Deep tissue and sports massage therapist (Massage only) - Halesowen

[Putin89]

External Link/Members Only

There have been a number of posts about this service in "Fit White Masseuse - Birmingham"

This is not Tantric Tasha from Stourbridge.

Comms : very good and easy all by text, texts included this is not a sexual service and no other services are available. Spoke to her just prior to visit.

Parking : lots of easy parking nearby

Meeting : she is very stunning, early twenties, fit, toned, tanned, wearing sports bra and tight leggings.
Massage on table in lounge, all very clean and tidy.
Competent sports massage. Friendly conversation all the way through.
Spoke about extras and definitely not available.
I had asked for a shower that she had agreed to, but she said I couldn't as there wasn't time. She is very busy and has clients back to back.

Coast : £90 for 90 minutes

I gave the review a negative as no extras, expensive and I left frustrated.

[bonham]

External Link/Members Only

There have been a number of posts about this service in "Fit White Masseuse - Birmingham"

This is not Tantric Tasha from Stourbridge.

Comms : very good and easy all by text, texts included this is not a sexual service and no other services are available. Spoke to her just prior to visit.

Parking : lots of easy parking nearby

Meeting : she is very stunning, early twenties, fit, toned, tanned, wearing sports bra and tight leggings.
Massage on table in lounge, all very clean and tidy.
Competent sports massage. Friendly conversation all the way through.
Spoke about extras and definitely not available.
I had asked for a shower that she had agreed to, but she said I couldn't as there wasn't time. She is very busy and has clients back to back.

Coast : £90 for 90 minutes

I gave the review a negative as no extras, expensive and I left frustrated.

Thanks for review Putin89 was it covered massage
Was massage good has some like to go for a good massage even if no extras thanks

[Putin89]

Yes it was a good sports massage!
Massage was covered, but with a large throw that I found to hot, I asked to remove when I was facing down.
When I was on my back I got her to use a small towel!

[bonham]

Yes it was a good sports massage!
Massage was covered, but with a large throw that I found to hot, I asked to remove when I was facing down.
When I was on my back I got her to use a small towel!

[JontyR]

Your review so your rating but the only thing I can see warranting a negative here is that you didn't get to have a shower - but it seems you could have had if you asked earlier. Bit pricey perhaps but you got what you agreed to for the price.

She was clear there was no extras.

[alabama1]

Your review so your rating but the only thing I can see warranting a negative here is that you didn't get to have a shower - but it seems you could have had if you asked earlier. Bit pricey perhaps but you got what you agreed to for the price.

She was clear there was no extras.

He said that he gave the negative as no extras were on offer 

[JontyR]

Yeah, I know. If she said there were and then there weren't then yep - get the red bold letters out.

But when she does (or doesn't) what she says then I don't see what the issue is.

[teddyking]

I think this is an unfair negative. She was clear there would be no sexual interaction before the massage and secondly you knew exactly how much you would be paying.

[RobT22]

Surely a positive. She was competent,  friendly, chatty, a bit of a stunner, well dressed for the job at hand, did what she offered at the agreed price. Poor girl. What more could she do???

[tesla]

I think this is an unfair negative. She was clear there would be no sexual interaction before the massage and secondly you knew exactly how much you would be paying.

I agree, sexual services were off the table before the massage started, you got exactly what you booked bar the shower

[alabama1]

Yeah, I know. If she said there were and then there weren't then yep - get the red bold letters out.

But when she does (or doesn't) what she says then I don't see what the issue is.

Yeah, you are right. Should be a positive. 

[Putin89]

I had asked for shower in texts and she had agreed that I could have one.

I do like the WSWS.....Will She Won't She side to massages......but this is DEFINITELY WON'T!
That was my experience!

I stick by my NEGATIVE, as after all this is a legit straight massage and UK Punting is not a site for reviewing straight massages!

[bonham]

This is where confusion sets in we try out these massage girls get a good massage and leave negative I've had a few messages and left positive if massage been good and a few I've kept going back as some were very sensual and ended up naturist but with no happy ending

[teddyking]

I had asked for shower in texts and she had agreed that I could have one.

I do like the WSWS.....Will She Won't She side to massages......but this is DEFINITELY WON'T!
That was my experience!

I stick by my NEGATIVE, as after all this is a legit straight massage and UK Punting is not a site for reviewing straight massages!

Sounds like a positive in my book 👍
Sounds like you tried your luck with a HE and got rejected so came here to ruin her reputation🤧

Also the only reason you didn’t get a shower was because you ran out of time so the SP has a right to refuse a shower when she has another client waiting.

[mr.bluesky]

You could have gave her a neutral rating. A positive for the massage but a negative for no happy ending. Although you were made aware of no extras on offer. It's good you posted a review of her as this makes it clear to everyone that a massage is all you will get.

[bonham]

On top off all this we're very gratefull for the review 

[JontyR]

I stick by my NEGATIVE, as after all this is a legit straight massage and UK Punting is not a site for reviewing straight massages!

Yes it is. And if you think otherwise then why are you reviewing it at all?

I do like the WSWS.....Will She Won't She side to massages......but this is DEFINITELY WON'T!
That was my experience!

As she told you before you turned up.

I had asked for shower in texts and she had agreed that I could have one.

Well as you have doubled down... when you propositioned her after she had seemingly done everything she could have reasonably done to avoid it  - she was within her rights to show you the door then and there. I am not surprised she wanted you off the premises straight away.

If there is an equivalent of SAAFE for legit massage providers you could have no complaints if your details have been shared and the only "will she won't she" aspect you will have is if they answer the phone or will you have been blocked.

[Putin89]

On top off all this we're very gratefull for the review 

Thanks Bonham

[teddyking]

Yes it is. And if you think otherwise then why are you reviewing it at all?

As she told you before you turned up.

Well as you have doubled down... when you propositioned her after she had seemingly done everything she could have reasonably done to avoid it  - she was within her rights to show you the door then and there. I am not surprised she wanted you off the premises straight away.

If there is an equivalent of SAAFE for legit massage providers you could have no complaints if your details have been shared and the only "will she won't she" aspect you will have is if they answer the phone or will you have been blocked.

Seems like OP is ruining her rep for not getting the HE he wanted even tho the SP told her no chance in the book process. A shower refusal is obv a cover for this and any how, you expected a shower after your time was up. She’s on my HL , thanks OP 👍

[shed]

Seems like OP is ruining her rep for not getting the HE he wanted even tho the SP told her no chance in the book process. A shower refusal is obv a cover for this and any how, you expected a shower after your time was up. She’s on my HL , thanks OP 👍

Just speculation that post. You cannot justify any of the content. The OP did a review and it's his rating. So it should be respected whatever the reason, even if others disagree. The review is appreciated and so we should encourage him to do more. 

[lamboman]

Comical negative,like going to my dentist who is quite fit and giving her a neg because she didn't wank me off whilst doing a filling.
Needs changing.

[Cryton123]

For what it’s worth, I’d say the rating is neither here nor there. She’s clearly offering a legit service so unlikely anyone else is going to see her and ask her to beat their meat.

Personally I wouldn’t have given it a negative but it’s still a worthy review because it’s offering information and could stop other punters getting into awkward situations with her.

I’m still tempted tbh, she looks fit as fuck and there’s nowt wrong with a good sports massage to loosen the knots! I’ll just make sure I don’t approach the subject of a sneaky wank 

[Jonf12]

Whatever happened to the freedom of thought, speech and opinion! I would request all those people who think this should have been positive to have a session with her and come back and write a review, I don’t think anyone has any right to tell the OP how his rating should be.
It’s his opinion and his alone, shouldn’t be anyone else’s business tbh!

[Jonf12]

Comical negative,like going to my dentist who is quite fit and giving her a neg because she didn't wank me off whilst doing a filling.
Needs changing.

Probably the lamest comparison ever made!
Okay, let’s be honest here, how many of the SPs write “no sexual services”  in their GT/VS AD and is exactly the opposite when you meet them. so, there is nothing wrong is expecting extras even though the AD/SP explicitly mentioned otherwise as it’s most likely than not you’ll get something more.

[JJDelta]

Thanks OP, although you're getting stick for the review. I agree with you, your review has informed punters of what to expect. No extras = negative. 

[seandana]

Probably the lamest comparison ever made!
Okay, let’s be honest here, how many of the SPs write “no sexual services”  in their GT/VS AD and is exactly the opposite when you meet them. so, there is nothing wrong is expecting extras even though the AD/SP explicitly mentioned otherwise as it’s most likely than not you’ll get something more.

+1 Jonf12 ,I have been in the room with a masseuse and she answers the phone to a new potential customer and says no extra and no sex over the phone , 10 minutes later she sucking my cock to completion , all i will say to the OP is, its your review and your rating ,obviously some fan boys don't like their lady getting a Red

[Jonf12]

+1 Jonf12 ,I have been in the room with a masseuse and she answers the phone to a new potential customer and says no extra and no sex over the phone , 10 minutes later she sucking my cock to completion , all i will say to the OP its your review and your rating ,obviously some fan boys don't like their lady getting a Red

 

[Straightsix]

I remember going to see Sladunka in Walsall on the recommendations from this site.
No extras indeed.....😆

[bonham]

I dont care if he puts a negative or a positive we all know what's on offer now he's took one for all massage lovers and saves the next punter having to wonder wether to book her or not.  tofts are more important in massage because you can take your bag away still full.
When you toft a sex worker even a negative you go away with bag empty 

[JontyR]

Nah, sorry. Don't agree.

Bait and switch. Negative.
Not delivering on agreed services. Negative. 

Doing what you say you will for the price you agree. Negging for that seems more than harsh... its like fluffiness but the other way.

Extras...the clue is in the name. If she's even hinted at something may be on offer then yeah, fine, if you must.

Not a fan boy. Never seen her. Probably never will. Just think we need to have some level of consistency here.

On an aside...if anyone's got a link to that dentist.

[mr.bluesky]

I dont care if he puts a negative or a positive we all know what's on offer now he's took one for all massage lovers and saves the next punter having to wonder wether to book her or not.  tofts are more important in massage because you can take your bag away still full.
When you toft a sex worker even a negative you go away with bag empty 

100% agree 

[houseboot]

Yes it is. And if you think otherwise then why are you reviewing it at all?
Nun
As she told you before you turned up.

Well as you have doubled down... when you propositioned her after she had seemingly done everything she could have reasonably done to avoid it  - she was within her rights to show you the door then and there. I am not surprised she wanted you off the premises straight away.

If there is an equivalent of SAAFE for legit massage providers you could have no complaints if your details have been shared and the only "will she won't she" aspect you will have is if they answer the phone or will you have been blocked.

Why is he reviewing her? ..... because he was asked to due to the nonsense on a previous thread about her identity.

www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=293958.msg3064543#msg3064543

As she told you before you turned up ..... He said, "Spoke to her just prior to visit." How do you know what was said?

When you propositioned her .... Que? How does, "Spoke about extras and definitely not available", equate with "propositioning her"?

[houseboot]

Seems like OP is ruining her rep for not getting the HE he wanted even tho the SP told her no chance in the book process. A shower refusal is obv a cover for this and any how, you expected a shower after your time was up. She’s on my HL , thanks OP 👍

"Ruining her reputation" Is a somewhat dramatic over reaction.

Personally, I would have rated "Positive" based on his description but your claim that he has ruined her reputation is complete tosh.

[Jaymes]

Don’t see how this can stay a negative. She was attractive and did what she said she would for the agreed price.

[Jayne_cobb]

"Ruining her reputation" Is a somewhat dramatic over reaction.

Personally, I would have rated "Positive" based on his description but your claim that he has ruined her reputation is complete tosh.

You could say he’s done the complete opposite- he’s built up her reputation as a legit massage provider.
So now if anyone google’s her they will see this review and know she’s legit.
No one looking for therapeutic massages is going to use ukpunting as a reference 

[Memphis87]

Same

Thanks OP, although you're getting stick for the review. I agree with you, your review has informed punters of what to expect. No extras = negative. 

[teddyking]

^

I don’t understand your logic for giving a masseur a negative if she made it abundantly clear there are strictly no extras ? 🙄🙄

If we use this same logic then most of these posts should be given a negative if punters expect a normal SP to give them CIMs and Anal etc (when they don’t offer it). On the basis of a massage service , the negative should be changed to a positive by a mod

[0ralist]

OP went there looking to get his cock tugged and it didn't happen, obviously he did find her attractive and was pissed he couldn't get extras that she didn't agree on from the very start and that warrants a negative from him ....

Thanks for the review, but all it has done is make you look bad.

But thanks all the same.
 

[Philloveit21]

Defo a sore looser, just not fair on the SP

[Paris69]

I don't agree.
The OP can give her any rating he wants. That's his right and in this case, disappointment at not getting tugged is his justification for his rating. Doesn't matter whether she said 'no' beforehand or not. We are allowed to be disappointed for whatever emotional reason we want.

How many have had a decent punt but in our heads given it an average simply cos we didnt find the girl attractive. It's all relevant... the next guy might think she is a 10.

It's up to us whether we agree with the rating, or accept it and then make our own minds up on whether his grading was fair or not.... Then make the choice whether to book, or not.

Irrespective of my own opinion, i'd use his review as research on whether i booked or not.... Not simply say 'Negative' i cant therefore justify going.....

[Jonf12]

I don't agree.
The OP can give her any rating he wants. That's his right and in this case, disappointment at not getting tugged is his justification for his rating. Doesn't matter whether she said 'no' beforehand or not. We are allowed to be disappointed for whatever emotional reason we want.

How many have had a decent punt but in our heads given it an average simply cos we didnt find the girl attractive. It's all relevant... the next guy might think she is a 10.

It's up to us whether we agree with the rating, or accept it and then make our own minds up on whether his grading was fair or not.... Then make the choice whether to book, or not.

Irrespective of my own opinion, i'd use his review as research on whether i booked or not.... Not simply say 'Negative' i cant therefore justify going.....

+1, these fanboys are getting butthurt, lol. Maybe if they cared so much they should write their own reviews than trying to be a saviour for the SP on someone else’s review. Losers!!

[teddyking]

Defo a sore looser, just not fair on the SP

+1
Glad some people see sense and we need to loosen up this toxic culture against SPs lmao. Seeing facts over some emotional punter that voluntarily cucked himself will only make this forum more useful and fair for everyone IMO

[Jonf12]

+1
Glad some people see sense and we need to loosen up this toxic culture against SPs lmao. Seeing facts over some emotional punter that voluntarily cucked himself will only make this forum more useful and fair for everyone IMO

My previous reply was just for fanboys like you! Have you had a massage session with her yet?
If Yes, write your own review and stop being a crybaby on someone else’s post.
If No, then you have absolutely no right whatsoever to judge someone else opinion who has actually gone and met her.

[Philloveit21]

Paris69 you agree with he’s negative review ? I’m not going to make an appointment with an SP if she’s not advertising what I want , I wouldn’t book a genuine massage if no extras were on offer especially if I’d confirmed on the phone no extras on offer , and then go for the massage and do a neutral review because I got no extras ,that’s  just not fair , if someone sees a SP and extras are advertised then the extras are not offered then by all means we have a right to give a neutral review ?

[Philloveit21]

Sorry I mean negative not neutral

[southern boy]

As it has been said before many say no extras are on offer on their adverts and over the phone but are then offered when you arrive so fair play to Putin  to let everyone know there's no chance.
It would have been a negative from me too 

[Philloveit21]

But he was happy with the service advertised , so why would he post a negative , just sour grapes cuz he was gagging but didn’t get what he wanted cuz what he wanted was firmly stated on the advert and verbally , no extras

[Jonf12]

But he was happy with the service advertised , so why would he post a negative , just sour grapes cuz he was gagging but didn’t get what he wanted cuz what he wanted was firmly stated on the advert and verbally , no extras

I would suggest that you take some time to read the previous replies on this thread before writing nonsense. Makes you look like a fool tbh.

[Bush]

My opinion for what it’s worth
...if you go for WSWS (which I never do to avoid frustration) then you have to accept disappointment but that should not in itself lead to a negative review
...I don’t think any poster can expect to have reviews protected from criticism......we all learn from critics! Defend the criticism by all means but don’t cry ‘you have no right to criticise’
...in this case I’d be reluctant to pay £90 for 90 mins and take a chance when the parameters are pretty well known.

Thanks for the review.....it’s generated a good debate

[teddyking]

Many people on this thread are clutching at straws at this point ... the fact someone mentioned another bloke received a HE from a totally different SP on similar circumstances should have no affiliation to this SP at all.

This whole debate is comical. If a SP says extras aren’t on the cards before payment then a punter should abide by this full stop. To then give a negative when extras weren’t provided is OP owns judgement but obv one most people on this thread don’t agree with