Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Sweet_Katrina - Whitechapel  (Read 16982 times)


6 review(s) for Sweet_Katrina (3 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Offline Festisio

https://www.adultwork.com/2243337 or https://www.adultwork.com/Sweet%5FKatrina

Saw Katrina's profile while doing some last minute AW browsing today.  Good comms on phone.

Based in a flat a short walk from Whitechapel station.  Works with another pro$$ie who I could hear entertaining a punter.  Did not run into each other however.

She is really pretty.  I know it's a dreadful AW cliche, but she is hotter and younger looking in the flesh.  Great body, although does look like a cesarean scar is there - fairly faint.  Very giggly, reasonable English but not fluent.  Shower is available.

Lots of kissing, great BJ.  Milks every last drop for CIM.  Enjoys RO and fingering.  Sweet tasting, good hygiene.  Second round lots of fucking.  She is not very deep (may have hit her cervix once at the start, guess that's my fault for her not being aroused enough  :lol:) and I think if you are very well endowed it may be a problem.  Didn't clock-watch at all. 

Great value, best sub £100 /hr punt I've had.  Would smash it again.

8/10
« Last Edit: May 03, 2014, 09:15:11 PM by Festisio »


6 review(s) found for Sweet_Katrina linked to in above post (3 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative)

Offline LL

Thanks for the review.  She's been on one of my hotlists for a while.  I've now moved her to my list of "must sees".

password02

Thanks for the review - is she a large lady? maybe a size 12 or would you consider her more a size 8/10? if the latter then I would consider her to be added to my HL

Offline Festisio

Not large at all definitely not 12.  In fact I was expecting her to be bigger than she is.  Thin arms.  Not massively toned though.

Offline El Jefe

Is she a smoker? did you smell it on her during kissing? Just asking because it's a turn off for me.

If shes not a smoker she is going on my hotlist.


Exactly Steve,
Value is out there. This is what happens when the girls realise that the pimps (agencies included) take too much AND they can work when they want to, not when they are told to.

Offline Festisio

Is she a smoker? did you smell it on her during kissing? Just asking because it's a turn off for me.

If shes not a smoker she is going on my hotlist.

Not a smoker.  That's my number one hate.  Great oral hygiene.


For those who think sub £100 is too cheap, you can book her here

 :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:

http://citylondonescorts.co.uk/paddington_escort_liann

http://www.admiralescorts.com/escort/paddington-w2-blonde-liann-1774

I wonder if they're using stolen and photoshopped photos or if she works via them as well.  I'll have to ask her if I see her again as there's no outcall option listed on the AW page.

Offline Jason

I am sure Festisio met with a different girl. Admiral pictures are always 100% genuine (notice also that they are more in number than the just three in the main AW profile and of better resolution- not sure about all these PG pictures, has anyone checked them?) and most importantly they never lie about the location. If Admiral says Paddington W2 it is 100% there. Semi-independent girls (i.e. those who advertise in AW and in agencies) work from the same premises and don't change locations as it their OWN premises (not agency ones). In this Aw profile she says she works in Aldgate/Whitechapel.

As she is good punt save her phone number: 07970994388. But I will report her to Adultwork. If the pictures are indeed hers (I am certain they are not but anyway) when they will check against her verification and PG pictures they will do nothing. But don't get surprised if the profile is deleted as I am adamant it is a B&S.

Offline Festisio

I am sure Festisio met with a different girl. Admiral pictures are always 100% genuine

But I will report her to Adultwork. If the pictures are indeed hers (I am certain they are not but anyway) when they will check against her verification and PG pictures they will do nothing. But don't get surprised if the profile is deleted as I am adamant it is a B&S.

I am sure I didn't.  How dare you say that you jumped up little weirdo.

I hope someone else sees her from here so they can confirm it, and then you can apologize.

Also I like the way you say Admiral's pictures are 100% genuine when they have removed that tat she has (which I saw yesterday) and photoshopped to hell.

Cunt.
« Last Edit: May 04, 2014, 10:58:29 AM by Festisio »

Offline Sedlmayer

I am sure Festisio met with a different girl. Admiral pictures are always 100% genuine (notice also that they are more in number than the just three in the main AW profile and of better resolution- not sure about all these PG pictures, has anyone checked them?) and most importantly they never lie about the location. If Admiral says Paddington W2 it is 100% there. Semi-independent girls (i.e. those who advertise in AW and in agencies) work from the same premises and don't change locations as it their OWN premises (not agency ones). In this Aw profile she says she works in Aldgate/Whitechapel.

As she is good punt save her phone number: 07970994388. But I will report her to Adultwork. If the pictures are indeed hers (I am certain they are not but anyway) when they will check against her verification and PG pictures they will do nothing. But don't get surprised if the profile is deleted as I am adamant it is a B&S.

What on earth makes you say this against the word of someone who has actually seen her very recently? Blind faith in an Agency FFS? Do you work for them BTW?

Offline Jason

What on earth makes you say this against the word of someone who has actually seen her very recently? Blind faith in an Agency FFS? Do you work for them BTW?

How many times do you spot a discrepancy between photoshopped pictures and the real thing? What I said is that Festisio may attributed the discrepancy to photshop instead of actually realising that it’s a totally different girl. It is not the first time that this has happened. Look for example the following review and you will understand: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=17124.msg265790#msg265790

Offline Steve2

When I googled the Adultwork pics I think the hits came from 2012, so in 2 years she almost certainly has moved

Festers and I often do not see eye to eye but I certainly wouldn't cast doubt on any of his reviews

 :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:

Offline Jason

When I googled the Adultwork pics I think the hits came from 2012, so in 2 years she almost certainly has moved
When I wrote my first of the two posts above I didn’t notice that she is not anymore listed in Admiral’s viewable gallery and that the link above is to a hidden page in their server (presumably storing their previous escorts). The other agency (citylondonescorts) says that she is not available. Also having re-examined the AW profile pictures which albeit professional they are not heavily photoshopped (actually they may not retouched at all) I will say that there is a third very possible scenario: The girl used to work for agencies in the past but NOT ANYMORE and she now works solely as an independent and she displays the non-photoshopped version of her professional pics (which were taken in 2012). This is a very different case from working simultaneously for agencies and as an indie and explains the difference in the stated location (which was my strongest argument as Type A agencies like Admirals are up to date with their girls locations). 

Still what makes me being a bit reluctant believing that these pictures really belong to this girl is the fact that I punt in the Aldgate/Whitechapel area quite a lot and during my thorough AW searches for the region I never came across to an AW profile with these pictures (which definitely have not been taken recently as they had previously been used by agencies). Certainly I would have seen them since the profile creation on 15/11/2013. Of course she may had been elsewhere but still I would have spotted her as I performed a very detailed search in the previous months across the entire London searching for all agency girls that simultaneously work as independents or turned completely into indies. Fake B&S profiles like for example this one https://www.adultwork.com/1774017 keep using pictures from agencies and periodically keep changing them with pics of different girls (all stolen from agencies or magazines etc). This is what I believe/believed has/had happened in Katrina’s case but I may be wrong and obviously this argument/reasoning is not very strong.

Obviously if anyone can post her PG pics it will clarify the issue completely but I can see from the second picture in the AW profile that she has a tattoo on her back (that has been removed by photoshop in the pictures used to be displayed by agencies). Can Festisio confirm that he noticed the same tattoo at the same place? (of course she may have removed it since 2012). Anyway.
« Last Edit: May 04, 2014, 01:40:30 PM by Jason »

Offline abdul

What I think that Festisio met the lady is attractive but she is definitely not in those AW pics maybe she looks similar as it also suggests in another thread https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=20512.msg310538;topicseen#msg310538  :hi:
Banning reason: Troll

Offline Steve2

Sorry Abdul and Jason BUT I think you are talking bollocks

 :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:

Offline Sedlmayer

"Can Festisio confirm that he noticed the same tattoo at the same place?"

He's already said he saw it there.  :dash: :dash: :dash:

He's seen her recently and says it's her. You're playing amateur wanker Sherlock with your bolloxy theories. I don't buy it - I believe the OP.

Do you know what? I'm going to try to book her for Tuesday, and assuming I get to see her, I will post my opinion here. If you're wrong, you'd better have a handsome apology ready.  :wacko: :crazy:

[By the way, we badly need a "wanker" emoticon on this forum  ;) ]

Offline Jason


Do you know what? I'm going to try to book her for Tuesday, and assuming I get to see her, I will post my opinion here.

When you contribute your first review or something else useful in this forum then you may begin talking to me. I have already offered a possible explanation as to what may have happened and that is in favour to Festisio being correct. As for your abusive comments you have already been reported to the mods.
« Last Edit: May 04, 2014, 07:15:55 PM by Jason »

I am sure Festisio met with a different girl. Admiral pictures are always 100% genuine (notice also that they are more in number than the just three in the main AW profile and of better resolution- not sure about all these PG pictures, has anyone checked them?) and most importantly they never lie about the location. If Admiral says Paddington W2 it is 100% there. Semi-independent girls (i.e. those who advertise in AW and in agencies) work from the same premises and don't change locations as it their OWN premises (not agency ones). In this Aw profile she says she works in Aldgate/Whitechapel.

As she is good punt save her phone number: 07970994388. But I will report her to Adultwork. If the pictures are indeed hers (I am certain they are not but anyway) when they will check against her verification and PG pictures they will do nothing. But don't get surprised if the profile is deleted as I am adamant it is a B&S.

Jason I am going to have to agree to disagree with you but Admiral are not 100 per cent accurate in there pictures. I have used them previously and while I did see the girl in question. The photos were photoshopped heavily. And as you can see clearly with this one the head has been super imposed on

http://www.admiralescorts.com/escort/cute-blonde-blonde-34b-brook-2220

Personally I would rather see a blurred out face if its for privacy reasons rather than head you can clearly see has been slapped on.

Offline Jason

Jason I am going to have to agree to disagree with you but Admiral are not 100 per cent accurate in there pictures. I have used them previously and while I did see the girl in question. The photos were photoshopped heavily. And as you can see clearly with this one the head has been super imposed on

http://www.admiralescorts.com/escort/cute-blonde-blonde-34b-brook-2220

Personally I would rather see a blurred out face if its for privacy reasons rather than head you can clearly see has been slapped on.

Cockneybstrd. Genuine and accurate are different words in my own vocabulary. Genuine is whether the pictures really belong to the girl or stolen from somewhere else (like pictures of glamour models from playboy magazines etc). In this regard Admiral escorts and the other type A agencies never use fake pictures. Now of course all the pictures used by these agencies are photoshopped and may also not be recently taken. The degree of accuracy varies and some may be completely inaccurate. So we basically agree.

And as for the tattoo I asked confirmation whether it is exactly the same tattoo in exactly the same place as this quote by Tom5334 says this:

That's not her in the photos, she had a profile on when she was up on tour up my way, good looking enough without the pictures of someone else.

The tattoo on the tailbone is the give away, real photos of her, it's not there.

Offline Sedlmayer

When you contribute your first review or something else useful in this forum then you may begin talking to me. I have already offered a possible explanation as to what may have happened and that is in favour to Festisio being correct. As for your abusive comments you have already been reported to the mods.

I'll talk to you any way I choose - if the mods don't like they will act accordingly. Your amateur sleuthing is ludicrous and unhelpful.
"as to what may have happened" - well, what may have happened exactly? You imagined for purely theoretical reasons that the OP was wrong and didn't see the girl he says he saw? On what basis exactly?
I have now booked this girl for Tuesday, and assuming the booking goes ahead, I will report here on what I have seen.
So I am putting my money where my mouth is - something I don't imagine you doing in a hurry.

I saw her yesterday, so I can dispel some of the bollocks that's in this thread.

She is indeed the girl in the photos, and has that tattoo on her back. They are a very accurate representation of how she looks and I immediately recognised her based on them. She is not 29 years old as stated, but 33 and has a child. She has subtle caesarian section scars, nothing nasty or obnoxious. I didn't see any ash trays or cigarettes anywhere in the house nor smelled or tasted smoke when I was with her, so I would assume she doesn't smoke.

She works in a flat with another working girl a short walk from Whitechapel station. Its very well maintained and clean and I had no hygiene complaints while I was there.

Service was outstanding. She's in my top 5 punts that I've ever had in the 4 years I've been seeing escorts. Friendly, polite, all services provided with no fuss and to a high standard.  I agree with the original review that she looks much better in person, and I echo what he says that she is a fantastic girl. Full thumbs up from me, no complaints.

Offline Festisio

Thanks to TheAntiHero for the report confirming it's not a B&S and to Steve and Sedimayer for not falling for Jason's utter nonsense and backing me up.

Talk about de-railing a thread!

But I will report her to Adultwork. If the pictures are indeed hers (I am certain they are not but anyway) when they will check against her verification and PG pictures they will do nothing. But don't get surprised if the profile is deleted as I am adamant it is a B&S.

I hope that was just bluster and you haven't actually reported a legit girl.

It might also do you some good to not have such blind faith in "type A" Agencies.

Offline NightKid

Sorry Abdul and Jason BUT I think you are talking bollocks

 :hi: :hi: :hi: :hi:

The moment Abdul chipped in his 0p worth, I immediately came to the same conclusion.  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Offline abdul

The moment Abdul chipped in his 0p worth, I immediately came to the same conclusion.  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Well I thought you'll come to a conclusion after ejaculation ;)
Banning reason: Troll




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)