Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Logan Montoya Jailed  (Read 95088 times)

Offline horny_mark999


Offline ProfessorYaffle

Blimey she doesn't look so hot with her make-up off does she?

OldAdmin

  • Guest
Didn't I ban this bitch before?

Offline geordiekevin

Agreed she looks like a crack head skank and will be doing time now the robbing whore  :drinks:

Offline smiths

External Link/Members Only


This is why I get paranoid about punting

Thanks for the link, what a low life scumbag. I see the first victim had her visit him at his work. Good on the second victim to involve the police. Blackmail is rightly treated as a serious crime and she has got her just desserts just a pity it wasnt a longer sentence in my view.

Offline Matium

Her photo needs to be up in case she ever tries to be a WG again.

Amelia Horn (Logan Montoya)

Hidden Image/Members Only

Conniving bitch.

Offline MDB72

Quite scary - I saw her long before I knew this forum existed. Luckily never had any trouble but shows the merits in taking all the precautions that are so regularly mentioned here.
Banned reason: Sharing account with SP.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Bangers and Gash

This is why punters who don't have a punting phone/sim or fake I.D are playing with fire.  :bomb:

Offline ollie52

The guy who met her at work is fucking asking for trouble, I won't even tell a girl what I do.

Offline PlasticGeordie

Bloody hell. And I was complaining that she was a bit miserable when I saw her ! I'd have laughed in her face if she had tried blackmailing me. Do your worst darling while I give the police a call. Respect to the guy who reported her. Presumably this is why it has been mentioned she has been wearing a tag lately yet still kept on escorting.  Can it actually be her real name is Amelia Horn ?   

grey402

  • Guest

Offline WillyW

Another not so flattering photo

External Link/Members Only

I saw her about 4 years ago just outside Yarm and had been tempted to see her again as she has been working in Beamish, glad I didn't!


fundude09

  • Guest
Another not so flattering photo

External Link/Members Only

I saw her about 4 years ago just outside Yarm and had been tempted to see her again as she has been working in Beamish, glad I didn't!

I take it Loretta Isaac is her mate and is also an escort here (just guessing)
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Offline OscarC

Jeez that pic of Loretta Isaac in the Gazette is scary.   In fact both pics!


Offline johnny34

What a BITCH.

Glad i avoided her. The posts about her electronic tag where enough to put me off.

Offline licky

She has worked as an independent in Manchester, and in parlours in the Manchester area, and most of her reports say she gave a poor and disinterested service.
Wouldn't touch her with a barge pole even before this.

charming_red

  • Guest
Enjoy the cold winter showers you conniving bitch.

miyagi

  • Guest
they both look like they take drugs in the pics here

External Link/Members Only


Offline Daffodil

What a fucking disgrace. An example of a prossie who should be straight on the "dangerous prossie" thread when it's produced.

As said above, guys who have anything to lose (which is the majority really) should be looking after their anonymity. This sort of shit happens, and probably a lot more than we hear about.

But don't you fluffy fanboys worry, I'm sure it won't happen to you  :rolleyes:

Barry Shipton

  • Guest
Didn't I ban this bitch before?
Yes spectacularly banned in this meltdown thread here
www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=19078.msg295039#msg295039
In which she said 'I'm not a nasty person at all I don't have a nasty bone in my body'

Probably being more honest as quoted in the press when she said after her arrest: “To be honest these men make me sick. They pay me for unprotected sex.'

Agreed, ideal first candidate for the dangerous WG Hall of Shame section.

chesterlad

  • Guest
I thought Logan Montoya was this Seductive Dolly that's advertising on A/W - profile has been logged into today, unless its her pimp trying it on again. Staying well clear anyway.


Offline claretandblue

I thought Logan Montoya was this Seductive Dolly that's advertising on A/W - profile has been logged into today, unless its her pimp trying it on again. Staying well clear anyway.

loretta isaac is submissive dolly and also went by the name sasha bee,i saw her clip of her on one of the bukkake sites a while back and at the time she was certainly attractive facially.

as she got off it could be her accessing her profile or as you say her pimp

Offline leedstony

To quote from the Gazette article, all 3 defendants are committed to changing and making good progress. Really??

Wonder what Horn/Montoya is charging now? 1/2 an ounce of snout?

Offline dino1990

how peoples life's can change. I met logan about 3 years ago from her nice flat in Boro. Was a decent punt and she was bloody gorgeous at the time. Looks like her life changed for the worse over the last couple of years.

Magicman11

  • Guest
Saw her about 2 years ago in a top floor flat in Darlington. Said it was her home at the time. Quite a nice residential area
Was a pretty underwhelming punt. No real interest but  the main thing I remember is an odd slurping noise as she sucked me off and utterly bizarre eyebrows .
She seemed quiet and not exactly the pornstar she made out she was. At the time would not have had her down as a druggie. Times change eh!

Offline akauya

Just in case "Dolly" tries to get rid of her AW profile, here's a screenshot

Loretta Isaac (Dolly) - click to enlarge

Hidden Image/Members Only


Amelia Horn, left, Luke Burton and Loretta Isaac

Hidden Image/Members Only

jcdmj12

  • Guest
5 grand?  Seems risky to try blackmailing people when they have your address.  A visit from a couple of large individuals with poor anger management skills to suggest that it would be best for the ongoing health of all concerned that the matter was dropped would cost a lot less than that.

Definitely a salutary lesson on the importance of maintaining a separate punting identity. Any prossies attempting to blackmail me would have more luck trying to blackmail Keyser Söze, unless they are in league with MI5.  :D
« Last Edit: September 12, 2014, 11:38:59 am by jcdmj12 »

Offline AnthG

Reading the news article I think this part is worth highlighting and keeping a mental note on too as many times people post to say 'a girl has asked me for a large sum of money and promised to work it off by saying I can have free punts with her whenever I want for the next month/two months etc'

This is what happened with her when someone did that

Quote from: NewsArticle
The second victim found Horn after looking for a female companion online in November last year. He found 'Logan' and they arranged to meet for sex and he paid her £200.

Over the following days he began to receive text messages from Horn, one of them saying she needed £1,500 for building work.

He agreed to pay the cash in return for the equivalent in sexual favours, but each time he contacted her, she made excuses not to meet.

She later asked for a further £2,500, which he refused but did give her £250. He, too, was then contacted by Burton who demanded £5,000 to stop the story hitting the papers.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Stalinator

Punting sim, only bring cash and most importantly never bring wallet or anything containing ID to a punt. I even park a fair distance away so my reg can't be taken.

This bitch highlights the fact that we as punters must take precautions.

sentinel

  • Guest
So why didn't the blackmail "victims" just get a couple of trusted mates and go round to her place and kick the shit out of her.

It wouldn't have been hard to find out where she lived and it would have avoided the publicity of going to the cops.


Offline AnthG

So why didn't the blackmail "victims" just get a couple of trusted mates and go round to her place and kick the shit out of her.

It wouldn't have been hard to find out where she lived and it would have avoided the publicity of going to the cops.
Because she probably worked out who the best people to blackmail would be. As in people most likely to pay - so had a flash car and talked about having a high paid job, least likely to turn violent due to coming across as shy in the punt and those with most to lose from them talking about their wives and kids etc.

If she for example asked me for £5,000 she would have zero chance as I couldn't pay it even if I pawned everything I own.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Tony Montana

  • Guest

yorkshire123

  • Guest
Rachel Dyson, mitigating, said Horn had a troubled childhood, but has had a baby and had proved to be a good mother.

Earl Pinnock, for Burton, said he had only been involved in the plot for one day.

Joe Hingston, for Isaac, said she had suffered a difficult past.


More money to the legal aid parasites, Troubled past my arse, rotten to the core the fucking lot of them  :thumbsdown:

Offline akauya

So why didn't the blackmail "victims" just get a couple of trusted mates and go round to her place and kick the shit out of her.

It wouldn't have been hard to find out where she lived and it would have avoided the publicity of going to the cops.


Maybe the victims are decent people who don't like the idea of ending up with a GBH charge and possibly convicted.

Offline sesalovdarlo

OMG!!!!!!!!! THIS EXPLAINS WHY SHE WAS TAGGED!!!

My last bait and switch with her, she had an electronic tag on, (Bout 5 month back)

This explains it!

Offline sesalovdarlo

She quotes they paid her for bare back!! lol stupid skank

Offline AnthG

OMG!!!!!!!!! THIS EXPLAINS WHY SHE WAS TAGGED!!!

My last bait and switch with her, she had an electronic tag on, (Bout 5 month back)

This explains it!
Did you ask her why she had it on? If so what did she say it was on for? She might have done something else ontop of all this
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline sesalovdarlo

Did you ask her why she had it on? If so what did she say it was on for? She might have done something else ontop of all this

No I didn't ask her. Basically I wanted to see a bit off feet during the app, and she said she didn't offer foot fetish, then at the end of the appointment she basically came clean why she wouldn't take off her stockings, I didn't ask why she had it on. Very likely that would be why, she would be f**ked if she had commited another crime in parallel with what happened here ^

Barry Shipton

  • Guest
All of them have form - would have been read in court - but paper only reports his as they were the most newsworthy:
"All three had previous convictions, Burton most seriously for assault, wounding and robbery."
Could have been another petty crime but time wise probably a curfew as part of her bail conditions for this one.

Offline Daffodil

Rachel Dyson, mitigating, said Horn had a troubled childhood, but has had a baby and had proved to be a good mother.

Earl Pinnock, for Burton, said he had only been involved in the plot for one day.

Joe Hingston, for Isaac, said she had suffered a difficult past.


More money to the legal aid parasites, Troubled past my arse, rotten to the core the fucking lot of them  :thumbsdown:

Every fucking criminal has somebody perpetrating their sob story. It's bollocks. There are plenty of people who have "troubled childhoods" who don't become prostitutes and blackmail punters.

The legal system can often be a disgrace. It's no wonder lawyers have a dreadful name, they defend whoever can pay them.

Good post by the way. Three different lawyers milking this particular cash cow  :mad:

Barry Shipton

  • Guest

Maybe the victims are decent people who don't like the idea of ending up with a GBH charge and possibly convicted.
And as it said in the report the guy's obviously a psycho with a record for violence which is why she used him to put the frighteners on these guys as the 'outraged big brother' so maybe not a wise idea.

What beats me is how they ever thought anyone would believe she was under age? Probably a crude attempt to prevent them going to the police but obviously a totally unconvincing lie as the second guy had the sense to call them straight in.

Offline AnthG

What beats me is how they ever thought anyone would believe she was under age? Probably a crude attempt to prevent them going to the police but obviously a totally unconvincing lie as the second guy had the sense to call them straight in.
Agree, she is a welll known porn star. The porn studio will have seen her id before they let her perform. It was stupid to have suggested she was underage.

Every fucking criminal has somebody perpetrating their sob story. It's bollocks. There are plenty of people who have "troubled childhoods" who don't become prostitutes and blackmail punters.

The legal system can often be a disgrace. It's no wonder lawyers have a dreadful name, they defend whoever can pay them.

But this part was just mitigation. Its just part of the process to try and knock time off the sentence. What I find odd is why newspapers always print it. Solicitors have a duty to say anything they can to try and downplay the offence as that is what is expected and part of their job in Mitigation.

External Link/Members Only

Quote from: How Sentences Are Worked Out
An aggravating circumstance is something that makes a crime more serious, eg burgling someone’s house while they are asleep in bed.

A mitigating circumstance is something that makes a crime less serious, eg you have problems in your personal life that have affected your behaviour.

The thing I find freaky from the story was this

Quote
She said Horn had a difficult background, went into a “downward spiral”, was sectioned and twice tried to kill herself after her boyfriend threw her out on learning she was pregnant.

The fact that she was sectioned means she was going on pretty bad, as it takes a lot to be sectioned - hence all these stores in the press about people who commit crimes and everyone asks why weren't they sectioned.

The thing I don't get is, if she was kicked out and was so freaked out to need to be sectioned for it, I can bet a fluffy punter out there somewhere would have taken her in. That is what fluffys do. So she didn't have to do all the threatening to kill herself and sectioning thing. She cannot be that stupid to not have twigged on that a punter somewhere out there will fall for a sob story.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Daffodil

Agree, she is a welll known porn star. The porn studio will have seen her id before they let her perform. It was stupid to have suggested she was underage.

But this part was just mitigation. Its just part of the process to try and knock time off the sentence. What I find odd is why newspapers always print it. Solicitors have a duty to say anything they can to try and downplay the offence as that is what is expected and part of their job in Mitigation.

External Link/Members Only

The thing I find freaky from the story was this

The fact that she was sectioned means she was going on pretty bad, as it takes a lot to be sectioned - hence all these stores in the press about people who commit crimes and everyone asks why weren't they sectioned.

The thing I don't get is, if she was kicked out and was so freaked out to need to be sectioned for it, I can bet a fluffy punter out there somewhere would have taken her in. That is what fluffys do. So she didn't have to do all the threatening to kill herself and sectioning thing. She cannot be that stupid to not have twigged on that a punter somewhere out there will fall for a sob story.

I don't understand your point.

We know that lawyers do what they can to get their client off, or reduce their sentence. It's regardless of whether they think it's right or not, it's whether they get paid. They have a duty once they've accepted to work a case, but why did they accept in the first place? One reason and one reason only.

It's also disgraceful that such an excuse ("troubled childhood") can be used to mitigate actions in our courts  :thumbsdown:

sentinel

  • Guest
And no doubt there will be a host of bleeding heart social workers etc. sticking up for all them- the usual shit like having a deprived upbringing, let down by society, not given a chance at school and blah blah blah.

Fucking criminals that's all they are and I still say somebody should have kicked the shit out of her.

Offline Daffodil

And as it said in the report the guy's obviously a psycho with a record for violence which is why she used him to put the frighteners on these guys as the 'outraged big brother' so maybe not a wise idea.

What beats me is how they ever thought anyone would believe she was under age? Probably a crude attempt to prevent them going to the police but obviously a totally unconvincing lie as the second guy had the sense to call them straight in.

Don't for a moment think that he was the second guy. This is the tip of the iceberg, we will never know how many punters they fucked over.

Offline AnthG

but why did they accept in the first place? One reason and one reason only.

To be honest for a case like Logan Montaya - as in just a regular nothing special chavvy girl, what likely happened is this solicitor was just the duty solicitor down for that police station that day that she was arrested.

There will be something like 5 or so law firms that have duty rosters with each police station where each day someone gets arrested that solicitor firm is contacted and asked to attend and then that case is theirs from then on in. The next day its a different law firm that gets the honour.

Everyone is entitled to a legal defence so even if it was something like the worst paedophile or whatnot who had been arrested, your law firm is down that day, you get the case to defend and cannot really say no if you firm is down in the books as that days duty roster.

On the flip side if she had been in the criminal systems already, she could as her phone call have said phone Billy and Jones law firm and the duty seargent will phone them and they then send someone round and they get the case from then on in. Law firms cannot usually refuse to represent someone. And with criminal cases they cannot cherry pick the cases they take on.

Its actually kind of good that its like that in my opinion as if law firms could cherry pick, it would mean that people with certain crimes never get decent solicitors as they want to take on either the easy cases or the ones that make them look good if they win and not take on any cases that are deemed socially reprehensible (remember even if it was a rape case, the person could be innocent which you don't know till after trial, if you say "i don't take rape cases" that means that innocent guy could be convicted for something the girl has fabricated). - but thats a major off topic for this thread, so sorry about that.
« Last Edit: September 12, 2014, 06:27:04 pm by AnthG »
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

kingkong

  • Guest
This whore will try and be  wg again, they all do; and it is up to us to look out for this vile skank and make sure other punters throughout the land know of her past. I have no doubt she will move to another city and change her name and appearance.