Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Sweet_Katrina - Whitechapel  (Read 19730 times)

Festisio

  • Guest
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Saw Katrina's profile while doing some last minute AW browsing today.  Good comms on phone.

Based in a flat a short walk from Whitechapel station.  Works with another pro$$ie who I could hear entertaining a punter.  Did not run into each other however.

She is really pretty.  I know it's a dreadful AW cliche, but she is hotter and younger looking in the flesh.  Great body, although does look like a cesarean scar is there - fairly faint.  Very giggly, reasonable English but not fluent.  Shower is available.

Lots of kissing, great BJ.  Milks every last drop for CIM.  Enjoys RO and fingering.  Sweet tasting, good hygiene.  Second round lots of fucking.  She is not very deep (may have hit her cervix once at the start, guess that's my fault for her not being aroused enough  :lol:) and I think if you are very well endowed it may be a problem.  Didn't clock-watch at all. 

Great value, best sub £100 /hr punt I've had.  Would smash it again.

8/10
« Last Edit: May 03, 2014, 09:15:11 pm by Festisio »

LL

  • Guest
Thanks for the review.  She's been on one of my hotlists for a while.  I've now moved her to my list of "must sees".

password02

  • Guest
Thanks for the review - is she a large lady? maybe a size 12 or would you consider her more a size 8/10? if the latter then I would consider her to be added to my HL

Festisio

  • Guest
Not large at all definitely not 12.  In fact I was expecting her to be bigger than she is.  Thin arms.  Not massively toned though.

Offline El Jefe

Is she a smoker? did you smell it on her during kissing? Just asking because it's a turn off for me.

If shes not a smoker she is going on my hotlist.

Offline Steve2

For those who think sub £100 is too cheap, you can book her here

 :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Offline Meursault

Exactly Steve,
Value is out there. This is what happens when the girls realise that the pimps (agencies included) take too much AND they can work when they want to, not when they are told to.

Festisio

  • Guest
Is she a smoker? did you smell it on her during kissing? Just asking because it's a turn off for me.

If shes not a smoker she is going on my hotlist.

Not a smoker.  That's my number one hate.  Great oral hygiene.


For those who think sub £100 is too cheap, you can book her here

 :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

I wonder if they're using stolen and photoshopped photos or if she works via them as well.  I'll have to ask her if I see her again as there's no outcall option listed on the AW page.

Jason

  • Guest
I am sure Festisio met with a different girl. Admiral pictures are always 100% genuine (notice also that they are more in number than the just three in the main AW profile and of better resolution- not sure about all these PG pictures, has anyone checked them?) and most importantly they never lie about the location. If Admiral says Paddington W2 it is 100% there. Semi-independent girls (i.e. those who advertise in AW and in agencies) work from the same premises and don't change locations as it their OWN premises (not agency ones). In this Aw profile she says she works in Aldgate/Whitechapel.

As she is good punt save her phone number: 07970994388. But I will report her to Adultwork. If the pictures are indeed hers (I am certain they are not but anyway) when they will check against her verification and PG pictures they will do nothing. But don't get surprised if the profile is deleted as I am adamant it is a B&S.

Festisio

  • Guest
I am sure Festisio met with a different girl. Admiral pictures are always 100% genuine

But I will report her to Adultwork. If the pictures are indeed hers (I am certain they are not but anyway) when they will check against her verification and PG pictures they will do nothing. But don't get surprised if the profile is deleted as I am adamant it is a B&S.

I am sure I didn't.  How dare you say that you jumped up little weirdo.

I hope someone else sees her from here so they can confirm it, and then you can apologize.

Also I like the way you say Admiral's pictures are 100% genuine when they have removed that tat she has (which I saw yesterday) and photoshopped to hell.

Cunt.
« Last Edit: May 04, 2014, 10:58:29 am by Festisio »

Offline Sedlmayer

I am sure Festisio met with a different girl. Admiral pictures are always 100% genuine (notice also that they are more in number than the just three in the main AW profile and of better resolution- not sure about all these PG pictures, has anyone checked them?) and most importantly they never lie about the location. If Admiral says Paddington W2 it is 100% there. Semi-independent girls (i.e. those who advertise in AW and in agencies) work from the same premises and don't change locations as it their OWN premises (not agency ones). In this Aw profile she says she works in Aldgate/Whitechapel.

As she is good punt save her phone number: 07970994388. But I will report her to Adultwork. If the pictures are indeed hers (I am certain they are not but anyway) when they will check against her verification and PG pictures they will do nothing. But don't get surprised if the profile is deleted as I am adamant it is a B&S.

What on earth makes you say this against the word of someone who has actually seen her very recently? Blind faith in an Agency FFS? Do you work for them BTW?

Jason

  • Guest
What on earth makes you say this against the word of someone who has actually seen her very recently? Blind faith in an Agency FFS? Do you work for them BTW?

How many times do you spot a discrepancy between photoshopped pictures and the real thing? What I said is that Festisio may attributed the discrepancy to photshop instead of actually realising that it’s a totally different girl. It is not the first time that this has happened. Look for example the following review and you will understand: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=17124.msg265790#msg265790

Offline Steve2

When I googled the Adultwork pics I think the hits came from 2012, so in 2 years she almost certainly has moved

Festers and I often do not see eye to eye but I certainly wouldn't cast doubt on any of his reviews

 :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:

Jason

  • Guest
When I googled the Adultwork pics I think the hits came from 2012, so in 2 years she almost certainly has moved
When I wrote my first of the two posts above I didn’t notice that she is not anymore listed in Admiral’s viewable gallery and that the link above is to a hidden page in their server (presumably storing their previous escorts). The other agency (citylondonescorts) says that she is not available. Also having re-examined the AW profile pictures which albeit professional they are not heavily photoshopped (actually they may not retouched at all) I will say that there is a third very possible scenario: The girl used to work for agencies in the past but NOT ANYMORE and she now works solely as an independent and she displays the non-photoshopped version of her professional pics (which were taken in 2012). This is a very different case from working simultaneously for agencies and as an indie and explains the difference in the stated location (which was my strongest argument as Type A agencies like Admirals are up to date with their girls locations). 

Still what makes me being a bit reluctant believing that these pictures really belong to this girl is the fact that I punt in the Aldgate/Whitechapel area quite a lot and during my thorough AW searches for the region I never came across to an AW profile with these pictures (which definitely have not been taken recently as they had previously been used by agencies). Certainly I would have seen them since the profile creation on 15/11/2013. Of course she may had been elsewhere but still I would have spotted her as I performed a very detailed search in the previous months across the entire London searching for all agency girls that simultaneously work as independents or turned completely into indies. Fake B&S profiles like for example this one External Link/Members Only keep using pictures from agencies and periodically keep changing them with pics of different girls (all stolen from agencies or magazines etc). This is what I believe/believed has/had happened in Katrina’s case but I may be wrong and obviously this argument/reasoning is not very strong.

Obviously if anyone can post her PG pics it will clarify the issue completely but I can see from the second picture in the AW profile that she has a tattoo on her back (that has been removed by photoshop in the pictures used to be displayed by agencies). Can Festisio confirm that he noticed the same tattoo at the same place? (of course she may have removed it since 2012). Anyway.
« Last Edit: May 04, 2014, 01:40:30 pm by Jason »

abdul

  • Guest
What I think that Festisio met the lady is attractive but she is definitely not in those AW pics maybe she looks similar as it also suggests in another thread https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=20512.msg310538;topicseen#msg310538  :hi:

Offline Steve2

Sorry Abdul and Jason BUT I think you are talking bollocks

 :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:

Offline Sedlmayer

"Can Festisio confirm that he noticed the same tattoo at the same place?"

He's already said he saw it there.  :dash: :dash: :dash:

He's seen her recently and says it's her. You're playing amateur wanker Sherlock with your bolloxy theories. I don't buy it - I believe the OP.

Do you know what? I'm going to try to book her for Tuesday, and assuming I get to see her, I will post my opinion here. If you're wrong, you'd better have a handsome apology ready.  :wacko: :crazy:

[By the way, we badly need a "wanker" emoticon on this forum  ;) ]

Jason

  • Guest

Do you know what? I'm going to try to book her for Tuesday, and assuming I get to see her, I will post my opinion here.

When you contribute your first review or something else useful in this forum then you may begin talking to me. I have already offered a possible explanation as to what may have happened and that is in favour to Festisio being correct. As for your abusive comments you have already been reported to the mods.
« Last Edit: May 04, 2014, 07:15:55 pm by Jason »

cockneybstrd

  • Guest
I am sure Festisio met with a different girl. Admiral pictures are always 100% genuine (notice also that they are more in number than the just three in the main AW profile and of better resolution- not sure about all these PG pictures, has anyone checked them?) and most importantly they never lie about the location. If Admiral says Paddington W2 it is 100% there. Semi-independent girls (i.e. those who advertise in AW and in agencies) work from the same premises and don't change locations as it their OWN premises (not agency ones). In this Aw profile she says she works in Aldgate/Whitechapel.

As she is good punt save her phone number: 07970994388. But I will report her to Adultwork. If the pictures are indeed hers (I am certain they are not but anyway) when they will check against her verification and PG pictures they will do nothing. But don't get surprised if the profile is deleted as I am adamant it is a B&S.

Jason I am going to have to agree to disagree with you but Admiral are not 100 per cent accurate in there pictures. I have used them previously and while I did see the girl in question. The photos were photoshopped heavily. And as you can see clearly with this one the head has been super imposed on

External Link/Members Only

Personally I would rather see a blurred out face if its for privacy reasons rather than head you can clearly see has been slapped on.

Jason

  • Guest
Jason I am going to have to agree to disagree with you but Admiral are not 100 per cent accurate in there pictures. I have used them previously and while I did see the girl in question. The photos were photoshopped heavily. And as you can see clearly with this one the head has been super imposed on

External Link/Members Only

Personally I would rather see a blurred out face if its for privacy reasons rather than head you can clearly see has been slapped on.

Cockneybstrd. Genuine and accurate are different words in my own vocabulary. Genuine is whether the pictures really belong to the girl or stolen from somewhere else (like pictures of glamour models from playboy magazines etc). In this regard Admiral escorts and the other type A agencies never use fake pictures. Now of course all the pictures used by these agencies are photoshopped and may also not be recently taken. The degree of accuracy varies and some may be completely inaccurate. So we basically agree.

And as for the tattoo I asked confirmation whether it is exactly the same tattoo in exactly the same place as this quote by Tom5334 says this:

That's not her in the photos, she had a profile on when she was up on tour up my way, good looking enough without the pictures of someone else.

The tattoo on the tailbone is the give away, real photos of her, it's not there.

Offline Sedlmayer

When you contribute your first review or something else useful in this forum then you may begin talking to me. I have already offered a possible explanation as to what may have happened and that is in favour to Festisio being correct. As for your abusive comments you have already been reported to the mods.

I'll talk to you any way I choose - if the mods don't like they will act accordingly. Your amateur sleuthing is ludicrous and unhelpful.
"as to what may have happened" - well, what may have happened exactly? You imagined for purely theoretical reasons that the OP was wrong and didn't see the girl he says he saw? On what basis exactly?
I have now booked this girl for Tuesday, and assuming the booking goes ahead, I will report here on what I have seen.
So I am putting my money where my mouth is - something I don't imagine you doing in a hurry.

TheAntiHero

  • Guest
I saw her yesterday, so I can dispel some of the bollocks that's in this thread.

She is indeed the girl in the photos, and has that tattoo on her back. They are a very accurate representation of how she looks and I immediately recognised her based on them. She is not 29 years old as stated, but 33 and has a child. She has subtle caesarian section scars, nothing nasty or obnoxious. I didn't see any ash trays or cigarettes anywhere in the house nor smelled or tasted smoke when I was with her, so I would assume she doesn't smoke.

She works in a flat with another working girl a short walk from Whitechapel station. Its very well maintained and clean and I had no hygiene complaints while I was there.

Service was outstanding. She's in my top 5 punts that I've ever had in the 4 years I've been seeing escorts. Friendly, polite, all services provided with no fuss and to a high standard.  I agree with the original review that she looks much better in person, and I echo what he says that she is a fantastic girl. Full thumbs up from me, no complaints.

Festisio

  • Guest
Thanks to TheAntiHero for the report confirming it's not a B&S and to Steve and Sedimayer for not falling for Jason's utter nonsense and backing me up.

Talk about de-railing a thread!

But I will report her to Adultwork. If the pictures are indeed hers (I am certain they are not but anyway) when they will check against her verification and PG pictures they will do nothing. But don't get surprised if the profile is deleted as I am adamant it is a B&S.

I hope that was just bluster and you haven't actually reported a legit girl.

It might also do you some good to not have such blind faith in "type A" Agencies.

Offline NightKid

Sorry Abdul and Jason BUT I think you are talking bollocks

 :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:

The moment Abdul chipped in his 0p worth, I immediately came to the same conclusion.  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

abdul

  • Guest
The moment Abdul chipped in his 0p worth, I immediately came to the same conclusion.  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Well I thought you'll come to a conclusion after ejaculation ;)

cockneybstrd

  • Guest
Well I thought you'll come to a conclusion after ejaculation ;)

Word play is not your friend Abdul.

abdul

  • Guest
As for the concern of those profile pics and tattoos which Jason remarked earlier I decided to see her and already made an appointment with her in evening hopefully I'll post it later. :hi:

Offline Sedlmayer

Oh thanks, Abdul - great to know that you're going to sort this out once and for all.

Stealthshagger

  • Guest
As for the concern of those profile pics and tattoos which Jason remarked earlier I decided to see her and already made an appointment with her in evening hopefully I'll post it later. :hi:

we'll expect Shakespeare, shall we?

vorian

  • Guest
What an odd thread this is. Established OP has a good punt and reviews it positively,  then for some reason, another member who has not seen the girl suggests it is not her in the pictures and reports her to AW. Then another member states he will book her and confirm and is reported to the mods for being abusive.

How does any of this crap put the punter first. :unknown:

abdul

  • Guest
As for the concern of those profile pics and tattoos which Jason remarked earlier I decided to see her and already made an appointment with her in evening hopefully I'll post it later. :hi:


Booking was confirmed by phone 2hrs earlier before meeting. Flat is in between Valance Rd and Old Montague Rd. When she opened the door I realized that I had to cut the booking to half an hour although she asked me how long do I want to stay then paid £60 and rest £30 I kept in my wallet for next punt. I don’t know why Festisio paid £100 for an hour. Festisio, I have no doubt on you as a genuine punter, but sorry she is definitely not the lady in pics, unless otherwise I came up with a Bait and Switch, she has a little closer look at those pics. What I remember she posted a picture few days ago and that was her genuine picture which she removed later and that picture was not in another site. Facially she is ok but not quite attractive to me. She is approaching 35yrs I assume, not slim size 10 and nice bum, caesarean scar is visible. She has a tattoo but it’s not exactly like the one in pic. Service wise she is good nice OWO technique very flexible in every positions although I smelt something from her fanny while in doggy mode :(. Somehow I managed to cum twice. She speaks English but not well and what I understand from talking to her that she is relatively new to this job and never worked before. She has a flatmate which I think is she External Link/Members Only :hi:
« Last Edit: May 05, 2014, 11:06:10 pm by abdul »

Festisio

  • Guest
Abdul...

I didn't pay £100.  In my review I described her as the best sub £100/hr an hour prossie I'd seen.  I paid £90.  You need to pay attention to the details or you will find those ACCA exams very hard to pass.

So, let me reiterate for the final time.  The woman in those photos was the woman I saw.  Same face, same body, same moles on her back, same everything.  I would know if it wasn't by virtue of having eyes.  The fact that the woman in those photos is the one you see when bookingher has been corroborated by TheAntiHero in this thread.

You must have been bait and switched (although maybe not the right terms as that woman exists, and is the one you get when making a booking (in 2 experiences by people here over the weekend).
« Last Edit: May 05, 2014, 11:40:03 pm by Festisio »

abdul

  • Guest
Abdul...

I didn't pay £100.  In my review I described her as the best sub £100/hr an hour prossie I'd seen.  I paid £90.  You need to pay attention to the details or you will find those ACCA exams very hard to pass.

So, let me reiterate for the final time.  The woman in those photos was the woman I saw.  Same face, same body, same moles on her back, same everything.  I would know if it wasn't by virtue of having eyes.  The fact that the woman in those photos is the one you see when bookingher has been corroborated by TheAntiHero in this thread.

You must have been bait and switched (although maybe not the right terms as that woman exists, and is the one you get when making a booking (in 2 experiences by people here over the weekend).

Am I being cynical  :(

Festisio

  • Guest
Am I being cynical  :(

You seemed to be under the impression it was someone else before even seeing her (see your 1st post in this thread).  Based on that 5 month old thread when maybe the profile was used by someone else, I don't know.

TheAntiHero

  • Guest
she is definitely not the lady in pics

lol bloody hell, she is! her tattoo is exactly the same as the pics and she's a size 10. The things about her you are describing are even in her pics and reviews on this thread. I didn't smell anything off while I was with her either.  Are you partially sighted? Was there a power outage?

vorian

  • Guest
This thread just gets weirder and weirder.  :unknown:

abdul

  • Guest
lol bloody hell, she is! her tattoo is exactly the same as the pics and she's a size 10. The things about her you are describing are even in her pics and reviews on this thread. I didn't smell anything off while I was with her either.  Are you partially sighted? Was there a power outage?

Let alone the smelly issue if any escort like this profile pics starts working in Valance Road @£90/hr who was working before with an agency @£150/hr in Paddington, under such cases I shall knock in those flat in Whitechapel almost every week for latest update of retired agency lady :hi:

vorian

  • Guest
Let alone the smelly issue if any escort like this profile pics starts working in Valance Road @£90/hr who was working before with an agency @£150/hr in Paddington, under such cases I shall knock in those flat in Whitechapel almost every week for latest update of retired agency lady :hi:

I refer the honorable gentlemen to the answer I gave moments ago.

Offline NightKid

She has a tattoo but it’s not exactly like the one in pic.

What the flying fuck is that supposed to mean? Tattoos are always a major distinguishing feature of a person so it's either:

A) She does indeed have the same tattoo on the same spot of her body, which means it was indeed her that you were seeing.
B) She did not have the same tattoo on the same spot, which means you got B&S-ed on.
C) You really have a visual impairment, as I have mentioned previously and repeated again by TheAntiHero.
D) You are lying in an attempt to give credence to your initial post in this thread.

I've said you were a liar before. Judging by TAH's follow-up post, you seem to be proving my point yet again.

This thread just gets weirder and weirder.  :unknown:

Edit: Then why not make it less weird by not leaving pointless remarks? :rolleyes:
« Last Edit: May 06, 2014, 01:13:02 am by NightKid »

Offline Sedlmayer

What an odd thread this is. Established OP has a good punt and reviews it positively,  then for some reason, another member who has not seen the girl suggests it is not her in the pictures and reports her to AW. Then another member states he will book her and confirm and is reported to the mods for being abusive.

How does any of this crap put the punter first. :unknown:

Damn good question  :unknown:

Offline Sedlmayer

OK - she wasn't answering her phone until just before 12:00, but I've booked her now for later today, as I said I would.
I will be posting here tomorrow morning as to what I found, and how the punt went.
I am fairly confident that the two punters who have actually seen her know what they're talking about, but we'll see.

Jason and Abdul (if they are indeed two different people) are playing some rather odd little game here, I suspect, and if they are, by tomorrow it will be the word of three of us (who have actually seen the girl) against theirs, and other genuine punters can make their own minds up from there.

See you tomorrow

cockneybstrd

  • Guest
OK - she wasn't answering her phone until just before 12:00, but I've booked her now for later today, as I said I would.
I will be posting here tomorrow morning as to what I found, and how the punt went.
I am fairly confident that the two punters who have actually seen her know what they're talking about, but we'll see.

Jason and Abdul (if they are indeed two different people) are playing some rather odd little game here, I suspect, and if they are, by tomorrow it will be the word of three of us (who have actually seen the girl) against theirs, and other genuine punters can make their own minds up from there.

See you tomorrow

Jason and Abdul are two very different people. Jason can certainly string a sentence together with coherent arguments and well Abdul is Abdul.

If you ever come across Abdul's blog you will understand that written communication is not his strong point.
« Last Edit: May 06, 2014, 12:57:13 pm by cockneybstrd »

Stealthshagger

  • Guest
Jason and Abdul are two very different people. Jason can certainly string a sentence together with coherent arguments and well Abdul is Abdul.

If you ever come across Abdul's blog you will understand that written communication is not his strong point.

a picture says a thousand words. a grown man putting up pics of his little nuts and shaved pepperami like that says a million words. mainly "help me"

Jason

  • Guest
I have given my reasoning why I initially believed that she is not the same girl as in the pics. Given Festisio’s and Antihero subsequent comments I am convinced that the girl in the pics is who they really met. That said the method of comparing the location displayed by “type A” agencies Vs the AW location had always proved to be a flawless technique regarding verification of pictures authenticity. In the very few cases that AW girls indeed work simultaneously for agencies and as indies the locations match. The reason of this time being wrong in my conclusion was the incorrect application of the technique as the girl is not displayed by the agencies anymore and was my mistake of not noticing about it in my first post (something that I already said and before). What concerned me the most and promptly made me to start all this without double checking were the comments believing that we are starting to see in AW the various agency girls now also working in parallel as indies. With this false excitement (and by reasoning the lower price as a result of bypassing the middleman) and without doing the necessary investigation many people run huge risks of falling for actual B&S profiles as it had been demonstrated numerous times in the past. Some examples can be read below:
1. https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=17124.msg265790#msg265790
2. https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=22035.msg327589#msg327589
3. https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=29301.msg412810#msg412810
4. https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=28651.0
5. https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=27553.0

Also given Abdul’s description of the location I am pretty sure it’s a place I have punted before with a different girl. It is an organised brothel keep changing girls. Previous girls working there (if it is indeed the same place of course):
1. External Link/Members Only  https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=22276.0
2. External Link/Members Only  https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=23121.0

The above profiles have long been deleted. Presumably the girls chose to start new ones -I couldn't though find them- or they simply stopped escorting. 

Jason and Abdul (if they are indeed two different people)
LOL.  :lol: :lol: :lol: You must really be a genius! :rolleyes:

by tomorrow it will be the word of three of us  (who have actually seen the girl) against theirs, and other genuine punters can make their own minds up from there.
Seriously do you really believe that you have any credibility in this forum? Or that you are regarded by everyone as a genuine punter and reliable member?
« Last Edit: May 06, 2014, 02:46:29 pm by Jason »

vorian

  • Guest
I believe that Sedlmayer was active on PN for a long time before coming over to UKP full time and is known as a genuine punter by a number of established UKP members including Smiths. Of course you can make up your own mind as to what you wish to believe.

Offline Sedlmayer

I believe that Sedlmayer was active on PN for a long time before coming over to UKP full time and is known as a genuine punter by a number of established UKP members including Smiths. Of course you can make up your own mind as to what you wish to believe.

Thank you Vorian - I was Southern Man on PN, and known to quite a few members over quite a few years. Read the posts I have written since coming over to UKP and make your own mind up.
Personally, I am coming to the conclusion that Jason is delusional.

Offline Steve2


Offline Steve2


Seriously do you really believe that you have any credibility in this forum? Or that you are regarded by everyone as a genuine punter and reliable member?

Oh yes he is Jason, but you come across as a  :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:

vorian

  • Guest
Personally I believe that Jason puts a lot of effort into his posts and contributes to the forum. Even if a lot of the stuff he comes out with goes over my head. Also I'm not a lover of agencies but some punters swear by them, so thats fair enough. However Jason I would say you seem to struggle with criticism, that is the nature of the forum and a bit of thick skin always helps.

abdul

  • Guest
Jason and Abdul are two very different people. Jason can certainly string a sentence together with coherent arguments and well Abdul is Abdul.

If you ever come across Abdul's blog you will understand that written communication is not his strong point.

Thanks cockneybstrd for the clarification :hi: