Lovely Amyra - Marble Arch - Refused service because I'm a UK Punting reviewer

[stuart.]

You're so vain you had to repost two of your reviews to show what a man you are. Did you forget the one who recognised you for what you are and objected to your habits?

The bit highlighted is enough to show where you're wrong

You're literally such a fucking retard this review of my it proves nothing and I thought you had finished arguing your point, you thought you was being clever reposting this and had something on me didn't you? But all you've done is prove your ignorance what a retard you are again and again, I guess you will go back to having nothing to say know?  Go on please argue with me on how this girl was in the right I want to hear it? Starting to think you are just a white Knight 🤔

[stuart.]

My two cents here, is that ‘pounding hard’ is just a figure of speech. I recall stuarts review of Bora at the time and she can take a ‘pounding’. Every girl is different and just like us guys everyone has different strokes. At the end of the day, consent is a must, and if shes communicative about it all, I can’t see any fault in that.

This is worded so perfectly and Bora is another girl that I saw over and over again excellent escorts she was

[scutty brown]

You're literally such a fucking retard this review of my it proves nothing and I thought you had finished arguing your point, you thought you was being clever reposting this and had something on me didn't you? But all you've done is prove your ignorance what a retard you are again and again, I guess you will go back to having nothing to say know?  Go on please argue with me on how this girl was in the right I want to hear it? Starting to think you are just a white Knight 🤔

So it's acceptable for you to repost old reviews but not for others to do so - especially when they show you in a bad light?
As for this girl, she clearly objected to your "pounding", but unusually was brave enough to say so. How many others were too intimidated to complain?

[Payyourwaymate]

Hidden Image/Members Only

[king tarzan]

Hidden Image/Members Only

🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣😂😂

[jamiekinkxxx]

My two cents:

1 Cent: It would appear from Stuart's multiple reviews (and each to their own) that he enjoys sex of shall we say... a more aggressive nature. Nothing wrong with that, each to their own. There are SPs out there that enjoy that too.
2 Cent: It would appear to me that Amyra to be did not enjoy her time with OP. The reference to the his first review, is to me, not the underlying issue as to why she refused him the 2nd time. I would am inclined to think, it is more to do with the fact she did not want to be 'pounded' in the same way again. As has been mentioned, every SP can choose who and how she likes to have sex.

Summary: I'd let this rest now as there are two sides and neither is going to back down. So lets stop the insults and move on.

[cotton]

That's the end of text message I did say all of that just not 2018 because I wouldn't remember that and I didn't tell her my name didn't think it was a big deal I also try to persuade her to do a facial again and told her I'd done it in the past and I would love to do it again but she said she does not do this service anymore


I guess I didn't tell her I was pink eye guy as you named me because I also am not a clairvoyant and yes I had to Google that word lol

yes she wouldn't know until I was at her doorstep but I too also wouldn't know until I was at her doorstep   

Of course you arnt a clairvoyant , and neither is she but ultimately it was you who failed to declare that you were pink eye stuart from 2018 , and therein lies the problem , she didnt want to see you again , if you had declared who you were at the outset, she could have refused service then rather than later.

Do we recognise the right of girls to refuse service to punters they have seen before and dont want to see again   

Essentially the issue is - punter sees girl , girl blocks punter , punter rebooks girl without declaring who he is , girl refuses service when she sees who punter is, punter thinks hes been hard done by.
Obviously you didnt deliberately book a girl that you knew had blocked you , it was inadvertent , but still , it was you that didnt declare who you were and deprived the girl of her right to make an informed choice wether to accept or refuse your booking.
Cant you see that at all   

[Jackson4]

This is entertaining but please don’t use the word “retard” - it’s really not great. I’m sure you can be more imaginative with your language creativity

[S1MPLEK1NG]

This is entertaining but please don’t use the word “retard” - it’s really not great. I’m sure you can be more imaginative with your language creativity

I agree, let's be adults about this and argue with some maturity.

[mrbang123]

I dont see anything wrong with Stuart’s previous reviews. Obviously the SP here just didn’t wanna see Stuart again coz she had ptsd from her last punt with Stuart. She must’ve hated the facial that she got so she put Stuart on her shit list (no list)

[Belgarion]

Another reason why it is important to not disclose too much detail in reviews or wave your UKP membership during bookings or booking requests.

[mrbang123]

We should get into the habit of leaving it 2weeks+ before writing reviews so that it’s harder for SPs to put 2 & 2 together.

[alabama1]

We should get into the habit of leaving it 2weeks+ before writing reviews so that it’s harder for SPs to put 2 & 2 together.

Not sure about that. I can't remember what i did 2 days ago 

[jamiekinkxxx]

Not sure about that. I can't remember what i did 2 days ago 

that made me LOL!   

[Ivor Hunch]

This is entertaining but please don’t use the word “retard” - it’s really not great. I’m sure you can be more imaginative with your language creativity

Yeah- in fact, not only, "really not great" but also, "really not acceptable". 

Like, hurting a girl without her consent, or laughing about disregardng her express requests/ limits. 

I really feel that there are some (and at the risk of cliche, I am sure it will be a small tiny majority of) members of the forum who struggle with the issue of consent when they are paying for sex.  Whether you are paying or not, full consent for everything is utterly non-negotiable.

Payment does not buy consent to anything y0u want to do.  Transgressing the boundaries of what the SP wants is, literally, a criminal offence. 

And, it seems to me, that because we all know that Plod, the Great British Jury, is never, realistically, going to be interested in the (entirley legitimate) complaint of a SP that, "I said, don't do that, but he did it anyway", that actually imposes on us as SP users a higher duty, as there is unlikely to be any external examination of what happens.

And this is not "white knighty" or "fluffy"- it is just be humane and don't abuse other people and then laugh about it.

I would like to think that for 99% of people reading this post, this should be utterly uncontroversial.

[stuart.]

So it's acceptable for you to repost old reviews but not for others to do so - especially when they show you in a bad light?
As for this girl, she clearly objected to your "pounding", but unusually was brave enough to say so. How many others were too intimidated to complain?

Not got a problem with you posting old reviews it's the one you picked of a escort that can't even pull together a string of positive reviews constantly gives shit service and just uses her good looks to bring guys in and do as little as possible and basically take guys hard-earned cash and sex with her didn't even last long or the BJ she just put in fuckall effort literally just relying on her looks to make money with no intention of giving good service, if you want to run to her rescue and on her side that's up to you white Knight. Do you think that review should be a positive as well?

[stuart.]

This is entertaining but please don’t use the word “retard” - it’s really not great. I’m sure you can be more imaginative with your language creativity

you know what you're completely right I shouldn't use that word and it's unfair on those people to compare them to someone beneath them like scutty brown

[stuart.]

I agree, let's be adults about this and argue with some maturity.

I agree with you but he started with his very first post insulting me even telling me I've got a small dick lol

[stuart.]

I dont see anything wrong with Stuart’s previous reviews. Obviously the SP here just didn’t wanna see Stuart again coz she had ptsd from her last punt with Stuart. She must’ve hated the facial that she got so she put Stuart on her shit list (no list)

After my review with her I saw many reviews kept popping up with facials afterwards 🤔

[stuart.]

Of course you arnt a clairvoyant , and neither is she but ultimately it was you who failed to declare that you were pink eye stuart from 2018 , and therein lies the problem , she didnt want to see you again , if you had declared who you were at the outset, she could have refused service then rather than later.

Do we recognise the right of girls to refuse service to punters they have seen before and dont want to see again   

Essentially the issue is - punter sees girl , girl blocks punter , punter rebooks girl without declaring who he is , girl refuses service when she sees who punter is, punter thinks hes been hard done by.
Obviously you didnt deliberately book a girl that you knew had blocked you , it was inadvertent , but still , it was you that didnt declare who you were and deprived the girl of her right to make an informed choice wether to accept or refuse your booking.
Cant you see that at all   

I'm trying not to be rude here but no one is going to start a text message like that 🤔

[jamiekinkxxx]

I'm trying not to be rude here but no one is going to start a text message like that 🤔

I always used to introduce myself if I’d seen a SP before along those lines and I will do again once I start again in mid May

[jamiekinkxxx]

Yeah- in fact, not only, "really not great" but also, "really not acceptable". 

Like, hurting a girl without her consent, or laughing about disregardng her express requests/ limits. 

I really feel that there are some (and at the risk of cliche, I am sure it will be a small tiny majority of) members of the forum who struggle with the issue of consent when they are paying for sex.  Whether you are paying or not, full consent for everything is utterly non-negotiable.

Payment does not buy consent to anything y0u want to do.  Transgressing the boundaries of what the SP wants is, literally, a criminal offence. 

And, it seems to me, that because we all know that Plod, the Great British Jury, is never, realistically, going to be interested in the (entirley legitimate) complaint of a SP that, "I said, don't do that, but he did it anyway", that actually imposes on us as SP users a higher duty, as there is unlikely to be any external examination of what happens.

And this is not "white knighty" or "fluffy"- it is just be humane and don't abuse other people and then laugh about it.

I would like to think that for 99% of people reading this post, this should be utterly uncontroversial.

+1

I think Stuart should discuss his preferences up front with SP’s so they know the type of sex he enjoys. They can then choose if it’s right for them. There are plenty that do but many that won’t. That way no one gets hurt or disappointed.

[stuart.]

she clearly objected to your "pounding",

You know pounding doesn't mean abusing women? like when I write that I don't mean I'm strangling them or beating them with a baseball bat, it just means to fuck hard and fast and I'm pretty sure many people like to fuck hard and fast especially when the girl is fit

[stuart.]

I always used to introduce myself if I’d seen a SP before along those lines and I will do again once I start again in mid May

Honestly feel like you guys are picking at any little thing that you can against me ☹️

[stuart.]

Even trying to tell me how I should text girls before a punt ridiculous

[scutty brown]

Honestly feel like you guys are picking at any little thing that you can against me ☹️

Maybe because people are trying to tell you something.
Personally I think you're in the same category as the idiot OP in this thread
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=305496.0

[stuart.]

Maybe because people are trying to tell you something.
Personally I think you're in the same category as the idiot OP in this thread
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=305496.0

You really have selective reading you posted an old review of mine and then when I shut you down you have nothing to say 😂 

[Ivor Hunch]

Maybe because people are trying to tell you something.
Personally I think you're in the same category as the idiot OP in this thread
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=305496.0

Agree entirely with this- and all the posts on the cited thread (apart from the OP's obvs)-  well said chaps.

[scutty brown]

You really have selective reading you posted an old review of mine and then when I shut you down you have nothing to say 😂

"Shut me down"??? Only in your imagination
I've no need to say any more as every post you make reinforces the image of you being a domineering aggressive fool

[stuart.]

Agree entirely with this- and all the posts on the cited thread (apart from the OP's obvs)-  well said chaps.

I am not the same as this guy, there's nothing wrong with asking if a service is available via text message before the meet, I would have never facial laylasinclair or NikkiChan if I didn't ask as it was not on their profile

[stuart.]

"Shut me down"??? Only in your imagination
I've no need to say any more as every post you make reinforces the image of you being a domineering aggressive fool

Literally all you can do is throw insults around you cannot argue a point

[scutty brown]

Literally all you can do is throw insults around you cannot argue a point

Any points I needed to make have already been made. I don't need to argue them. I've made my assessment of you, others will either agree or disagree. But carry on posting, each one exposes your mindset further.

[stuart.]

laughing

You think I was laughing in her face when I got cum in her eye?

I put lol here as well doesn't mean I was laughing while Koa was sucking me off

You can take it how you want but it was not in a malicious way

Services
As for services. OWO, Was toothy and a bit painful lol 

[stuart.]

Any points I needed to make have already been made. I don't need to argue them. I've made my assessment of you, others will either agree or disagree. But carry on posting, each one exposes your mindset further.

There you go again you say stuff but with nothing behind it because of lack of brain power

[stuart.]

Not got a problem with you posting old reviews it's the one you picked of a escort that can't even pull together a string of positive reviews constantly gives shit service and just uses her good looks to bring guys in and do as little as possible and basically take guys hard-earned cash and sex with her didn't even last long or the BJ she just put in fuckall effort literally just relying on her looks to make money with no intention of giving good service, if you want to run to her rescue and on her side that's up to you white Knight. Do you think that review should be a positive as well?

You can't respond to this because I won this argument

[stuart.]

Yeah- in fact, not only, "really not great" but also, "really not acceptable". 

Like, hurting a girl without her consent, or laughing about disregardng her express requests/ limits. 

I really feel that there are some (and at the risk of cliche, I am sure it will be a small tiny majority of) members of the forum who struggle with the issue of consent when they are paying for sex.  Whether you are paying or not, full consent for everything is utterly non-negotiable.

Payment does not buy consent to anything y0u want to do.  Transgressing the boundaries of what the SP wants is, literally, a criminal offence. 

And, it seems to me, that because we all know that Plod, the Great British Jury, is never, realistically, going to be interested in the (entirley legitimate) complaint of a SP that, "I said, don't do that, but he did it anyway", that actually imposes on us as SP users a higher duty, as there is unlikely to be any external examination of what happens.

And this is not "white knighty" or "fluffy"- it is just be humane and don't abuse other people and then laugh about it.

I would like to think that for 99% of people reading this post, this should be utterly uncontroversial.

You don't know me and you don't know shit about me you can make me out to be a monster as much as you like

You just sit there behind the internet and passed judgement on me

[scutty brown]

Not got a problem with you posting old reviews it's the one you picked of a escort that can't even pull together a string of positive reviews constantly gives shit service and just uses her good looks to bring guys in and do as little as possible and basically take guys hard-earned cash and sex with her didn't even last long or the BJ she just put in fuckall effort literally just relying on her looks to make money with no intention of giving good service, if you want to run to her rescue and on her side that's up to you white Knight. Do you think that review should be a positive as well?

But whatever you claim is irrelevant when set alongside the fact that she screamed at you to stop because of the way you were treating her

[stuart.]

But whatever you claim is irrelevant when set alongside the fact that she screamed at you to stop because of the way you were treating her

I didn't treat her bad and in my opinion she was a nutcase with a fiery temper

Whatever you do never book Freya from Diva as she will fuck your brains out and pound up and down on your cock intensity as you will see it as being violated, abused and treating bad lol

[Meursault]

This sounds like bollocks

+1

[stuart.]

+1

Are you saying that I fabricated the review from 2018 and this one and the text message she sent me? That's a pretty serious allegation if that's what you are saying

[LLPunting]

More bullocks and your points are bullocks and your detective skills are bullocks you cannot argue your point further that's the point 🤣

He doesn't have to because you're making all his points for him. 

[stuart.]

He doesn't have to because you're making all his points for him.

How?

[stuart.]

He doesn't have to because you're making all his points for him.

Would you prefer if I change this review to a positive?

Should I stop reviewing altogether?

[LLPunting]

This is entertaining but please don’t use the word “retard” - it’s really not great. I’m sure you can be more imaginative with your language creativity

Ah but it is very telling that he uses it.

[stuart.]

I used the same username on UKP Diva and Adultworks and here is my feedback from Adultworks you may recognise some of the escorts

Hidden Image/Members Only

[LLPunting]

Yeah- in fact, not only, "really not great" but also, "really not acceptable". 

Like, hurting a girl without her consent, or laughing about disregardng her express requests/ limits. 

I really feel that there are some (and at the risk of cliche, I am sure it will be a small tiny majority of) members of the forum who struggle with the issue of consent when they are paying for sex.  Whether you are paying or not, full consent for everything is utterly non-negotiable.

Payment does not buy consent to anything y0u want to do.  Transgressing the boundaries of what the SP wants is, literally, a criminal offence. 

And, it seems to me, that because we all know that Plod, the Great British Jury, is never, realistically, going to be interested in the (entirley legitimate) complaint of a SP that, "I said, don't do that, but he did it anyway", that actually imposes on us as SP users a higher duty, as there is unlikely to be any external examination of what happens.

And this is not "white knighty" or "fluffy"- it is just be humane and don't abuse other people and then laugh about it.

I would like to think that for 99% of people reading this post, this should be utterly uncontroversial.

Sadly it is clear from the reviews and comments all over this forum that 99% is an unrealistic estimation.

[LLPunting]

You can't respond to this because I won this argument

Quoting Trumpisms, what a card!

[LLPunting]

I used the same username on UKP Diva and Adultworks and here is my feedback from Adultworks you may recognise some of the escorts

Hidden Image/Members Only

See, you love making other people's points for them.  Thanks by the way.   

[scutty brown]

I used the same username on UKP Diva and Adultworks and here is my feedback from Adultworks you may recognise some of the escorts

Hidden Image/Members Only

Since when has Adultwork feedback had any validity or relevance? Or truth?

[stuart.]

Since when has Adultwork feedback had any validity or relevance? Or truth?

So all these girls are lying?