Clausewitz theory is highly regarded in the Russian army, the whole 24th Feb 2022 invasion was unconventional, to start a offensive operation against a country the size of Ukraine, with approx 100k-180k troops, is absolutely unconventional.
That may (or may not) be 'unwise' but it is not Unconventional warfare. Conventional warfare involves '
conventional weapons (not chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear ones) and battlefield tactics between two or more states in an open confrontation, in which forces are well-defined and fight using weapons that target each other’s military power'. Unconventional warfare has traditionally referred to guerrilla tactics subversion espionage etc.
The Russian invasion was wholly conventional warfare. It has of course since developed into something else which will have a huge effect on worldwide military operations going forward.
Yes terms like a SMO have been around, but not widely used afaik, the point was everyone from generals to journalists presumed it was going to be a no holds barred steamroller, similar to OIF in 2003.
I gave the accepted definition of a special operation above, but in relation to Putin’s SMO this was his stated purpose
"Its goal is to protect people who have been subjected to bullying and genocide... for the last eight years. And for this we will strive for the demilitarisation and denazification of Ukraine.
"And to bring to court those who committed numerous bloody crimes against civilians, including against citizens of the Russian Federation."But as a military operation there was no detail of how this this would be achieved? It was of course deliberately vague so as not to be a declaration of war between the two countries. I understand many of the Russian generals were taken by surprise when the order was actually given to proceed and invade.
I like everyone else who watched it happen in Feb 2022 thought it would be all over in a week or two at the most, and there would be a sensible negotiation.
Thanks, I assumed incorrectly then. It could and should have been rapid. Yes, you cannot steamroller over a country the size of Ukraine rapidly, but the overall conventional battle plan was sound, against a vastly inferior Ukraine.
The execution was not. In particular had the battle of Kyiv (Antonov Airport) been won by Russia in the opening days/weeks (and it could and should have been) then we would likely be having a different discussion now. The regime and capital would probably have been toppled. It was a very close call but Russia lost the battle and we are where we are 4 years on.
External Link/Members Only