Author Topic: Fuckme_carmenxo Paisley  (Read 9311 times)


32 review(s) for Fmc_xo (22 positive, 2 neutral, 8 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Online Jock D

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,778
  • Likes: 38
  •  
  • Reviews: 123
Why would she text you and tell you all of this?

Did you let her know that you're a member here to gain favour or are you just sad?

Have a look at his/her obsessive posts... :wacko:

Dodgy doesn't even begin to cover it...an absolute walloper :thumbsdown:

Offline Thepunteruk

Clatty,
I for one would welcome that offer to provide proof of threatening behaviour. However, this could easily be manufactured from any other phone (as the number will be obscured). So a date stamp will be crucial in all of this.
I am willing to privately provide you with a curtailed detail of my punting number. But again, I cannot prove or disprove that was my number 6 months ago.

Secondly, this behaviour could have occurred, but with someone else (mistaken identity).
So let's focus on my malicious and threatening behaviour on here. And this rampage I've been on.

A neutral review last year.
Agreeing with two other negative reviews that appeared in quick succession, and giving my opinion further on there.
This also promoting me to post a separate and succinct negative review.

Hardly a crusade or a malicious rampage.

Dman88 has laid these accusations squarely on me. On a forum whereby for the above reasons I cannot defend myself with real world proof.
Instead we should be looking at the credentials of "him".

In my opinion, he has clearly slipped up and showed himself to be either a punter with chronic EAS, or even potentially a female WG past or present.



« Last Edit: February 02, 2022, 07:11:53 pm by Thepunteruk »

Offline Scotpak

I think where you've maybe let yourself down and started to look like you've got an agenda is where you've posted your negative.

When I read your neutral review it read positive but marked as neutral due to time keeping/Comms.

I think putting a separate negative review months later was always going to raise questions.




Offline Problem Child

I think where you've maybe let yourself down and started to look like you've got an agenda is where you've posted your negative.

When I read your neutral review it read positive but marked as neutral due to time keeping/Comms.

I think putting a separate negative review months later was always going to raise questions.
Agree with this 100%
The language in your neutral when you used the term  “completed it mate” when referring to an other person  was poor form and strangely vindictive  imo.
The additional negative review yesterday which was basically you reviewing the same incident that formed part of the aforementioned neutral seemed an unusually petty move  for what was merely a cancellation 6 months ago. This would suggest something else has occurred. Unfortunately, I can’t  see this ever being resolved, coz as a few posters will already know Carmen lost her work phone last October/November so any screenshots to back up Dman’s claims are long gone..
« Last Edit: February 02, 2022, 09:19:02 pm by Problem Child »

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,165
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
Clatty,
I for one would welcome that offer to provide proof of threatening behaviour. However, this could easily be manufactured from any other phone (as the number will be obscured). So a date stamp will be crucial in all of this.
I am willing to privately provide you with a curtailed detail of my punting number. But again, I cannot prove or disprove that was my number 6 months ago.

Secondly, this behaviour could have occurred, but with someone else (mistaken identity).
So let's focus on my malicious and threatening behaviour on here. And this rampage I've been on.

A neutral review last year.
Agreeing with two other negative reviews that appeared in quick succession, and giving my opinion further on there.
This also promoting me to post a separate and succinct negative review.

Hardly a crusade or a malicious rampage.

Dman88 has laid these accusations squarely on me. On a forum whereby for the above reasons I cannot defend myself with real world proof.
Instead we should be looking at the credentials of "him".

In my opinion, he has clearly slipped up and showed himself to be either a punter with chronic EAS, or even potentially a female WG past or present.
Just to clarify, I'm not implying you have done anything wrong at all, as I've said no one on here knows where the truth lies...

What I suggested was a possible solution to the situation as its going round in circles now... Dman88 appears sporadically, that's his form, and recently it's in relation to said WG, or to chip in his two bobs worth wee shitty digs at me on threads that he's not participated in prior...

I've called him out plenty on here, there is something not right with him, so he either backs up his claims, or he can fuck up IMO...  :wacko:
« Last Edit: February 02, 2022, 10:21:31 pm by Clattypats »

Offline glasgow_69

Can we just leave it there everyone.
I gave an honest review and its being hijacked from both sides.
Lets all move on.

Offline FBman78

Something I've said previously, but to no avail... He's compromised...

I wonder if Davie is her pimp. Either that or he is her fairy Godmother.

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,418
  • Likes: 816
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
I wonder if Davie is her pimp. Either that or he is her fairy Godmother.
Any reason for thinking I'm a pimp?   :unknown:

Offline Asian guy

Something isn’t right with Dman. His defence of carmen, who has had issues and fall outs with Gea, and his reviews don’t stack up.
His review of Ramona but he can’t remember her having tattoos is weird. Maybe a B&S but maybe dman trying to suggest a B&S to cause trouble.

His review of Alex at GEA is equally questionable and questioned by the reply directly under it. I found Alex to be the total opposite of what he said service wise.

The 4 year gap between reviews is also strange. Carmen was at Gea a few years ago. Could this have been 2017 when Dman popped up praising Sophie (who I suspect was carmen) but giving Alex a negative review? Did carmen fall out with Alex at GEA.

If Dman isn’t carmen I would eat my shoes

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,174
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18

Offline Matrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,792
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 164
The "man" in question hasn't been back on.

Must be viewing this through one of their other accounts...

Offline FBman78

Any reason for thinking I'm a pimp?   :unknown:

Sorry Davidmac it was meant to read Dman should have proofread the post.  Apologies to Davie.

Offline Asian guy

The "man" in question hasn't been back on.

Must be viewing this through one of their other accounts...

He/she had planned to come back on at 19.30 but they are running late  :lol: :lol:

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,418
  • Likes: 816
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Sorry Davidmac it was meant to read Dman should have proofread the post.  Apologies to Davie.
No probs.   :drinks: