Sugar Baby?
Masaj
Shemales

Author Topic: Seeking.com in the South West  (Read 73817 times)

Offline T0pgun

Jessica moon, 26, Bristol

Known escort with profile on adultwork
External Link/Members Only

Offline simit

Recent renewal on SA has revealed the following time consumers:

External Link/Members Only
O wow she does believe that everything must be right.  £100 just to meet / have a drink £300 for an intimate encounter - I am not sure that would happen.

External Link/Members Only
This one used to have a profile on AW

External Link/Members Only
She feels like she is just playing around and has no intention of meeting and actually I can't think why I tried to begin with  :crazy:

External Link/Members Only
Serious ambitions above what would be VFM

External Link/Members Only
Money up front and proof of hotel booking.  There is a post in West Midlands about her not being genuine.

That's all for now folks



Offline simit

O yeah, this one really hits my spot but wont respond - any body know anything of her

External Link/Members Only

Online southcoastpunter

O yeah, this one really hits my spot but wont respond - any body know anything of her

External Link/Members Only

I assume you did what she asked ? (ie don't ask for private pics until you have chatted sand in your first message quote  "kittens"  so that she knows you read her profile?) Interesting that she also says "but I also don't like this strange entitlement some "daddies" have on here".......so its not just us guys that think some ladies have "entitlement" issues - some ladies think that some of us guys do too!!

Offline Prifessionallondinguy

I assume you did what she asked ? (ie don't ask for private pics until you have chatted sand in your first message quote  "kittens"  so that she knows you read her profile?) Interesting that she also says "but I also don't like this strange entitlement some "daddies" have on here".......so its not just us guys that think some ladies have "entitlement" issues - some ladies think that some of us guys do too!!

 :D Since we’re often paying a pretty sum surely we’re allowed some thoughts about entitlement?
Her statement says it all really!
I wouldn’t go as far as calling her a “lady”.
« Last Edit: July 13, 2022, 10:43:31 pm by Prifessionallondinguy »

Online southcoastpunter

:D Since we’re often paying a pretty sum surely we’re allowed some thoughts about entitlement?


absolutely yes . i, like many others, stay clear of the "i deserve to be spoilt like the princess I am" lot and others who give off "I am entitled to a luxurious lifestyle" vibes. I was merely pointing out that it appears that a few of them think a few of us give off entitlement vibes (presumably entitlement to have sex with them albeit in exchange for money when it clearly is a mutual consent situation)

Offline Cunning Punt

O yeah, this one really hits my spot but wont respond - any body know anything of her

External Link/Members Only

Intel given is very valuable but it's a lot easier for folks - and you're more likely to get response to your own queries - if you include a location and ideally a profile name with links.  :hi:

The girl you've linked above, location Glos, has been on and off SA for at least 3 years now (and at least 1 previous profile) - with the same headline asking which Star Trek captain guys like.  :unknown:

I contacted her on two occasions, via separate profiles - hers and mine; she read my posts, viewed my profile and did not respond. Probably she didn't fancy me but my instinct is that she hasn't actually had an arrangement. As stated, the comment about 'entitlement' on her profile is very revealing - and probably it is hypocritical, for she no doubt thinks she is entitled to a young Brad Pitt type offering a pot of cash for not a lot.
 
« Last Edit: July 14, 2022, 03:47:48 pm by Cunning Punt »

Offline Palace123

I've always found the best approach is to offer a scale of arrangement based on her time shared with you. Let's be honest, guys aren't looking for girlfriends on there so chances are you will have a great time for a few sessions and then either her (better offer) or you (better girl) will get bored. Best to be up front...polite, charming but direct. no pussy footing around.  That's just been my experience. The ones who are serious will respond...the others will burn your time for nothing.  £300 seems to be the new normal these days for a date. Some want far more...and others will for far less. But that has consistently been the middle ground for a good looking one and I've interviewed for a fair few :).
« Last Edit: July 18, 2022, 10:40:27 pm by Palace123 »
Banned reason: Using the threat of reviews on UKP to gain favours, not understanding the detrimental effect on the site. l
Banned by: daviemac

Online Danj89

Sultrybabe - bath
Insists on deposits prior to meeting or payment for chats due to timewasters in the past.

Offline hamchang

O yeah, this one really hits my spot but wont respond - any body know anything of her

External Link/Members Only

Did you quote "Kittens" in your message? If so it means shes not interested in you lad.

Offline Jake_sully

Hi all,

Been back on Seeking again despite the ridiculous sign up fee…

Just FYI, bit of a time waster, my profile is clear and suggests I’m looking for more intimate meets as part of an arrangement, after a fair few messages describing previous arrangements, what I’m looking for, chat moved to WhatsApp and she then sends a ream of messages saying how she sometimes doesn’t ever want intimacy as part of an arrangement and takes a few meets before she may be interested… I thought perhaps she may change her mind when meeting in person but she didn’t even want to entertain the idea of meeting casually for a coffee or drink etc. so yeh, just to advise those to not waste your time if you are looking for some naked fun…

Bridget xo , Somerset, (near Yeovil)
External Link/Members Only

Offline inalco

She looks hot!

But no good if intimacy is off the table.

Presumably she just wanted a meal out with no hanky panky, how much was she wanting for that out of interest?

I hit lucky once with SA, but was only a mamber for a month.


Offline simping

Jasmine, 24, Bristol

Known escort with profile on adult work
External Link/Members Only

What's her aw profile?

Offline Jake_sully

She looks hot!

But no good if intimacy is off the table.

Presumably she just wanted a meal out with no hanky panky, how much was she wanting for that out of interest?

I hit lucky once with SA, but was only a mamber for a month.



Didn’t get that far to confirm an amount. Also she never shared her picture with me on SA, so can’t actually comment on the rest of her appearance other than her ass…


Offline Palace123

just started another stint after a long lay off....is it me or are the girls more up for it? Maybe its the time of year or maybe I've been fortunate but arranged a first date with a twenty something y/o and straight away back to mine. Prices seem to be higher, but there's still some who seem to be comfortable with £200-300, although more often than in the past I'm hearing 400-500. 
Banned reason: Using the threat of reviews on UKP to gain favours, not understanding the detrimental effect on the site. l
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Hantsolo

just started another stint after a long lay off....is it me or are the girls more up for it? Maybe its the time of year or maybe I've been fortunate but arranged a first date with a twenty something y/o and straight away back to mine. Prices seem to be higher, but there's still some who seem to be comfortable with £200-300, although more often than in the past I'm hearing 400-500.

Have to agree. I've been quoted £400 plus a couple of times and countered with a much lower offer thats been accepted without hesitation from them. Clearly some are still trying it on for the higher rates, but if guys are willing to pay that I can't blame the girl.....although it does give them a false sense of worth!

Offline Palace123

Can I ask what they accepted?  There's such a wide margin of variance here. For sure, the super hotties are looking for sums that only 0.005% can afford regularly. But to be honest, all that princess stuff I find pretty off putting. I still think £250 is a fair price for one date because that £250 soon becomes £500-600 when you add on all the extras of travel, hotel and dinner.


Have to agree. I've been quoted £400 plus a couple of times and countered with a much lower offer thats been accepted without hesitation from them. Clearly some are still trying it on for the higher rates, but if guys are willing to pay that I can't blame the girl.....although it does give them a false sense of worth!
Banned reason: Using the threat of reviews on UKP to gain favours, not understanding the detrimental effect on the site. l
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Cunning Punt

Can I ask what they accepted?  There's such a wide margin of variance here. For sure, the super hotties are looking for sums that only 0.005% can afford regularly. But to be honest, all that princess stuff I find pretty off putting. I still think £250 is a fair price for one date because that £250 soon becomes £500-600 when you add on all the extras of travel, hotel and dinner.

Reckon 250 is generous more than fair, certainly for outside London. If she can host or is going to come to you and not expect any travel money on top or to be taken out for dinner, then that's different.

I've generally done 150-200 precisely because of what you describe, the extra costs including hotel, and I want 3 meets a month. That said, expectations generally have gone up so it's increasingly hard to get an arrangement for no more than 200.

Some girls just calling themselves princess etc don't really mean it but I generally avoid girls who lay it on thick about being "treated like a princess" on their profile.


Offline Palace123

Totally agree, if you are landing 150-200 fair play. I've managed to lock in a couple at £200 but I was willing to walk away if they said more pls. Most I paid was 400 this time so far..I was really apprehensive about paying that much and probably wouldn't again anytime soon...but actually she was a total star...rampant as hell and up for anything. She was only here in the UK for a few days and likes to do this when she's not in her own country. When I chat to these girls they all seem to have found guys who throw insane amounts at them...although it obviously doesn't last long. I've found that The general view is that the girl is willing to be very flexible if she likes you...they seem to prefer it if you to call out the amount so they can decide...that can range between £200 and £2K. Some said the guys even pay them to travel to them and don't even show up. I do believe them as they've no reason to lie after we have had sex. One girl said her guy just gave her a credit card after meeting a few times. It's a different world.   My exp, I find it's best to be really honest...I tell them I'm not a high roller, I like to chat in person, have dinner and great sex... but not always in that order :)

Reckon 250 is generous more than fair, certainly for outside London. If she can host or is going to come to you and not expect any travel money on top or to be taken out for dinner, then that's different.

I've generally done 150-200 precisely because of what you describe, the extra costs including hotel, and I want 3 meets a month. That said, expectations generally have gone up so it's increasingly hard to get an arrangement for no more than 200.

Some girls just calling themselves princess etc don't really mean it but I generally avoid girls who lay it on thick about being "treated like a princess" on their profile.
Banned reason: Using the threat of reviews on UKP to gain favours, not understanding the detrimental effect on the site. l
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Pawgylove

Completely agree, no point lying on a site like SA… everyone knows what they’re there for.
My luck was variable on it, most of the girls have stupid demands and a few of the hot ones are online only. I rarely tend to go for the super hot as they generally have had arrangements with money thrown at them. Most I’ve paid was £350 incl hotel, I fully regretted it cos she def took her pics from flattering angles….. then £250 and now I’ve got two on the go who would take less than £200 cos we get along really well and they’re not so fussed about money. Those tend to be the best for me.

I do have one that’s just at £200 who I see infrequently, but she’s has since joined AW  :lol:

Offline Hantsolo

Can I ask what they accepted?  There's such a wide margin of variance here. For sure, the super hotties are looking for sums that only 0.005% can afford regularly. But to be honest, all that princess stuff I find pretty off putting. I still think £250 is a fair price for one date because that £250 soon becomes £500-600 when you add on all the extras of travel, hotel and dinner.

£200 is my usual if I am providing the hotel, if she can accommodate then I will go to £300. I've paid more as well as less, depends on the girl, how flush I am feeling and how desperate! £250 is a good guide price mate

Offline Cunning Punt

if you are landing 150-200 fair play.

My exp, I find it's best to be really honest...I tell them I'm not a high roller, I like to chat in person, have dinner and great sex... but not always in that order :)

Admittedly, it's a struggle now getting any arrangements, let alone for 150-200 price point. I have a fairly limited budget based on the fact I like to have 2/3 meets a month because I don't have a OH and I'm too old and ugly to succeed on other dating sites/real life.

I stress that I am looking for regular and long term, as long as there is chemistry of course, which helps in the negotiating. If they have common sense, they recognise the opportunity of a regular arrangemnt at 200 or even 150, 3 x a month is better than a one-off at 300. And just generally coming across as a regular rather than a one-off chancer is more appealing.

I agree with being honest; in fact I deliberately downplay expectations by saying if they're looking for significant financial support then they perhaps should look elsewhere. From my POV, it's not just cost, it's dynamic; if a girl is almost entirely focused on cash then that is reflected in their demeanour, body language and attitude etc.

Offline Palace123

I do really enjoy the diversity of SA, one date can be with a 24 year old, the next with 40+ . It's also surprising that they are not all on hard times, some have plenty of money. A couple of girls I spoke to said they prefer it as they have been in difficult relationships and this has clearer borders . Then of course there are the desperate ones...not many but some who seem to want to get you to meet them immediately and are quite happy to message first. That sounds good but I find it a little off putting in reality, its still dating at the end of the day..a little chase feels much better in reward.

Fyi..I've seen the same scam recently around travel, wanting tickets costs to be paid into pay pal up front but refusing to give email address. Or the old...I've lost my phone as soon as you ask for a video chat. I prefer to video chat everyone now if only for a minute or two, it's saved me a couple of no-shows as they clearly weren't the person in the pics if they refuse.  it's no guarantee but it does at least remove the catfishes and guys who work behind stolen pics. Blackmail was a big thing last time I was on there, doesn't seem so bad this time. Fortunately I'm not married and I suspect my boss would just laugh, but others may have more to lose..in my advice, don't give out any real personal information whatsoever until you meet in person and definitely do not use WhatsApp as it links to all social media accounts. Telegram or snapchat is better.

« Last Edit: July 26, 2022, 06:52:21 am by Palace123 »
Banned reason: Using the threat of reviews on UKP to gain favours, not understanding the detrimental effect on the site. l
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Cunning Punt

I prefer to video chat everyone now if only for a minute or two, it's saved me a couple of no-shows as they clearly weren't the person in the pics if they refuse.  it's no guarantee but it does at least remove the catfishes and guys who work behind stolen pics.

In addition to the above, video calls reduce the likelihood of no shows because a) you can judge better the girl's demeanour/personality and how bothered she is and b) it makes you 'real' in their eyes and gives you a chance to establish a rapport sometimes not possible in texts. Girls are more likely to flake on someone who they've not seen and is anonymous to them, and they don't know if there is any chance of chemistry.

in my advice, don't give out any real personal information whatsoever until you meet in person and definitely do not use WhatsApp as it links to all social media accounts. Telegram or snapchat is better.

I've found girls who insist on Kik or Telegram are a waste of time for whatever reason, ie pics sellers or pros or just timewasters. No idea about SC - I'm too old for it, I reckon.

WhatsApp is a better platform and used by most SDs and SBs. The answer is simple: Use a punting phone or SIM and don't link it to access your real personal social media accounts.

Offline JimmySW

Olivia Attwood: Getting Filthy Rich is on the ITV hub and she does Sugar Babies this week - very interesting!

External Link/Members Only
« Last Edit: July 27, 2022, 08:16:10 am by JimmySW »

Offline Palace123

Yes agree...second phone far more preferable and the IM accounts which don't have phone numbers attached do attract more scammers. for me, WhatsApp is no problem but I'm guessing for some, they should be very careful. I've already had some black dude call to black mail me, left a message saying he he didn't want to come round and visit me but he had all my social accounts etc. I suggested he popped round at his earliest convenience for his lovely surprise that will be waiting for him when he arrives. He didn't phone again after that. (True).

In addition to the above, video calls reduce the likelihood of no shows because a) you can judge better the girl's demeanour/personality and how bothered she is and b) it makes you 'real' in their eyes and gives you a chance to establish a rapport sometimes not possible in texts. Girls are more likely to flake on someone who they've not seen and is anonymous to them, and they don't know if there is any chance of chemistry.

I've found girls who insist on Kik or Telegram are a waste of time for whatever reason, ie pics sellers or pros or just timewasters. No idea about SC - I'm too old for it, I reckon.

WhatsApp is a better platform and used by most SDs and SBs. The answer is simple: Use a punting phone or SIM and don't link it to access your real personal social media accounts.
Banned reason: Using the threat of reviews on UKP to gain favours, not understanding the detrimental effect on the site. l
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Cunning Punt

Anyone had any dealings with this one?
CuteElsa, 24, Gloucester
External Link/Members Only

Very professional photos on profile, brief responses, moves to kik not WA (claims her account has been spammed), then her short convo sounds like a bloke. Kik doesn't have a video call facility so I will probably pass.


Char94, Gloucester
External Link/Members Only

Not met this one but had conversation and caution needed, so anyone who's considering her can PM me for info.
« Last Edit: August 05, 2022, 10:00:30 pm by Cunning Punt »

Offline simit

Char94 messaged me to start a chat, which is mostly unheard of.  I said thanks but no thanks

Offline markxj

Anyone had any dealings with this one?
CuteElsa, 24, Gloucester
External Link/Members Only
I'm interested; pm me!

Very professional photos on profile, brief responses, moves to kik not WA (claims her account has been spammed), then her short convo sounds like a bloke. Kik doesn't have a video call facility so I will probably pass.


Char94, Gloucester
External Link/Members Only

Not met this one but had conversation and caution needed, so anyone who's considering her can PM me for info.

Offline Cunning Punt



If you meant CuteElsa, then not got any info to share or pm you about; I explained what dealings I've had and suspicions, and was asking if anyone had interacted.  :rolleyes:

Offline Doombar

If you meant CuteElsa, then not got any info to share or pm you about; I explained what dealings I've had and suspicions, and was asking if anyone had interacted.  :rolleyes:
I had the same initial experience as you.  As soon as she said she uses kik I lost interest.

Offline Palace123

Curious to know whether guys here say they are looking for long term or not?  Faithful or casual arrangements?

Interested to hear your views?
Banned reason: Using the threat of reviews on UKP to gain favours, not understanding the detrimental effect on the site. l
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Palace123

Wanted online first...time waster it seems.

if it's the same girl it's unlikely she will Fuck for £100 I had a arranged to see her last week and agreed at £200 She never turned up and when challenged she says her price that SD's pay is £300 a meet
Banned reason: Using the threat of reviews on UKP to gain favours, not understanding the detrimental effect on the site. l
Banned by: daviemac

Online southcoastpunter

Curious to know whether guys here say they are looking for long term or not?  Faithful or casual arrangements?

Interested to hear your views?

yes i say that i am seeking long term - because I am. And many ladies seek that too. Unless they are just WG's on seeking but i don't go for those. Its hard enough to find a good one let alone a good different one every time or every 3rd time etc.

I usually have 2 or 3 LT ones on the go at the same time and tell them!

Offline Cunning Punt

Curious to know whether guys here say they are looking for long term or not?  Faithful or casual arrangements?

Interested to hear your views?

Yes, say long term and also regular if there's chemistry of course, that is more likely to reassure genuine girls and you may be able to get a lower ppm if there's the prospect of it being 2/3 times a month. But you're still being honest. Of course, most of the time there isn't really much chemistry and it doesn't last very long but I always go in with the intention of it working out.

Pro types aren't usually fussed as SCP suggests.

I don't usually refer to it being monogamous/faithful - that might put some girls off, and I may not be faithful. If a SB actually asks for monogamy (rare), then you need to make a decision.
« Last Edit: August 09, 2022, 06:33:25 pm by Cunning Punt »

Offline Doombar

CreativeMusician
External Link/Members Only

Just a warning about this one.  She is a scammer who is just looking to get money in return for some stock photos and vids.

She has no interest in meet ups. Will send voice messages and make lots of false promises to get money out of you.
« Last Edit: August 17, 2022, 12:50:48 pm by Doombar »

Offline Palace123

Another warning this time for : SultryActress In Bristol.  I would provide a link but she blocked me when she realised she was going to get nothing from me.

Date arranged...the old classic, text on the day saying she's run out of money...sob story about fraud and asking for some of the arrangement up front. Told her what I thought about that...needless to say never happened.

I kept seeing her profile as featured which had raised alarm bells before...the pics I saw suggested she needed no help attracting guys. Now its clear that it was to maximise scams. Given the amount of time she spent on trying to get me on the hook, this person would probably make more money stacking shelves than trying to scam people for the odd £100. Must be the most lowest paid job ever.

Bloody scammers are at it in the South West like crazy. Beware of very posh accent, this person is using multiple profiles. I had the same voice from the above on a different profile when exchanging voice notes.
« Last Edit: August 25, 2022, 06:28:50 pm by Palace123 »
Banned reason: Using the threat of reviews on UKP to gain favours, not understanding the detrimental effect on the site. l
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Cunning Punt

Another warning this time for : SultryActress In Bristol.  I would provide a link but she blocked me when she realised she was going to get nothing from me.

Date arranged...the old classic, text on the day saying she's run out of money...sob story about fraud and asking for some of the arrangement up front. Told her what I thought about that...needless to say never happened.

I kept seeing her profile as featured which had raised alarm bells before...the pics I saw suggested she needed no help attracting guys. Now its clear that it was to maximise scams. Given the amount of time she spent on trying to get me on the hook, this person would probably make more money stacking shelves than trying to scam people for the odd £100. Must be the most lowest paid job ever.

Bloody scammers are at it in the South West like crazy. Beware of very posh accent, this person is using multiple profiles. I had the same voice from the above on a different profile when exchanging voice notes.

Here you go:
External Link/Members Only

You can still click on their profile to get the url even if you're blocked. Just got to the message thread and click on the thumbnail picture (crossed out).

Offline Maverick090

I met up with sultry actress in Bristol last week, met in a bar and went off to a hotel. Had no issues with her would definitely recommend, smashing body and a great attitude. When reading your posts it’s almost of a different person. We have arranged to meet up again?

Offline jamieb28

Anyone got any contact details for any girls in exeter area ? Worth a try, gonna sign up one day if I can stomach the sign on fee

Online southcoastpunter

Anyone got any contact details for any girls in exeter area ? Worth a try, gonna sign up one day if I can stomach the sign on fee

No one is going to (or should) give you CONTACT details of a lady off SA. It free to join and look, its only when you want to message a lady or read a message from a lady that you need to subscribe.
« Last Edit: September 10, 2022, 03:43:14 pm by southcoastpunter »

Offline bristolnick

O yeah, this one really hits my spot but wont respond - any body know anything of her

External Link/Members Only

I have meet her in real life  after chatting on other sites. She's very laid back and fun to be around, she is Poly so won't get with someone thats not

Offline Palace123

I met up with sultry actress in Bristol last week, met in a bar and went off to a hotel. Had no issues with her would definitely recommend, smashing body and a great attitude. When reading your posts it’s almost of a different person. We have arranged to meet up again?

Glad you had a good time...100% not a different person unless someone else is operating her profile...which on there is not beyond the realms of possibilities. Although a leopard doesn't change its spots. Exercise caution if I were you. She was charming as can be until I said no to giving her money up front. If she was genuine in her excuse and was scammed herself, which nobody thinks for a second she was...the last person would ask for a sub from the date you would go on that very day. My feeling is she gets through a ton of guys, she's a premium member without showing it, featured all the time. Slightly off putting to me personally.
« Last Edit: September 11, 2022, 10:42:45 am by Palace123 »
Banned reason: Using the threat of reviews on UKP to gain favours, not understanding the detrimental effect on the site. l
Banned by: daviemac

Offline PunterSthompson

I keep having my profile shut down saying I am soliciting for sex.
Happened to anyone else?
Two profiles, both different email addresses.
I hadn’t paid a subscription fee so had yet to message anyone.
So I hadn’t solicited anyone.
Not using a home computer either, my IP address was blocked.

Offline Palace123

I imagine it’s linking your profile with an old one you used , were you a paying member once? Perhaps they use payment card to do this. Can’t suggest sex for money on there , if someone takes offence then they can report you and this will trigger the block. Even the term PPM is not allowed I’ve heard. Just have to be carful in how you frame the arrangements and always move the discussion to what’s app. If they are serious they will give you their number, it’s a good filter to be honest. But if you’re not a paying member then I guess you’re not that serious anyway so nothing lost right?
« Last Edit: September 13, 2022, 07:06:45 am by Palace123 »
Banned reason: Using the threat of reviews on UKP to gain favours, not understanding the detrimental effect on the site. l
Banned by: daviemac

Offline PunterSthompson

I've been a paying member for years on and off. Come and go with a new profile each tim and anew email address.
I have used the same payment cards previously, however the last profile I set up I hadn't subscribed. So no payment card to link and no email address to link.
My profile was neutral with no mention of PPM or propositions. And as I said, no messages to anyone.
I find it strange how I have been shut down.

Online southcoastpunter

in that case, perhaps its something in your profile that they don't like or something is linking to your old/other profiles. Maybe pics? or your IP address?

Offline Palace123

I've been a paying member for years on and off. Come and go with a new profile each tim and anew email address.
I have used the same payment cards previously, however the last profile I set up I hadn't subscribed. So no payment card to link and no email address to link.
My profile was neutral with no mention of PPM or propositions. And as I said, no messages to anyone.
I find it strange how I have been shut down.

 Have you raised it with their support team?
Banned reason: Using the threat of reviews on UKP to gain favours, not understanding the detrimental effect on the site. l
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Hantsolo

Couple of potentials I'm chatting to, anyone had the pleasure?

BeliveInYou    Cirencester. Classy looking MILF....sure I have seen her mentioned on a previous profile
External Link/Members Only

PrettySinger   Bournemouth.
External Link/Members Only