Hi
Here’s my response to some of the comments: First, it’s not my intention to criticise anyone contributing to this website.
This is the second thread you've posted on since joining. You've only contributed to 2 threads and you started both. The first was an advert for Busty Swedish Ingrid. When someone pointed out he had a bad time with her, you said he hadn't seen her.
In this thread you "strongly doubt" the other reviews for the SP are genuine.
£300 is a lot of money to waste for this ‘old boiler’. But if others have a different opinion about the same provider, with her heavily photoshopped pictures, then that’s their good right.
Their review their rating, I'd trust them more than I'd trust you.
Do some due dilligence before dropping £300 on an hour. A search for her phone number shows a profile last edited in 2018 where she was 58. It was obvious she's an "old boiler" as you put it.
Regarding the AW reviews: yes, I can’t prove these reviews are fake, but the fact that the majority of those is written by AW members who are not active, should make you think.
AW feedback is notoriously dodgy, but as far as her's goes, it looks as solid as AW feedback gets.
- She has 80 escorting FBs on AW
- You suggest the majority are "member not active" whereas the reality is it's less than half @ 33
- From 2018 onwards only 6 out of 30 are "member not active", people move on!
It looks to me like you're Busty Swedish Ingrid slagging your competition.
