Author Topic: Sweet naana, Soho - most bizarre punt I’ve ever experienced  (Read 6775 times)


51 review(s) for sweet nanaa (40 positive, 9 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline Ja_myk

External Link/Members Only

Saw her earlier today

Comms:

I phoned her and got no answer. Got a text back few mins later and as I was already in the area I was able to see her within 10 mins of contact.

Location:

Easy to find in soho and clean place

Looks:

Her skin is a lot looser than in the pics and is definitely not 30 as stated in the profile. Other reviews state 50s I’d say late 50s to 60s.

The punt:

After handing over paperwork she asked me to go wash my hands which I did. Came back to the room and she took me back to the bathroom to wash my cock with soap and water. A real geisha experience lol.

She did some weird dance moves and winks. Made things really awkward if I’m honest. I chuckled and then she kept doing it???

She got on her knees and gave OWO whilst I sat on the bed. Not bad, not the best and it lasted no more than 2 mins.

Now this is where it gets bizarre.

She asks me what position I want. I replied, “I want you to RIDE me.” Which I thought I’d clear enough but I guess her English isn’t top notch either so she mishears me.

She pushes me down and pins my wrists to my chest, not very strongly but enough to get the message across. She starts to ride me and starts repeating. “Rape you! Rape you! Nice boy I rape you!” Now she was grinning as she did this and her long straight hair and less than ideal age made me feel like I was being fucked by Gollum.

Usually I’d ask someone to slow down when they’re going so fast riding me but I just wanted it to be over at that point so I just let it happen and came.

She washed my cock after too and kept calling me a nice boy.


In conclusion


Wtf was that

Offline HighlyMotivated

Weirdly arousing but I’ll give it a miss due to the Gollum comment

Offline MrDizzy

Just be thankful she didn't try and get hold of your ring.

My preciousssss...

Offline tantraman


Online Lennysrabbits

The Gollum comment is enough to remove from my HL lol.

Sorry about the experience.

Offline MrBeano

unless i'm missing something but it sounds like a miscommunication there at the end, but over all seems a negative is a bit harsh no?

Offline sgc

unless i'm missing something but it sounds like a miscommunication there at the end, but over all seems a negative is a bit harsh no?

That's what I was thinking.  It seems like she was enthusiastic!

Offline nasescoba1985

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 7
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Bit harsh this haha Nana is a little crazy at times, but that’s just her personality. Can’t fault her service though.
Banned reason: White knight / noncontributing obnoxious twat
Banned by: daviemac

Online scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,771
  • Likes: 546
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
Bit harsh this haha Nana is a little crazy at times, but that’s just her personality. Can’t fault her service though.

In your five years of membership a review of her would have been helpful

Offline Nz

Seems like she misheard "ride" for "rape". You got roleplay or a fantasy for free!  :lol:

Correction... Reading her review from April 2020 this seems to be a thing of hers!
« Last Edit: July 10, 2020, 08:26:09 pm by Nz »

Offline johnsthomas

Seems like a little harsh from someone’s first post.
From experience Nana’s demeanour can seem a little unusual although I would challenge anyone to say that she is not excellent value for money or fastidious about cleanliness which in our current situation has to be a good thing.
Ok we all have our own opinions but for me she is still one of the best value punts in Soho

Offline tantraman

Seems like a little harsh from someone’s first post.
From experience Nana’s demeanour can seem a little unusual although I would challenge anyone to say that she is not excellent value for money or fastidious about cleanliness which in our current situation has to be a good thing.
Ok we all have our own opinions but for me she is still one of the best value punts in Soho

Agreed :thumbsup: ...

Conclusion:

Nanaa does what she says on tin, including PSE antics. She ain’t a nubile PYT, but is great VFM and real go-er … albeit a tad crazy. A Positive for sure, I shall return.

Offline Adamstiles

Nana is a great sp, she's a weekly regular for me and can't fault her, albeit excitable, attitude.

Offline Nomad77

I happened to see Nana yesterday (review to follow) and she informed me that Ja_myk left out a rather significant detail from his review: that it was a 15 minute booking only. On that basis, apart from the slight misunderstanding, the service described appears to be a perfectly good one. I would not normally rush to defend someone I have previously written a negative review of myself, but I do think that in this instance a correction is called for.

Online rebelscum

I happened to see Nana yesterday (review to follow) and she informed me that Ja_myk left out a rather significant detail from his review: that it was a 15 minute booking only. On that basis, apart from the slight misunderstanding, the service described appears to be a perfectly good one. I would not normally rush to defend someone I have previously written a negative review of myself, but I do think that in this instance a correction is called for.

Bit weird that she's discussing other punters with you.  Hardly discreet.  Between her bringing her personal issues into your previous punt with you (as well as with another punter or two), and due to your recent positive review, any feint hope I'd have saw her is gone.  You've put yourself in an awkward position now.  If you meet her again, you'll not be able to be honest for fear of her flying off the handle again.  Again, bit concerning your discussing other reviews of her from here, now looks if you have a vested interest in this WG.  Though maybe other people are fine with it and I'm the odd one out.   :unknown: 

Offline Nomad77

I was fully aware of the risk of Nana flying off the handle when I saw her and confessed to writing a negative review - and I'm prepared to take the same risk in order to be honest in future. As for discussing other punter's reviews it was not my intention to do so. Nana brought it up since it was the second negative review she'd had and it seemed to me she had a point in regard to it being a rather unreasonable one.

Let me be absolutely clear, I did not write the positive review to in order to placate her. My intention was from start to finish to be honest. If there is a subjective element in this it is the sense I had on my first meeting with her, despite the difficult and slightly disturbing nature of the experience, that underneath it all she is quite a nice person. Perhaps I'm a bit soft headed in that sense, but not in the sense that I'd sacrifice honesty to avoid a her flying off the handle once more.

Offline Zammo

Bit weird that she's discussing other punters with you.  Hardly discreet.  Between her bringing her personal issues into your previous punt with you (as well as with another punter or two), and due to your recent positive review, any feint hope I'd have saw her is gone.  You've put yourself in an awkward position now.  If you meet her again, you'll not be able to be honest for fear of her flying off the handle again.  Again, bit concerning your discussing other reviews of her from here, now looks if you have a vested interest in this WG.  Though maybe other people are fine with it and I'm the odd one out.   :unknown:

+1 This is getting very concerning and we, as punters, shouldn't be taking a position of running from camp to camp with a 'well SHE said this, SHE said that' attitude. It's not appropriate and doesn't do anything to help preserve anonymity.
 
Nomad77 you've just written a positive review of her so this no doubt, is the reason for you riding in with your alabaster armour. If you felt the need (for whatever silly reason) to "come clean" to her about your previous bad review then that's up to you. It's none of your business what another punter writes in his review as you weren’t there! Calling for a correction because you've decided to take a SP's 'side' is one of the very fundamentals of white knighting and discussing other punters with Nanaa over a glass of vino in her living room is VERY bad form to say the least, regardless of who brings it up! Maybe you should call for 'corrections' on her other less than positive reviews - you never know, she may break out the cheese-board for you next time.
I know now not to trust a word you write I suppose.

This is the reason that I gave Nanaa a neutral in my review - she showed me a text on her phone from another punter who was basically simping for her. Although it's common sense to use a punting phone, details of other punters shouldn't be shown or indeed, the topic of conversation in a punt. At all. It's a punt not a mothers meeting.

Online scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,771
  • Likes: 546
  •  
  • Reviews: 126
Its worth pointing out that one contributor to this thread has already been banned by the mods for white-knighting her

Offline Nomad77

OK, point taken. It was one detail arising from what Nana said, the fact that Ja_myk's booking was a 15 minute one, that seemed to me relevant. But I agree I should not have mentioned it.

Offline Nomad77

Let me add that I did not discuss anything with Nana about other punters. She mentioned Ja_myk's negative review only in the context of my own confession to writing a negative review of my own. In response I merely commented that the point she mentioned seemed relevant. I agree that I should not have taken the SP's word in regard to this detail being omitted. I am rather new to punting, so please accept my apologies for naivety on this matter. The glass of vino by the way came later - no such discussion happened in that manner.


Offline JackTheStripper

+1 This is getting very concerning and we, as punters, shouldn't be taking a position of running from camp to camp with a 'well SHE said this, SHE said that' attitude. It's not appropriate and doesn't do anything to help preserve anonymity.
 
Nomad77 you've just written a positive review of her so this no doubt, is the reason for you riding in with your alabaster armour. If you felt the need (for whatever silly reason) to "come clean" to her about your previous bad review then that's up to you. It's none of your business what another punter writes in his review as you weren’t there! Calling for a correction because you've decided to take a SP's 'side' is one of the very fundamentals of white knighting and discussing other punters with Nanaa over a glass of vino in her living room is VERY bad form to say the least, regardless of who brings it up! Maybe you should call for 'corrections' on her other less than positive reviews - you never know, she may break out the cheese-board for you next time.
I know now not to trust a word you write I suppose.

This is the reason that I gave Nanaa a neutral in my review - she showed me a text on her phone from another punter who was basically simping for her. Although it's common sense to use a punting phone, details of other punters shouldn't be shown or indeed, the topic of conversation in a punt. At all. It's a punt not a mothers meeting.

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Offline Nomad77

'Correction' was definitely the wrong word, I should have used a more neutral term. When a reviewer fails to specify how long he spent with an SP it does I think make it difficult evaluate the service provided. I fully agree that taking the SP's word for that missing detail was not appropriate. It would be much better if Ja_Myk himself could supply this information himself.

Offline Ja_myk

Sorry for not replying till now. Haven’t had a look at the review since I posted

As naana seems to have told you the meet was for 15 mins, my bad for not mentioning in the review. However that doesn’t go against anything I’ve mentioned.

Owo wasn’t the best. Not bad at all but not what I usually like. What I said about her looks, I may have been a bit harsh with my analogies but the pictures are misleading and not an accurate depiction of her. I mean when are they ever on AW?





Offline Ja_myk

Bit weird that she's discussing other punters with you.  Hardly discreet.  :unknown:

Agreed. It’s worth mentioning that she texted me after reading the review herself. She mentioned that she was trying her best and I’d hurt her feelings. Which did make me feel bad but what can I do now?

I didn’t reply but the day after she tried WhatsApp video calling me...



Offline Wigwoman

The Gollum comment is enough to remove from my HL lol.

Sorry about the experience.

Enough to add it to mine.  :thumbsup:

Online Lennysrabbits

Agreed. It’s worth mentioning that she texted me after reading the review herself. She mentioned that she was trying her best and I’d hurt her feelings. Which did make me feel bad but what can I do now?

I didn’t reply but the day after she tried WhatsApp video calling me...

Whatsapp video calling?! Definitely a red flag especially if punters have a partner.

Probably should avoid this SP.