Help uber transaction spotted

[winkywanky]

Speaking of witch (sorry, which  ) if there were a dadsnet, what might be the acronym for the other half?

[Ali Katt]

Speaking of witch (sorry, which  ) if there were a dadsnet, what might be the acronym for the other half?

LM - Lady Muck.

Re: not allowed, what is 'DH'? Dear husband or something? God, that makes them sound like a coven of witches (perhaps that's not so far from the truth  ).

Darling Husband, Also Darling Daughter, Darling Son. etc.

[Blackpool Rock]

Now that this is in offtopic, here's a screenshot of the not allowed thread

Hidden Image/Members Only

That only looks like the 1st page, it ran to almost 4 full pages

[Animalbeast]

Hi guys mrs spotted uber transaction on joint account. I got an uber to a punt and its stupidly linked to joint account. Any way i can get rid of this or use a good excuse. She already caught me off guard and i said i didmt use an uber. Help please.

Don’t mention it again. Disconnecting everything will make her suspicious if she realises. The best thing would be to keep things connected, as long as she can’t see Uber receipts and end destinations etc, and start using Uber a bit more eg when it’s hot, cold, at 9am when TFL is crowded because it’s too risky etc basically normalise her eyes to seeing Uber on your account and she won’t mention it

[winkywanky]

LM - Lady Muck.
Darling Husband, Also Darling Daughter, Darling Son. etc.

Ah, so a degree of sarcasm.

In which case LM seems somehwat justified.

How about EB? (Earbasher).

Or LMC (Little Miss Can'tbewrong)?

Perhaps EM (Elephant Memory)?

[Animalbeast]

Ohhhhhhhj shit.  Just read this fully. Unlucky bruh

[JonasG]

What a clusterfuck for both parties tbh.

Sad.

[B4bcock]

Re: not allowed, what is 'DH'? Dear husband or something?

In this instance she probably means it as DickHead.

[winkywanky]

 

[Billy no mates]

Her name is Manchester something, all his reviews are around Manchester, I think it is the same person.

As in the same man she is talking about the uber thing about.

[Animalbeast]

Her name is Manchester something, all his reviews are around Manchester, I think it is the same person.

As in the same man she is talking about the uber thing about.

Definitely the same guy. Wonder which punt put him in the dog house. But his most recent review is about about a hooker that does bareback. If his missus has seen that  becomes  even if his wife isn’t search savvy someone on mums net will show her how to see someone’s reviews on Ukp through a google search

[Animalbeast]

Darling Husband, Also Darling Daughter, Darling Son. etc.

Always assumed it was “dear husband” because they had already killed the poor fellah’s soul

[Animalbeast]

Do you know every detail of your wife’s life!  If the foot was on the other shoe, could you for certain say “she has no reason for using  Uber at that day and time”  the scary thing reading your wife’s thread is the way she says “if he used Uber for a work do or meeting he would have told me about it on the day or in passing”  such an innocuous thing, yet she thinks you would mention that detail of your day. It points to a very controlling relationship.

[kuck]

That only looks like the 1st page, it ran to almost 4 full pages

Oh crap. I missed most of the soap opera, then

I only got this from the google cache.

[Animalbeast]

That only looks like the 1st page, it ran to almost 4 full pages

It got deleted by the mums net. What remains online, for now,  and what was screenshoted is the Google Cache of that thread which is for the 21st Sep.

[Blackpool Rock]

Her name is Manchester something, all his reviews are around Manchester, I think it is the same person.

As in the same man she is talking about the uber thing about.

Her full name was Manchester Ibis Girl without any spaces, I previously thought it had something about a hotel name in it which was Ibis so i'm guessing she works there

[hunkybc]

I wonder why it was deleted from not allowed !?

[daviemac]

I wonder why it was deleted from not allowed !?

It said on the thread that the poster had asked for it to be removed as they were sorting it out off the boards.

[Blackpool Rock]

I wonder why it was deleted from not allowed !?

If you read this thread fully then it became clear that someone on MN flagged about this thread in the same way that someone on here flagged there was a duel thread running on there.
It almost became quite comical how both threads developed and posted about how the other thread was aware of the other, a bit like 2 guys with guns both racing to reload a gun and get their thread deleted 

[Ali Katt]

Always assumed it was “dear husband” because they had already killed the poor fellah’s soul

You and winky are correct. I am wrong.
External Link/Members Only

[Horizontal pleasures]

What would JRC (JimmyRedCab) have commented?

[Horizontal pleasures]

I have to work hard when I park my car to use a different private credit card and it takes ages fiddling with the online bullsh*t or telephone quirks of the parking services so the missus does not know where I have been. All same the Uber problem mentioned here.

[stampjones]

This has got to be just about the worst thing that can happen (if he passed on a dose scrub just about). making a fuck up with the uber on the joint account is bad, but then by basically saying to her look actually its way worse than you think, have a look at all this! Its like a fawlty towers episode or something! I can only imagine how they both feel. Absolute shitshow all round.

[Private Parts]

This has got to be just about the worst thing that can happen (if he passed on a dose scrub just about). making a fuck up with the uber on the joint account is bad, but then by basically saying to her look actually its way worse than you think, have a look at all this! Its like a fawlty towers episode or something! I can only imagine how they both feel. Absolute shitshow all round.

Gentlemen! Reprieve. Über can soldier on for 18 months!
As usual the bleeding hearts come out indignant.
Life is a risk. You are just as vulnerable in a black cab as in Uber transport.
I’m waiting for the black boys to take me to task.
We can’t live in the 19th century ruling on horse drawn carriages.
Unless, of course, our brethren know better.
PP

[daviemac]

Gentlemen! Reprieve. Über can soldier on for 18 months!
As usual the bleeding hearts come out indignant.
Life is a risk. You are just as vulnerable in a black cab as in Uber transport.
I’m waiting for the black boys to take me to task.
We can’t live in the 19th century ruling on horse drawn carriages.
Unless, of course, our brethren know better.
PP

What on earth are you on about, it has nothing to do with what sort of taxi or private hire vehicle he used, the issue is it was paid for out of a joint account so his other half could see the transaction. 

[Private Parts]

What on earth are you on about, it has nothing to do with what sort of taxi or private hire vehicle he used, the issue is it was paid for out of a joint account so his other half could see the transaction. 

This is off topic chat.  (According to the heading)
I was merely commenting on the outcome of a judicial review.
Unless Uber is not mentioned in the OPs header.
In which case I apologise
Sometimes it’s hard to breathe let alone have an opinion.
As was pm’d to me this is a big boys site.
I defer to the big boys.
PP

[Private Parts]

What would JRC (JimmyRedCab) have commented?

Maybe just maybe.
Heavens I mention someone by name
PP

[daviemac]

This is off topic chat.  (According to the heading)
I was merely commenting on the outcome of a judicial review.
Unless Uber is not mentioned in the OPs header.
In which case I apologise
Sometimes it’s hard to breathe let alone have an opinion.
As was pm’d to me this is a big boys site.
I defer to the big boys.
PP

If you want to talk about a judicial review of Uber feel free to start a thread about it. Your post (which does not mention anything about a judicial review) about Uber and black cabs made no sense in relation to the topic of this thread, which is about some numpty getting caught out by his wile.     

[Private Parts]

As usual we genuflect.
There is little point in considering the wider context.
I shall return to under my stone.
What happened to lateral thinking?
Buried by UKP
PP

[RAJEC]

As usual we genuflect.
There is little point in considering the wider context.
I shall return to under my stone.
What happened to lateral thinking?
Buried by UKP
PP

You can just leave 

[RedKettle]

As usual we genuflect.
There is little point in considering the wider context.
I shall return to under my stone.
What happened to lateral thinking?
Buried by UKP
PP

I do not believe there was an issue about the wider context - just a suggestion that you did that on a specific thread for that topic instead of this one.  I must say that I was also confused by your post as I had not kept up with the Uber legal issues so being clearer would have helped me!

[Private Parts]

Again Gentlemen
Please accept my sincere apologies for any confusion.
I shall shut up.
PP

[sparkus]

Sorry but what business is it of anyone's missus if they take an Uber?

The company itself ferry thousands of non-punting passengers a day to where they want to go, if a bloke can't be arsed to wait for a train or bus or doesn't want to sit among others and fancies treating himself once then it's his business and no one else's really.  Punter or not.

[GingerNuts]

Sorry but what business is it of anyone's missus if they take an Uber?

The company itself ferry thousands of non-punting passengers a day to where they want to go, if a bloke can't be arsed to wait for a train or bus or doesn't want to sit among others and fancies treating himself once then it's his business and no one else's really.  Punter or not.

Asking about an unexpected transaction on a joint account is hardly unusual.

It went pear shaped when the OP denied using an Uber instead of giving a plausible reason.

[Jonestown]

Sorry but what business is it of anyone's missus if they take an Uber?

The company itself ferry thousands of non-punting passengers a day to where they want to go, if a bloke can't be arsed to wait for a train or bus or doesn't want to sit among others and fancies treating himself once then it's his business and no one else's really.  Punter or not.

All very true, but if you are using the Uber to get to a punt it helps if you don't use a joint credit card to set up the trip and pay, and it also helps if you don't fluff the answer when the OH raises a question when the cc statement comes in, as we all know, well some of us, when it comes to women and their suspicions, if there's a doubt, then there's no doubt.

[sparkus]

Asking about an unexpected transaction on a joint account is hardly unusual.

It went pear shaped when the OP denied using an Uber instead of giving a plausible reason.

If he'd stuck to his guns from the off then denying wouldn't have been necessary.

Fragrances and cash withdrawals are trickier to deny, which involves much masking from the off.  I've had to be inventive on both scores over the years.

[GingerNuts]

If he'd stuck to his guns from the off then denying wouldn't have been necessary.

Fragrances and cash withdrawals are trickier to deny, which involves much masking from the off.  I've had to be inventive on both scores over the years.

His wife asked about a transaction on a joint account. He could have quickly thought of a reason but instead he panicked and just denied using an Uber.

What guns should he have been sticking to?

[sparkus]

His wife asked about a transaction on a joint account. He could have quickly thought of a reason but instead he panicked and just denied using an Uber.

What guns should he have been sticking to?

Saying he could use Uber if he wanted to.

I get the chain of events, I was querying the denial.

[GingerNuts]

Saying he could use Uber if he wanted to.

I get the chain of events, I was querying the denial.

He couldn't come up with a reason so he denied it.

Are you suggesting there was something else he could have done?

[scutty brown]

If he had any sense he'd tell her the truth - and explain to his wife that if she wasn't such an unreasonable bitch then he wouldn't have to fuck other women

[sparkus]

He couldn't come up with a reason so he denied it.

Are you suggesting there was something else he could have done?

Not denied it in the first place.  Sheesh.

As far as I can tell, OP hasn't even updated the thread despite needling by others and him logging on since his last comment.  I was more making a general point about others in his situation than demanding any answer from him or you on his behalf.

[GingerNuts]

Not denied it in the first place.  Sheesh.

He should've just told his Mrs it was none of her business. That wouldn't have aroused any suspicions.

[Chorley]

Without wishing to sound overly pessimistic I reckon you're fucked mate? 
You've sown the seeds of doubt t in her mind and she will be watching you like a hawk now.
And even if you don't do anything suspicious in the future you can bet that she'll bring it up when you have an argument. Even if it 10 years later. 

[Punterperson1971]

Not denied it in the first place.  Sheesh.

As far as I can tell, OP hasn't even updated the thread despite needling by others and him logging on since his last comment.  I was more making a general point about others in his situation than demanding any answer from him or you on his behalf.

Maybe responding more to this thread would make it worse for op I don’t know how because all the evidence is still here

[daviemac]

Maybe responding more to this thread would make it worse for op I don’t know how because all the evidence is still here

How are we going to make it worse for the OP??? It's in off topic now his Mrs can't see it, as far as she's concerned it doesn't exist.   

[Punterperson1971]

How are we going to make it worse for the OP??? It's in off topic now his Mrs can't see it, as far as she's concerned it doesn't exist.   

Is it because they can’t view the off topic as a guest on here if so my mistake apologies for thinking otherwise

[daviemac]

Is it because they can’t view the off topic as a guest on here if so my mistake apologies for thinking otherwise

Guests don't even see off topic exists it just isn't there until you log in.     It was moved here by one of the Admin (mods can't move threads here, they can only merge with existing ones) so the OP could update us on how it was going, doesn't look like that is going to happen though.   

[Punterperson1971]

Guests don't even see off topic exists it just isn't there until you log in.     It was moved here by one of the Admin (mods can't move threads here, they can only merge with existing ones) so the OP could update us on how it was going, doesn't look like that is going to happen though.   

Thanks

[cotton]

It said on the thread that the poster had asked for it to be removed as they were sorting it out off the boards.

Do you mean "they" as in the OP and his wife are sorting it out off the boards , or that the wife and the MN lynchmob are sorting it out off The boards.
If its the latter the mind boggles what cunning traps they are setting for the OP , the poor barsteward.

[daviemac]

Do you mean "they" as in the OP and his wife are sorting it out off the boards , or that the wife and the MN lynchmob are sorting it out off The boards.
If its the latter the mind boggles what cunning traps they are setting for the OP , the poor barsteward.

I've got no clue mate, how would I know, I wasn't involved, you need to ask the OP on here or the person who posted on MN.  I'm just going off what was posted on there where the thread was.   


Hidden Image/Members Only
I would presume the situation would be resolved between the two of them and not by the wife on her own, hence the 'they'.