Brazilian Mel, Chelsea SW3 – beyond extraordinary.

[west8]

External Link/Members Only

This was always going to be a memorable experience for me for two reasons:
i.) First ever ‘Latina’;
ii.) First Adultwork meeting.

I had read the gushing praise for Mel some days before and as my house is a few minutes’ walk from Chelsea Cloisters, I decided to step outside of my usual punting parameters: Brunette Slavs and Thai/Asian girls.

A late night meeting was arranged quickly and efficiently via SMS around lunchtime on the day. Lingering doubts remained but as a gentleman never keeps a lady waiting, I decided that, worst case scenario, I would ‘take one for the team’.


The Good:
Mel is perfect. No, she’s better than perfect. She has porcelain, freckled skin and could easily pass for an English, Irish or even Scottish lass on first glance. Brazilian would have been my last guess. I’m a big lad, but in her heels Mel was just shy of six feet tall – the perfect height for me as I dislike towering over a companion. She has an angelic face with slight, almost elfin features. Think of Emma Watson with a dash of Doutzen Kroes and you have Mel.

Mel’s physique is mind-boggling. In purely anatomical terms, Polish Jessica has the most amazing figure I have ever seen. Mel’s body is an equal. But Mel has a behind that, quite frankly, has to be seen (and felt) to be believed. It is beyond perfect. I have never – NEVER – seen an arse so pert and taut. Should the Museum of Modern Art ever decide to seek a reference work for an arse exhibition, they need look no further than Mel’s sublime behind.

That alone was worth the ‘entry price’. The fact that she also has perfect, long, slender legs and a gorgeous bust was merely an afterthought.


The Bad:
This past week alone, I have been to three different addresses in Chelsea Cloisters. Probably most of the flats over the past 10 or so years. In London terms, it’s akin to a battery farm. A few of the girls have reasonable 50-80 sq m, two-bedroom apartments. But the majority of those who choose not to share are living and working in a confined space of 30 sq m – ie a very, very small studio. Think student digs.

This is in no way a bad reflection on Mel and with anyone other than Mel, I would probably have been somewhat disappointed. Indeed, her smile and gregarious personality rendered the environment irrelevant.

However, if luxurious surroundings as per some of the grander flats in Knightsbridge, South Kensington and even Paddington (often with a bath) are of importance, Chelsea Cloisters (and indeed Nell Gwynn House) are best avoided.


The Ugly: N/A


Final words

Over the course of almost 20 years, a few remarkable ladies have left such an impression that I find myself forever in search of such perfection:

i.) Indian 'Pamper' Pandora (retired)
ii.) Ebony Nicole Foxxx (retired)
iii.) Thai Sylvia (retired)
iv.) Polish Jessica

There is now a fifth:
Brazilian Mel

Mel is a true 10/10
Her service was virtually flawless in every respect - 9.5/10
Overall score - 9.75/10

[shagbambi]

Thanks for the review.  Please could you supply a link for Polish Jessica, who you rate so highly and list as still active.

[mrhappypants]

External Link/Members Only

This was always going to be a memorable experience for me for two reasons:
i.) First ever ‘Latina’;
ii.) First Adultwork meeting.

I had read the gushing praise for Mel some days before and as my house is a few minutes’ walk from Chelsea Cloisters, I decided to step outside of my usual punting parameters: Brunette Slavs and Thai/Asian girls.

A late night meeting was arranged quickly and efficiently via SMS around lunchtime on the day. Lingering doubts remained but as a gentleman never keeps a lady waiting, I decided that, worst case scenario, I would ‘take one for the team’.


The Good:
Mel is perfect. No, she’s better than perfect. She has porcelain, freckled skin and could easily pass for an English, Irish or even Scottish lass on first glance. Brazilian would have been my last guess. I’m a big lad, but in her heels Mel was just shy of six feet tall – the perfect height for me as I dislike towering over a companion. She has an angelic face with slight, almost elfin features. Think of Emma Watson with a dash of Doutzen Kroes and you have Mel.

Mel’s physique is mind-boggling. In purely anatomical terms, Polish Jessica has the most amazing figure I have ever seen. Mel’s body is an equal. But Mel has a behind that, quite frankly, has to be seen (and felt) to be believed. It is beyond perfect. I have never – NEVER – seen an arse so pert and taut. Should the Museum of Modern Art ever decide to seek a reference work for an arse exhibition, they need look no further than Mel’s sublime behind.

That alone was worth the ‘entry price’. The fact that she also has perfect, long, slender legs and a gorgeous bust was merely an afterthought.


The Bad:
This past week alone, I have been to three different addresses in Chelsea Cloisters. Probably most of the flats over the past 10 or so years. In London terms, it’s akin to a battery farm. A few of the girls have reasonable 50-80 sq m, two-bedroom apartments. But the majority of those who choose not to share are living and working in a confined space of 30 sq m – ie a very, very small studio. Think student digs.

This is in no way a bad reflection on Mel and with anyone other than Mel, I would probably have been somewhat disappointed. Indeed, her smile and gregarious personality rendered the environment irrelevant.

However, if luxurious surroundings as per some of the grander flats in Knightsbridge, South Kensington and even Paddington (often with a bath) are of importance, Chelsea Cloisters (and indeed Nell Gwynn House) are best avoided.


The Ugly: N/A


Final words

Over the course of almost 20 years, a few remarkable ladies have left such an impression that I find myself forever in search of such perfection:

i.) Indian 'Pamper' Pandora (retired)
ii.) Ebony Nicole Foxxx (retired)
iii.) Thai Sylvia (retired)
iv.) Polish Jessica

There is now a fifth:
Brazilian Mel

Mel is a true 10/10
Her service was virtually flawless in every respect - 9.5/10
Overall score - 9.75/10

wouldn't it be easier to just write an add - sorry I meant to say "review" - for Polish Jessica.  Let me guess, her  breath smells like a dogs arse and she has the mind of a duck but she is REALLY good looking...

[west8]

I think you mean 'ad', but no, it wouldn't. If you look at my review, do you see a link to Jessica? No, because there isn't one.

Do you see a link to Jessica's indie site? No, because there isn't one.

Why do you think I omitted a link to her from my review for Mel? Because it was as sure as night follows day that someone would decide 'hey, that west8 guy is here to promote Jessica'.

So, well done for being MrPredictable.

Moreover, if you pull your head out of your rear and head over to C69, PN or any number of sites, you will see that the girl in question is well reviewed.

So don't you dare accuse me of being a shill for anyone.

[west8]

ShagBambi,

I won't - purely because someone else will then accuse me of 'promoting' her. But do a search of the reviews on PN - she's well reviewed and easy to find.

The reason I think Mel pips it overall is the fact that her indie rate of 150 is good value. Especially as I know which two agencies she is on - both at 500 / hr!

150 for Mel and her epic arse vs. 250 for Jessica and her epic body and Mel takes the gold.

[boywonder]

What about her service? Rimming, cim?

Does she have a fat brazilian ass or is she european by way of brazil

[west8]

What about her service? Rimming, cim?

Does she have a fat brazilian ass or is she european by way of brazil

Covered extensively in previous reviews. I'm generally a vanilla kinda guy, so left more than happy.

The picture of her perfect bottom on her profile is genuine. I recognise the red sheets!

[mrhappypants]

I think you mean 'ad', but no, it wouldn't. If you look at my review, do you see a link to Jessica? No, because there isn't one.

Do you see a link to Jessica's indie site? No, because there isn't one.

Why do you think I omitted a link to her from my review for Mel? Because it was as sure as night follows day that someone would decide 'hey, that west8 guy is here to promote Jessica'.

So, well done for being MrPredictable.

Moreover, if you pull your head out of your rear and head over to C69, PN or any number of sites, you will see that the girl in question is well reviewed.

So don't you dare accuse me of being a shill for anyone.

Look mate, loads of people have seen and reviewed mel on here.  If you've seen someone else you rate who has not been discussed then write a balanced review.  No need to be coy or get on your high horse or to spend all your time going on about a girl who is well known.  If you have a point make it. And if you have not, well you are pointless

[west8]

I've tried to read your review of Mel, mr happypants. You've met her. Care to provide a link to it?

Is this forum a place where anyone 'new' who has any opinion is not welcome? If so, just let me know and I'll jog on.

Also, please point out where I have been 'coy' or have 'gotten on my high horse'? For the benefit of us all, please elaborate ...

Small bit you're missing here is that I was punting when you were swimming in your daddy's balls.

Therefore, if you wish to lecture or don't like what I have to write about my experience, tough shit.

Simples!

[sugarfreegum]

see mel

i agree with everything that has been said however her skin does bother me a bit.

to the OP did you get CIM with her as when i asked her she said this was not available today.. after reading reports i am not sure it was not avaiable today or it was never available

[west8]

Can't answer the CIM question I'm afraid.

Not a service I'm usually partial to, so never asked.

DFK was very full on though - at her instigation.

[mrhappypants]

I've tried to read your review of Mel, mr happypants. You've met her. Care to provide a link to it?

Post 16 on Jason’s original review here https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=34930.0

Is this forum a place where anyone 'new' who has any opinion is not welcome? If so, just let me know and I'll jog on.

In my view you are very welcome to "jog along," not because you are a new member who are the life blood of the board but because, reading your posts and reviews, you look suspiciously like a tout.

Also, please point out where I have been 'coy'

Here

Final words

Over the course of almost 20 years, a few remarkable ladies have left such an impression that I find myself forever in search of such perfection:

i.) Indian 'Pamper' Pandora (retired)
ii.) Ebony Nicole Foxxx (retired)
iii.) Thai Sylvia (retired)
iv.) Polish Jessica

There is now a fifth:
Brazilian Mel

 

What I mean by coy is your review of a girl, who is already well-known here, where you refer to "a few remarkable ladies who have left such an impression.”  I believe the technical term for this kind of advertising is a "teaser/"

or have 'gotten on my high horse'? For the benefit of us all, please elaborate ...

Hmm  this is either grandiose or rather revealing.  Who is the "us all" you refer to?  Are you speaking on behalf of all the members of UKP, and on what authority?  Or are you a member of the Associated Union of Touts (incorporating the Municipal Union of Pimps and Fuckwits) and speaking on behalf of all your members?  By high horse I mean that classic line "don't you dare accuse me of being a shill.."!  Well hey honey, I dare! Shill!....  Pimp!.... Tout!....  Why don't you threaten to scratch my eyes out :-).

Small bit you're missing here is that I was punting when you were swimming in your daddy's balls.

Really?  I just turned 49 so either you started punting before you reached the age of majority, or you must be using your old age Bus Pass to get to out calls, in which case I doff my hat to you and would welcome any dietary advice you care to share.  Do tell which?

Therefore, if you wish to lecture or don't like what I have to write about my experience, tough shit.

Simples!

The reason I am giving you a hard time is your short tenure on the board and the way you appear to be either promoting particular girls or building your post and review count makes you look like a tout.  You may be straight forward; I have called ‘em wrong before and admitted it.  But I will not be going to see anyone recommended by you unless there is a reliable back up recommendation for a good while yet.

Dave

[maxjabby]

West8 I think its a great review most helpful. I wouldn't let certain peoples negativity bother you because from what I have seen on this site since becoming a member certain members push CONSTANT negativity. It's what one might call a 'Keyboard Warrior'.

Mels been on my hotlist for some time and I managed to pay her a visit early last week. I will be posting my review today 

[maxjabby]

.

[maxjabby]

I've tried to read your review of Mel, mr happypants. You've met her. Care to provide a link to it?

Is this forum a place where anyone 'new' who has any opinion is not welcome? If so, just let me know and I'll jog on.

Also, please point out where I have been 'coy' or have 'gotten on my high horse'? For the benefit of us all, please elaborate ...

Small bit you're missing here is that I was punting when you were swimming in your daddy's balls.

Therefore, if you wish to lecture or don't like what I have to write about my experience, tough shit.

Simples!

 

[mrhappypants]

Utterly convincing; now go an write your first review.

[west8]

Post 16 on Jason’s original review here https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=34930.0

In my view you are very welcome to "jog along," not because you are a new member who are the life blood of the board but because, reading your posts and reviews, you look suspiciously like a tout.

Yes, I'm touting on behalf of retired girls that no member here can ever book as per my personal favorites. Good point.

I'm also touting on behalf of girls who each have multiple positive reviews. Said multiple reviews being the reason I chose them in the first place.

I think my touting strategy might need a re-think.

I saw her Tuesday.  Jason's review is accurate of my (limited) experience of her, both looks and service.  She is away for a little while but I will be booking again and will write a proper review if I have much to add.  Thank you for the recommendation Jason.

Where is the 'proper review' you refer to?

What I mean by coy is your review of a girl, who is already well-known here, where you refer to "a few remarkable ladies who have left such an impression.”  I believe the technical term for this kind of advertising is a "teaser/"

I think you mean a teaser for the only girl not listed as 'retired' in my all-time Hall of Fame. Can you please provide a link to Jessica as you must know the girl I'm talking about?

Hmm  this is either grandiose or rather revealing.  Who is the "us all" you refer to?  Are you speaking on behalf of all the members of UKP, and on what authority?  Or are you a member of the Associated Union of Touts (incorporating the Municipal Union of Pimps and Fuckwits) and speaking on behalf of all your members?  By high horse I mean that classic line "don't you dare accuse me of being a shill.."!  Well hey honey, I dare! Shill!....  Pimp!.... Tout!....  Why don't you threaten to scratch my eyes out :-).

'Us all' being the readership. You and I and anyone else who reads this thread.

Really?  I just turned 49 so either you started punting before you reached the age of majority, or you must be using your old age Bus Pass to get to out calls, in which case I doff my hat to you and would welcome any dietary advice you care to share.  Do tell which?

First punt aged 20. I'm a decade younger than you and a lot less sceptical, clearly.

The reason I am giving you a hard time is your short tenure on the board and the way you appear to be either promoting particular girls or building your post and review count makes you look like a tout.  You may be straight forward; I have called ‘em wrong before and admitted it.  But I will not be going to see anyone recommended by you unless there is a reliable back up recommendation for a good while yet.

That's your right and I have no problem with you making accusations which I know to be inaccurate. But blame the members who reviewed the girls I chose as my 'first 5' on Adultwork.

As mentioned, each of the girls was chosen based on their pre-existing positive feedback, so it's hardly surprising my success rate is 100% on AW thus far.

[mrhappypants]

 Interesting that in your lengthy reply you do not address my central point; that you wrote a review that added little to the debate on a well reviewed girl with what I think was the intention of placing a teaser for a girl who has not previously been reviewed on this board.  This, together with your odd literary style (see; I am STILL daring), short tenure and high post rate all look odd to me.

Dave

[west8]

Interesting that in your lengthy reply you do not address my central point; that you wrote a review that added little to the debate on a well reviewed girl with what I think was the intention of placing a teaser for a girl who has not previously been reviewed on this board.  This, together with your odd literary style (see; I am STILL daring), short tenure and high post rate all look odd to me.

Teaser for a girl to whom I did not link for a reason: I have been seeing her more than 10 years. I -like- to keep her to myself.

So, your contention is that I paid 150 to meet Mel, wrote little about her, then used the little I wrote about her to promote a girl to whom I did not include any sort of link?

Interesting logic.

FYI: 'Jessica' is how I how know her. Her well-known Indie site and name I omitted for a reason.

Why is why you still don't know which girl I was even talking about.

[mrhappypants]

Is Maxjabbly another one of your profiles?

Dave

[west8]

Why not ask the site Admin.

You could also ask if they will give you that Moderator role you are clearly so desperate for.

[mrhappypants]

Really?  I don't think I logged on here for more than an hour last week and wouldn't have had time to rebut you post above had stunning Julie not stood me up this morning.

Dave

[west8]

Just enough time to stalk me and then suggest I have more than one account on this forum.

Good work

[mrhappypants]

  thanks

[Harry Balzac]

When I contacted her she wasn't prepared to do a facial unless I booked at least an hour. So I didn't bother.

Not mentioned on the profile.

[west8]

When I contacted her she wasn't prepared to do a facial unless I booked at least an hour. So I didn't bother.

Not mentioned on the profile.

Mel is 100% all about the £. She makes no attempt to hide it and (imho) would cancel a 1 or 2 hour booking if she received a £2K overnight from one of the agencies she works for.

That said, such is her prerogative. With an arse like she has, I understand why she is perhaps a little too self-confident despite being a relatively new arrival.