Mia – GEA

[superfloss]

I saw Mia about 4 years ago when she first started, she left and came back in the summer. She’s a very pretty girl and the photos of her accurate, some guys may find her a bit too skinny though. I think she puts in a lot of hours and it maybe beginning to tell but I had a good time her and would be happy to see her again. Service wise she does finger in pussy, owo and fk.
A bit of a clock watcher.

Age              21 – 25
Face Looks:   9/10
Body:      8/10
Pussy:      Shaved
Photo Accurate
Height      5'5"
Dress Size           6
Breast       Super Nice
Tattoos      A Few
Blow Job           Yes - Without Condom
Cum In Mouth   No
Touch Pussy   Yes - On The Intside
Kiss              Yes -    With Tongue


External Link/Members Only

[superfloss]

This review is from a punt I had with her last week, by the way.

[Courtney]

Have you been here before Dentalfloss? This GEA overload writing style is reminding me of the previously banned Jazzman.

[superfloss]

Have you been here before Dentalfloss? This GEA overload writing style is reminding me of the previously banned Jazzman.

I'm just trying to give useful info that will help others not blow £150.
I've done 4 reviews in a month you've done 4 reviews in 4 years.
I leave if it's a problem.

[Courtney]

I'm just trying to give useful info that will help others not blow £150.
Is that a bad thing?

No, it’s not a bad thing if coming from someone genuine. But I suspect you have been here before, you’ve evaded my question.....a possible sign of guilt.

I've done 4 reviews in a month you've done 4 reviews in 4 years.

....how original. Would you like a medal? My hero.

[Courtney]

Phone number search 07759314105

....yeah, and just where have I seen this before:

Yes.
To do a phone number search you should try
07407 180822
07407180822
7407180822
447407180822

....touting your GEA girls again ....throwing in the odd negative just to be clever. Not clever enough I'm afraid.

[rogue5]

I'm just trying to give useful info that will help others not blow £150.

By posting a positive review.....

[Courtney]

By posting a positive review.....

Yeah, his positives would sometimes read like negatives and vice versa. Can’t make up his mind ...probably just made up or just gives the negatives to the WGs that have left the agency.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showreviews;u=21742

The Jazzman reviews. Spot the difference.

[Dman88]

Courtney you accuse everyone of being Jazzman.. he seems to have struck a nerve with you and perhaps left you a little traumatised for whatever reason.

[Matrix]

Courtney you accuse everyone of being Jazzman.. he seems to have struck a nerve with you and perhaps left you a little traumatised for whatever reason.

That's nonsense.

The troll has had more comebacks than Lazarus.

[Courtney]

Courtney you accuse everyone of being Jazzman.. he seems to have struck a nerve with you and perhaps left you a little traumatised for whatever reason.

Not everyone and if you’ve been following properly you will see I’ve called it right so far every time. I’m just highlighting my suspicions and gathering evidence. If you look at the post reports (maybe you can’t) you will see I’m not the only one with this suspicion.

I see you are another GEA fanboy. One of your mates is he?    You seem protective for some weird reason.

[superfloss]

Not sure what's going on here?
Is the problem that I'm doing balanced reviews or something?
I found this style of review from a site I was using in Canada last week (External Link/Members Only) where they give a sort of tick box of the good and bad.
I thought it was quite a useful way to do it.
If you don't want my reviews I'll stop doing them then.

[Matrix]

Not sure what's going on here?
Is the problem that I'm doing balanced reviews or something?

You're suspected of being a previously banned multiple times troll. Hope that clears it up.

What makes you think anyone has a problem with balanced reviews? (the question may help you avoid the point being made for a little longer. Another similarity with the aforementioned.) 

[Courtney]

You're suspected of being a previously banned multiple times troll. Hope that clears it up.

What makes you think anyone has a problem with balanced reviews? (the question may help you avoid the point being made for a little longer. Another similarity with the aforementioned.) 

...even his man “Dman88” managed to work that part out. 

Oh dear Dentalfloss/Jazzman/TheHun/Fireman/Hoseman and the 50 approximate other accounts you had....not very good at lying/pretending/playing the innocent are we?

[superfloss]

I'm not sure why you post on this site Courtney, you don't do reviews or add any value that can help other from making punting decisions.
It just seems to be to get other genuine reviews banned.
I'm leaving for now, anyway, so no need to reply.

[Matrix]

External Link/Members Only

[Dman88]

External Link/Members Only

Tune

[Courtney]

I'm not sure why you post on this site Courtney, you don't do reviews or add any value that can help other from making punting decisions.
It just seems to be to get other genuine reviews banned.
I'm leaving for now, anyway, so no need to reply.

...oh really?!! You said something similar before if I recall and you still came back:

Santiago. 25 reviews all "Positive". Worthless.

JazzMan
Reviews: 47

Thehun10
Reviews: 13

Mindful
Reviews: 5

Can't remember the rest but they give a lot of good info and save other punters money.

I'll close the door on my way out then.

I've caught you out again and you can't take it. You're a brainless arrogant dunce that should have behaved yourself in the first place instead of touting, white knighting, insulting UKP membership etc.

BTW

I saw Mia about 4 years ago when she first started

...of course you did. So much so I've quoted it here just for old time sake.

Mia
External Link/Members Only

They say she is 21yrs but I thinks she about 25.
Very pretty and petite. I would say she is more of a size 6.
Similar to Lola, great at DFK and gfe. Inexperienced and tries to please.
Happy to do owo and cim.

Send me a message for more details

 

[Courtney]

P.S. Also....

Don't want to be critical Santiago because you do a lot of reviews and give a lot of useful info,
but 33 Positives out of 34?

A lot similar to:-

....yes a lot similar to this critical Santiago theme from your other-selves:

I'm implying that all Santiago's reviews are 10/10

Santiago. 25 reviews all "Positive". Worthless.
 

...just all too much of a coincidence.

[superfloss]

I think forums, all forums can be quite useful but sometimes they can descend into nonsense when some users spend 5 or 6 hours just trying to get other banned.
It's a pity really.

[francobegbie]

Oh shit, Inspector Clouseau is on your case. Times a ticking, wait till Cato gets here

[Matrix]

P.S. Also....

....yes a lot similar to this critical Santiago theme from your other-selves:

...just all too much of a coincidence.

He's right Courtney. No idea what you're talking about. 

It's always good to read reviews because you can find out some useful info.
So I don't like to criticise reviewers.
But Santiago's are always Positives (22 positives, 0 Negatives), usually 10/10 sort of thing.

Still better than nothing.

[Courtney]

I think forums, all forums can be quite useful but sometimes they can descend into nonsense when some users spend 5 or 6 hours just trying to get other banned.
It's a pity really.

Admin decides who gets banned, you should know, you've had plenty experience so far. I'm not "trying" to do anything. I'm highlighting my suspicions. It is the ethos of the forum. If you feel this is a huge injustice and instead of being a whining greeting face, you can use the report button it's over there ------->

[Courtney]

It's always good to read reviews because you can find out some useful info.
So I don't like to criticise reviewers.
But Santiago's are always Positives (22 positives, 0 Negatives), usually 10/10 sort of thing.

Still better than nothing.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=118890.0

..that's right and he was also You Only Live Once.

Oh shit, Inspector Clouseau is on your case. Times a ticking, wait till Cato gets here

Matrix is also a good inspector. Were we right or were we right?

P.S Reporting my post Franco? Perhaps you should read the rules and get a grip of the forum ethos instead of being a dunce.

[Matrix]

Credit for this one has to go to Chief Courtney, and of course Admin for banning the twat (again). 

Hidden Image/Members Only

[francobegbie]

It’s my turn to get quoted now.

[Matrix]

It’s my turn to get quoted now.

External Link/Members Only

 

[Courtney]

Credit for this one has to go to Chief Courtney, and of course Admin for banning the twat (again). 

Hidden Image/Members Only

  Cheers.

[Matrix]

Reading up, seems Santiago deserves some of the credit too. 

[Santiago]

Cheers Matrix 

That dumb prick can't help himself

 

[Courtney]

Reading up, seems Santiago deserves some of the credit too. 

Cheers Matrix 

That dumb prick can't help himself