There is a growing body of opinion - that I agree with - that contrary to popular opinion it is woman, not men, who are more likely to get bored with their partner in a long-term relationship. When you think about it there are sound evolutionary reasons for this : a woman stays with a man long enoughto see the infant through the early years but then is ready to mate with a different man with different DNA.
Do you know anything about biology and evolution? I think you need to get yourself down the library fella.
The chances of an older women getting pregnant dwindles until menopause puts a stop to it
altogether. Whilst the percentage of women in their 40's has increased, at 40+ women have just a 5% chance of giving birth naturally, and a 40% chances of having a miscarriage.
External Link/Members OnlyIs an older woman (who is unlikely to be highly fertile), going to be able to attract a fertile man who wants children, when said man has younger women to choose from in the gene pool - I think that's unlikely.
Whereas an older man can leave a relationship and still be confident that he can father children with another partner for many decades to come as is proven. I don't even need to quote from a medical book - Al Pacino has just fathered a child and he's 83. Ronnie Wood, Mick Jagger and so on.
I'm intrigued to hear where this
"growing body of opinion" comes from, must be some weird sort of community, who haven't read any biology or evolution books in the past 200 years