Dating a prossie. Is it as bad an idea as it sounds?

[David1970]

Correction, one punter does. 

Sorry for my mistake, I wonder who the one punter is? 

[daviemac]

But all the time, everyone else has to be drawn into yours as you are a race-baiting troll that see's racism everywhere and anywhere to the extent you put quite literally multiple vile terrorist organisations as your avatars in order to annoy people.

So how about this, stop with the insults towards my posts all the time as it doesn't help and its against the rules here. And maybe post a constructive post in a topic that doesn't involve you twisting it to be about race sometime or another....

Anth pack it in you are the one turning this towards racism. If anyone posts any such remarks the mods, admin or owner will deal with it and if you think anyone is being racist then report it.

[Hobbit]

What I find most perplexing in these threads is how some people would talk about how an escort is not dating/marriage material because she fucks so many guys/sucks so many dicks....all the whole those same people have a family of their own. You'd think that mindset would mean they are not marriage material either as they go about shagging random woman, licking their arse and what not; and they do it for fun and entertainment unlike an escort who would do it to provide a living for herself.

I also read the argument from time to time "What would you do if you found out your daughter was a WG? Tell her you're proud of her?",
well good sir, let me ask you this: What would you do if your daughter found out you were a punter who cheats on her mother? Tell her that she should be proud of you because at least the marriage is saved?

People are complex human beings, and as long as there's love, care, communication and a desire to make it work and do right by each other any two people....ANY....can have a stable and fulfilling relationship regardless of everything else in their life.

You are right, there aren't many married material men around either, it works both ways. But for me, a hooker most likely will not have the qualities that most men would class as "marriage material". There are exceptions but I find that they only apply to girls that retire within the first few years or so. The longer they stay the more difficult it becomes to leave prostitution and the lifestyle. 

[Thephoenix]

As the famous Chinese philosopher Hu Flung Dung say:-

(a) Confirmation Bias.
The misconception...your opinions are the result of years of rational, objective analysis.
The truth... Your opinions are the results of years of paying attention to information that confirmed what you believed, while ignoring information that challenged your preconceived notions.

(b) The straw man fallacy.
The misconception... When you argue, you try to stick to the facts.
The truth... In any argument, anger will tempt you to reframe your opponents position.

(c) The representative heuristic.
The misconception... Knowing a person's history makes it easier to determine what sort out person they are.
The truth...You jump to conclusions based on how representative a person seems to be of a preconceived character type.

People are still making ridiculous sweeping generalisations, and don't seem to understand how silly they look.

I guess you'll never be able to reason with the unreasonable.

[threechilliman]

What I find most perplexing in these threads is how some people would talk about how an escort is not dating/marriage material because she fucks so many guys/sucks so many dicks....all the whole those same people have a family of their own. You'd think that mindset would mean they are not marriage material either as they go about shagging random woman, licking their arse and what not; and they do it for fun and entertainment while hiding it from their families unlike an escort who would do it to provide a living for herself and is likely to confide in her partner about her work.

I also read the argument from time to time "What would you do if you found out your daughter was a WG? Tell her you're proud of her?",
well good sir, let me ask you this: What would you do if your daughter found out you were a punter who cheats on her mother? Tell her that she should be proud of you because at least the marriage is saved?

People...human beings...are complex, and as long as there's love, care, communication and a desire to make it work and do right by each other any two people....ANY....can have a stable and fulfilling relationship regardless of everything else in their life.

Extending it further, presumably those who fuck about a lot in civvy life aren't marriage material either.

[AnthG]

Anth pack it in you are the one turning this towards racism.

Actually, with respect, the person who brought the whole subject of racism into this discussion, for no reason whatsoever, and totally sidetracking things was you

By your theories I should ban you as a racist, after all I've banned a few recently and they were members, like you, they were punters, like yo

And it was the sort of statement, that required a response to it implying you were about to ban me for something I haven't even done.

When I say this, Mr El-Racebaiter (David1970) then showed up to have a go with insults.

[David1970]

Mr El-Racebaiter (David1970)

AnthG thanks for the new name, love it.
Makes no sense, but thanks mate

[daviemac]

Actually, with respect, the person who brought the whole subject of racism into this discussion, for no reason whatsoever, and totally sidetracking things was you

And it was the sort of statement, that required a response to it implying you were about to ban me for something I haven't even done.

When I say this, Mr El-Racebaiter (David1970) then showed up to have a go with insults.

Again you are trying to twist the meaning and being selective in your quote. The point is you habitually state, quite categorically, that all escorts are drug takers, all escorts are unsuited to relationships. These and other such comments you make are inaccurate sweeping statements. Therefore if it's OK for you to make such statements about escorts why is it not OK to make sweeping statements about punters. I used the racist angle because you know racists get banned. I did not say you were racist, I asked if I should treat you like one.

Read the full quote again.

By your theories I should ban you as a racist, after all I've banned a few recently and they were members, like you, they were punters, like you. So then Anth, what do I do, treat people as individuals and accept that as individuals they are all different, are capable of having vastly different outlooks, different beliefs and are capable of very different level of acceptance in a relationship. Or class you as a racist because some other punters are. 

I am more than happy to debate any issue, in a civilised manner, on the forum, I will listen to and give a measured response to anyone's point of view, what I can't be arsed with is those who say "no punter should do this, no punter should do that" or those who claim all escorts do this or do that. You wouldn't do this with you children type of thing. That is not offering you own opinion it is forcing your beliefs onto others.

As an example, if you said to me, "I've seen quite a few escorts that have been involved in drugs", my response would be, that with one exception it was not a thing I had seen. I wouldn't doubt your experience.  However if you say to me, as you have done,  "all escorts take drugs" I would tell you you are talking shite because that is not from your own experience, you have only seen a very small minority of escorts. You can't possibly know what they all do.

You put forward a fairly reasonable set of scenarios here https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=279769.msg2908052#msg2908052 to which my response is here  https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=279769.msg2908091#msg2908091 Like several others on this thread you have bypassed the logical debate posts in favour of throwing accusations around.

[AnthG]

Again you are trying to twist the meaning and being selective in your quote. The point is you habitually state, quite categorically, that all escorts are drug takers, all escorts are unsuited to relationships. These and other such comments you make are inaccurate sweeping statements.

I have made specific repeated emphasis to say I am not saying that. I started with Escorts who are graduates of Red Brick University Students wont do this and would be fantastic to date. Such As Bethany Diamond.

Then I switched it after reading Home Alones posts, and from that also remembering something Durham Lad said to me. And switched it to WGs over 35 would be the best girls to date, such as Keeva and Bethany Diamond.

This shows I am not sitting here inflexible with my statements and am adapting to what is being said.

Re-read my posts. I made great emphasis in my comments to say they were targeted towards a select group of escorts who didn't go to university, and are in their 20s and are blingy by nature; as in they smoke, take drugs, they have tattoos, have fake tan, wear designer clothes, cannot live 2 seconds without looking at their expensive mobile phone. I mean thats a pretty select and small group I am referring to. I am not saying all escorts are like that. I am saying those ones are the absolute worst ones to date.

[Home Alone]

Can we just add "May" or "Some" in his sentences for him? Otherwise, this will drag on for another 11 pages.

 

[MissWolf]

Is your entire purpose for posting now just to come and insult me?

Plus, for someone who gets so offended at perceived racism, to the extent you even post terrorist groups as your avatars on here. Where are you in the very racist topic going on that I mentioned a few posts above about literally genociding an entire group of people to help society??

Hypocrite much??

*Edit*. Seems you edited your against the forum rules post.....

Pull your head out of your arse little boy, you seem to have shit in your eye as well as coming out of your mouth

At no point ever have I edited a post because it was against forum rules

I have no links to terrorism nor do i have a terrorist group as my avatar, it's me on the other site and I have no avatar on here, your rant about racism and me getting offended by it is tosh and has no basis.

And finally I wasnt replying to you or insulting you I was saying I dont fit your stereotypes, that is vastly different from your accusation

I don't post to annoy or insult you, you're not that important

Now in the politest possible way FUCK Off 

[AnthG]

Pull your head out of your arse little boy, you seem to have shit in your eye as well as coming out of your mouth

At no point ever have I edited a post because it was against forum rules

I have no links to terrorism nor do i have a terrorist group as my avatar, it's me on the other site and I have no avatar on here, your rant about racism and me getting offended by it is tosh and has no basis.

And finally I wasnt replying to you or insulting you I was saying I dont fit your stereotypes, that is vastly different from your accusation

I don't post to annoy or insult you, you're not that important

Now in the politest possible way FUCK Off 

Whoa fuckety fuck me. Is this a scooby doo villain moment and you've just revealed yourself as David1970. As you've just replied to this post from me directed at him that has nothing whatsoever to do with you and replied as him....

Wow, talk about shocker on a Friday afternoon. Even if Arnold Schwarzenegger ran into my room right now and shoved his index finger up my bum I would be less shocked that I am right now at this.....

[daviemac]

Pull your head out of your arse little boy, you seem to have shit in your eye as well as coming out of your mouth

At no point ever have I edited a post because it was against forum rules

I have no links to terrorism nor do i have a terrorist group as my avatar, it's me on the other site and I have no avatar on here, your rant about racism and me getting offended by it is tosh and has no basis.

And finally I wasnt replying to you or insulting you I was saying I dont fit your stereotypes, that is vastly different from your accusation

I don't post to annoy or insult you, you're not that important

Now in the politest possible way FUCK Off 

He wasn't taking about you, he was talking about David1970

[MissWolf]

He wasn't taking about you, he was talking about David1970

My bad, I apologise for picking up the wrong reply

The F... off still stands though 

[AnthG]

He wasn't taking about you, he was talking about David1970

Or check the IPs, someones arsed up and didn't know which account they were signed into when making that post....Its happened on here before multiple times that punters were infact WGs who were posting on two accounts simultaneously...

[David1970]

Whoa fuckety fuck me. Is this a scooby doo villain moment and you've just revealed yourself as David1970. As you've just replied to this post from me directed at him that has nothing whatsoever to do with you and replied as him....

Wow, talk about shocker on a Friday afternoon. Even if Arnold Schwarzenegger ran into my room right now and shoved his index finger up my bum I would be less shocked that I am right now at this.....

What the hell have I got to do with terrorism?

You have truly lost the plot

[AnthG]

What the hell have I got to do with terrorism?

You have truly lost the plot

List the avatars you've had on here after the rules changed. You do it, not me. You have had 4 avatars on here. What were the other 3.

[cotton]

My bad, I apologise for picking up the wrong reply

The F... off still stands though 

Time to go back to observing the thread David , err i mean Misswolf

[MissWolf]

Whoa fuckety fuck me. Is this a scooby doo villain moment and you've just revealed yourself as David1970. As you've just replied to this post from me directed at him that has nothing whatsoever to do with you and replied as him....

Wow, talk about shocker on a Friday afternoon. Even if Arnold Schwarzenegger ran into my room right now and shoved his index finger up my bum I would be less shocked that I am right now at this.....

I have only one account thanks

My bad, as I said to Davimac 

[David1970]

Or check the IPs, someones arsed up and didn't know which account they were signed into when making that post....Its happened on here before multiple times that punters were infact WGs who were posting on two accounts simultaneously...

You now claiming I am really a WG, as well as being involved in terrorism and so kind of race hate person and that’s just this afternoon.

You have totally lost the plot 

[AnthG]

You now claiming I am really a WG

You have totally lost the plot 

Based on pretty strong evidence of a WG quite literally replying to a post directed towards you, as you. If OldAdmin was still around he'd be looking into you two very closely right now.

There is no way MissWorlf is that stupid to think my post in anyway had anything to do with her. Why would she think that? I have never even replied to her post once. And there is no way she could think any of that applied to her at all.

[daviemac]

Time to go back to observing the thread David , err i mean Misswolf

As amusing as it might've been, I do not believe they are one and the same. Anyway can we get back to the topic in hand and forget about the bickering.  I'm trying to type a reply to Anth.   

[cotton]

As amusing as it might've been, I do not believe they are one and the same. Anyway can we get back to the topic in hand and forget about the bickering.  I'm trying to type a reply to Anth.  

Ok but just make sure there no generalising about anything 

[Colston36]

He must be seeing some old school cultured courtesans or women that made bank of selling sex early before the competition came in and made it harder for everyone else. I highly doubt those sort of women he is talking about exist on AW now. I would have thought sex sellers of that nature would be more likely to be found in the higher social circles of the rich....and books written in the victorian times of rich mistresses  .

A great writer once said "to generalise is to be an idiot." This thread is full of generalisations, mostly suggesting all whores are grabbing, drug-addled idiots. I have met one or two; we all have, I imagine. And I agree that few whores are good with money; it's a stressful way of making a living.  The experiences I quoted were to do with women I happened to meet. I have no idea how the one who took £1.34 million from a man did it. I actually spoke to the guy on the phone. He was clearly crazy about her - and could afford it, but she must have been fiendishly cunning to manage it. I agree: I suspect people like her (or him) only come along once in a blue moon. And I don't see why there can't be rich mistresses now, just as in Victorian times. There is FAR more money sloshing around than there was then.

[David1970]

As amusing as it might've been, I do not believe they are one and the same. Anyway can we get back to the topic in hand and forget about the bickering.  I'm trying to type a reply to Anth.   

Davie with the greatest respect, I don’t find this is funny, I don’t want it sweep under the carpet, Anth is making a serious accusation against me. This afternoon alone he has linked me to terrorism, race hate and now I have a 2nd account as a WG.

[cotton]

Davie with the greatest respect, I don’t find this is funny, I don’t want it sweep under the carpet, Anth is making a serious accusation against me. This afternoon alone he has linked me to terrorism, race hate and now I have a 2nd account as a WG.

To be fair David if you choose to deliberately troll Anth you cant then complain when it blows back on you .
And Anth dont let David provoke you. Like Doc said "You make a very considerable and positive contribution to this forum but you need to adapt." 

[MissWolf]

Based on pretty strong evidence of a WG quite literally replying to a post directed towards you, as you. If OldAdmin was still around he'd be looking into you two very closely right now.

There is no way MissWorlf is that stupid to think my post in anyway had anything to do with her. Why would she think that? I have never even replied to her post once. And there is no way she could think any of that applied to her at all.

Anth  I pride myself on holding my hand up when I've mad a fuck up, be that in work, life or on the Internet.

So as painful as that is for me to do, today I was that stupid  I replied to you as I genuinely thought you were talking to me and had quoted me.

I made a mistake,  my bad, let's move on shall we!

[daviemac]

Davie with the greatest respect, I don’t find this is funny, I don’t want it sweep under the carpet, Anth is making a serious accusation against me. This afternoon alone he has linked me to terrorism, race hate and now I have a 2nd account as a WG.

As I say with any thread I am quite involved in if you have an issue then report it and let one of the other mods or Head1 have a look. I am not dodging the issue, I just want to be fair about it.

[winkywanky]

Changed it also, thanks again. Seriously DH, if you followed me around doing this I likely will never get in an argument on the forums again being accused of generalising 

He's available at £50/hr, and if my personal case is anything to go by, well worth it because after only five sessions I find I never get into arguments on the internet any more 

[David1970]

To be fair David if you choose to deliberately troll Anth you cant then complain when it blows back on you .
And Anth dont let David provoke you. Like Doc said "You make a very considerable and positive contribution to this forum but you need to adapt." 

I have never linked Anth to terrorism like has done to me, I have never claimed Anth has 2 accounts one of them a WG as he has done to me , that is this afternoon alone.

Don’t worry I did notice your snide remark (reply#567), but it was not worth replying to.

[cotton]

He's available at £50/hr, and if my personal case is anything to go by, well worth it because after only five sessions I find I never get into arguments on the internet any more 

Yeh but we both know when you run out of money for sessions with doc your just a ticking time bomb   

[daviemac]

I have made specific repeated emphasis to say I am not saying that. I started with Escorts who are graduates of Red Brick University Students wont do this and would be fantastic to date. Such As Bethany Diamond.

Then I switched it after reading Home Alones posts, and from that also remembering something Durham Lad said to me. And switched it to WGs over 35 would be the best girls to date, such as Keeva and Bethany Diamond.

This shows I am not sitting here inflexible with my statements and am adapting to what is being said.

Re-read my posts. I made great emphasis in my comments to say they were targeted towards a select group of escorts who didn't go to university, and are in their 20s and are blingy by nature; as in they smoke, take drugs, they have tattoos, have fake tan, wear designer clothes, cannot live 2 seconds without looking at their expensive mobile phone. I mean thats a pretty select and small group I am referring to. I am not saying all escorts are like that. I am saying those ones are the absolute worst ones to date.

Anth, read my response to your post earlier, As I've been quite open about my life experiences which is where I draw references from, it covers all the relevant points. Nobody is saying every escort is suitable to have a relationship with. It should go without saying to be able to form a relationship in any set of circumstances it would have to be with someone suitable.

Any chance you can post some links to the type of escort you are referring to. You know the ones that are in their 20's etc.as there are loads who don't fit your demograph. 

The main argument on this thread seems to be that it is not possible to have a relationship with any escort, something that is just not true.

[Rochelle]

That specific group being ALL working girls?

All the ones in their twenties apparently.
 

[cotton]

I have never linked Anth to terrorism like has done to me, I have never claimed Anth has 2 accounts one of them a WG as he has done to me , that is this afternoon alone.

Don’t worry I did notice your snide remark (reply#567), but it was not worth replying to.

Well heres an idea ; stop trolling Anth 
And stop snivelling , its pathetic

[ratedj]

There are big men on this thread...

[smiths]

Based on pretty strong evidence of a WG quite literally replying to a post directed towards you, as you. If OldAdmin was still around he'd be looking into you two very closely right now.

There is no way MissWorlf is that stupid to think my post in anyway had anything to do with her. Why would she think that? I have never even replied to her post once. And there is no way she could think any of that applied to her at all.

Anth please take my advice and chill out, don't let yourself get wound up. How about this for you, while you have been posting on this thread this afternoon I was out punting and I can still smell the WGs disgusting fishy fanny on my fingers. And for that I coughed up £100 to her.

[waynekerr600]

And for that I coughed up £100 to her.

Oh dear 

14 days isolation for you then.

[Hobbit]

He wasn't taking about you, he was talking about David1970

she has a dusty phone. it’s not her fault 

[Global_Punter]

A wise man once told me that "nice guys finish last" SP's need nice guys to play this role AKA cash cows

If you can afford to give her the lifestyle she'll quit the game. Escorting pays well, If you have what it takes to be the boss, her king then she'll submit to you.


I agree with AnthG if you can't give her the lifestyle " Houston you have a problem "

If you are in the position to be the boss then date an SP, tell her to quit her job.

All this degrees, diploma and PHD's don't mean jack shit - cash is king, that($) what lead her to her job. So if you ask me the question again " can you wifey her " the answer is no, unless you can pay to be the boss.

Some folks have been posting since morning and still as I stated none of the arguments outweigh the other " ego is the enemy "

I will leave it alone  lots disney ideology going on in folks heads

[Belgarion]

As the famous Chinese philosopher Hu Flung Dung say:-

(a) Confirmation Bias.
The misconception...your opinions are the result of years of rational, objective analysis.
The truth... Your opinions are the results of years of paying attention to information that confirmed what you believed, while ignoring information that challenged your preconceived notions.

(b) The straw man fallacy.
The misconception... When you argue, you try to stick to the facts.
The truth... In any argument, anger will tempt you to reframe your opponents position.

(c) The representative heuristic.
The misconception... Knowing a person's history makes it easier to determine what sort out person they are.
The truth...You jump to conclusions based on how representative a person seems to be of a preconceived character type.

People are still making ridiculous sweeping generalisations, and don't seem to understand how silly they look.

I guess you'll never be able to reason with the unreasonable.

An excellent post. 

[Belgarion]

I have made specific repeated emphasis to say I am not saying that. I started with Escorts who are graduates of Red Brick University Students wont do this and would be fantastic to date. Such As Bethany Diamond.

Then I switched it after reading Home Alones posts, and from that also remembering something Durham Lad said to me. And switched it to WGs over 35 would be the best girls to date, such as Keeva and Bethany Diamond.

This shows I am not sitting here inflexible with my statements and am adapting to what is being said.

Re-read my posts. I made great emphasis in my comments to say they were targeted towards a select group of escorts who didn't go to university, and are in their 20s and are blingy by nature; as in they smoke, take drugs, they have tattoos, have fake tan, wear designer clothes, cannot live 2 seconds without looking at their expensive mobile phone. I mean thats a pretty select and small group I am referring to. I am not saying all escorts are like that. I am saying those ones are the absolute worst ones to date.

Do Red Brick Universities teach people Dating Etiquette as part of the curriculum?

You claim to have gone to a Red Brick University. Would that make you someone lovely to date?

Using your logic of course.

[whiskyfan]

A wise man once told me that "nice guys finish last" SP's need nice guys to play this role AKA cash cows

If you can afford to give her the lifestyle she'll quit the game. Escorting pays well, If you have what it takes to be the boss, her king then she'll submit to you.


I agree with AnthG if you can't give her the lifestyle " Houston you have a problem "

If you are in the position to be the boss then date an SP, tell her to quit her job.

All this degrees, diploma and PHD's don't mean jack shit - cash is king, that($) what lead her to her job. So if you ask me the question again " can you wifey her " the answer is no, unless you can pay to be the boss.

Some folks have been posting since morning and still as I stated none of the arguments outweigh the other " ego is the enemy "

I will leave it alone  lots disney ideology going on in folks heads

This thread proves it Disney matter what anyone else says or what arguments are presented, some will always believe their views are right.

[Hobbit]

A wise man once told me that "nice guys finish last" SP's need nice guys to play this role AKA cash cows

If you can afford to give her the lifestyle she'll quit the game. Escorting pays well, If you have what it takes to be the boss, her king then she'll submit to you.


I agree with AnthG if you can't give her the lifestyle " Houston you have a problem "

If you are in the position to be the boss then date an SP, tell her to quit her job.

All this degrees, diploma and PHD's don't mean jack shit - cash is king, that($) what lead her to her job. So if you ask me the question again " can you wifey her " the answer is no, unless you can pay to be the boss.

Some folks have been posting since morning and still as I stated none of the arguments outweigh the other " ego is the enemy "

I will leave it alone  lots disney ideology going on in folks heads

There’s more to life than money and a good woman would know that and if she doesn’t then she isn’t marriage material 

[Home Alone]

What a bloody good, grown-up, discussion this has developed into.  Respect to all who have contributed. A really good, mature debate.

As the hotel bellboy who delivered a bottle of champagne to George Best in bed with the then-current Miss World and the pair of them surrounded by his gambling winnings, is said to have asked,

Where did it all go wrong?

[AnthG]

Do Red Brick Universities teach people Dating Etiquette as part of the curriculum?

It has got nothing to do with dating etiquette. It has everything to do with how many superficial chavs have you seen ever go to a red brick?

There were none whatsoever on my course of over 200 (the first two years all the medical, dentistry, pharmacy, microbiology and etc were all together in the lectures, you only specialised in the final year of your degree).

Every one of them were nice, decent, girl next doors. Or that's how they appeared to me. I say that, as DurhamLad would be swearing blind they'd all be raving and orgying at nighttime.

But also, a lot of them seem to be on SA. Which if true is heaven for a guy like me. These nice girls are actually on there and its unreal.

[Belgarion]

It has got nothing to do with dating etiquette. It has everything to do with how many superficial chavs have you seen ever go to a red brick?

There were none whatsoever on my course of over 200 (the first two years all the medical, dentistry, pharmacy, microbiology and etc were all together in the lectures, you only specialised in the final year of your degree).

Every one of them were nice, decent, girl next doors. Or that's how they appeared to me. I say that, as DurhamLad would be swearing blind they'd all be raving and orgying at nighttime.

But also, a lot of them seem to be on SA. Which if true is heaven for a guy like me. These nice girls are actually on there and its unreal.

A University degree does not stop people from being superficial.

There are down to earth chavs and superficial chavs, just like there are down to earth grads and superficial grads of all universities.

You are mixing up qualifications and personality traits.

[Grenadier36]

It has got nothing to do with dating etiquette. It has everything to do with how many superficial chavs have you seen ever go to a red brick?

There were none whatsoever on my course of over 200 (the first two years all the medical, dentistry, pharmacy, microbiology and etc were all together in the lectures, you only specialised in the final year of your degree).

Every one of them were nice, decent, girl next doors. Or that's how they appeared to me. I say that, as DurhamLad would be swearing blind they'd all be raving and orgying at nighttime.

But also, a lot of them seem to be on SA. Which if true is heaven for a guy like me. These nice girls are actually on there and its unreal.

So have you actually met up with one from SA yet?

[AnthG]

You are mixing up qualifications and personality traits.

It is my firm belief, you have to have certain personality traits to obtain certain qualifications.

It is not easy to get decent GCSE grades, even harder to get decent A-Level grades to get you into a red brick. And then you need to fill out your UCAS 'about me' application form and say something good and enticing about yourself to make the university actually want to allow you on the course in the first place. All of this is very hard to achieve.

Therefore to successfully achieve all of that, you need to have a certain personality characteristic about you. Which are very desirable in women, for me at least

[Doc Holliday]

Can we just add "May" or "Some" in his sentences for him? Otherwise, this will drag on for another 11 pages.

 

Sadly he is still doing it in page 12 

Every one of them were nice, decent, girl next doors.

[waynekerr600]

There were none whatsoever on my course of over 200 (the first two years all the medical, dentistry, pharmacy, microbiology and etc were all together in the lectures, you only specialised in the final year of your degree).

Are you sure that paragraph is accurate Anth?