Dating a prossie. Is it as bad an idea as it sounds?

[LLPunting]

oh please 

What?

BoJo could easily have said what she said, given the circumstances.

She's no Trump though, much to her relief or you'd be right up her.

[finn5555]

Did he apologises to you for falsely accusing you of having multiple accounts which is against site rules?

Was he meant to then 

[AnthG]

However they are not allowed to go on the likes of UKE and complain about anything said on here so why should you be allowed to whinge on here about what is said about you on other sites.

Thank you very much for confirming that fact.

The topic of dating escorts is a topic on this forum. I am a member of this forum, and only this forum. I am not a member on UKE. I have not made a single post on UKE since August 2019. I have asked to be banned from there twice, under two separate admins. I have made that request public so everyone knows I am not a member of that forum and want nothing to do with it and am banned from there, at my own request.

A particular poster. Who everyone knows is the biggest troll on these forums, who I have had a long history with. Who is also a member of this forum.

Has been purposefully "dissecting" me and my posts that are made on this forum, alongside also other members of this forum who have posted on this topic on the UKE forum. For no other reason other to troll me, manipulate people against me, and effectively troll this forum as a consequence. 

And you have confirmed in your post this is against the rules of this forum to do this, and also that UKE forum to do this. Your very post said that fact. And yet nobody gives one single fuck that this guy is doing it because it is king dick Belgarion who thinks he runs the place and everyone on there is terririfed of him. Just like everyone was terrified of James999 on here becasue Admin is letting this guy run the show and bans anyone who says anything about him.

I am just going to log out from his forum as there is something very strange going on that you can say in a post.

"However, they are not allowed to go on the likes of UKE and complain about anything said on here so why should you be allowed to whinge on here about what is said about you on other sites." And actually it be me you are warning here for doing this and not him.

[finn5555]

Thank you very much for confirming that fact.

The topic of dating escorts is a topic on this forum. I am a member of this forum, and only this forum. I am not a member on UKE. I have not made a single post on UKE since August 2019. I have asked to be banned from there twice, under two separate admins. I have made that request public so everyone knows I am not a member of that forum and want nothing to do with it and am banned from there, at my own request.

A particular poster. Who everyone knows is the biggest troll on these forums, who I have had a long history with. Who is also a member of this forum.

Has been purposefully "dissecting" me and my posts that are made on this forum, alongside also other members of this forum who have posted on this topic on the UKE forum. For no other reason other to troll me, manipulate people against me, and effectively troll this forum as a consequence. 

And you have confirmed in your post this is against the rules of this forum to do this, and also that UKE forum to do this. Your very post said that fact. And yet nobody gives one single fuck that this guy is doing it because it is king dick Belgarion who thinks he runs the place and everyone on there is terririfed of him. Just like everyone was terrified of James999 on here becasue Admin is letting this guy run the show and bans anyone who says anything about him.

I am just going to log out from his forum as there is something very strange going on that you can say in a post.

"However, they are not allowed to go on the likes of UKE and complain about anything said on here so why should you be allowed to whinge on here about what is said about you on other sites." And actually it be me you are warning here for doing this and not him.

Anth take a few days out give your head a wobble and deal with your demons 

[Mr Sinister]

Interesting to read the past few pages, Anth input is in the right direction although he may come across as little odd.

It's more desirable for men to have many sexual partners. This is why ladies man is a compliment.
It is more desirable for women to have less sexual partners.

Since the dawn of time it has always been about the strong dominant man mating with all the beautiful women, a man has the ability to procreate with as many women as possible even in old age, while for the most part a woman is restricted to time and biology. There are exceptions.

80/20 rule which dictates now 80% of women(even the most average) are chasing the top 20% of men to settle down with. So yeah if you're good looking, tall, have a good body, finances, high valued etc...you are going to be more sought after even if you have slept with 200 women, in return this man seeks a stable, strong, feminine woman to be by his side to create life and all the trappings, a woman who is less promiscuous is seen as higher valued, good wife, mother material.

Jordan Peterson has some very interesting points when it comes to men, women, relationships and modern behaviour of Western society. I don't agree with everything he comes out with but he gets a lot of vitriol from the left for having a different view that does not pander. This is coming from someone who leans to the left.

[David1970]

Was he meant to then 

I would have thought he would have apologised after saying she had two profiles which could have her banned if it was true, which is was not.

[smiths]

Thank you very much for confirming that fact.

The topic of dating escorts is a topic on this forum. I am a member of this forum, and only this forum. I am not a member on UKE. I have not made a single post on UKE since August 2019. I have asked to be banned from there twice, under two separate admins. I have made that request public so everyone knows I am not a member of that forum and want nothing to do with it and am banned from there, at my own request.

A particular poster. Who everyone knows is the biggest troll on these forums, who I have had a long history with. Who is also a member of this forum.

Has been purposefully "dissecting" me and my posts that are made on this forum, alongside also other members of this forum who have posted on this topic on the UKE forum. For no other reason other to troll me, manipulate people against me, and effectively troll this forum as a consequence. 

And you have confirmed in your post this is against the rules of this forum to do this, and also that UKE forum to do this. Your very post said that fact. And yet nobody gives one single fuck that this guy is doing it because it is king dick Belgarion who thinks he runs the place and everyone on there is terririfed of him. Just like everyone was terrified of James999 on here becasue Admin is letting this guy run the show and bans anyone who says anything about him.

I am just going to log out from his forum as there is something very strange going on that you can say in a post.

"However, they are not allowed to go on the likes of UKE and complain about anything said on here so why should you be allowed to whinge on here about what is said about you on other sites." And actually it be me you are warning here for doing this and not him.

Just to clarify unlike previously there is no a specific rule on UKE now about WGs not responding to negative reviews/posts on here. It now says its not encouraged to post about other forums, not that you cant do so. Plus added is mention or linking to certain forums is censored, that may include UKP for all I know as I haven't tried to do that. I have seen UKP mentioned recently so I assume mentioning it isn't censored but not seen any links to here from their recently so don't know about that.

But previously, moaning WGs on UKE didn't always post links to negs on here anyway, they often posted what they said was a general thread up, then it came out they had just got a neg on here, and really they were posting about it which some admitted to. Some thought this wasn't breaking the rules then as they hadn't posted a link to the review on here, on their.

And for further clarification I am not in the least terrified of Belgarion as I wasn't at all of James on here. Of course admin/mods on here are concerned with UKP not UKE, they are 2 completely separate sites Anth so what one does or doesn't allow isn't connected to what the other does or doesn't allow. They have their own set of rules.

[daviemac]

"However, they are not allowed to go on the likes of UKE and complain about anything said on here so why should you be allowed to whinge on here about what is said about you on other sites." And actually it be me you are warning here for doing this and not him.

FFS Anth I've told you I'm giving you advice, take it, don't take it, I couldn't give a shit. But you are right this is a warning, a warning for reasons outlined below.

Read and try and understand the actual words (in the order they are written) in my post. Nobody is allowed to go on the other site and complain about anything written on here, therefore why should people be allowed to moan on here about things said on there, it works both ways.

Despite repeatedly being told not to you continue to raise issues regarding what people say about you on those other sites, keep your comments to what is said on this one and only this one. Again if you have issues with things on other site take it up there, not here.

[waynekerr600]

I have not made a single post on UKE since August 2019.

Is that accurate Anthony?

[sparkus]

Id never heard of him.
Investigating with an impartial and open mind reading his Wiki page i dont in any way get the impression he is a right wing shock jock as you call him.
They describe him thus ; "Jordan Bernt Peterson (born 12 June 1962) is a Canadian clinical psychologist and a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto. He began to receive widespread attention in the late 2010s for his views on cultural and political issues."
External Link/Members Only

Just because you haven't heard of him doesn't make him less notorious.  He was until the advent of his YouTube fame a fairly obscure backwater academic in his native Canada, known for work on personality traits.  Since he discovered the power of shock and its ability to garner followers on YouTube, leading to a best-selling "self help" book aimed at angry disaffected white men, he's ramped up the attacks on feminism and gone for shock value by demanding "enforced monogamy":

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Says he's no right-winger but has time to put out videos attacking the left and that old favourite of the identitarian/Brevik followers "Cultural Marxism".  Obviously has box office under the current situation given his views on white privilege (a "Marxist lie").

And of course, after claiming to have never heard of him and just come across his work with an open mind, you then try to suggest he's not "controversial" (though controversy is what puts money in his bank account, even if it doesn't the poor saps who lap up his works).

[daviemac]

I would have thought he would have apologised after saying she had two profiles which could have her banned if it was true, which is was not.

Especially as it was dealt with within 7 minutes of his accusation.

As amusing as it might've been, I do not believe they are one and the same. Anyway can we get back to the topic in hand and forget about the bickering.  I'm trying to type a reply to Anth.   

I could've said they are definitely not one and the same but I don't like to deal in absolutes. 

[Belgarion]

Just saying this now, but according to a new review gone up on the 'review place'. It seems according to it you have been discussing me none stop elsewhere.

I am not a member of any other forum than this one and don't read them at all. Therefore, can you not just keep your comments to here? I am fully willing to discuss anything and everything when put to me. As I have clearly shown. And am not embarrassed or shamed to admit things that may make me look not to great and a bit stupid. I am also willing to admit if I am wrong on my beliefs if good arguments are put to me in the topics that I can read. Therefore, chatting about people in secret elsewhere just seems a bit off and creepy to me. Just saying, stop it please.

No, I've not been discussing you non stop. Others have made comments and I've responded to the comments.

Someone is getting their kicks out of winding you up.

[smiths]

FFS Anth I've told you I'm giving you advice, take it, don't take it, I couldn't give a shit. But you are right this is a warning, a warning for reasons outlined below.

Read and try and understand the actual words (in the order they are written) in my post. Nobody is allowed to go on the other site and complain about anything written on here, therefore why should people be allowed to moan on here about things said on there, it works both ways.

Despite repeatedly being told not to you continue to raise issues regarding what people say about you on those other sites, keep your comments to what is said on this one and only this one. Again if you have issues with things on other site take it up there, not here.

As I posted above there is no longer a specific rule on UKE not to post or complain about things posted on here, its just not encouraged to post about other forums, not that you cant do so, some who get mentioned/linked to are subject to being censored. Some have been moaning and complaining about posts on this thread, so those posts haven't been censored, or not yet anyway.

My advice to Anth is forget about other forums and what is posted. As you say join if you have issues on another forum.

[king tarzan]

a woman who is less promiscuous is seen as higher valued, good wife, mother material.

absolutely 
I am a very big fan of family unified morals... Mike Pence/Jair Balsonaro great role models to follow.. eye of the 🐆👊👊👊

[Belgarion]

As I posted above there is no longer a specific rule on UKE not to post or complain about things posted on here, its just not encouraged to post about other forums, not that you cant do so, some who get mentioned/linked to are subject to being censored. Some have been moaning and complaining about posts on this thread, so those posts haven't been censored, or not yet anyway.

My advice to Anth is forget about other forums and what is posted. As you say join if you have issues on another forum.

The amusing thing is the notion that I'm too scared to speak to him directly. I've done it many times on this thread.

He chooses to ignore some bits, selects what he wants to respond to, then draws the wrong conclusions.

I've told him many times, he posts inflammatory stuff then gets upset when people respond to it.

It's hilarious

[smiths]

No, I've not been discussing you non stop. Others have made comments and I've responded to the comments.

Someone is getting their kicks out of winding you up.

Which proves such posts are allowed now on UKE as I said they were, this thread has been commented on by a number of posters on their, not subject to censorship so far.

[Belgarion]

absolutely 
I am a very big fan of family unified morals... Mike Pence/Jair Balsonaro great role models to follow.. eye of the 🐆👊👊👊

Thats why you are on a punters forum. What lovely morals you have.

No secret you are a fan of 2 men that hate gay people.

I hope that one day, you stop fighting and come out of the closet, it will help manage the anger you have.

Also, men are unlikely to complain or write a blog about your hairy arse 

[Belgarion]

Which proves such posts are allowed now on UKE as I said they were, this thread has been commented on by a number of posters on their, not subject to censorship so far.

Yup, usually do not encourage cross fertilisation but some people like to be the centre of attention.

Then they complain when they get the attention. I would not be surprised if someone is stirring the pot behind the scenes and feeding AnthG information to get him agitated.

You have to wonder if that person has his best interests at heart.

[king tarzan]

Also, men are unlikely to complain or write a blog about your hairy arse 

Maybe i am a hairy gorilla, but what was written was absolutely nonsense... they were both all over me the second the door opened.. and then one of them writes utter hairy fairytale nonsense.. and trust you to transfer that ridiculous post for ridicule 

[sparkus]

Thats why you are on a punters forum. What lovely morals you have.

No secret you are a fan of 2 men that hate gay people.

I hope that one day, you stop fighting and come out of the closet, it will help manage the anger you have.

Also, men are unlikely to complain or write a blog about your hairy arse 

This is the point really, none of the right wing strong men/'thought leaders' the small coterie on UKP look up to would actually want them for company.  The Right generally equate sex buyers and sellers as degenerates.

[Private Parts]

Quote “ Someone is getting their kicks out of winding you up”

Very easily

 

[finn5555]

Thats why you are on a punters forum. What lovely morals you have.

No secret you are a fan of 2 men that hate gay people.

I hope that one day, you stop fighting and come out of the closet, it will help manage the anger you have.

Also, men are unlikely to complain or write a blog about your hairy arse 

Takes all sorts to make life interesting.
If he is homophobic so what  he don’t hide it like many do.
Like many topics he speaks his mind which to many don’t as they are afraid of upsetting the masses 

[king tarzan]

This is the point really, none of the right wing strong men/'thought leaders' the small coterie on UKP look up to would actually want them for company.  The Right generally equate sex buyers and sellers as degenerates.

one can still be sexually active and have morals as there is no depravity involved in the sexual engagement.
A man needs the physical comfort a beautiful woman can bring..... the outlet of physical desires without complications is acceptable far as i am concerned.

[scutty brown]

what many of you seemed to have missed is that the real inflammatory stuff isn't on UKE -its posts on that independent review site purporting to represent whats been said on UKE. Posted by a fake Belgarion profile. Many of us have had our IDs stolen or faked on that site - including even me.
Anth is almost certainly getting his wires crossed as to where the critical posts are

==edit==
I tried putting the name of the site but the forum software renamed it "wankers"..............tells you all you need to know

[smiths]

Yup, usually do not encourage cross fertilisation but some people like to be the centre of attention.

Then they complain when they get the attention. I would not be surprised if someone is stirring the pot behind the scenes and feeding AnthG information to get him agitated.

You have to wonder if that person has his best interests at heart.

It worked both ways to a degree about this thread, in fact more than 1 poster on UKE has mentioned this thread, Anth has mentioned UKE on here on this thread. If I were him I would take Daviemacs advice, and if bothered enough post what he wants to say on UKE about UKE not on here.

[king tarzan]

what many of you seemed to have missed is that the real inflammatory stuff isn't on UKE -its posts on wankers purporting to represent whats been said on UKE. Posted by a fake Belgarion profile. Many of us have had our IDs stolen or faked on that site - including even me.
Anth is almost certainly getting his wires crossed as to where the critical posts are

he Belgarian posted it on here, he got banned.. but to be honest i found what was said very amusing.. even though 95% lies, what was written certainly was not the way they were behaving by any means.. Belgarion was kicked in the nuts by the great old Admin for a few weeks... but i did find the whole thing amusing as to what fabricated nonsense.. just light humour on Belgarion part.. funny though old Admin response to her..

[smiths]

what many of you seemed to have missed is that the real inflammatory stuff isn't on UKE -its posts on that independent review site purporting to represent whats been said on UKE. Posted by a fake Belgarion profile. Many of us have had our IDs stolen or faked on that site - including even me.
Anth is almost certainly getting his wires crossed as to where the critical posts are

==edit==
I tried putting the name of the site but the forum software renamed it "wankers"..............tells you all you need to know

 I havent missed it as I know about that site and informed present admin of both sites that's not me posting on it a long time ago. Some of what I have posted has been directly lifted off both sites, other things have been made up that I never posted on either site.

What isn't known that I know of is who it IS posing as some of us on their. I agree there could be some crossed wires here, the Belgarion on there isn't the real one on here and UKE.

[Belgarion]

Takes all sorts to make life interesting.
If he is homophobic so what  he don’t hide it like many do.
Like many topics he speaks his mind which to many don’t as they are afraid of upsetting the masses 

It does indeed. It is clear to me that he's battling some demons and I'm trying to help him accept his sexuality.

There's nothing wrong with fancying men

[Belgarion]

what many of you seemed to have missed is that the real inflammatory stuff isn't on UKE -its posts on that independent review site purporting to represent whats been said on UKE. Posted by a fake Belgarion profile. Many of us have had our IDs stolen or faked on that site - including even me.
Anth is almost certainly getting his wires crossed as to where the critical posts are

==edit==
I tried putting the name of the site but the forum software renamed it "wankers"..............tells you all you need to know

Not even first time someone has pretended to be me on there.

I'm flattered by the attention but the person did a poor job.

Cannot even get the basics right

[king tarzan]

I havent missed it as I know about that site and informed present admin of both sites that's not me posting on it a long time ago. Some of what I have posted has been directly lifted off both sites, other things have been made up that I never posted on either site.

What isn't known that I know of is who it IS posing as some of us on their. I agree there could be some crossed wires here, the Belgarion on there isn't the real one on here and UKE.

I don't know about the in and outs about fake ID's.. but was funny though especially old Admins few chosen words for her!!

[scutty brown]

I havent missed it as I know about that site and informed present admin of both sites that's not me posting on it a long time ago. Some of what I have posted has been directly lifted off both sites, other things have been made up that I never posted on either site.

What isn't known that I know of is who it IS posing as some of us on their. I agree there could be some crossed wires here, the Belgarion on there isn't the real one on here and UKE.

Comments within that site and elsewhere seem to suggest its an Indian guy with relatively poor English creating most of the fake profiles, presumably someone with a grudge (and before anyone says it that is NOT an accusation against Tarzan or anyone else)

[Grenadier36]

It worked both ways to a degree about this thread, in fact more than 1 poster on UKE has mentioned this thread, Anth has mentioned UKE on here on this thread. If I were him I would take Daviemacs advice, and if bothered enough post what he wants to say on UKE about UKE not on here.

Yes he should. But that would spoil his martyrdom!

[finn5555]

There's nothing wrong with fancying men

No there isn’t but very few do, and if someone don’t like it they are free to say so. To many snowflakes nowadays taking exception to others views

[pbrown355]

This is the point really, none of the right wing strong men/'thought leaders' the small coterie on UKP look up to would actually want them for company.  The Right generally equate sex buyers and sellers as degenerates.

"The Right" have the same level of degeneracy as everyone else (my opinion) just more hypocrisy than most.

[whiskyfan]

No there isn’t but very few do, and if someone don’t like it they are free to say so. To many snowflakes nowadays taking exception to others views

One of whom has just flounced off.

[Belgarion]

No there isn’t but very few do, and if someone don’t like it they are free to say so. To many snowflakes nowadays taking exception to others views

I don't fancy men and will not punt a TS. I however won't go round the forum hurling insults at people that do and try to belittle their contributions to the site.

That is what KT does. Since he's not a snowflake, he should be able to take back what he dishes out.

[daviemac]

As I posted above there is no longer a specific rule on UKE not to post or complain about things posted on here, its just not encouraged to post about other forums, not that you cant do so, some who get mentioned/linked to are subject to being censored. Some have been moaning and complaining about posts on this thread, so those posts haven't been censored, or not yet anyway.

My advice to Anth is forget about other forums and what is posted. As you say join if you have issues on another forum.

Yeah you posted that as I was typing the reply to Anth, I hadn't noticed the rule change. my point to him still stands, it is pointless trying to resolve issues you have on other sites here, as I said to him there is no way of knowing who is actually posting and if it concerns you join and post a rebuttal. Personally I only take notice of things said by members of sites I am also a member of.

[Belgarion]

he Belgarian posted it on here, he got banned.. but to be honest i found what was said very amusing.. even though 95% lies, what was written certainly was not the way they were behaving by any means.. Belgarion was kicked in the nuts by the great old Admin for a few weeks... but i did find the whole thing amusing as to what fabricated nonsense.. just light humour on Belgarion part.. funny though old Admin response to her..

Got put on the naughty step for a week for sharing the blog. It is unfortunate I didn't save it

[Colston36]

absolutely 
I am a very big fan of family unified morals... Mike Pence/Jair Balsonaro great role models to follow.. eye of the 🐆👊👊👊

Whilst this thread has strayed into a swamp of mutual recrimination, where do the racists Pence and Bolsanaro come into the conversation?

[sparkus]

Whilst this thread has strayed into a swamp of mutual recrimination, where do the racists Pence and Bolsanaro come into the conversation?

The coterie hiding behind chest-beaters to support their worldview.

[finn5555]

I don't fancy men and will not punt a TS. I however won't go round the forum hurling insults at people that do and try to belittle their contributions to the site.

That is what KT does. Since he's not a snowflake, he should be able to take back what he dishes out.

I totally agree 

[Supermix]

I’d say it wasn’t a bad idea.

People are people and if two individuals are happy then what is the problem. Who are we to try and persuade someone to live on our thoughts. If you are both happy and are fully grown adults then I’m sure it will be fine. If not then it is what it is, there are no rules to love even though many people try to inflict social norms.

[king tarzan]

I’d say it wasn’t a bad idea.

People are people and if two individuals are happy then what is the problem. Who are we to try and persuade someone to live on our thoughts. If you are both happy and are fully grown adults then I’m sure it will be fine. If not then it is what it is, there are no rules to love even though many people try to inflict social norms.

something that is not my curry.. but someone else cup of tea.. EACH TO THERE OWN

[The Outsider]

I haven't yet read the full 17 pages of this thread.  Would doing so, be as bad an idea as it sounds? 

[sparkus]

I haven't yet read the full 17 pages of this thread.  Would doing so, be as bad an idea as it sounds? 

I wish I'd never commented early on as it always shows on 'New replies'.

[smiths]

Yeah you posted that as I was typing the reply to Anth, I hadn't noticed the rule change. my point to him still stands, it is pointless trying to resolve issues you have on other sites here, as I said to him there is no way of knowing who is actually posting and if it concerns you join and post a rebuttal. Personally I only take notice of things said by members of sites I am also a member of.

Indeed, I hope he takes this advice.

[yandex]

I haven't yet read the full 17 pages of this thread.  Would doing so, be as bad an idea as it sounds? 

Yes, bad idea - quick summary:

The OP has successfully trolled 17 pages from 1 post. He's been on site since his original and only post and hasn't responded to anything so must be pissing himself laughing
There are a few individuals who take a very dim view of dating WGs
There are a few individuals who take exception to those individuals and some of the language they use
There are a few individuals who take the view that people are complex and relationships are complex and that you never know
There are a few individuals who think it's a bad idea and express that without being offensive
Anth has posted extensively and seems to be having an argument with himself and anyone else he can rope in - I've lost interest in some of it but he seems to be someone who sees the world in absolutes and is forever angry when people point out that it's not that easy

Hope that helps

[cotton]

Just because you haven't heard of him doesn't make him less notorious.  He was until the advent of his YouTube fame a fairly obscure backwater academic in his native Canada, known for work on personality traits.  Since he discovered the power of shock and its ability to garner followers on YouTube, leading to a best-selling "self help" book aimed at angry disaffected white men, he's ramped up the attacks on feminism and gone for shock value by demanding "enforced monogamy":

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Says he's no right-winger but has time to put out videos attacking the left and that old favourite of the identitarian/Brevik followers "Cultural Marxism".  Obviously has box office under the current situation given his views on white privilege (a "Marxist lie").

And of course, after claiming to have never heard of him and just come across his work with an open mind, you then try to suggest he's not "controversial" (though controversy is what puts money in his bank account, even if it doesn't the poor saps who lap up his works).

Yeh well i really hadnt heard of him , but i hadnt heard of Bolsenaro either until KT mentioned him.
So basically you are against him because you perceive him as representing the interest of white people and he makes a counter arguement to some of the socially progressive pc policies that are popularly being promoted.
Personally i dont have a problem with somebody representing the interests of white people any more than i have a problem with the interests of black people being represented by the BLM movement. Neither engage me personally but i dont see one as good while the other is bad. But i can see why you dont like him on that basis , politics based on color is obviously going to excludesome and be divisive.
I just read his Wikipage and that didnt make him come across as "controversial" , i guess you think hes contraversial because you dont agree with him , to me he just represents a different opinion thats all 

[scutty brown]

I haven't yet read the full 17 pages of this thread.  Would doing so, be as bad an idea as it sounds? 

yes

[daviemac]

Yeh well i really hadnt heard of him , but i hadnt heard of Bolsenaro either until KT mentioned him.
So basically you are against him because you perceive him as representing the interest of white people and he makes a counter arguement to some of the socially progressive pc policies that are popularly being promoted.
Personally i dont have a problem with somebody representing the interests of white people any more than i have a problem with the interests of black people being represented by the BLM movement. Neither engage me personally but i dont see one as good while the other is bad. But i can see why you dont like him on that basis , politics based on color is obviously going to excludesome and be divisive.
I just read his Wikipage and that didnt make him come across as "controversial" , i guess you think hes contraversial because you dont agree with him , to me he just represents a different opinion thats all 

New Rules for the Off Topic Board:

1. No religion, race, or politics.