberately chosen to use such language on this forum given my experience with this particular SP.

My communication with every SP is ALWAYS polite, considerate and well intended. Whether it be in person or via telephone.

I would be happy to include screenshots of my conversations with the SP and a transcription of my voice note, if the rules allowed.
« Last Edit: May 04, 2025, 08:41:50 am by PilotMan »

Offline dkpunter

Totally agree.

I have deliberately chosen to use such language on this forum given my experience with this particular SP.

My communication with every SP is ALWAYS polite, considerate and well intended. Whether it be in person or via telephone.

I would be happy to include screenshots of my conversations with the SP and a transcription of my voice note, if the rules allowed.
I think this would help a lot. Can a mod pitch in, please?
Banned reason: We don’t condone any illegal action here, especially harassment of a SP
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,416
  • Likes: 547
  •  
  • Reviews: 503
The reviews seems fair enough to me, time was wasted and the OP has left a review of his experience.
I don’t think it needs anything else proven.
The SP isn’t on here kicking off its fake so I’m happy as it stands

Offline Redwoodentransistor

I'll be marked as a white knight but knowing Sarah since she landed in UK I can say she is genuine and would never record a video call.


I mean this with the greatest respect, DKP, but I'm not sure how you are in a position to make that statement? Assuming she is just a WG you've seen a few times ad there is nothing more sinister going on, how can you possibly say whether she would or wouldn't record a video call?

Offline dkpunter

I mean this with the greatest respect, DKP, but I'm not sure how you are in a position to make that statement? Assuming she is just a WG you've seen a few times ad there is nothing more sinister going on, how can you possibly say whether she would or wouldn't record a video call?
By any means, do you care explaining what do you mean "there's nothing more sinister going on"?
What allegations are you raising?
I've met her more than a few times over the years,  and I think that after such time you have an idea about them person on the other end?
Are allegations on WG ok but anything else is instead automatically dismissed "as sinister"?

Please explain yourself
Banned reason: We don’t condone any illegal action here, especially harassment of a SP
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Redwoodentransistor

Sorry. no offence intended (not sure where that came from?). I simply meant I am assuming you do not know her personally, other than the implied business relationship.

There are WG's I have seen more than once, but I couldn't confidently predict how they would act with other punters

Offline dkpunter

Fair enough, thanks for the explanation.
No other link between me and Sarah than all the times I've met her as a client.

Still after so many times I think to have an idea about her personality hence me stating she wouldn't record videos.

But this is just my idea as it's others idea she would do that instead
Banned reason: We don’t condone any illegal action here, especially harassment of a SP
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Redwoodentransistor

No worries, and genuinely did not wish to offend. I was not implying anything "sinister" (Quite the opposite) 

Offline gguk

Definetely no one should agree to a video call or sending a photograph before meeting any SP

Offline PeteSmyth

Asking potential punters to conduct a video call to demonstrate their commitment to meet is such an unusual practice, that there's probably more to this request than meets the eye. Final word. I did once have a conversation with a WG who had similiar issues with punters not showing up. Her solution was only to accept same day bookings. This worked a treat for her.

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,202
  • Likes: 334
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
I say this with the greatest respect DKP, but I'm not sure how you are in a position to make such a statement?

Assuming she is just a WG you've seen a few times, how can you say for certainty whether she would or wouldn't record a video call?



Offline dkpunter

I say this with the greatest respect DKP, but I'm not sure how you are in a position to make such a statement?

Assuming she is just a WG you've seen a few times, how can you say for certainty whether she would or wouldn't record a video call?
I've replied to this exact question above.
Anyways no point in me dragging this anymore
Banned reason: We don’t condone any illegal action here, especially harassment of a SP
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline dkpunter

Well after a good sleep I think I can see better your points folks.
Yes I agree there's nothing that can guarantee a misuse of the requested video call and even if I think to know the WG we're still talking about someone that at her best is a good actress, right?
While I never had issues (some delay between 10-30mins at most, but then the meeting took place) so far, she has an history of suddenly dropping out of committed meetings so everyone should be aware and make their choice - if you're lucky you have a great experience if not she wastes severely your time: this is what this forum is for at the very end.

I apologise if I any reply from me was out of line
Banned reason: We don’t condone any illegal action here, especially harassment of a SP
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline PeteSmyth

I do believe that there are other steps this WG could do to at least try to reduce the number of punter no-shows rather than insist on video calls, which is a very odd request. Personally, I would not under any circumstances compromise my anonymity by agreeing to do a video call with a WG. When it comes to the sex industry, trust no-one. I wouldn't be surprised if PC Plod had a hand in this.

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,202
  • Likes: 334
  •  
  • Reviews: 205

I apologise if I any reply from me was out of line

I don't feel an apology was needed, but your reflection and change of perspective shows what good discussion is all about. I appreciate and respect all points of view, this forum gives us punters a place to share, learn and benefit from those views.

I previously hadn't given much thought to my privacy with a video call to the said SP, I was lax in thinking that she had good reviews and there was nothing to worry about.

@PeteSmyth brought this to my attention and made me realise how naive I had been, regardless of her good reviews.

Onwards and upwards  :hi:

Online scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,666
  • Likes: 535
  •  
  • Reviews: 125
I do believe that there are other steps this WG could do to at least try to reduce the number of punter no-shows rather than insist on video calls, which is a very odd request. Personally, I would not under any circumstances compromise my anonymity by agreeing to do a video call with a WG. When it comes to the sex industry, trust no-one. I wouldn't be surprised if PC Plod had a hand in this.

You're all missing a point
Typically a pre-punt video call despite being cited as a "get to know you" or "pre-punt screening" session is actually a way for the girl to make money without actually seeing you.........
Often it's a chargeable call (which she'll try to stretch out) and at the end of it she won't be able to find any free time to see you.
It's a screening for a punt that will never happen

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,202
  • Likes: 334
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
You're all missing a point
Typically a pre-punt video call despite being cited as a "get to know you" or "pre-punt screening" session is actually a way for the girl to make money without actually seeing you.........
Often it's a chargeable call (which she'll try to stretch out) and at the end of it she won't be able to find any free time to see you.
It's a screening for a punt that will never happen

How does she make money from a Video call if it's on WhatsApp?

Online scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,666
  • Likes: 535
  •  
  • Reviews: 125
How does she make money from a Video call if it's on WhatsApp?

Was it WhatsApp? If so I missed that. But it doesn't detract from what I said, which is the usual case when the girl requires a pre-punt video session 

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,202
  • Likes: 334
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
Was it WhatsApp? If so I missed that. But it doesn't detract from what I said, which is the usual case when the girl requires a pre-punt video session

I get your point about her making money if she had requested a video call via some chargeable method, such as AW, I would definitely have seen that as a cynical opportunity to make money.

She didn't ask for anything like that.

We were messaging the whole time over WhatsApp, and that's where I tried to video call her. She just said she couldn't answer my video calls because she was busy.

Sorry if I didn't make that clear previously.

Offline DouglasReynholm

I get your point about her making money if she had requested a video call via some chargeable method, such as AW, I would definitely have seen that as a cynical opportunity to make money.

She didn't ask for anything like that.

We were messaging the whole time over WhatsApp, and that's where I tried to video call her. She just said she couldn't answer my video calls because she was busy.

Sorry if I didn't make that clear previously.
Seemed clear enough to me PilotMan. If any prossie asked me to do a video call first the answer would be no. Ditto bank transfer in advance.

Offline Condominium

I assume the extra blurb on Sarah’s profile under ‘update about bookings’ is new?

Either way, it makes direct reference to this forum and this thread, as well as some harassment she’s been subject to for some time from a UKP member. It seems as good an explanation as any as to why her booking process might have become more erratic, assuming it’s genuine.

Offline dkpunter

I assume the extra blurb on Sarah’s profile under ‘update about bookings’ is new?

Either way, it makes direct reference to this forum and this thread, as well as some harassment she’s been subject to for some time from a UKP member. It seems as good an explanation as any as to why her booking process might have become more erratic, assuming it’s genuine.
Definitely new! Never seen that before.
I'm sure I've seen a faq on the subject (video call) for a very short period on her profile but no mention of harassment, just time wasters at that time.
Banned reason: We don’t condone any illegal action here, especially harassment of a SP
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,202
  • Likes: 334
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
I assume the extra blurb on Sarah’s profile under ‘update about bookings’ is new?

Either way, it makes direct reference to this forum and this thread, as well as some harassment she’s been subject to for some time from a UKP member. It seems as good an explanation as any as to why her booking process might have become more erratic, assuming it’s genuine.

I think that has been added today.

I do feel sorry for her in light of the harassment she has allegedly received.

I did make quite a few unanswered video calls, so it's unlikely I am going to be her stalker. Even so, the booking could have been dealt with far better on her part.

Rather than insist on a video call, she could have also insisted that I make a booking through AW and that I had to have positive feedback and not a new account.

There is also a facility on AW for SP's that can identify if a user has / had other profiles - so this would help prevent her stalker setting up loads of new random accounts.

Sarah seems like a clever girl, so I'm sure that none of this new to her.

Offline Aaa111

AW profile now not accessible…

Online scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,666
  • Likes: 535
  •  
  • Reviews: 125
if a new profile appears then I suggest we don't identify it as her, or cross-link to it.
If there is a stalker, no need to make life easy for him

Offline MacGargan19

Just to comment on my experience with sarah - I met her in Norwich years ago, when we re-engaged more recently (I had a new number) she requested the video call, but I guess as I'd met her once it felt easier to do, a quick video call over whatsapp then all settled. For me explaining a video clip of a punt that then didn't happen would be easier than some secret camera at a punt that definitely did happen, ha, but I do understand the concern.

I didn't see the post on her AW profile, but she did mention she was having trouble with a UKP member that was making her more cautious. No excuses from me though as the OPs account speaks for itself, I have been luckier with my my meets.

Offline DouglasReynholm



Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,202
  • Likes: 334
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
That's a good point, she could be recording the call and you never know what can happen to that video, how it could be used, and by who.

I feel lucky now, like I've swerved some potential trouble.

This is why video calls are a No!

This member is being blackmailed after doing a video call.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=431733.0;topicseen