Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: WG's who shoot porn videos bareback but don't provide it to regular punters  (Read 5647 times)

ALyons

  • Guest
Considering most people advice here not seeing WG's who provide bareback, there are many top end WG's on adultwork who shoot porn videos bareback and even do it with creampie endings.

Are they seen as more safer options? What's peoples feeling towards seeing these WGs who do it for porn but not when it comes to standard punter services?

apple

  • Guest
it is with there partners to make things more desirable

GeeWiz

  • Guest
They're idiots.  Certificates mean very little - just see how often the LA porn industry shuts down after performers get infected.  Health is wealth, the financial rewards are just not worth the risks.

As for punting bareback, not for all the tea in China.  If anyone thinks it a worthwhile activity, there's a site out there for men looking to infect/get infected.  If that don't bring BB guys to their senses, they need a check up from the neck up IMO.

vorian

  • Guest
They're idiots.  Certificates mean very little - just see how often the LA porn industry shuts down after performers get infected.  Health is wealth, the financial rewards are just not worth the risks.

As for punting bareback, not for all the tea in China.  If anyone thinks it a worthwhile activity, there's a site out there for men looking to infect/get infected.  If that don't bring BB guys to their senses, they need a check up from the neck up IMO.

The bug chasers,  :vomit:

Offline LanceVance

Seeing a WG bareback is foolish, but I think porn escorts who bareback with co-stars are still (mostly) safe because their male screen partners will be tested too. I get what GeeWiz says about the porn industry shut downs, but I can understand a pornstar WG who decides that doing porn bareback is safer than whoring bareback. Porn actors always get tested, punters should but not all do. So I wouldn't have trouble seeing a porn WG as long as they don't do bareback with punters.

Offline Dani

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,603
  • Likes: 1
Thing is getting tested is only any good on the day they are tested.  Who is too say they don't go out on a Friday night and pull some old tart for a quicky and catch something but still have their clean bill of health certificate.

I personally think they are worthless as there is no way to monitor their sexual activites between the test and the filming.  They could have shagged 20 women all with some disease and have caught them all.


Sienna_Bronze

  • Guest
I understand why punters don't bareback with prossie's but I don't understand why so many of you wouldn't see a girl who bareback's other punters. I'm sure many prossie's don't use condoms with partners in their personal life. Surely it's not that different?

cockneybstrd

  • Guest
Thing is getting tested is only any good on the day they are tested.  Who is too say they don't go out on a Friday night and pull some old tart for a quicky and catch something but still have their clean bill of health certificate.

I personally think they are worthless as there is no way to monitor their sexual activites between the test and the filming.  They could have shagged 20 women all with some disease and have caught them all.
Or twenty geezers as well as twenty women

After all a lot of them are gay for the pay

vorian

  • Guest
I understand why punters don't bareback with prossie's but I don't understand why so many of you wouldn't see a girl who bareback's other punters. I'm sure many prossie's don't use condoms with partners in their personal life. Surely it's not that different?

I see your point but for me it is about reducing the risk and its about volume. If a girl BB with her partner and I am sure that is the case for the majority you only have a couple of people involved but if she does BB with punters you have many' many more variables involved. Again no guarantee but does reduce the risk.

pleasure

  • Guest
I understand why punters don't bareback with prossie's but I don't understand why so many of you wouldn't see a girl who bareback's other punters. I'm sure many prossie's don't use condoms with partners in their personal life. Surely it's not that different?

You don't see the difference between bareback with one guy that you know, or bareback with 30 complete strangers a week?

I've no desire to be with a girl who's exposed herself to that degree of risk. Even using condoms with her, I wouldn't feel comfortable giving her oral or even kissing her.

I'm not one to judge others, and I'm quite happy to leave the barebackers to their fun, but I don't want anything to do with it myself.

Offline dandaley

it is with there partners to make things more desirable

yep +1

Offline Daffodil

Thing is getting tested is only any good on the day they are tested.  Who is too say they don't go out on a Friday night and pull some old tart for a quicky and catch something but still have their clean bill of health certificate.

I personally think they are worthless as there is no way to monitor their sexual activites between the test and the filming.  They could have shagged 20 women all with some disease and have caught them all.

They are not worthless. Would you rather fuck somebody who was tested clean five years ago or one who was tested five days ago?

Also it tells you that the person is at least health conscious enough to be tested.

Yes, it doesn't guarantee they are disease free (what can you guarantee in life?), but it reduces risk. Hence, not worthless  :hi:

Offline smiths

I understand why punters don't bareback with prossie's but I don't understand why so many of you wouldn't see a girl who bareback's other punters. I'm sure many prossie's don't use condoms with partners in their personal life. Surely it's not that different?

I used to think the answer to this was obvious but enough posters like yourself have posted telling me they clearly dont think its obvious. If a WG advertises she offers BB then i assume at least some of her punters would of done it with other WGs thus increasing the risk of infection all round. I would be to worried about the risks to punt with such WGs anyway.

In addition i dont wish to meet let alone have sex with filthy skanks i KNOW offer BB to any Tom, Dick or Abdul. The fact WGs may well do BB with their partners is something not within my control, at least i can avoid those that advertise they offer it to punters though.


Offline smiths

Considering most people advice here not seeing WG's who provide bareback, there are many top end WG's on adultwork who shoot porn videos bareback and even do it with creampie endings.

Are they seen as more safer options? What's peoples feeling towards seeing these WGs who do it for porn but not when it comes to standard punter services?

IF a pornstar wishes to continue doing porn they have to test negative on a regular basis so unlike with WGs who dont HAVE to get tested at all a porn star has to to get work. Now thats the theory, whether its also the practice depends on how you view it of course, and how much faith you have in the testing process.

Offline Ali Katt

  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 10,961
  • Likes: 13
  • Reviews: 28

Sienna_Bronze

  • Guest
You don't see the difference between bareback with one guy that you know, or bareback with 30 complete strangers a week?

I've no desire to be with a girl who's exposed herself to that degree of risk. Even using condoms with her, I wouldn't feel comfortable giving her oral or even kissing her.

I'm not one to judge others, and I'm quite happy to leave the barebackers to their fun, but I don't want anything to do with it myself.

I am not just taking about wg's who have partners but they ones who like to have fun outside of work. Condom use isn't very high in 'normal' life. Or maybe I just know some scabby people.

LL

  • Guest
I agree with the OP and have often thought that seeing a pornstar who also escorts is slightly riskier than seeing a girl who only escorts since the pornstar is a professional barebacker at the end of the day.

Offline Taggart

Considering most people advice here not seeing WG's who provide bareback, there are many top end WG's on adultwork who shoot porn videos bareback and even do it with creampie endings.


And  then you wonder why so many profiles on AW say things like 'ask for BB and I will block you'.

Note to WGs:   Well dont fucking well tempt us with it or imply it's available in the first place by showing us pictures of you indulging in BB.  (not that I'd ever contemplate it with any partner whose sexual history is unknown to me)

Missfilan

  • Guest
And  then you wonder why so many profiles on AW say things like 'ask for BB and I will block you'.

Note to WGs:   Well dont fucking well tempt us with it or imply it's available in the first place by showing us pictures of you indulging in BB.  (not that I'd ever contemplate it with any partner whose sexual history is unknown to me)

Yes I don't understand why they would show cum shots if that's not something they provide. I don't have action type photos but if I did then I wouldn't dream of having anything that I would not do with a client as it's misleading. It would be like posing for anal and then saying but I only do that with my boyfriend or posing in various uniforms when they are not my cup of tea at all.

« Last Edit: May 03, 2014, 10:48:03 pm by Missfilan »

taplow

  • Guest
Tell me, is the bareback fear purely about HIV?  I just don't think you catch it from vaginal intercourse and so I indulge whenever I can. 

vorian

  • Guest
Tell me, is the bareback fear purely about HIV?  I just don't think you catch it from vaginal intercourse and so I indulge whenever I can.


Really,  well good luck with that. Guess the medical and scientific community were mistaken all these years then.

Missfilan

  • Guest
Tell me, is the bareback fear purely about HIV?  I just don't think you catch it from vaginal intercourse and so I indulge whenever I can.

I have a feeling you already know the answer to this but on the slim chance that I got it wrong, GOOGLE is your friend.

taplow

  • Guest

Really,  well good luck with that. Guess the medical and scientific community were mistaken all these years then.

No, the question is if it is purely about HIV.  And if so surely the medical and scientific community is more than the Terence Higgins Trust.

Offline smiths

Tell me, is the bareback fear purely about HIV?  I just don't think you catch it from vaginal intercourse and so I indulge whenever I can.

The risk of catching a STI isnt by any means just limited to HIV for me, HIV is but one thing i could catch. It IS possible to catch HIV from vaginal intercourse so your factually wrong to say you dont think you can catch it, you can. Only the individual punter can decide what risks he is prepared to take for the rewards on offer of course.

As you clearly havent a clue as to the risks involved my advice is talk to the staff at the GUM who will tell you the facts impartially, they are the trained medical professions after all, not those of us on here.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2014, 11:32:54 pm by smiths »

taplow

  • Guest
The risk of catching a STI isnt by any means just limited to HIV for me, HIV is but one thing i could catch. It IS possible to catch HIV from vaginal intercourse so your factually wrong to say you dont think you can catch it, you can. Only the individual punter can decide what risks he is prepared to take for the rewards on offer of course.

As you clearly havent a clue as to the risks involved my advice is talk to the staff at the GUM who will tell you the facts impartially, they are the trained medical professions after all, not those of us on here.

Thanks for the advice.  I was just wondering whether it was just HIV everyone's scared of as all the rest of the diseases and infections don't seem to hold such terror.  Can I also be tiresomely pedantic and say that I'm not "factually wrong" to say I don't think you can catch HIV from vaginal intercourse as I really don't think you can. 
Also it's not really fair to say that I haven't a clue as to the risks involved as I've received expert advice from Tony Smith who drinks in the Rose and Crown in Stoke Newington, although he was a bit pissed. 

Offline Anadin

IF a pornstar wishes to continue doing porn they have to test negative on a regular basis so unlike with WGs who dont HAVE to get tested at all a porn star has to to get work. Now thats the theory, whether its also the practice depends on how you view it of course, and how much faith you have in the testing process.

Yeah you never know what anyone gets up to but I figure if a pornstar is shooting regularly then she's probably clean in theory.

Can I also be tiresomely pedantic and say that I'm not "factually wrong" to say I don't think you can catch HIV from vaginal intercourse as I really don't think you can.

:lol: I lol'd

Rochdull lad

  • Guest
...

Also it's not really fair to say that I haven't a clue as to the risks involved as I've received expert advice from Tony Smith who drinks in the Rose and Crown in Stoke Newington, although he was a bit pissed.

I'm not sure whether  :unknown: or  :bomb: is the correct response to this.

Offline Daffodil

I'm not sure whether  :unknown: or  :bomb: is the correct response to this.

The correct response was to laugh

 :dash:

cockneybstrd

  • Guest
Thanks for the advice.  I was just wondering whether it was just HIV everyone's scared of as all the rest of the diseases and infections don't seem to hold such terror.  Can I also be tiresomely pedantic and say that I'm not "factually wrong" to say I don't think you can catch HIV from vaginal intercourse as I really don't think you can. 
Also it's not really fair to say that I haven't a clue as to the risks involved as I've received expert advice from Tony Smith who drinks in the Rose and Crown in Stoke Newington, although he was a bit pissed.

Not the Tony Smith who drinks in the Rose and Crown in Stoke Newington. I forgot he was the leading expert worldwide on std's

What other pearls of wisdom did he share ????


Missfilan

  • Guest
Well I am going to join him and his friend Tony for :drinks: as I have heard he gives some cracking advice and well, I'm jealous  :scare:

vorian

  • Guest
Oh why didn't you say Tony told you. Of course in that case he's always right. :D

Offline LanceVance

Stop feeding the troll guys!  :dash:

Offline smiths

Thanks for the advice.  I was just wondering whether it was just HIV everyone's scared of as all the rest of the diseases and infections don't seem to hold such terror.  Can I also be tiresomely pedantic and say that I'm not "factually wrong" to say I don't think you can catch HIV from vaginal intercourse as I really don't think you can. 
Also it's not really fair to say that I haven't a clue as to the risks involved as I've received expert advice from Tony Smith who drinks in the Rose and Crown in Stoke Newington, although he was a bit pissed.

You ARE factually incorrect, as i said previously dont take my word for it, go speak to a qualified medical profession at the GUM, dont bother asking Tony Smith. :rolleyes:
« Last Edit: May 04, 2014, 11:49:47 am by smiths »

Offline smiths

Not the Tony Smith who drinks in the Rose and Crown in Stoke Newington. I forgot he was the leading expert worldwide on std's

What other pearls of wisdom did he share ????

I am in Tottenham later so will pop in and have a chat with Tony Smith on my way home and feedback any other pearls he comes out with. :thumbsup:

taplow

  • Guest
Oh why didn't you say Tony told you. Of course in that case he's always right. :D

I wouldn't go that far.  I didn't think much of his idea of opening up a shoe library.

taplow

  • Guest
You ARE factually incorrect, as i said previously dont take my word for it, go speak to a qualified medical profession at the GUM, dont bother asking Tony Smith. :rolleyes:

I've learned my lesson here.  I'll check the NHS website or the Alex Higgins Trust.

taplow

  • Guest
I am in Tottenham later so will pop in and have a chat with Tony Smith on my way home and feedback any other pearls he comes out with. :thumbsup:

Mine's a large one.

cockneybstrd

  • Guest
I've learned my lesson here.  I'll check the NHS website or the Alex Higgins Trust.

Its Terence Higgins but you already knew that. Comedy Posters should be amusing.

I note that a filthy barebacker who was banned from here is from Taplow


taplow

  • Guest
Its Terence Higgins but you already knew that. Comedy Posters should be amusing.

I note that a filthy barebacker who was banned from here is from Taplow

I suppose someone's got to live there,  but it does seem to be a bit extreme to ban him for it though.